[ ]      [ ]

  
  
  
[ click here for album info & other purchase options ]
Artist:God is an Astronaut [ more ]
Song:A Deafening Distance
Album:All is Violent, All is Bright [ info ]
Released:2006
Last Played:May 20, 2013 - 00:57
Avg. Rating:7.5  (Total Ratings: 1260)
Your Rating:(Log in above to Rate)
Ratings Dist:
1 votes: 19 (1.5%)2 votes: 12 (0.95%)3 votes: 27 (2.1%)4 votes: 25 (2%)5 votes: 33 (2.6%)6 votes: 90 (7.1%)7 votes: 326 (26%)8 votes: 441 (35%)9 votes: 214 (17%)10 votes: 73 (5.8%)
Rate Song:

Share this song   |   Tweet this song
Artist Website  |  Artist Search  |  Lyrics Search
Wikipedia Entry  |  Artist Info (AMG)

258 comments for this song:spacerLog in above to post your comment

Rofi
(Amsterdam)
Posted: May 15, 2013 - 11:45 

If God would make this kind of music, I would listen to him 
Nadita
(Zürich, Switzerland)
Posted: Apr 04, 2013 - 03:36 

Love it!
It makes me think if there would be a chance that RP would Play "young blood" by Russian Circles!
wow..!!!

Probably there would be a chance. Event though its quite -  louder! :-)
richlister
(Here, there, pretty much everywhere.)
Posted: Dec 14, 2012 - 04:44 

 palad1 wrote:


Actually... 

*pushes nerd glasses back-on*

Douglas Addams mentions that the engineers that built it ran a test question by it but did not wait for the answer. The question was what is 6*9. Later-on it is revealed that this race had 13 fingers in total, making their numeric system base-13.

42 in base 13 = 54 base 10

Douglas Adams wowed never to make any more math jokes after that.

 
 
And to think, you'll never get that time back.
jazzface78
(you're gonna make me give myself a good talkin' to, NY)
Posted: Nov 29, 2012 - 15:19 

heroin much? 


palad1
(London UK. A froggie in exile.)
Posted: Oct 25, 2012 - 09:19 

 
Blastcat900 wrote:

The number 42 is, in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, "The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything", and is calculated by an enormous supercomputer over a period of 7.5 million years to be 42. Unfortunately no one knows what the question is. Thus, to calculate the Ultimate Question, a special computer the size of a small planet and using organic components was created and named "Earth".
 

Actually... 

*pushes nerd glasses back-on*

Douglas Addams mentions that the engineers that built it ran a test question by it but did not wait for the answer. The question was what is 6*9. Later-on it is revealed that this race had 13 fingers in total, making their numeric system base-13.

42 in base 13 = 54 base 10

Douglas Adams wowed never to make any more math jokes after that.

 
max_p
Posted: Sep 06, 2012 - 09:19 

 ottovonb wrote:
Ah....nothing like a dreamy interlude in the middle of a crappy work day. Nice!
 
yeah but had a 'droner' on just prior
oldviolin
(Esse Quam Videri)
Posted: Aug 27, 2012 - 07:15 

it's not so far, really...
Proclivities
(Carrboro, NC)
Posted: Aug 10, 2012 - 10:06 

 justsomeone wrote:
If God is an astronaut, who built the spaceship?
 
Some guy named Kevin.
jim1964
(1379 miles to Wall Drug)
Posted: Aug 05, 2012 - 21:59 

...this is cool, I'm watching the live NASA feed on the landing of the Mars rover and in the background this is playing. Maybe God is an astronaut.
shplody
Posted: Jul 05, 2012 - 11:22 

Never thought RP would play God is an astronaut... terrific stuff.
ottovonb
Posted: Jul 05, 2012 - 11:21 

Ah....nothing like a dreamy interlude in the middle of a crappy work day. Nice!
tulfan
(Still in SE MI)
Posted: Jul 05, 2012 - 11:21 

 justsomeone wrote:
If God is an astronaut, who built the spaceship?
 


My God wouldn't need one but ironically does wear a helmet
justsomeone
(Between a rock and a hard place)
Posted: Jun 25, 2012 - 12:57 

If God is an astronaut, who built the spaceship?
Byronape
("post-capitalist wreckageville")
Posted: Apr 05, 2012 - 19:05 

 unclehud wrote:
What's to say there aren't living beings that require an ammonia atmosphere, use sulfur for metabolic energy, communicate through touch or telepathy, and would explode in gravitational fields less than 4G?  (Cell phone pun for those not paying close attention.)  It's quite plausible that they would absolutely assume a form completely "alien" to Earthlings.  Why, oh why, must it possess general human characterisitics?

While I agree 100% with your arguement, there are some reasons why "intelligent" life would generally be considered to have a humanoid form.  

Think about the traits that make humans (argueably) superior to other life on this planet.  

1) Brains as far from the ground as possible.
2) Front facing eyes with short optic nerves.
3) Multiple communication methods that frequently combine to add context (ie, "Sure honey, you can go out drinking all night..." while her toe is tapping and eyebrow up.)
4) Limbs with multiple points of articulation.
5) Digits with multiple points of articulation.
6) Thumbs.  They speak for themselves.
7) Walking upright, freeing upper limbs for object manipulation.

There are many others, but I think you get the drift.

Now, I think the assumption that intelligent life on "Earth-like" planets (liquid water, O2 and carbon-dioxide, hard non-liquid surfaces) would generally have humanish characteristics due to the thought that all life needs liquid water to form.  

That being said, there is no reason that I can think of that other forms wouldn't evolve on their own.  It would all depend on what was needed to thrive in their environment.
Blastcat900
Posted: Apr 05, 2012 - 18:50 

 Byronape wrote:

It just so happens that 42 is the answer to Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything.  I don't think that's a coincidence...
 
The number 42 is, in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, "The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything", and is calculated by an enormous supercomputer over a period of 7.5 million years to be 42. Unfortunately no one knows what the question is. Thus, to calculate the Ultimate Question, a special computer the size of a small planet and using organic components was created and named "Earth".


fredriley
(Nottingham, UK)
Posted: Mar 22, 2012 - 04:19 

 unclehud wrote:
To revisit an previous topic on this thread ...
 
Someone suggested earlier, and I paraphrase here, that there is a negligible chance of livable conditions on another planet in the Milky Way.  That comment went on to list a few items required to sustain life: "(liquid water, energy, and organic material) ".
 
That someone was wrong, going by the increasing number of extrasolar planets being discovered by astronomers, a few of which look to be 'goldilocks planets'. With over 400 billion stars in our galaxy, and millions of galaxies in the universe, there must be countless billions of planets. Even if the conditions for carbon-based life are unlikely, say 1 in 10 million for arguments' sake, then you've still got millions of planets in the universe that are suitable for life.  IMO the probability of there not being extraterrestrial life is vanishingly small.

Not that that's what this band's name is about. I think it's an ironic comment on the Von Daniken pseudo-religion of the 70s (as mentioned in an earlier comment of mine) which in essence saw extraterrestrials as gods guiding humanity to progress and watching over us over the millennia.
leathepea
(Hickory, NC)
Posted: Feb 29, 2012 - 12:45 

 ozzie1313 wrote:
If God is an astronaut, then he is too many light years away for us to really know anything about him with any accuracy.  We can only be enthralled with the myth like earlier mankind used oral history to not lose track of and to perpetuate their identity. 
 
Awesome! 


ozzie1313
Posted: Feb 19, 2012 - 10:12 

If God is an astronaut, then he is too many light years away for us to really know anything about him with any accuracy.  We can only be enthralled with the myth like earlier mankind used oral history to not lose track of and to perpetuate their identity. 
RedGuitar
(Iowa, USA)
Posted: Feb 15, 2012 - 11:42 

 unclehud wrote:
To revisit an previous topic on this thread ...
 
Someone suggested earlier, and I paraphrase here, that there is a negligible chance of livable conditions on another planet in the Milky Way.  That comment went on to list a few items required to sustain life: "(liquid water, energy, and organic material) ".
 
Years ago under the stimulus of powerful chemicals, my friends and I used to critique "the Star Trek view of cosmology".  Why must we assume that other sentient beings use carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen for metabolism?  Why must they always be assumed to inhabit axially symmetrical bodies, with, let's be serious here, a head, thorax, two arms and two legs?  Star Trek and LOTS of other science fiction vehicles also portrayed aliens using vocalizations or other noises for communication — a characteristic at which we chuckled for hours.  (Damned chemicals.)
 
What's to say there aren't living beings that require an ammonia atmosphere, use sulfur for metabolic energy, communicate through touch or telepathy, and would explode in gravitational fields less than 4G?  (Cell phone pun for those not paying close attention.)  It's quite plausible that they would absolutely assume a form completely "alien" to Earthlings.  Why, oh why, must it possess general human characterisitics?
 
That's like, just my opinion, man.  No disrespect aimed at anyone.
 
I am most definitely with you on this.  "Life" could have many forms!

eruwenolorien
(SC)
Posted: Feb 02, 2012 - 09:52 

 unclehud wrote:
To revisit an previous topic on this thread ...
 
Someone suggested earlier, and I paraphrase here, that there is a negligible chance of livable conditions on another planet in the Milky Way.  That comment went on to list a few items required to sustain life: "(liquid water, energy, and organic material) ".
 
Years ago under the stimulus of powerful chemicals, my friends and I used to critique "the Star Trek view of cosmology".  Why must we assume that other sentient beings use carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen for metabolism?  Why must they always be assumed to inhabit axially symmetrical bodies, with, let's be serious here, a head, thorax, two arms and two legs?  Star Trek and LOTS of other science fiction vehicles also portrayed aliens using vocalizations or other noises for communication — a characteristic at which we chuckled for hours.  (Damned chemicals.)
 
What's to say there aren't living beings that require an ammonia atmosphere, use sulfur for metabolic energy, communicate through touch or telepathy, and would explode in gravitational fields less than 4G?  (Cell phone pun for those not paying close attention.)  It's quite plausible that they would absolutely assume a form completely "alien" to Earthlings.  Why, oh why, must it possess general human characterisitics?
 
That's like, just my opinion, man.  No disrespect aimed at anyone.
 
I love this post, as I have always been stumped by the assumption that "living" means "needs the elements as humans to exist."

Also, I love this song. Solid 10!

unclehud
(300 feet above the planet)
Posted: Nov 16, 2011 - 06:02 

To revisit an previous topic on this thread ...
 
Someone suggested earlier, and I paraphrase here, that there is a negligible chance of livable conditions on another planet in the Milky Way.  That comment went on to list a few items required to sustain life: "(liquid water, energy, and organic material) ".
 
Years ago under the stimulus of powerful chemicals, my friends and I used to critique "the Star Trek view of cosmology".  Why must we assume that other sentient beings use carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen for metabolism?  Why must they always be assumed to inhabit axially symmetrical bodies, with, let's be serious here, a head, thorax, two arms and two legs?  Star Trek and LOTS of other science fiction vehicles also portrayed aliens using vocalizations or other noises for communication — a characteristic at which we chuckled for hours.  (Damned chemicals.)
 
What's to say there aren't living beings that require an ammonia atmosphere, use sulfur for metabolic energy, communicate through touch or telepathy, and would explode in gravitational fields less than 4G?  (Cell phone pun for those not paying close attention.)  It's quite plausible that they would absolutely assume a form completely "alien" to Earthlings.  Why, oh why, must it possess general human characterisitics?
 
That's like, just my opinion, man.  No disrespect aimed at anyone.


Maupie
(Velp (gld), the Netherlands)
Posted: Oct 30, 2011 - 06:28 

this is bad, this sucks
bmeador
(24fps)
Posted: Oct 25, 2011 - 17:54 

What a wonderful transition to this from Utopia. Nice, Bill. Very nice!

Krispian
(Vancouver, BC)
Posted: Oct 25, 2011 - 17:54 

Goldfrapp - Utopia > God is an Astronaut - A Deafening Distance = Nice segue!
On_The_Beach
(The Blue Planet)
Posted: Oct 13, 2011 - 18:20 

 Byronape wrote:
It just so happens that 42 is the answer to Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything.  I don't think that's a coincidence...
 
I'm not a "Hitchhikers" pundit, but I'm glad you picked up the (intentional) reference.


Byronape
(Snorkeling in the River Styx)
Posted: Oct 11, 2011 - 17:22 

 On_The_Beach wrote:

Well, I've done the counting. As it turns out there are 42 more grains of sand on Earth than there are stars in the universe. So take THAT, universe!! (The universe thinks it's so great.)

 
It just so happens that 42 is the answer to Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything.  I don't think that's a coincidence...


sporkster
(Adelaide, South Australia)
Posted: Aug 09, 2011 - 20:45 

I don't mind this song, but I don't really understand why it's being played to death... There is so much other music out there!
Ntropy
(Cleveland, OH)
Posted: Jul 27, 2011 - 18:38 

 fabduchi wrote:
I really like this song! The album is great too.

 
 
Yeah. I just adore these guys... They are incredible.

On_The_Beach
(Vancouver BC, Bud)
Posted: Jun 24, 2011 - 22:29 

 Proclivities wrote:
Despite what Carl Sagan asserted, it's quite possible (or probable) that there are more grains of sand on the Earth's beaches than there are stars in the Universe - but I haven't counted lately.
 
Well, I've done the counting. As it turns out there are 42 more grains of sand on Earth than there are stars in the universe. So take THAT, universe!! (The universe thinks it's so great.)

drife
(Golden, CO)
Posted: Jun 15, 2011 - 12:30 

This sounds like something right out of the Porcupine Tree music book.
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next