Spot on comment Koko. The sounds of oneness is a simple hum of the universe.
Kokoloco53 wrote: 

Any clues of what happened to Chicane? They were excellent

Nice idea for a little while, then it becomes incredibly boring.

 midigitguy wrote: 
Is there something wrong with disco? 

Long time no hear! 9*

Please stop singing... 

this is a 10 1/2 and what's ewrong with disco dancing ??

Too close to disco...
 

bump
 zipper wrote: 

Like it

Anybody know who the singer is?

Put me in the "still liking it" corner...

still liking it   

still hating it. . . 

I'm sometimes surprised at the naivete of some of you who for some reason get stuck on technicalities, like this song because it is not a complicated piece. Get real, get a life, get perspective. Even Beethoven wrote simple beautiful songs, like the Moonlight Sonata that most 3 grade pianists can muddle through. Buddhist monks learned centuries ago the pleasure and benefits of even repeating a simple word, Om, and how that could soothe the soul. Music is much the same, in my opinion, it serves many purposes, to rouse the troops into battle, inspire a football team, praise the gods, celebrate love and sex, and sometimes, just pleases the soul, bathing it in simple sound. Beauty. Peace.

 walchenbach wrote: 

 apd wrote: 
...nope, nothing more clever than the name of the band, well, that in confluence with flight from the album cover:  stream-of-consciousness association with the rolling chicane...

Reminds me of Suzanne Vega too...

drum and bass track really unimaginative. 
dun, dun, tsss
dun, dun, tsss
dun, dun, tsss

blah, blah, blah

 brianbf1986 wrote: 
nah, it's a fail when it's a top 40 song that's hiding the effect to cover for a singer who can't, or is too lazy, to hit a note (or, when it's used by a singer who can actually sing, but it's used just to sound au corraint. Yes, I'm talking to you, Mr. Coldplay) but here, it's pretty obvious so I assume it's used as a texture. Anyway, the rest of the tune is fab.

 mandolin wrote: 
OK, I don't get it - why did you post that? PLEASE tell me it's more than just the name of the band.

 brianbf1986 wrote: 

It sounds more like a phaser/flanger effect (which long-preceded auto-tune) to me, but even if if is an auto-tune device, it's done to create a "sweeping" effect more than it is to disguise possible pitch inaccuracies.  I don't consider the use of auto-tune being a "slap in the face" of anyone, particularly musicians (who may or may not have integrity); it's just another recording effect.  I suppose we all hear different things though.

Can anyone say auto-tune? Fail, this song and all songs using auto-tune as a pitch correcter are big slap in the faces of all true musicians with integrity.

Thanks for keeping up with the little video clip !!! 

 FWIW, I never tire hearing this tune. It's just got a great groove to it.

 zipper wrote: 
nuf said

Nice song, but loses points with me for Auto-tune on the vocal.

Chicane are under rated and this is another example of their fine work

reminds me of spring after a long dreary winter