ick (...out of the primordial ooze) | | Posted: May 16, 2013 - 06:54 | |
mutepoint wrote: True. Musician's prerogative and such. However, any terrestrial (or Innerwebs) radio station might give airplay a second thought as they take into account the listener's environment. Same reason that wide-appeal stations don't play anything with excessive foul language or abusive/derogatory content. (Leave that crap to the college stations that think they can get away with it in the wee hours. )
You have the option of changing the station if it doesn't meet your criteria for your listening environment. After all, there are plenty of stations out there that probably fit your requirements. |
|
DaveInVA (In a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA) | | Posted: May 16, 2013 - 06:51 | |
Sounds like some kid playing with a signal generator in the background..
|
|
Proclivities (Paris of the Piedmont) | | Posted: Mar 15, 2013 - 03:48 | |
mutepoint wrote: True. Musician's prerogative and such. However, any terrestrial (or Innerwebs) radio station might give airplay a second thought as they take into account the listener's environment. Same reason that wide-appeal stations don't play anything with excessive foul language or abusive/derogatory content. (Leave that crap to the college stations that think they can get away with it in the wee hours. ) I know what you mean; some musical sounds can be more jarring than desired, even out of a work environment. |
|
mutepoint
| | Posted: Mar 14, 2013 - 15:28 | |
Proclivities wrote:Those odd keyboard sounds may be understandably annoying to a lot of folks, but whether or not a song is "disruptive to a work environment" should never be of any concern to a songwriter or musician - unless they were hired to compose or play Muzak back in the 1960s and '70s. True. Musician's prerogative and such. However, any terrestrial (or Innerwebs) radio station might give airplay a second thought as they take into account the listener's environment. Same reason that wide-appeal stations don't play anything with excessive foul language or abusive/derogatory content. (Leave that crap to the college stations that think they can get away with it in the wee hours. ) |
|
Proclivities (Paris of the Piedmont) | | Posted: Mar 14, 2013 - 13:11 | |
mutepoint wrote:FUCKING ANNOYING sound effects in this tune are disruptive to a work environment. Is it a phone ringing?
FFS. Those odd keyboard sounds may be understandably annoying to a lot of folks, but whether or not a song is "disruptive to a work environment" should never be of any concern to a songwriter or musician - unless they were hired to compose or play Muzak back in the 1960s and '70s. |
|
donnyballgame (41*53'36.29N 87*38'20.43W) | | Posted: Mar 14, 2013 - 13:04 | |
Thought for a moment this was Wayne Coyne and Flaming Lips that I hadn't heard. Weird.
|
|
vincentp1324
| | Posted: Mar 14, 2013 - 13:03 | |
First comment I've ever made in years of listening. This is that bad.
|
|
84MacGuy (Portlandia, Oregon) | | Posted: Mar 14, 2013 - 13:02 | |
As stated by others, this is one hell of an annoying song.
|
|
mutepoint
| | Posted: Mar 14, 2013 - 12:59 | |
FUCKING ANNOYING sound effects in this tune are disruptive to a work environment. Is it a phone ringing?
FFS.
|
|
sbegf (Manchester, Maryland) | | Posted: Feb 11, 2013 - 04:30 | |
Pyro wrote:Love the electronic arpeggios....although it is ridiculously easy to do with electronic keyboards.... Can't stand them...reminds me of an annoying 80's video game. |
|
agkagk (Ontario, Canada) | | Posted: Jan 10, 2013 - 20:04 | |
thermion7 wrote:Reminds me of ELO. But I gave it a 7 anyway. Reminds me of ELO, so I gave it a 3. |
|
Boy_Wonder (Bath, back in the UK) | | Posted: Dec 10, 2012 - 11:02 | |
|
shellbella (so california) | | Posted: Dec 10, 2012 - 10:58 | |
This song is annoying as hell....
|
|
mostling
| | Posted: Oct 08, 2012 - 17:24 | |
Just saw Grandaddy last month at the first reunion show in years. At the Independent in SF. It was awesome, and they played this song. Rumor is they might put out a new record. In the meantime Jason Lytle's new album is about to drop, and can be heard for free on NPR as of today.
|
|
mandolin (...drifting...) | | Posted: Oct 08, 2012 - 17:23 | |
...so next we should hear some unkle and younger brother?..
|
|
radders171
| | Posted: Feb 14, 2011 - 05:39 | |
I think I'm a bit late coming to the table on this one. In fact late in coming to the musical table in gereral as I've had the blinkers on for many years (i'm refering to ELO blikers so relevant to this thread i guess).
Very good friends of mine bought me this album last year in the attempt of trying to broaden my musical horizons (successfully). In fact they are truly encyclopedic. I was instantly impressed and immediately and noticed the ELO resemblance (i'm refering to the elctronic 'twidly' sounds so not the actual songwriting itself). In fact Grandaddy did a cover of ELO's Shangri-La I believe on their last album (as a bonus track).
Anyway.. I was listening to the album again last night. I can't remember in between which songs, but there is a spoken line also taken from ELO's Face The Music album (Fire on High track). ELO were always accused (or cited) as using subliminal messages hidden in their music which actually amounted to just reversing some words so that they could only be heard by playing the record backwards (great fun on turntables). On Fire On High, there is a line which says (in reverse) "music is reversible, but time is not". Grandaddy have done the same. Only funnily (I think I'm right), they've only spoken the words as they sound in reverse rather than actually reversing the correct lyric (if that makes sense).
Not sure is anyone spotted this before. I guess it would only be ELO fans listening to Grandaddy who would. Oh no, I just revealed my musical past. Oops!
|
|
diane (seacoast, nh, usa) | | Posted: Jun 10, 2005 - 10:01 | |
ploafmaster wrote:Ya know, I'm sure some people hate it and some love it, but I'm in the latter category when it comes to the nifty synth arpeggio in the background. ... :( I'm firmly in the former. They took a neat, glittery sound effect and pile drove it right into the ground. |
|
ploafmaster (Richmond, VA) | | Posted: Apr 27, 2005 - 11:02 | |
Ya know, I'm sure some people hate it and some love it, but I'm in the latter category when it comes to the nifty synth arpeggio in the background.
I like this!
|
|
radiojunkie (a sleepy bordertown (NY/CT)) | | Posted: Apr 12, 2005 - 19:47 | |
Oh, nice joke, Bill. In this mix, anyway, Grandaddy is following immediately after It's A Beautiful Day -- which elicited an outpouring of abuse from all the "youngsters" out there in our audience, as Ed Sullivan would have said; everything from "f**ing hippie sh*t!" to "how long does it take you to chew your soup?"  Well, gettin' a vibe off the gr-amps. |
|
drover (Chicago, IL) | | Posted: Feb 27, 2005 - 15:04 | |
Not sure why, but I have since overcome my objection to the arpeggios and bumped my rating up from a 5 to a 7. At first I was ambivalent about Grandaddy but I recently listened to Sophtware Slump and bought an mp3 of almost every song on the track including this one.
Meanwhile, dissers of ELO should try to forgive them for "Don't Bring Me Down" and give the recent album Zoom a listen.
|
|
Pyro (Between a rock and a hard place) | | Posted: Jan 14, 2005 - 09:34 | |
Ityllux wrote:I believe this song would be more likeable with better singing and without the digital arpeggios....
Whoops! One person's trash is another's treasure! |
|
Pyro (Between a rock and a hard place) | | Posted: Jan 14, 2005 - 09:33 | |
Love the electronic arpeggios....although it is ridiculously easy to do with electronic keyboards....
|
|
LLMikeJ (midwest) | | Posted: Jan 14, 2005 - 09:30 | |
i have a sample of the "i gotta get outta here" lyric set as my windows shut-down sound. 8)
|
|
Malc (Scotland. The other side of the world from Paradise.) | | Posted: Dec 30, 2004 - 16:12 | |
This band has been pigeonholed as slacker rock. Maybe true as they are VERY laid back.
The Sophtware Slump must be listened to in one sitting to hear the genius writing and arranging at it's best.
The band must have grown up listening to ELO and decided to ditch the string section. The feel is there though.
|
|
LLMikeJ
| | Posted: Nov 16, 2004 - 07:37 | |
awesome. thanks for playing this song. these guys are great in concert. highly recommended. their video content behind the stage is truly top notch. I have been to hundreds of concerts and this one was top ten. If they come to your town, look for them to be BBQ'ing at a local skate park...
 :nodhead:
too bad there aren't emoticons with beards |
|
thermion7 (Vancouver, WA USA) | | Posted: Nov 01, 2004 - 13:15 | |
Reminds me of ELO. But I gave it a 7 anyway.
|
|
masterhead (Sacramento, Ca) | | Posted: Nov 01, 2004 - 13:14 | |
Peyote wrote:Grandaddy's Chemical Brothers got Flaming Lips!!!
Its a joke!!
While listening to ELO... |
|
masterhead (Sacramento, Ca) | | Posted: Nov 01, 2004 - 13:14 | |
This are some of the most amusing comments I have read for a while..I think Grandaddy would be proud.
|
|
rgj13 (Peninsulated.) | | Posted: Jul 08, 2004 - 18:52 | |
moheybee wrote:Wow, I havvn't heard this song for so long.
It brings back good memories.
:-s You must be really young! |
|
Peyote (sideways) | | Posted: May 03, 2004 - 11:07 | |
Grandaddy's Chemical Brothers got Flaming Lips!!!
Its a joke!!
|
|