Twirlin' in the kitchen. Do what you must do and do it well. Solid 8.

Nice lyrics.

Everybody in my church loves this beautiful cover originally from Bob Dylan's album Blood On The Tracks...
 

boy, yeah. i mean, i can about guarantee that neko did not cover this song because she heard it one day and said "ew, i can do that so much better". rather, i think she is paying beautiful tribute to a wonderful song by bob.

 bpkengor wrote: 
Wow, just wow.  I can understand people who can't take Dylan's voice.  I happen to love Dylan's singing...warts and all.  But to say the man shouldn't publish????

Give me Dylan any day. Celine Dion makes me wish I was on the Titanic.

 bpkengor wrote: 
Dude!  Where did you escape from?

 mikec09 wrote: 
guys with nasal voices like Dylan & Newman & Waits should not even be allow to record, much less publish.    We need more voices like Karen Carpenter & Celine Dion...

 bpkengor wrote: 
Neko Case vs. Bob Dylan?  I'll take Dylan's side any day, all day, dude!

Especially when it comes to listenability over the long haul . . .

No disrespect, bpkengor (people in glass houses shouldn't throw around witty moniker critiques) but I'm guessing you're in the camp of folks who don't like singers such as Randy Newman or Tom Waits because they are not necessarily the "usual" sound/tonality.

Give me singers like them any day. 

And btw . . . I'm not in the "only the original writer's version is good" camp . . . for ex., I like the Jose Feliciano version of "Light My Fire" better than the Doors . . . much more listenable over the years.

But anyway . . . nice to discuss music with you, dude! 

 mikec09 wrote: 
sorry mikec09 (what an unusual moniker?),  you're wrong.    This is very much a dramatic improvement on the dreary original version by a very overrated singer/songwriter.  And I use the term "singer/songwriter" very loosely!    More like a professional blackboard scratcher ...

Ouch . . . sorry Neko Case fans . . . this is dramatically not an improvement on Bob Dylan's version.  Oy!

It's pretty good so I gave it a 6.  Dylan's original is better.

 Gregorama wrote: 
Yes agreed but depends on the listener but having said that they would make an interesting duet.

This version of Dylan's song would segue with George Harrison's version of Dylan's "If Not For You" very nicely.

alright, I give in: just bumped it to 10.

 chelsiaann wrote: 
You need medication and FAST !!!  

I love Neko, but Dylan does this better.

I agree with Dylan comments... My view is a bit more sexist... A guy's take on the words is different from a woman's... same words, different meaning...  her version wouldn't be added to the soundtrack of "Wonder Boys"...

 vanmas wrote: 

The original version is almost always better.
But this is a sweet version
It kind of fits Neko

 vanmas wrote: 
Me too.  Except for "All along the Watchtower."   Hendrix transformed that tune.

Nice done... But Dylan take's the lead!
One of the most covered artists...
I like the originals more!

Makes one think, which Dylan cover is better - this or Sinead Lohen's To Ramona?

Neko sang this on "Austin City Limits" and that recording is far superior. It's even more stripped down than this and it just sparkles.

Great song...for little country swing....yee haw.

@ toterola, yah a fine woman, she could sing anything to me.. but not this one. FILLER.

 archrrone wrote: 
I agree...and I'm so NOT sorry Bob! It's the only way I can like a Bob Dylan tune....better still having NC singing it.

 fatcatjb wrote: 
Yeah, that was cool, but what gives with that wierd piano bridge (out of tune, intentionally?). And, maybe, kick the nicotine and just fire up a doobie instead.

Wendy Bucklew did a great cover of this.  Neko... not so much.