Proclivities (Carrboro, NC) | | Posted: Apr 14, 2011 - 19:51 | |
Shimmer wrote:POSEURS!
I guess they were as much "poseurs" as the guys depicted below were "tools"...  ...then again, all rock/pop stars are poseurs or tools to some extent, anyhow. |
|
ttburger3 (Corona Del Mar) | | Posted: Apr 14, 2011 - 19:45 | |
the Rolling Stones were a lot better when they were young. where they got the concept for this song is beyond me, but I love the melody, the simple arrangement and the fact that Mick Jagger's voice actually sounds good. . . . . and I've never even been to a renaissance fair
|
|
BHTMMan (Ankeny, Iowa) | | Posted: Apr 14, 2011 - 19:43 | |
A classic that is not played enough!
|
|
Hannio (Austin, TX) | | Posted: Mar 14, 2011 - 08:39 | |
tommyfly wrote: Guess what paulmack? Lay off the guy. He's just stating an opinion.
Indeed. Some people take it far too personally. |
|
Canlistener (Ontario Canada) | | Posted: Mar 14, 2011 - 08:38 | |
I always thought the Stones were awful, after hearing this I am very comfortable with my decision.
|
|
lemmoth (NYC) | | Posted: Mar 14, 2011 - 08:37 | |
Up next - Neil Young, Borrowed Tune???
|
|
socalhol (Seattle) | | Posted: Jan 10, 2011 - 17:21 | |
k_trout wrote:really hard to dance to
maybe try twirling around in a circle with some scarves in hand..........  |
|
tommyfly
| | Posted: Dec 10, 2010 - 03:25 | |
paulmack wrote: Guess what? I don't agree. Being as self-centered as you, I declare myself right, therefore you are wrong. How about that? Of course, I'm not that self-centered and I don't really care whether you like the song or not, doesn't affect my enjoyment of it anyway. But I still have a healthy dislike for intolerance. There are times when such an attitude blocks progress. I also hear that it's habit-forming.
Guess what paulmack? Lay off the guy. He's just stating an opinion. |
|
paulmack (the hissing swamps) | | Posted: Nov 08, 2010 - 08:34 | |
lsfeder wrote:Definitely not their best effort....
Guess what? I don't agree. Being as self-centered as you, I declare myself right, therefore you are wrong. How about that? Of course, I'm not that self-centered and I don't really care whether you like the song or not, doesn't affect my enjoyment of it anyway. But I still have a healthy dislike for intolerance. There are times when such an attitude blocks progress. I also hear that it's habit-forming. |
|
lsfeder (At the wheel of a Benzo) | | Posted: Nov 08, 2010 - 08:28 | |
Definitely not their best effort....
|
|
HazzeSwede (Vinyl Land) | | Posted: Nov 08, 2010 - 08:27 | |
Love this LP ! All of it.
|
|
TJOpootertoot (Toronto) | | Posted: Nov 08, 2010 - 08:26 | |
Yeah, Borrowed Tune has a lot more heart and soul than this number from The World's Greatest Rock and Roll Band (TM).
|
|
On_The_Beach (Vancouver BC, Bud) | | Posted: Aug 04, 2010 - 23:57 | |
lemmoth wrote:I'm singing this borrowed tune I took from the Rolling Stones
Nice reference, lemmoth. I'll take Neil's tune over this misguided cheese any day. |
|
Shimmer (Bethesda, MD) | | Posted: Aug 04, 2010 - 19:59 | |
|
k_trout (Dream State) | | Posted: May 01, 2010 - 10:07 | |
|
Detlaps (Littlerock, too close to Los Angeles) | | Posted: Jan 26, 2010 - 17:01 | |
Back when this album came out, Lady Jane, or just Jane, was slang for pot, grass, weed......
spanzo wrote:Also 'Lady Jane' was slang for female genitalia - as in one of DH Lawrence's dirty books "John Thomas and Lady Jane", which was an early version of Lady Chatterley's Lover which had been decensored a few years before this album came out ScopArch wrote:Lady Jane = Jane Boleyn sister-in law-of Anne Boleyn Lady Anne = Anne Boleyn, Janes sister and Henry the VIII's 2nd of six wives Lady Mary = Mary Boleyn, Annes half sister, and Mistress of Henry VIII There's a story here somewhere..... ">(click here) Proof once again of Jaggers penchant for English history It's good be King |
|
Papernapkin (Mountain View, CA) | | Posted: Jan 26, 2010 - 16:59 | |
Perfect tune... when you're wearing your puffy shirt.
|
|
johnjconn (chicago land) | | Posted: Jan 26, 2010 - 16:59 | |
|
lophrequa (the very edge of the land) | | Posted: Dec 26, 2009 - 06:57 | |
Geecheeboy wrote:Frankly a little goofy. had to scroll halfway down the page to find you and i'm with you - literally laughable. glad everyone else seems to get a kick out of it |
|
DaveInVA (VA) | | Posted: Aug 22, 2009 - 09:15 | |
The best song on the LP for me. I used to really like the Rotary Connections version of this song. Haven't heard that one in a long while...
|
|
spanzo
| | Posted: Aug 11, 2009 - 16:11 | |
Also 'Lady Jane' was slang for female genitalia - as in one of DH Lawrence's dirty books "John Thomas and Lady Jane", which was an early version of Lady Chatterley's Lover which had been decensored a few years before this album came out ScopArch wrote:Lady Jane = Jane Boleyn sister-in law-of Anne Boleyn Lady Anne = Anne Boleyn, Janes sister and Henry the VIII's 2nd of six wives Lady Mary = Mary Boleyn, Annes half sister, and Mistress of Henry VIII There's a story here somewhere..... ">(click here) Proof once again of Jaggers penchant for English history It's good be King |
|
lily34 (lexvegas) | | Posted: Jul 21, 2009 - 19:00 | |
romeotuma wrote:
This song is soooo good for the ears...
indeed. |
|
bachbeet
| | Posted: Jul 21, 2009 - 18:53 | |
Not the best song from that album but still pretty good. And, it did sound quite different from most rock at the time. Plus, it showed a softer side to the Stones.
|
|
(former member) (hotel in Las Vegas) | | Posted: Jul 21, 2009 - 18:47 | |
This song is soooo good for the ears...
|
|
slowhand (NC) | | Posted: May 19, 2009 - 05:27 | |
|
aaoaoo (Sacramento) | | Posted: Apr 17, 2009 - 14:40 | |
It's a shame that dulcimer-tuning technology didn't really take off until the 1970s.
|
|
coffee-eyes (Right outside of Boston) | | Posted: Apr 17, 2009 - 14:39 | |
Ya know, I really hate this song, but yet I find myself singing along with it every damn time. There must be three brain cells buried in there that enjoy this for some odd reason.
Plus, my sister and I used to refer to each other as "Lady Jane," as in "You're not so smart, Lady Jane!" So there's that too.
|
|
Papernapkin (Mountain View, CA) | | Posted: Apr 17, 2009 - 14:39 | |
Geecheeboy wrote:Frankly a little goofy. Tis true, my Lord. |
|
Geecheeboy (under a crescent moon and palmetto tree) | | Posted: Apr 17, 2009 - 14:38 | |
|
More_Cowbell (North of Chicago, IL, USA) | | Posted: Apr 17, 2009 - 14:37 | |
|