The Beatles
Dig A Pony
Let It Be
(1970)

Buy CD
169 comments:lyrics:add your comment
kcar
May 06, 2013 - 23:03
joelbb wrote:

Dear PA and midreaming,
1. They were not a "Boy Band". They were in their mid-20s when they took off in '63, not mid-teens, They'd played in the rock dungeons of Liverpool and Hamburg for several years before becoming popular.
2. The band contained significant musical talent: 2 terrific and one mediocre song writers, 4 vocalists and one of the best rock drummers going. Do recall that McCartney eventually wrote classical pieces performed by the London Symphony. Also note that Ringo still tours w/ Starr's All-Stars, an ad hoc group of superstars who are chosen from the many who desire to play (non-Beatles) music with the man.
3. They were graced with an extraordinary supporting cast, first their early manager Brian Epstein and later George Martin, possibly THE best rock-pop producer ever.
4. If you really think they wrote/sang/performed bubble gum, you've obviously never listened to "Revolver", many critics' pick for best pop album ever cut. It's filled with complexly arranged tunes that often spoke pithily to the cultural realities of the time.
5. Also please recall that, as cliched as they seem to be 40 - 45 years later, along with "Revolver", "Rubber Soul" (their C&W album), "Sgt. Pepper" and "Abbey Road" were monstrously influential, an influence which reverberates in music that you actually like quite a lot. However, you lack the historical referents to perceive that influence (i.e, you are ignorant twits).
6. Finally, note that from the time Hendrix went to London in '65 to the time he died in '70 was only 75% of the longevity of the Beatles; Janis Joplin's popular career was about the same; Kurt Cobain's even shorter. Meanwhile, Barry Manilow has persisted for decades. Obviously, much like penises, it's not the length but the quality of its employment that marks a good musical career. I suspect you know little about either.


Joel, you pretty much nailed it apart from the snarky bit at the end. The Beatles paid their dues in Hamburg (Ringo aside). They were tight, professional band. Brian Epstein cleaned and polished them up for the Brits and American audiences, but he just helped them get their collective foot in the door. The Beatles' talent, discipline and drive put them on top. Remember that Epstein killed himself in part because he realized the lads no longer needed him--they'd taken control of their careers and music.

I'll bet that every success in rock, pop and rap is due to a mix of hype and talent. People will always debate about which musician or band got by on hype only and which had lasting talent. The Beatles were lucky in part because they showed up near the beginning of mass-marketed rock and youth culture and part of their fame was probably partly due to being one of the first superstar bands. Admittedly, they were famous for being famous.

But the Beatles set trends and changed the rules of popular music and their impact has lasted for decades. Overhyped bands don't get to do that.


helgigermany
May 06, 2013 - 22:48
bachbeet wrote:
One of their weakest.

agree!


joelbb
Oct 30, 2012 - 23:04
midreaming wrote:
PA1749 wrote:
bachbeet
Oct 30, 2012 - 22:35
One of their weakest.


(former member)
Sep 29, 2012 - 11:08

This song is soooo good it puts a spring in my step this autumn day...




(former member)
Aug 28, 2012 - 22:14


This song is soooo good it puts a spring in my step this summer night...




Proclivities
Jul 28, 2012 - 13:12
unclehud wrote:
PA1749 wrote:
midreaming
Jul 28, 2012 - 12:28
PA1749 wrote:
I expect to take A LOT of heat for this but....

Ok, I like the Beatles. I think they made some great music. But, I just don't understand the magnitude of the hype.

1. Boy band from England makes it big doing teeny bopper bubble gum rock.
2. Boy band discovers drugs.
3. Boy band gets experimental and goes off the deep end.
4. Boy band falls apart.
5. The longevity of the entire band was only 7 years. (even New Kids on the Block was together for 10 years)
h8rhater wrote:
Stingray
May 26, 2012 - 05:24
half as nice!


donnyballgame
Apr 24, 2012 - 12:03
Comparing The Beatles to NKOTB is like comparing Chuck Yeager to Flash Gordon. Yeah, they both went fast, but one looked a bit hokey (can you guess which one?)






neuticle
Apr 24, 2012 - 11:54
"Like"

2cats wrote:

Bill, we need a "Like" button on here.






(former member)
Mar 23, 2012 - 18:22


This song is soooo good it puts a spring in my step this spring evening...




Stratocaster
Jan 25, 2012 - 18:09
On_The_Beach wrote:

Hopefully there'll be an official release of the Let it Be movie on DVD soon, if only for the rooftop concert footage. As I understand it the versions that are floating around are well-packaged bootlegs or VHS to DVD transfers.

I have had the DVD for years. Ordered off eBay but was shipped from Europe.


2cats
Jan 20, 2012 - 07:52
drsteevo wrote:
Gotta agree with what Bill said when he played this a few weeks ago; It is probably John Lennon's best vocal performance in a Beatles song.

PA1749, I can't even respond to someone who would compare The Beatles to NKOTB.

However, to respond to the other folks here, I don't think you had to grow up with the Beatles to appreciate them. I was a small child when they broke up but I don't think they are over-rated in any way.

Bill, we need a "Like" button on here.



drsteevo
Jan 20, 2012 - 07:45
Gotta agree with what Bill said when he played this a few weeks ago; It is probably John Lennon's best vocal performance in a Beatles song.

PA1749, I can't even respond to someone who would compare The Beatles to NKOTB.

However, to respond to the other folks here, I don't think you had to grow up with the Beatles to appreciate them. I was a small child when they broke up but I don't think they are over-rated in any way.




unclehud
Dec 19, 2011 - 15:00
PA1749 wrote:
I expect to take A LOT of heat for this but....

No heat from me, bud.

No fault of yours, but you weren't around to feel the global effect they had on those living during the 1960's and 1970s — whether we were old or young back then — and that global optimism is a major reason they are still so widely accepted.

You're an English teacher, so I'm a bit surprised you don't appreciate the poetry that serves as most Beatles lyrics, but, hey, to each his own.

Here's how I would judge them, using your NKOTB comparison: in 50 more years, which do you think you'll hear on the radio, in elevators, on movie soundtracks, re-recorded by big-name music acts, or covered by honky-tonk bar bands? (" They say it's your birthday, da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da ...")



(former member)
Nov 17, 2011 - 20:47


Everybody in my hotel room loves this song...





ziggytrix
May 12, 2011 - 16:48
kaybee wrote:

I must agree with much of what you say Rooney.

A lot of what the Beatles did was deceptively complex. I tried singing along with this and it's really, really hard to sing this song! Maybe that's why no-one else has covered it!

Paul's harmonies are relatively easy to sing. But trying to sing like John is rough!



cohifi
Apr 11, 2011 - 02:28
The other benefit to RP: wildlife photos


HazzeSwede
Apr 11, 2011 - 02:18
  kaybee wrote:

  I must agree with much of what you say Rooney.

A lot of what the Beatles did was deceptively complex.  I tried singing along with this and it's really, really hard to sing this song!   Maybe that's why no-one else has covered it!
 
...some can !






View this page on our desktop website