higado
| | Posted: Apr 06, 2009 - 03:00 | |
EssexTex wrote:Wouldn't it be good if this wasn't played again.
Yehaa never ever, soooooo baaaad |
|
Pyro
| | Posted: Mar 05, 2009 - 14:23 | |
trekhead wrote:He gets a real Stevie Wonder thing going there, especially in this version.
7, overall.
Oops, backscrolled....I see someone else DID hear a little bit of Stevie! |
|
purplespider
(Portland, OR) | | Posted: Mar 05, 2009 - 14:23 | |
vapid & irritating  |
|
Pyro
| | Posted: Mar 05, 2009 - 14:22 | |
Does anyone else hear a little Stevie Wonder in the vocals?
|
|
awebber27
(under the northern lights and midnight sun) | | Posted: Feb 02, 2009 - 00:56 | |
Even though RP is defined by undefinable eclecticism...., this song still does not fit the mold. Too poppy..., and he admits it himself..., He has it bad... This was a very frustrating song to listen too.  |
|
walchenbach
(Puget Sound) | | Posted: Feb 02, 2009 - 00:50 | |
Reminds me of something off the Dan Fogelberg Greatest Hits Album. Uggg.
|
|
rtwingo
(Out of my mind (be right back)) | | Posted: Jan 01, 2009 - 09:41 | |
The lexical description of Sucko-Barfo.
|
|
Bosonator
(Nova Scotia) | | Posted: Nov 08, 2008 - 15:23 | |
Holy weird chords, Batman. This one is hard to learn.
|
|
trekhead
(Under The Full Moon) | | Posted: Oct 30, 2008 - 05:58 | |
He gets a real Stevie Wonder thing going there, especially in this version.
7, overall.
|
|
TJS
(Denver) | | Posted: Oct 30, 2008 - 05:56 | |
Totally different flavor than the original, but I still love it.
|
|
ndad47
(the great state of maine) | | Posted: Sep 28, 2008 - 15:03 | |
my god. this floored me. I had never heard this version. what a great surprise for a rainy sunday.
|
|
joan_c
(St. Paul, MN) | | Posted: Sep 28, 2008 - 13:58 | |
jcjoh wrote:Not nearly as good as original. Acoustic hardly ever is.
Oh, I think acoustic is almost always better.  |
|
ClaireWild
(Ireland) | | Posted: Sep 28, 2008 - 13:56 | |
EssexTex wrote:Wouldn't it be good if this wasn't played again.
Why would it be good if it wasn't played again? You haven't given any constructive criticism; this is a quite interesting tune, and comes over well acoustically. I'm not a fan of Nik Kershaw, but really - be fair! This acoustic version is well played, and very pleasant, |
|
EssexTex
(Bee Cave, Texas) | | Posted: Aug 28, 2008 - 09:53 | |
Wouldn't it be good if this wasn't played again.
|
|
squidish
(Big island near SF) | | Posted: Jun 25, 2008 - 19:25 | |
Wasn't this on the Pretty In Pink soundtrack? By Danny Hutton Hitters? But this is a good version.
|
|
Chazar
(Orlando, FL) | | Posted: May 25, 2008 - 08:53 | |
Are you kidding with this ? 
I prefer.."wouldn't it be nice to hit you with your shoe....
|
|
Papernapkin
(Mountain View, CA) | | Posted: May 25, 2008 - 08:34 | |
|
jcjoh
| | Posted: Apr 23, 2008 - 20:32 | |
Not nearly as good as original. Acoustic hardly ever is.
|
|
garthwb
(Emerald Isle) | | Posted: Mar 23, 2008 - 08:35 | |
fantomas wrote:POP SINGERS SUCKS, MORE MOZART MINUS BORED GUYS WITH UGLY HATS  At least TRY to make your opinion considered and meaningful... |
|
fantomas
(Colombia) | | Posted: Feb 20, 2008 - 20:56 | |
POP SINGERS SUCKS, MORE MOZART MINUS BORED GUYS WITH UGLY HATS |
|
nelamvr6
(New London, CT USA) | | Posted: Jan 20, 2008 - 10:32 | |
Wow! That was excellent! Without a doubt my favorite Nik Kershaw tune, and that was an excellent version!
|
|
jennywho
| | Posted: Jan 20, 2008 - 10:31 | |
Ok - and I'm all about acoustic music - but I like the original better. Would probably be better with some harmony vocals.
|
|
cirruss
| | Posted: Jan 20, 2008 - 10:28 | |
|
Wizzuvvoz
(Land of Nod. East of Eden on Route 66.) | | Posted: Nov 18, 2007 - 13:34 | |
Boosiewolf wrote:Whoa! Where did THIS version come from???
  
*sings high harmony with Nik* I dig this a lot (8). Quite nice--I like it better than the original. That doesn't happen very often. |
|
Alexandra
(The Gem City, Ohio) | | Posted: Nov 18, 2007 - 13:32 | |
Whoa! Where did THIS version come from???
*sings high harmony with Nik* |
|
edellison
| | Posted: Oct 19, 2007 - 04:10 | |
bcorcoran wrote:It's too... too... Blessed Union of Souls-ish. Yuck.
your a fucking idiot mate |
|
prickelpit96
(Hannover, Germany) | | Posted: Oct 18, 2007 - 04:51 | |
Hm, this song is absolutely _nothing_ without the typical 80's-style of music and instruments.
 |
|
bcorcoran
(Alexandria, VA) | | Posted: Aug 16, 2007 - 08:26 | |
It's too... too... Blessed Union of Souls-ish. Yuck.
|
|
DoctorHooey
(/etc) | | Posted: Aug 16, 2007 - 08:25 | |
Oh man, I've never heard this and it just makes me desperately long for the original. That's one of my favorite songs of the very wacky and prolific early 80's.
|
|
Monkeysdad
| | Posted: Jul 15, 2007 - 20:16 | |
fretman wrote:How can this be acoustic when its transmitted through the internet?
How can this be digital if its heard by man analog ears?
Well, where is my beautiful wife? Where's my big new car?
Same as it ever was...
God, you're deep!  |
|
Share this song
Tweet this song