RP Listener Forum

RAFT  »   Philosophy (Meaty Metaphysical Munchables!)
Post to this Topic
Proclivities  (Paris of the Piedmont)
Jan 27, 2016 - 10:54am

philo
 
 
Proclivities  (Paris of the Piedmont)
Sep 24, 2015 - 11:19am

1
2
 
haresfur  (The Golden Triangle Australia)
Aug 16, 2015 - 3:29pm

 Prodigal_SOB wrote:



 
I thought he was going to say that the back transform proves it is most ethical to kill the smallest child.
 
Prodigal_SOB  (Back Home Again in Indiana)
Aug 16, 2015 - 12:14pm



 
ScottFromWyoming  (Powell)
Jun 5, 2015 - 7:00am

 RichardPrins wrote:
What did Nietzsche mean when he said 'if you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back at you'?

 
That was a good discussion. And I had that book when I was a kid
 
RichardPrins
Jun 5, 2015 - 5:44am

Consciousness Began When the Gods Stopped Speaking
How Julian Jaynes’ famous 1970s theory is faring in the neuroscience age
 
RichardPrins
Feb 23, 2015 - 7:14pm

What did Nietzsche mean when he said 'if you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back at you'?
 
RichardPrins
Jan 28, 2015 - 5:56pm


 
Prodigal_SOB  (Back Home Again in Indiana)
Nov 3, 2014 - 8:44am





 
RichardPrins
Oct 27, 2014 - 3:08pm

The Cold Logic of Drunk People - The Atlantic
At a bar in France, researchers made people answer questions about philosophy. The more intoxicated the subject, the more utilitarian he or she was likely to be.
 
Prodigal_SOB  (Back Home Again in Indiana)
Oct 23, 2014 - 5:23pm

  
  Have I ever told the one about the poor misguided philosophy student who was always putting Descartes before Horace?
 
 
Prodigal_SOB  (Back Home Again in Indiana)
Oct 17, 2014 - 10:58am

 RichardPrins wrote:
{#Mrgreen}

Nobody really needs instruction for that, as it sort of comes naturally. I bet even amoebae know how to do it (in its most basic form).
 
  There are people in this town getting doctorates in folklore.  That's always seemed a bit odd to me too.

 
 
RichardPrins
Oct 17, 2014 - 10:44am

 Prodigal_SOB wrote:
You know this is something I really don't think I need that much instruction in.
 
{#Mrgreen}

Nobody really needs instruction for that, as it sort of comes naturally. I bet even amoebae know how to do it (in its most basic form).


 
Prodigal_SOB  (Back Home Again in Indiana)
Oct 17, 2014 - 9:48am

 RichardPrins wrote: 
You know this is something I really don't think I need that much instruction in.
 
 
RichardPrins
Oct 17, 2014 - 8:41am

Heil Hedonism! {#Drunk}
 
RichardPrins
Oct 8, 2014 - 7:31pm

Chimpanzee 'personhood' effort begins new court battle | Science/AAAS | News

Chimpanzees are back in court. Today, judges in New York state heard the first in a series of appeals attempting to grant “legal personhood” to the animals. The case is part of a larger effort by an animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) to free a variety of creatures—from research chimps to aquarium dolphins—from captivity.

Late last year, NhRP filed lawsuits in three New York lower courts on behalf of four captive chimpanzees in the state. Two—Tommy and Kiko—live in cages on private property, according to the group. The other two—Hercules and Leo—are lab chimps at Stony Brook University. The litigation was spearheaded by Steven Wise, a prominent animal rights lawyer and NhRP’s founder, who spent years consulting with scientists, policy experts, and other lawyers to hone a strategy. His group settled on filing a writ of habeas corpus, which allows a person being held captive to have a say in court. Any judge that granted the writ would be tacitly acknowledging that a chimpanzee is a legal person and thus must be freed from its current confines.

That didn’t happen: All three lower courts dismissed the lawsuits. So NhRP appealed, and Wise argued the first of those appeals this afternoon. Making his case for Tommy in front of a five-judge panel and a packed courthouse, he contended that chimpanzees are so cognitively and genetically similar to humans that they deserve a fundamental right to bodily liberty. He wants Tommy—and eventually the other chimpanzees—moved to a sanctuary in Florida. Wise didn’t have any pushback: Tommy’s owners didn’t appear in court, and they didn’t file legal briefs challenging the case.

“It went as well as we could have hoped,” says NhRP’s executive director, Natalie Prosin, who was also at the hearing. “The judges were really engaged. They had obviously read our briefs and materials, and they asked really intelligent questions.”

Prosin is also heartened by a move the court made in July. In response to NhRP’s concerns that Tommy’s owners would try to move him out of state to avoid further litigation, the judges unanimously granted a preliminary injunction to prevent any move. “That was a major victory for us,” Prosin says. “It means the court thinks our appeal has a decent chance of success.”

That’s a fair assessment, says Richard Cupp, a law professor at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California, and a noted opponent of personhood for animals. But he still doesn’t think NhRP is going to win. “The weight of precedent and reasoning goes so strongly against these cases,” says Cupp, who would rather see a focus on animal welfare than animal rights. “Animal personhood is an artificial and unrealistic concept,” he says. “Language won’t help these creatures—human responsibility will.” (...)


 
RichardPrins
Aug 18, 2014 - 6:22pm


 
haresfur  (The Golden Triangle Australia)
Jul 1, 2014 - 6:30pm

 RichardPrins wrote:


 
{#Lol}
 
RichardPrins
Jul 1, 2014 - 6:18pm


 
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19  Next