| RedGuitar wrote: Apparently, it's a bonus track on the deluxe edition. Seems to be Target only |
rtreeApr 19, 2013 - 14:01 | Snorah has awakened! |
| Everyone in my pants loves this whole album. |
| She's so young to have that voice and the obvious ability to use it well. |
| Sure is windy in here |
| Moved her up to a 6. second listening |
| calypsus_1 wrote: It is not my intention to dwell too much on this subject, the troubled and confusing stage that crosses the artistic life of this artist, because I have already made it clear what I think about it. However, I do not want let answer you . Do not wait from me, either now or in the future, the "politically correct", the "convenient", the " innocent sympathy ", the "infatuation", about any artist who plays here. And if there are exceptions, it is because of my sentimental side. I have for me, each musical work that is being proposed by an artist, is unique, and it is like the first. And when analyzing consciously this work, we must put aside the credits, merits, successes already achieved, awards, the commercial weight of the name in the market, the celebrity. Staying distant and exempt from these restrictions, the most often subvert and distort, benefit or harm, the analysis of concrete work. The main "sin" of the latter album, is a mistake to think that the artist can resolve the situation, with a few studio sessions with ingenious and easy, and even vulgar, musical solutions, and presenting them as if they were the result of musical development, the culmination of many years of work, a decade, justifying it as a requirement to provide change of musical and artistic direction. We all know that after reaching a certain level of commercial success, the artists brake intense fighting, either by competition, new talent emerging, for maintaining the "status" by the pressure of the objectives of the business, and contract enforcement inherent. In the field of music can not improvise everything, not everything can "over the knee" because the expectations generated by this artist were high, and listen and meditate on the last proposed album, there is a huge deficit of creativity/ inspiration , maturity , uncertainty on course and style, the matrix musical, beyond that the songs were not sufficiently worked the instrumental level, because the basis on which they are conceived, not allow to go further. "When we do not have a dog, we hunted with cat". No, thanks. Only our "I sentimental" makes us, perhaps, even get a little attached to this artist, as always we feel about our first love. I also think, after passing the phase of this disc, of precipitate and occasional character, with more reflection, and means of support, adequate musicians, etc, Norah might be able to shine again. By the way, say, for a young lady of 33 years old, it would be nice to go over to the gym, jogging, and taking care of a proper diet to avoid having to wear "kilts" in their performances live on stage .... Now ( On_The_Beach) , about the "out of context", you are. That you are decontextualize what I said, why are you removing a phrase of my entire comment. An ability to "smart-ass". Not pass. Then I'll remind you again, my entire comment , and maybe now you understand better .... calypsus_1 wrote: |
| On_The_Beach wrote: Oh sure, quote him out of context! . It is not my intention to dwell too much on this subject, the troubled and confusing stage that crosses the artistic life of this artist, because I have already made it clear what I think about it. However, I do not want let answer you . Do not wait from me, either now or in the future, the "politically correct", the "convenient", the " innocent sympathy ", the "infatuation", about any artist who plays here. And if there are exceptions, it is because of my sentimental side. I have for me, each musical work that is being proposed by an artist, is unique, and it is like the first. And when analyzing consciously this work, we must put aside the credits, merits, successes already achieved, awards, the commercial weight of the name in the market, the celebrity. Staying distant and exempt from these restrictions, the most often subvert and distort, benefit or harm, the analysis of concrete work. The main "sin" of the latter album, is a mistake to think that the artist can resolve the situation, with a few studio sessions with ingenious and easy, and even vulgar, musical solutions, and presenting them as if they were the result of musical development, the culmination of many years of work, a decade, justifying it as a requirement to provide change of musical and artistic direction. We all know that after reaching a certain level of commercial success, the artists brake intense fighting, either by competition, new talent emerging, for maintaining the "status" by the pressure of the objectives of the business, and contract enforcement inherent. In the field of music can not improvise everything, not everything can "over the knee" because the expectations generated by this artist were high, and listen and meditate on the last proposed album, there is a huge deficit of creativity/ inspiration , maturity , uncertainty on course and style, the matrix musical, beyond that the songs were not sufficiently worked the instrumental level, because the basis on which they are conceived, not allow to go further. "When we do not have a dog, we hunted with cat". No, thanks. Only our "I sentimental" makes us, perhaps, even get a little attached to this artist, as always we feel about our first love. I also think, after passing the phase of this disc, of precipitate and occasional character, with more reflection, and means of support, adequate musicians, etc, Norah might be able to shine again. By the way, say, for a young lady of 33 years old, it would be nice to go over to the gym, jogging, and taking care of a proper diet to avoid having to wear "kilts" in their performances live on stage .... Now ( On_The_Beach) , about the "out of context", you are. That you are decontextualize what I said, why are you removing a phrase of my entire comment. An ability to "smart-ass". Not pass. Then I'll remind you again, my entire comment , and maybe now you understand better .... calypsus_1 wrote: |
| RedGuitar wrote: Apparently, it's a bonus track on the deluxe edition. nice - best track on the album and it's not "on" the album. So, where does that leave the rest of us who paid for the cd? Classy move, Norah. I now feel zero guilt about illegally downloading this song. |
| BillG wrote: calypsus_1 wrote: |
BillGJan 03, 2013 - 14:51 | calypsus_1 wrote: And you remember what I'll say now: The audience will be very alert and expectant, not to say "on the back foot" with the work that the artist Norah Jones may submit in the future. Is it, "the first time, anyone can fall, but the second one only falls whoever". exactly! er, wait a minute... |
bam23Nov 28, 2012 - 19:38 | calypsus_1 wrote: Your generosity and kindness. You can get "right in picture". But not so. I'm obviously a different perspective about "doing thing differently." Evil things are when an artist needs the permittivity and complacency of fans. Everything on the contrary, an artist needs rigor and demands constant from the audience, just like the artists remain on alert, and awake to new challenges. "she's a cutie?", but surely it is, and it was never in question, everything in its right place. I'm in "the first row" of those who are sad and surprised by the circumstances that led to the artist Norah J. choose to follow this path lately. But I try not to mix and confuse, analysis and artistic rigor, with sympathy. And you remember what I'll say now: The audience will be very alert and expectant, not to say "on the back foot" with the work that the artist Norah Jones may submit in the future. Is it, "the first time, anyone can fall, but the second one only falls whoever". I'm sorry to say this, would not be so sincere, go so far, but the truth is that content, of the last record of Norah Jones, negatively affected in me, the level of interest and hearing, not only now, as records discographic previous, as i fear affecting decisively in the future. I hope not. Well, it's a right entertaining slog of a read, that much is true. . cmarcan wrote: |
| I like Nora Jones in all of her musical incarnations. heard her doing a wide spectrum mix of music in one set that just killed me. she sang songs ranging from dreamy slow smooth jazz through pop all the way to boot scooting country, without bobbling or dropping the vibe. it was one hell of a set, and worth every penny for the price of admission.... |
| paulmack wrote: Can someone please tell me how to purchase this song? It doesn't appear on any track listing I can find in the usual places - Amazon, iTunes, eMusic, etc. Help! And thanks in advance. Apparently, it's a bonus track on the deluxe edition. |
| paulmack wrote: Can someone please tell me how to purchase this song? It doesn't appear on any track listing I can find in the usual places - Amazon, iTunes, eMusic, etc. Help! And thanks in advance. There's no song on the album by that title, at least what I saw on Amazon.com MP3 downloads. Perhaps it's a lyric in one of the songs? |
| Hilarious comment! I gave up reading the subject post about 1/2 way through... triviagal wrote: I'm on meds. After reading a couple sentences of this comment my brain started reading it in Yoda's voice. |
| She sleeps through a lot of her songs. This is one of the worst. Auto-pilot Norah. Phoned it in. Sleep walking. |
| Do not worry, so you stay also so beautiful...... . triviagal wrote: I'm on meds. After reading a couple sentences of this comment my brain started reading it in Yoda's voice. |
| I have this album, and I want to like it, but I just can't. The singing and musicianship is tops, but It just seems like she's getting a breakup off her chest, and it's not fun to listen to. |
| Sorry, read a bit further and see that it is an iTunes/Target bonus track - it will be available elsewhere I guess sometime in late October or thereabouts. |