[ ]      [ ]

  
  
  
[ click here for album info & other purchase options ]
Artist:Vieux Farka Toure [ more ]
Song:Bullet the Blue Sky
Album:In the Name of Love - Africa Celebrates U2 [ info ]
Released:2008
Last Played:Mar 21, 2012 - 04:38
Avg. Rating:5.7  (Total Ratings: 519)
Your Rating:(Log in above to Rate)
Ratings Dist:
1 votes: 49 (9.4%)2 votes: 28 (5.4%)3 votes: 39 (7.5%)4 votes: 28 (5.4%)5 votes: 38 (7.3%)6 votes: 79 (15%)7 votes: 154 (30%)8 votes: 72 (14%)9 votes: 22 (4.2%)10 votes: 10 (1.9%)
Rate Song:

Share this song   |   Tweet this song
Artist Website  |  Artist Search  |  Lyrics Search
Wikipedia Entry  |  Artist Info (AMG)

162 comments for this song:spacerLog in above to post your comment

aspicer
(Chicago, IL)
Posted: Feb 18, 2012 - 09:50 

Good stuff - definitely gets the nod!  Has a cool more spiritual element to it....
OCDHG
(High on a mountain)
Posted: Jan 17, 2012 - 15:52 

Vocals > Bono
Guitar < The Edge
TuneAgeWhereWoof
Posted: Jan 17, 2012 - 15:51 

Very cool, I like the diversity.  Keep it up RP!
lee_sf
(sea level)
Posted: Dec 16, 2011 - 23:05 

Pleasantly weird; one of those tunes you wonder- would it be as interesting if it didn't mess with your memory of the original? I have to go listen to the original U2 album now, though. 

woodchuk
(Lunar Lagrange point L1)
Posted: Sep 13, 2011 - 03:34 

IMHO, superior to the U2 version.   Great song!   Love the spoken French parts and that Malian groove..

unclehud
(300 feet above the planet)
Posted: Aug 12, 2011 - 18:45 

 Byronape wrote:
...  I do take issue with the whole idea of all of Africa celebrating U2...  Kinda like all of China celebrating Angelina Jolie for adopting a kid.
 
I'm guessing that a whole lot of Africa never heard of U2, and is therefore not celebrating U2.  Seems to me they're probably too busy running from bloody revolutions, trying to stay on the good side of dictators and institutionalized corruption, or trying to find their next meal.  Don't have time to be celebrating U2 anyway.

But that's all speculation on my part.
Baby_M
(a 100+-year old building in downtown Akron, Ohio)
Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 09:47 

Cool.  Comes at it from a completely different direction than the original.
sfearll
(Sunny SoCal)
Posted: Apr 08, 2011 - 12:25 

I love the funky covers played here on RP...! 
Byronape
(Purgatory)
Posted: Apr 08, 2011 - 12:24 

 lootunes wrote:
I don't like this.  But I kind of like this.  Can't decide.
 
I agree with this.  Despite my general contempt for anything U2 (at least late 90's and up U2), this is an interesting cover.  I do take issue with the whole idea of all of Africa celebrating U2...  Kinda like all of China celebrating Angelina Jolie for adopting a kid.

S-curvy
(Lovely Alameda, the Isle of Style)
Posted: Jan 04, 2011 - 09:35 

To Derekd, sorry bro', but I say "Yes."

What??  Yes???  Yes, an affirmation of my enjoyment of this tune.  Bump to "8" on the rater scale.
ziggytrix
(Dallas, TX)
Posted: Jan 04, 2011 - 09:32 

The "ooh ooh ooohs" sound a bit... constipated....

Sorry.

It's like a screeching sour note in the middle of an orchestra... really distracts.
pcicatar
(Portland, OR)
Posted: Jan 04, 2011 - 09:28 

Interesting enough for me want to hear the rest of the album.  My ear caught the chorus and I'm happy to've heard this left of center cover!
Nerubo
(Denver, CO)
Posted: Oct 01, 2010 - 11:26 

This is a great version: I was enjoying the jam aspect, when I suddenly noticed it was a cover of Bullet the Blue Sky.  That's the best kind of cover:  the kind where you don't realize what song it is until you're well into it. 
jlind
(Chicago, IL)
Posted: Aug 30, 2010 - 11:33 

This is really bad, at least its followed by a good U2 song
rtrudeau
(Bay Area, California)
Posted: Jul 29, 2010 - 11:37 

 Poacher wrote:

No? 

You mean 'no' it is too short? Is is 'no' to covers? Or 'no' to . . . oh I give up. Why is it some commenters even bother to click the link to make a comment? And for that matter do they think anyone even gives a fuck?

Just wondering.

:) 
 

Just speculating here ... this song may be too foreign for some ears. But who knows really, with an insightful and eloquent comment like "no"? Sigh.
Webfoot
(Eugene, Oregon)
Posted: Jul 29, 2010 - 11:36 

I was thinking "cool cover."  Funny that "Cool" seems to be a common thread in the comments.  Cool.
Hannio
(Austin, TX)
Posted: Jul 29, 2010 - 11:34 

This is awesome.
Poacher
(Brighton, UK)
Posted: Mar 24, 2010 - 10:26 

 derekd wrote:
No.
 
No? 

You mean 'no' it is too short? Is is 'no' to covers? Or 'no' to . . . oh I give up. Why is it some commenters even bother to click the link to make a comment? And for that matter do they think anyone even gives a fuck?

Just wondering.

:) 
EssexTex
(Gitche Gumee)
Posted: Mar 24, 2010 - 10:25 

Crazy sex music....very nice.
lootunes
Posted: Mar 24, 2010 - 10:24 

I don't like this.  But I kind of like this.  Can't decide.
rssarma
Posted: Jan 20, 2010 - 10:33 

I really love this cover! It's amazing how well the artist has added to this song. I actually just bought this album on Amazon, thanks RP!

derekd
(Just Visiting This Planet)
Posted: Jan 20, 2010 - 10:30 

No.
crockydile
(Outer Spiral Arm, Milky Way)
Posted: Nov 18, 2009 - 14:37 

 zipper wrote:
way cooler than the original.
 
{#Beat}

1wolfy
(Mission Viejo California)
Posted: Sep 16, 2009 - 14:30 

Yes, it is cool...but the original is The Kind


zipper
Posted: Sep 16, 2009 - 14:23 

way cooler than the original.
vandal
(arriving somewhere, but not here. . .)
Posted: Sep 16, 2009 - 14:22 


this is so right. . .

unclehud
(300 feet above the planet)
Posted: Sep 16, 2009 - 14:22 

LOVE IT!  Heard a country/bluegrass version of this last month, and LOVED IT!  (Come on, you know you do, too!  You already know all the words!)

The concept of "outside it's America" seems to transcend language and musical genre.

... and today Bill follows it with a U2 tune.  Oh baby, do it to my ears ...

DaveInVA
(In a crumbling Queen Anne mansion in Damnville, VA)
Posted: Sep 16, 2009 - 14:20 

WTF?
LastChance
Posted: Sep 16, 2009 - 14:20 

Eeew.
LastChance
Posted: Jul 15, 2009 - 11:27 

This is just wrong.
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next