Now Playing:
loading...



[ ]      [ ]

      
[ click here for album info & other purchase options ]
Artist:Neil Young [ more ]
Song:Throw Your Hatred Down
Album:Mirror Ball [ album info ]
Released:1995
Last Played:Jul 31, 2010 - 12:41
Avg. Rating:6.8    (Total Ratings: 1001)
Your Rating:(Log in above to Rate)
Ratings Dist:
1 votes: 45 (4.5%)2 votes: 40 (4%)3 votes: 46 (4.6%)4 votes: 35 (3.5%)5 votes: 48 (4.8%)6 votes: 83 (8.3%)7 votes: 217 (22%)8 votes: 283 (28%)9 votes: 143 (14%)10 votes: 61 (6.1%)
Rate Song:

Artist Website  |  Request this song
Google Artist Search  |  Google Lyrics Search
Artist Info (AMG)  |  Song Info (SongMeanings)
Wikipedia Entry  |  Tour Schedule (Pollstar)

354 comments for this song:spacerLog in above to post your comment

MortimerS
Posted: Jul 31, 2010 - 12:44 

"Dressed in golden pants"  would've rhymed better.
Oh well.

Synth80s
(*Beautiful* Southern California (cough, choke, honk))
Posted: Jul 26, 2010 - 15:24 

I'm not a big fan of Neil Young, but I like the raw tone and overall rhythmic insistence of this song.
helgigermany
(Germany)
Posted: Jul 22, 2010 - 05:44 

 Dynai wrote:
Utter crap. Neil Young makes my ears bleed. I'm so tired of hearing him and Tom Petty from RP
 
I wonder why you join RP then!!

Dynai
Posted: Jul 18, 2010 - 17:42 

Utter crap. Neil Young makes my ears bleed. I'm so tired of hearing him and Tom Petty from RP
Cynaera
(South of Neanderthal)
Posted: Jul 18, 2010 - 17:35 

I love Neil Young when he rocks. I love him when he gets all political and righteously-indignant.  I love him, period. {#Sunny}{#Dancingbanana_2}
lwilkinson
(North Am-Home of the Last of the Rugged Individualists)
Posted: Jul 14, 2010 - 14:08 

 lwilkinson wrote:

"....da da da .....pick your hatred up ..... da da ..... pick your hatred of Neil Young uuuppppp... da dum da dum ....'

A virtual cacaphony of loud, senseless blather by the king of "I can't get past 1969"......

{#Yell}

 
My comment from a year ago still stands................................

 Gryn wrote:
Bill, for the love of good music.. Please stop playing this song.
 
"....da da da .....pick your hatred up ..... da da ..... pick your hatred of Neil Young uuuppppp... da dum da dum ....'

A virtual cacaphony of loud, senseless blather by the king of "I can't get past 1969"......

{#Yell}

Sjaaks
(Horst, Netherlands)
Posted: Jul 03, 2010 - 05:56 

 crockydile wrote:
I'm sick of this song. Not on par with his other stuff.
 
Maybe that's why i like this song so much. I'm not a Neil Young fan but mostly because i don't know the most of his work, this one really speaks to me...

Right on!!
9

k_trout
(Dream State)
Posted: Jun 20, 2010 - 08:41 

pearl jam and neil young - it rocks
walk
(SF)
Posted: Jun 16, 2010 - 20:50 

{#Meditate}


crockydile
(Outer Spiral Arm, Milky Way)
Posted: Jun 12, 2010 - 17:36 

I'm sick of this song. Not on par with his other stuff.
westslope
(BC coast)
Posted: Jun 12, 2010 - 17:35 

Regional nuclear war is next on the list.

Just one in a long string of low-probability, nasty consequence events.   Get your lead-lined bunkers built.  Gets your arms cache built up.

And just remember:  you can never kill enough civilians.


Businessgypsy
(Deepest, Darkest Florida)
Posted: Jun 03, 2010 - 18:56 

LowPhreak wrote:
Easy to say Mr. Right Wing Faux Tough Guy, when you have a job that pays enough to allow you to do that. Not what a large percentage of America has though.

And just wait until you get a major illness/surgery or injury. You'll be losing everything you have after you've paid for that wonderful, overpriced "insurance" you bought.

Keep voting right wing, dumb ass, and keep dreaming for the day when you'll have an excuse to shoot someone with your pop gun.
I said all that? Appears not. Read my comment again, and I'll gladly engage in a factual and respectful discussion of my actual statements, if that's what you'd like. Maybe we'd both learn something. I'm not afraid of ideas.

Hannio
(Austin, TX)
Posted: May 19, 2010 - 13:30 

 LowPhreak wrote:


Easy to say Mr. Right Wing Faux Tough Guy, when you have a job that pays enough to allow you to do that. Not what a large percentage of America has though.

And just wait until you get a major illness/surgery or injury. You'll be losing everything you have after you've paid for that wonderful, overpriced "insurance" you bought.

Keep voting right wing, dumb ass, and keep dreaming for the day when you'll have an excuse to shoot someone with your pop gun.
 

Dude... throw your hatred down!
lemmoth
(NYC)
Posted: Apr 30, 2010 - 17:28 

Great freaking band.   Will be seeing them again soon - without the lead singer from this tune
LowPhreak
(United Corporate States of Neo-Feudal Amurika, Inc.)
Posted: Apr 22, 2010 - 05:18 

 Businessgypsy wrote:
Lots of experts on why people in the US own guns posting here. A few even have actual on the street experience as citizens.

I'm trained, licensed, practiced and armed to protect myself and innocents in harm's way, not to overthrow the government. It's about taking personal responsibility for my well being - like working to eat, house myself and pay for healthcare.

What?     They don't?

Well, that explains a lot.


 

Easy to say Mr. Right Wing Faux Tough Guy, when you have a job that pays enough to allow you to do that. Not what a large percentage of America has though.

And just wait until you get a major illness/surgery or injury. You'll be losing everything you have after you've paid for that wonderful, overpriced "insurance" you bought.

Keep voting right wing, dumb ass, and keep dreaming for the day when you'll have an excuse to shoot someone with your pop gun.


Businessgypsy
(Deepest, Darkest Florida)
Posted: Apr 17, 2010 - 19:28 

Lots of experts on why people in the US own guns posting here. A few even have actual on the street experience as citizens.

I'm trained, licensed, practiced and armed to protect myself and innocents in harm's way, not to overthrow the government. It's about taking personal responsibility for my well being - like working to eat, house myself and pay for healthcare.

What?     They don't?

Well, that explains a lot.


oldviolin
(Esse quam videri)
Posted: Apr 17, 2010 - 19:15 

Do it now
Zep
(The big country)
Posted: Apr 14, 2010 - 07:42 

 On_The_Beach wrote:
I have no problem with the right to bare arms:
http://www.financegetspersonal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/keira-knightley.jpg

 

Bare arms

meloman
(Warsaw, Poland)
Posted: Apr 14, 2010 - 07:41 

 lmic wrote:

In our twisted logic here in "TLotF," we demand the right to bear arms—and believe me, we're gonna get it but good after McDonald v. Chicago is decided under a Roberts Court—for the simple reason that we don't trust our gov't. And why should we? Unlike in the European countries, American governance is currently constituted of the special interests, by the special interests, for the special interests.

Why we don't just insist that government do its job for the people, instead of making a popular fetish of caching weapons to defend against it, is beyond me.

  

I don't think people in Europe have any illusions. We don't trust our governments, but the difference is we've been aware of government duplicity for a long time. We know that people get elected to make sure they feather their own nests. Americans are much more naïve. Until recently most of them actually believed all that "democracy" propaganda and now that they are learning the truth, they're all "up in arms." I see it as a sign of growing up. Every society has to do it. We in Europe have had many centuries to deal with our kings, queens, emperors, dictators, etc. Now it's the turn of the Americans to deal with the liars in their government and figure out what to do about their crumbling empire. Good luck.


EniwaMan
(Hokkaido, Japan)
Posted: Apr 10, 2010 - 06:32 

 lmic wrote:
Why we don't just insist that government do its job for the people, instead of making a popular fetish of caching weapons to defend against it, is beyond me.
 
This is one of the most incisive, spot-on observations I've read in a while.  And concise!  That's a load of cultural/political baggage packed into one sentence.  Since you framed it in the form of a question (sort of), I'll take a crack at it.

I think people feel powerless and defeated by enemies and forces beyond their comprehension:  the financial fat-cats and their clients in D.C.; globalism and the resulting displacement of an industrial class; rising secularism and strident atheism, which they interpret as an affront to the very essence of their identities as Americans; the impotency, loss of power and prestige of the U.S. in geopolitics; the shattering of the American Myth in countless ways.  The list goes on and on.  

Just as with urban gang-bangers who feel empowered by their weaponry, the tea-party folks, survivalists, militia-types, First Amendment obsessives, and other "fetishists," as you aptly refer to them, look to their weaponry as the last measure of their ability to bend the flow of history to their liking.  Obama was right when he said these people "cling" to guns and religion when they feel distressed and powerless.  In "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" American mythology, redress of grievances and injustice is always just a courageous leader away.  But now people see the hyper-partisanship and the influence peddling in D.C. as two sides of the same dysfunctional coin, so there's no point in looking to Washington for help.  What's left?  Pitchforks. Cynicism.  Conspiracy theories.  And a whole "news" network dedicated to perpetuating and exploiting this rage for its own selfish ends.

(What got into me?  I don't think of myself as being very political.  Hmmm...)


leathepea
(Hickory, NC)
Posted: Mar 26, 2010 - 12:03 

Man, he is a mud duck on the guitar.
Geecheeboy
(under a crescent moon and palmetto tree)
Posted: Mar 26, 2010 - 12:01 

Well, it's got a good beat, but doesn't seem much like a dance song...
sqqqrly
(Baboosic Lake, NH)
Posted: Mar 26, 2010 - 12:01 

 On_The_Beach wrote:
I have no problem with the right to bare arms:
http://www.financegetspersonal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/keira-knightley.jpg

  Yuck!  She looks like a manikin from the Dawn of the Dead set.....and her right arm is on wrong.

leathepea
(Hickory, NC)
Posted: Mar 26, 2010 - 11:59 

 On_The_Beach wrote:
I have no problem with the right to bare arms:
http://www.financegetspersonal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/keira-knightley.jpg

  Someone get her a cheeseburger quick!!!


cely
(the tropics of discourse)
Posted: Mar 22, 2010 - 20:11 

Judging from the comments, I guess this song gets the "Sweet Home Alabama" type worked up.  For the rest of us, if you haven't run across Mirrorball it's a great record, and this is not at all the best song on it.
And, by the way, about the comment before me.  Yes to bare arms, but that woman is closer to naked bones. She needs to meet a good cook. 

On_The_Beach
(Vancouver BC, Bud)
Posted: Mar 21, 2010 - 15:56 

I have no problem with the right to bare arms:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_y9hosLA0JOg/SdmZBeNIHQI/AAAAAAAABks/82veMbm8tGM/s400/keira-knightley-hot+babe.jpg

horstman
(Syracuse, New York)
Posted: Mar 21, 2010 - 15:16 

 fredriley wrote:

 The Land of the Free (strange place - you can get an assault weapon on the high street but can't smoke in public, go figure), then you have an arms race, and perps regularly go about their business tooled up with increasing firepower.  


Fred,

The chance of me or my family getting gunned down is pretty rare, but the obnoxious behavior of smokers lighting up where ever they please and stinking up restaurants and bars is now against the law in New York State.

So now I can go out in public and not stink up my clothes and increase my chances of a cold due to smokers. Yeah, we have guns, and it is a problem,but it's not just an American problem.

At least we don't have people strapping bombs to their chests and walking into shopping malls, schools, and churches.

{#Shhh}
lmic
(Harmless Little Bunny)
Posted: Mar 21, 2010 - 15:10 

 fredriley wrote:
 Crime in the UK, whatever you think of it, rarely involves gun use, such that when it does it's news. And I write this from the "gun capital of the UK", and even with that unwanted moniker shooting incidents barely reach into the tens annually. Contrast that with a comparable city in TLotF .
 
In our twisted logic here in "TLotF," we demand the right to bear arms—and believe me, we're gonna get it but good after McDonald v. Chicago is decided under a Roberts Court—for the simple reason that we don't trust our gov't. And why should we? Unlike in the European countries, American governance is currently constituted of the special interests, by the special interests, for the special interests.

Why we don't just insist that government do its job for the people, instead of making a popular fetish of caching weapons to defend against it, is beyond me.

Hannio
(Austin, TX)
Posted: Mar 17, 2010 - 05:20 

 unclehud wrote:

I thought we already did.  The sixth commandment (for some of us) and laws in every nation (for the rest of us).
 

Sorry.  I should have used the sarcasm emoticon.
westslope
(BC coast)
Posted: Mar 09, 2010 - 15:08 

fredriley,,

Many citizens are armed in places like Cuba and Switzerland but gun crimes are rare.

 

But, yes, no guns, no shooting, including accidental shootings.


Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12  Next