handyrae
(Zero Point Field) | | Posted: Jun 16, 2010 - 06:44 | |
This wouldn't be so bad if it didn't go on so darn long.
|
|
mrdak
(Middle GA) | | Posted: May 15, 2010 - 12:06 | |
|
sirdroseph
(Tokyo) | | Posted: May 15, 2010 - 12:03 | |
Other than Blood, Sugar, Sex, Magic; Red Hot Chili Peppers = Suckage 2 -> 1 |
|
crockydile
(Outer Spiral Arm, Milky Way) | | Posted: May 15, 2010 - 12:03 | |
OHMish wrote:This deserves a red hot sparkling 2
It sure got one from me. This should have been left in the studio. |
|
romeotuma
(hotel in Las Vegas) | | Posted: Apr 13, 2010 - 17:28 | |
Netto wrote:oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah,  Agreed!
|
|
Netto
(Khimki, Russia) | | Posted: Apr 13, 2010 - 17:25 | |
romeotuma wrote:
This song is good for the ears...
oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah, Agreed! |
|
crockydile
(Outer Spiral Arm, Milky Way) | | Posted: Apr 13, 2010 - 17:23 | |
|
mybaldbird
| | Posted: Feb 09, 2010 - 14:02 | |
holborne wrote: LorraineV1 wrote: Firstly, I love this song. Love the Peppers new and old. I also love that it followed Higher Ground by Stevie Wonder.
Second—- holborne.... you need to lighten up. You know exactly what tomeck meant by "kinda gay".
No, I guess I don't. Why don't you explain it? Jeeze, you are a dense one aren't you? You see, english is a crazy language. It's full of idioms and words with multitudes of meanings. Sure, there are some really annoying trends in our language, like the misuse of "their, there, and they're" or "your and you're". However, considering you are old enough to know how to post to an internet forum, you should know by now that the word "gay" does not solely refer to homosexuals. Hell, it didn't even refer to homosexuals at all for a long time, instead it just referred to being happy. Now it has yet another meaning as a general derogatory statement. You should realize that there are people out there who use the word "gay" in such a way who have nothing against homosexuals, it's just a term they grew up with and for whatever reason they use it. There are also a lot of people who hate homosexuals and use "gay" to make people like you mad. Those people are assholes, don't give them any more power than they already have. |
|
romeotuma
(hotel in Las Vegas) | | Posted: Feb 09, 2010 - 13:38 | |
This song is good for the ears...
|
|
vandal
(arriving somewhere, but not here. . .) | | Posted: Feb 09, 2010 - 13:37 | |
LowPhreak wrote:*yawn*
bump |
|
sirdroseph
(Outer Mongolia) | | Posted: Feb 09, 2010 - 13:37 | |
lumper5 wrote:a sad ghost ...
Good call! Other than the album Blood,Sugar,Sex,Magic, they pretty much blow chunks! |
|
johnjconn
(chicago land) | | Posted: Feb 09, 2010 - 13:37 | |
typical terrible tune from RHCP
yuk
|
|
lumper5
(Carrboro, NC) | | Posted: Feb 09, 2010 - 13:36 | |
|
LowPhreak
(United States of Duplicitous Tools) | | Posted: Jan 09, 2010 - 02:51 | |
|
kilroyjoe3
(Charlottesville, VA) | | Posted: Dec 08, 2009 - 18:13 | |
Now that this song isn't on the radio every three hours, like the summer they released this album, I kinda enjoy it. It was OVERPLAYED-O, now its OK-O.
5 from me.
|
|
helgigermany
(Germany) | | Posted: Nov 07, 2009 - 08:50 | |
|
jcioban
(Between NYC and Boston) | | Posted: Nov 07, 2009 - 08:46 | |
I think it is interesting when bands stray from their trademark. I find this album pretty interesting, but people are really bashing it. Personally, I think RHCP is maturing rather nicely....
|
|
pkimbrel
(Normal, IL) | | Posted: Oct 06, 2009 - 19:54 | |
lawman wrote:Lush bass!  I must agree - that is a redeeming quality in the recording. |
|
pkimbrel
(Normal, IL) | | Posted: Oct 06, 2009 - 19:53 | |
Is this supposed to be an attempt reggae? I mean... seriously? Wow. California reggae. Ahem... be back in a bit...
|
|
dmax
(Doofenshmirtz Evil Incorporated) | | Posted: Oct 06, 2009 - 19:53 | |
Incredibly formulaic.
The pseudo-rapping
long slow portion
somewhat energetic break
back to the same.
Yuk. And really trite chords.
|
|
OHMish
(Copenhagen) | | Posted: Sep 05, 2009 - 07:46 | |
This deserves a red hot sparkling 2
|
|
wrangler
(swamps of jersey) | | Posted: Jun 02, 2009 - 07:20 | |
nope, no thanks, not a fan.
|
|
ilibjorn
(Tucson, AZ) | | Posted: Jun 02, 2009 - 07:20 | |
Gregorama wrote:I think they are in a rut. They used to really rock, but now seem stuck in this pop drivel stage.
I agree. Was really diappointed by last double cd. Love their spirit though. Great in concert. |
|
papaman
(Downstate New Mexico) | | Posted: Jun 02, 2009 - 07:20 | |
Hey-o, listen what I say-o. Really? Happy Gilmore: Hey, why don't I just go eat some hay, make things out of clay, lay by the bay? I just may! What'd ya say? |
|
tdola2
| | Posted: Jun 02, 2009 - 07:19 | |
hey oh - no, no
give it a ze-ro
hey oh
|
|
randomprime
| | Posted: Jun 02, 2009 - 07:17 | |
capandjudy wrote:
Cheer up. Every day above ground is a good day.
Hey Oh, listen what she say-oh. |
|
lawman
(Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) | | Posted: Jun 02, 2009 - 07:17 | |
Lush bass! |
|
holborne
(New York) | | Posted: May 03, 2009 - 09:24 | |
LorraineV1 wrote:Firstly, I love this song. Love the Peppers new and old. I also love that it followed Higher Ground by Stevie Wonder.
Second—- holborne.... you need to lighten up. You know exactly what tomeck meant by "kinda gay".
No, I guess I don't. Why don't you explain it? |
|
LorraineV1
| | Posted: May 01, 2009 - 14:16 | |
Firstly, I love this song. Love the Peppers new and old. I also love that it followed Higher Ground by Stevie Wonder.
Second—- holborne.... you need to lighten up. You know exactly what tomeck meant by "kinda gay".
holborne wrote:
Oh, cute! Do you teach your kids to refer to unworthy things by referring to them as "black" or "Jewish" too, by any chance?
|
|
holborne
(New York) | | Posted: May 01, 2009 - 14:12 | |
tomeck wrote:Yea! The more I listen to it, the more I like it. At first I thought it's kinda gay, but now i turn speakers louder, when I hear it. Strong 8. Oh, cute! Do you teach your kids to refer to unworthy things by referring to them as "black" or "Jewish" too, by any chance? |
|
; "Tongue")