winterhawk
| | Posted: Jul 27, 2006 - 20:00 | |
Pipes wrote:
Interesting what you call necessary because I am able to deduce what the edited words are. I'm not offended by the profanity but would not want my children listening to it. Is your vocabulary such that you cannot convey a strong message without profanity? Hopefully your children will learn enough profanity in school that they are able to communicate with you in the manner in which you are accustomed.
YIKES! |
|
Geecheeboy (under a crescent moon and palmetto tree) | | Posted: Jul 13, 2006 - 04:14 | |
You all would be singing a different tune if this white boy dropped the N word as easily as he drops the others. Artisic integrity would count for nothing in that case, I would bet. You'd have him on a stake instead of a cross.
|
|
ElSupreme (ATL) | | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:31 | |
toker wrote:It would be a shame if we were unable to explain to our children why certain words bothered us.
This is hard to believe coming from someone named 'toker'. |
|
ElSupreme (ATL) | | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:27 | |
Pipes wrote:
Interesting what you call necessary because I am able to deduce what the edited words are. I'm not offended by the profanity but would not want my children listening to it. Is your vocabulary such that you cannot convey a strong message without profanity? Hopefully your children will learn enough profanity in school that they are able to communicate with you in the manner in which you are accustomed.
But this song isn't really that profane. A quick listen actually reveals 1 F-bomb and two $#!Ts. And a GD if you really count that one, I don't. But in the edited one you also lose (that I can remember off the top of my head from when this was played on the radio) are: Balls, Whore, Green, Drugs (I think this one was gone in the radio edit), 45. I remember there being a lot more 'bleeps' but cant remember any more. |
|
redeyespy (Sunny, FL) | | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:18 | |
toker wrote:It would be a shame if we were unable to explain to our children why certain words bothered us.
We'll be too busy simply telling our children that certain words are inherently bad, socially unacceptable, etc. The why is explained by, "well, they're just bad words." Just like our parents told us. Some kind of dubious evolution has occurred-it was decided at some point that certain words are offensive and that "fact" has been perpetuated. The more you ponder it, the more absurd it really is. |
|
gntlemanartist (where you least suspect) | | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:16 | |
Mugro wrote:
Your inappropriate is my appropriate. The obscenities in this song are NECESSARY to convey the message of the song. The radio edit drains this song of any strength that the album version has.
I completely agree (hey something Mugro and I agree on!) this song makes so much more sense in the unedited version. It's not a glorification of the violece it depicts, unlike a lot of gansta rap, it's a truly heart wrenching depiction of human beings at their most desperate and depraved. |
|
juliealice (Oakland, CA) | | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:16 | |
This is one of the few rap songs that I really like. Great lyrics. I especially love the line "You know where it ends, it usually depends on where you start." So true. Anyway, glad to hear this on RP.
|
|
rah
| | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:15 | |
Pipes wrote:
Interesting what you call necessary because I am able to deduce what the edited words are. I'm not offended by the profanity but would not want my children listening to it. Is your vocabulary such that you cannot convey a strong message without profanity? Hopefully your children will learn enough profanity in school that they are able to communicate with you in the manner in which you are accustomed.
Necessary is completely irrelevent. The songwriters chose specific words for their lyrics. Broadcast radio plays an edited version rather than be slapped with fines by the FCC; RP is under no such contraints, and can therefore play the song the way it's written. If you don't approve of them for yourself or your children, it's your choice not to listen to the song or buy the album, that's all. |
|
redeyespy (Sunny, FL) | | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:13 | |
Another case of mere good intentions not being enough to make a listenable song. |
|
justlistening (Never Sure (So. Ca.)) | | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:12 | |
toker wrote:It would be a shame if we were unable to explain to our children why certain words bothered us.
Why? |
|
mikedill (Chicago, IL) | | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:11 | |
hells yeah, bitches.
love a little variety in here.
|
|
justlistening (Never Sure (So. Ca.)) | | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:11 | |
LaundryDetergent wrote:Did they play this song by accident? It does not belong on RP.
I don't mind it once in awhile. Nothing wrong with it at all. |
|
Lonestar (St.Catharines, ON) | | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:11 | |
This is a steaming turd of a song.
|
|
hippiechick
| | Posted: Jun 28, 2006 - 12:11 | |
Censorship is ridiculous. You can't say whore but you can blow up as many people as you want. You can't make love, but you can show rape. Hypocritical and insulting to a person's intelligence.
|
|
toker (its a jungle out there) | | Posted: Jun 13, 2006 - 21:27 | |
It would be a shame if we were unable to explain to our children why certain words bothered us.
|
|
LaundryDetergent (Longmont, CO) | | Posted: Jun 13, 2006 - 21:22 | |
Did they play this song by accident? It does not belong on RP.
|
|
Pipes (Top of the mountain) | | Posted: May 30, 2006 - 08:23 | |
Mugro wrote:
Your inappropriate is my appropriate. The obscenities in this song are NECESSARY to convey the message of the song. The radio edit drains this song of any strength that the album version has.
Please remember that your audio player has a mute button. Use it and spare the rest of us of being forced to listen to the neutered version of this song. Afterall, who appointed you as Commissioner of the FCC???
Interesting what you call necessary because I am able to deduce what the edited words are. I'm not offended by the profanity but would not want my children listening to it. Is your vocabulary such that you cannot convey a strong message without profanity? Hopefully your children will learn enough profanity in school that they are able to communicate with you in the manner in which you are accustomed. |
|
Mugro (Lane Village, Red Sox Nation) | | Posted: May 30, 2006 - 07:16 | |
Geecheeboy wrote:Wish you had played the radio edit. Bill says it's ok with him if we play RP in our office or store yet over the top profanity is not appropriate for office or store, any more than it is appropriate to yell obscenities in public. Childish. Adolescent indeed.
Your inappropriate is my appropriate. The obscenities in this song are NECESSARY to convey the message of the song. The radio edit drains this song of any strength that the album version has.
Please remember that your audio player has a mute button. Use it and spare the rest of us of being forced to listen to the neutered version of this song. Afterall, who appointed you as Commissioner of the FCC??? |
|
Geecheeboy (under a crescent moon and palmetto tree) | | Posted: May 30, 2006 - 07:05 | |
Wish you had played the radio edit. Bill says it's ok with him if we play RP in our office or store yet over the top profanity is not appropriate for office or store, any more than it is appropriate to yell obscenities in public. Childish. Adolescent indeed.
|
|
Mark1970 (Between the dim and the dark) | | Posted: May 30, 2006 - 06:58 | |
the_bink wrote:Thanks for not playing the radio edit.
No kidding. I'm not a big fan of this song but there is NOTHING worse than the radio edit. All the bleeps, scratches, reeeees, whooooops, and other strange noises is incredibly annoying. Not sure why they even bothering playing the song with half the lyrics removed. |
|
rgj13 (Back home in San Franciscoland.) | | Posted: May 15, 2006 - 17:12 | |
dmax wrote:
Nuh UH.
Yuh, HUH! No way, dude! I TOTALLY hate this song beyond all possible hatedom. Don't even. |
|
(former member) (Shadow Valley Condos) | | Posted: May 15, 2006 - 17:05 | |
rgj13 wrote:
Oh yeah? I hate it more than you do.
Nuh UH. |
|
Coppertop (San Diego, CA) | | Posted: May 15, 2006 - 17:03 | |
Most excellant Mr Bill !!
|
|
rgj13 (Back home in San Franciscoland.) | | Posted: May 15, 2006 - 17:03 | |
dmax wrote:Man, I super hate this tune. Adolescent emo.
Oh yeah? I hate it more than you do. |
|
(former member) (Shadow Valley Condos) | | Posted: May 15, 2006 - 17:01 | |
Man, I super hate this tune. Adolescent emo.
|
|
CCinSB
| | Posted: May 15, 2006 - 17:00 | |
good song. Got to see him live few yrs back. Very good, turntables and all.
|
|
stet (Venice Beach CA) | | Posted: May 15, 2006 - 17:00 | |
Where'd this come from??
None of his other stuff I've heard comes within 100 yards of how good this. These lines are amazing
I've seen a rich man beg
I've seen a good man sin
I've seen a tough man cry
I've seen a loser win
And a sad man grin
I heard an honest man lie
I've seen the good side of bad
And the down side of up
And everything between
I licked the silver spoon
Drank from the golden cup
Smoked the finest green
I stroked daddies dimes at least a couple of times
Before I broke their heart
You know where it ends
Yo, it usually depends on where you start
|
|
AliGator (Home) | | Posted: May 15, 2006 - 16:58 | |
I like.
It must not have been overplayed on French radio. |
|
Gryn (Oregon) | | Posted: May 01, 2006 - 03:34 | |
So amazingly underrated. Everlast kicks ass. More, please.
|
|
Gish05 (Pittsburgh, PA) | | Posted: Apr 16, 2006 - 13:44 | |
I feel like I'm in Ninth Grade again. Hooray? |
|