RadioDoc wrote: 
Oh no. That sounds like a Neko slam.

 lmic wrote: 

Yah, no kiddin', some of the priciest "real estate" in the Bay Area, lmic! This one is $500 PER NIGHT.



from http://www.vrbo.com/184236 

Master Suite with large whirlpool bath and deck on the water, plus 2 guest bedrooms, 2 1/2 baths, fully equipped office, computer with broadband/WiFi, music studio, 3 separate decks and your own dock with 14' motorboat and 2 kayaks.  Why pay $500 a night for a single hotel room when you can have all this for only $495 per night?

i dig this guy! especially when he sings with Emmy Lou

YEE HAW!

Bright Eyes! Dig this guy, he has a way with words.

I doubt you could afford a houseboat in Sausalito, Conor!

Hey!  Greetings from Sausalito! 

(I don't have a houseboat ... but my father's has a great house in the Sausalito hills.)

 ch83575 wrote: 
I myself had blue hair once, but I was in college, and that's not as daring as pink anyway.

 holborne wrote: 
I dated a girl in High School with pink hair.  One day she stuck a safety-pin through her ear without even warning me or anything... kinda freaked me out.  Its 11 years later and we are married now.  She let that hole grow closed, and her hair is just brown now but she still freaks me out from time to time. 

 RadioDoc wrote: 
Got me.

Consider though: While punk may have been dead in 73, Canada lags behind the rest of the industrialized world in many ways, and Winnipeg would be considered backwoods by Canadian standards. We got a GAP at our mall only last year, and teens still order acid wash jean jackets out of the Sears catalogue. So, it follows then that punk might not have been dead here, even though the rest of the world considered it so.

 RadioDoc wrote: 
Uh...yeah. If you were actually born in 1973, you were hardly punk before it was cool, unless your parents gave you a mohawk and pierced your little nose with a clothespin while you were in diapers.

OldFrenchie wrote: If you were indeed born in 1973, you're not "punk".  You may be a punk though.

 holborne wrote: 
Its true! I was punk way back before it was considered "cool" (or kewl?).

holborne wrote:I Agree.  That goes for rating really bad performances a 10 just because it's some chick you think is hot...

I'll give this one  a 7 for now.  I don't really care why Conor Oberst is considered a bad guy unless it is political, and as I've posted here before if artists are supposed to refrain from producing work that is devoid of their feelings then it is not art.  It is mass produced, tasteless pablum.

There are some artists I really disagree with politically but until they run for office that is completely irrelevant if their artistic product is something I like.

 OldFrenchie wrote:   
Wow, you're so punk rock!

I have no idea who the guy is. I rated it on my reaction to the song.

 holborne wrote: 
Whatever. If it sucks it sucks. I call 'em like I hear 'em.

Oh, come on, guys. Rate the song that you actually hear, not the person singing it. It doesn't make you a big rebel just because you see Conor Oberst and go, "Ew, give him a low rating!"