RP Listener Forum - Radio Paradise - eclectic commercial free Internet radio
[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Name My Band - Antigone - Dec 21, 2014 - 5:59pm
 
~*Funny Cats*~ - MsJudi - Dec 21, 2014 - 5:58pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - BlueHeronDruid - Dec 21, 2014 - 5:15pm
 
how do you feel right now? - Antigone - Dec 21, 2014 - 4:30pm
 
Small-town news - haresfur - Dec 21, 2014 - 2:52pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Steely_D - Dec 21, 2014 - 2:27pm
 
• • •  What's For Dinner ? • • •  - DaveInVA - Dec 21, 2014 - 2:27pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - triskele - Dec 21, 2014 - 2:04pm
 
Kindle Fire HDX app broken, repeats songs, plays two song... - freemusic - Dec 21, 2014 - 1:32pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - Alexandra - Dec 21, 2014 - 12:37pm
 
What's that smell? - Proclivities - Dec 21, 2014 - 11:20am
 
How's the weather? - Steve - Dec 21, 2014 - 10:04am
 
Funny Videos - buzz - Dec 21, 2014 - 9:22am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - RichardPrins - Dec 21, 2014 - 8:40am
 
What did you have for dinner? - Lazy8 - Dec 21, 2014 - 8:23am
 
Facebook Tips - Red_Dragon - Dec 21, 2014 - 8:11am
 
It is time to visit Morocco - Coaxial - Dec 21, 2014 - 7:59am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Proclivities - Dec 21, 2014 - 7:41am
 
Spambags on RP - Proclivities - Dec 21, 2014 - 4:57am
 
Maps • Google • GeoGuessr - ScottFromWyoming - Dec 21, 2014 - 2:18am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - Coaxial - Dec 20, 2014 - 9:19pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos; Please Limit to 510 ... - haresfur - Dec 20, 2014 - 5:50pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Alexandra - Dec 20, 2014 - 5:29pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - Alexandra - Dec 20, 2014 - 5:19pm
 
TV shows you watch - DaveInVA - Dec 20, 2014 - 5:17pm
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - Dec 20, 2014 - 4:09pm
 
Song stuck in your head? - ColdMiser - Dec 20, 2014 - 3:47pm
 
What makes you smile? - triskele - Dec 20, 2014 - 2:28pm
 
Tales from the RAFT - Coaxial - Dec 20, 2014 - 2:23pm
 
To me , Torture is ............ - Red_Dragon - Dec 20, 2014 - 1:44pm
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Dec 20, 2014 - 12:32pm
 
Putinphilia - sirdroseph - Dec 20, 2014 - 11:31am
 
What do you want to drive? - Sean-E-Sean - Dec 20, 2014 - 9:58am
 
Tech & Science - haresfur - Dec 20, 2014 - 9:56am
 
Today in History - DaveInVA - Dec 20, 2014 - 7:32am
 
The War On Drugs = Fail - Coaxial - Dec 20, 2014 - 6:53am
 
WTF??!! - sirdroseph - Dec 20, 2014 - 5:14am
 
Last gas price paid? - marko86 - Dec 20, 2014 - 3:21am
 
Those Lovable Policemen - RichardPrins - Dec 19, 2014 - 6:36pm
 
Things You Thought Today - PoundPuppy - Dec 19, 2014 - 6:18pm
 
Geeky Jokes - haresfur - Dec 19, 2014 - 5:06pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - islander - Dec 19, 2014 - 4:35pm
 
Make triskele smile - triskele - Dec 19, 2014 - 3:57pm
 
Israel - RichardPrins - Dec 19, 2014 - 3:44pm
 
city kitties/cat doctor... rescues - olivertwist - Dec 19, 2014 - 3:04pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Alexandra - Dec 19, 2014 - 1:55pm
 
Breaking News - Coaxial - Dec 19, 2014 - 1:06pm
 
Quotations - sirdroseph - Dec 19, 2014 - 11:47am
 
Cuba - RichardPrins - Dec 19, 2014 - 10:41am
 
NEED A COMPUTER GEEK! - ScottFromWyoming - Dec 19, 2014 - 10:40am
 
Obama's Second Term - sirdroseph - Dec 19, 2014 - 9:39am
 
2016 Elections - RichardPrins - Dec 19, 2014 - 9:01am
 
Those lovable acronym guys & gals - RichardPrins - Dec 19, 2014 - 8:21am
 
Ebola - miamizsun - Dec 19, 2014 - 8:20am
 
Art Show - Prodigal_SOB - Dec 19, 2014 - 8:09am
 
Movie Recommendation - sirdroseph - Dec 19, 2014 - 7:17am
 
Let's build a city - miamizsun - Dec 19, 2014 - 7:10am
 
Oklahoma Questions and Points of Interest - sirdroseph - Dec 19, 2014 - 6:45am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - sirdroseph - Dec 19, 2014 - 4:58am
 
RPeep News You Should Know - sirdroseph - Dec 19, 2014 - 4:41am
 
Russia - sirdroseph - Dec 19, 2014 - 4:02am
 
hallucinogenic drugs - kurtster - Dec 19, 2014 - 2:18am
 
Venezuela - RichardPrins - Dec 18, 2014 - 6:45pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - Dec 18, 2014 - 4:44pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - DaveInVA - Dec 18, 2014 - 3:49pm
 
When I need a Laugh I ... - ScottFromWyoming - Dec 18, 2014 - 1:04pm
 
The Global War on Terror - RichardPrins - Dec 18, 2014 - 11:59am
 
Holiday food gift ideas - bokey - Dec 18, 2014 - 11:01am
 
SIngle Payer Health Now! Sen. Bernie Sanders sums up - miamizsun - Dec 18, 2014 - 10:32am
 
Aliens: The Answer To Everything! - sirdroseph - Dec 18, 2014 - 9:47am
 
And the good news is.... - sirdroseph - Dec 18, 2014 - 9:41am
 
The War On You - sirdroseph - Dec 18, 2014 - 9:17am
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - sirdroseph - Dec 18, 2014 - 9:02am
 
::Famous Birthdays:: - sirdroseph - Dec 18, 2014 - 8:30am
 
Me and Mrs. Jones: Got To Give It Up - Red_Dragon - Dec 18, 2014 - 8:19am
 
(a public service of RP)
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Another Gun rampage in The U.S Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 57, 58, 59  Next
Post to this Topic
aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Oct 18, 2013 - 12:56pm

Details Emerge on Sandy Hook Shooting, Items Found in Lanza Rooms
RichardPrins
Anti-Procrustean
RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 25, 2013 - 2:36pm

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights
UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United States signed a U.N. Arms Trade Treaty regulating the $70 billion global trade in conventional arms on Wednesday and the Obama administration sought to allay the fears of the powerful U.S. gun lobby which says the pact will violate the constitutional rights of Americans.

The treaty, which relates only to cross-border trade and aims to keep weapons out of the hands of human rights abusers and criminals, still requires ratification by the U.S. Senate and has been attacked by the influential gun rights group the National Rifle Association (NRA).

Among the NRA arguments against the treaty are that it undermines American sovereignty and that it disregards the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees citizens the right to bear arms.

The United States, the world's No. 1 arms exporter, became the 91st country to sign when U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry put pen to paper on the sidelines of the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations.

"It's significant that the United States, which amounts for about 80 percent of the world's export in arms, has signed," Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop told a news conference. (...)
O Canada?
sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Sep 23, 2013 - 4:06am

 RichardPrins wrote:
I think that's the gist, however there are always practical problems, for instance when you say no country or entity should be arming (...). Arming another sovereign nation usually just involves commerce (or in some other cases ideological sponsorship/subsidy). And despite grandiose claims to the contrary, very little ethics appears to be involved.

Disarming is an even more complex issue (which of course also includes WMDs).


 

True, I also think it is incredibly hypocritical for the US or any other nation to try to disarm WMDs in the manner they are attempting without including Israel and any other country friend or foe that houses chemical and biological weapons.  And regarding nuclear, it does not take a brain surgeon to figure out that the only thing standing between US invasion in countries that have conflicts with the US is nuclear capability, past has proven that.  If I were Iran, I would be working overtime to become a nuclear nation which is what they are doing to be sure.
RichardPrins
Anti-Procrustean
RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 23, 2013 - 3:13am

 sirdroseph wrote:
Should the US intervene in the Syrian or any other Civil War? A simple no will suffice. I am consistent in my position. No country or entity should be arming or disarming another sovereign nation and certainly not its citizens. I think to hold that position and to be against military intervention by the US is quite hypocritical. 

I think that's the gist, however there are always practical problems, for instance when you say no country or entity should be arming (...). Arming another sovereign nation usually just involves commerce (or in some other cases ideological sponsorship/subsidy). And despite grandiose claims to the contrary, very little ethics appears to be involved.

Disarming is an even more complex issue (which of course also includes WMDs).
RichardPrins
Anti-Procrustean
RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 23, 2013 - 3:05am

 kurtster wrote:
 RichardPrins wrote:
I don't see any links to those exact statistics (or for that matter to your particular claim on ratios), so I don't know whether they are true or not.

Neither

.
From the article you posted ...

One more figure. There have been fewer than 20 terror-related deaths on American soil since 9/11 and about 364,000 deaths caused by privately owned firearms. If any European nation had such a record and persisted in addressing only the first figure, while ignoring the second, you can bet your last pound that the State Department would be warning against travel to that country and no American would set foot in it without body armour.


Going to the link in the paragraph above from the article led me to this ...

As with the Boston killings, each of these murders robbed a person of his or her life and left a family devastated. But compared to other types of violent deaths, the numbers are small. In 2010, to take a year at random, there were 11,078 firearm homicides in the United States, and 19,392 firearm suicides. In the same year, there were 544 homicides by suffocation and 89 by fire, plus 79 intentional poisonings and 52 intentional drownings. Statistically speaking, people in American had a higher chance of being killed by malaria than by terrorists. (These figures come from the Centers for Disease Control.)


That is the basis for my ratio of 2:1 and the rest of my calculations.  I used your article and followed the links provided within the article for the article's conclusions of saying that the number of deaths in the US over the period in question warranted the conclusion of saying the number of gun deaths warranted a comparison to the number of deaths in a civil war of some sort and a travel warning as seen above.

Just using the facts you provided.

I'm done for the night.  Later ...

 
That talks about 2010, not the period of '68-Now, which were the statistics in question.

And no, I don't follow every link that's in an article, especially when it appears as not directly relevant (to the overall statistics). Your link in question (above) leads to the stats of terrorism (and compared to the insane amount of resources spent) which is a familiar (risk) argument that has been used by skeptics of GWOT since 2001.
sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Sep 23, 2013 - 2:18am

 RichardPrins wrote:
American gun use is out of control. Shouldn't the world intervene?
The death toll from firearms in the US suggests that the country is gripped by civil war
{#Mrgreen}

 
Should the US intervene in the Syrian or any other Civil War? A simple no will suffice. I am consistent in my position. No country or entity should be arming or disarming another sovereign nation and certainly not its citizens. I think to hold that position and to be against military intervention by the US is quite hypocritical.


kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Sep 22, 2013 - 11:41pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
I don't see any links to those exact statistics (or for that matter to your particular claim on ratios), so I don't know whether they are true or not.

Neither

.
From the article you posted ...

One more figure. There have been fewer than 20 terror-related deaths on American soil since 9/11 and about 364,000 deaths caused by privately owned firearms. If any European nation had such a record and persisted in addressing only the first figure, while ignoring the second, you can bet your last pound that the State Department would be warning against travel to that country and no American would set foot in it without body armour.


Going to the link in the paragraph above from the article led me to this ...

As with the Boston killings, each of these murders robbed a person of his or her life and left a family devastated. But compared to other types of violent deaths, the numbers are small. In 2010, to take a year at random, there were 11,078 firearm homicides in the United States, and 19,392 firearm suicides. In the same year, there were 544 homicides by suffocation and 89 by fire, plus 79 intentional poisonings and 52 intentional drownings. Statistically speaking, people in American had a higher chance of being killed by malaria than by terrorists. (These figures come from the Centers for Disease Control.)


That is the basis for my ratio of 2:1 and the rest of my calculations.  I used your article and followed the links provided within the article for the article's conclusions of saying that the number of deaths in the US over the period in question warranted the conclusion of saying the number of gun deaths warranted a comparison to the number of deaths in a civil war of some sort and a travel warning as seen above.

Just using the facts you provided.

I'm done for the night.  Later ...
RichardPrins
Anti-Procrustean
RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 22, 2013 - 8:36pm

 kurtster wrote:
So answer my question regarding my analysis of the stats in the article you posted.
 
Are you trying to turn a sentiment with deliberate dishonesty or did you fail to read your own reference source all the way through ? 

I don't see any links to those exact statistics (or for that matter to your particular claim on ratios), so I don't know whether they are true or not.

Neither.
kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Sep 22, 2013 - 8:23pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
My (unanswered) question was obviously about your false assertion of my position. The rest is the usual UN paranoia, which has been amply addressed in the past.


On the bolded we clearly disagree and your (reference) article is the type of language used within the SAT.  The SAT if the US ratified it would allow the UN to come in immediately and put Chicago under UN imposed matial law.  Read it.  Its very explicit.

I edited my reply and did answer your question while you were composing the above.

So answer my question regarding my analysis of the stats in the article you posted.
 
Are you trying to turn a sentiment with deliberate dishonesty or did you fail to read your own reference source all the way through ?


RichardPrins
Anti-Procrustean
RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 22, 2013 - 8:08pm

 kurtster wrote:
About your position, my intepretation of the UN's or both ? 

My (unanswered) question was obviously about your false assertion of my position. The rest is the usual UN paranoia, which has been amply addressed in the past.
kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Sep 22, 2013 - 8:00pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

Yes.

 

I was concluding based upon the articles you have posted over the years.  Its as simple as that.  Its hard to tell where you personally stand on many things.
RichardPrins
Anti-Procrustean
RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 22, 2013 - 7:50pm

 kurtster wrote:
Am I wrong ?
 
Yes.
kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Sep 22, 2013 - 7:45pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

What lead you to believe that I would actually advocate such a thing?

 
Am I wrong ?
RichardPrins
Anti-Procrustean
RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 22, 2013 - 7:33pm

 kurtster wrote:
(...) It may wake a few people up to what you and the UN are advocating for us Americans in order to take away our guns. (...)
 
What lead you to believe that I would actually advocate such a thing?
kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Sep 22, 2013 - 7:18pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
American gun use is out of control. Shouldn't the world intervene?
The death toll from firearms in the US suggests that the country is gripped by civil war
{#Mrgreen}

 
Yep bash away.  Its OK.

The article you cite is making the case for UN intervention as mentioned in the highly debated Small Arms Treaty.  I have read the entire treaty.  Those that say we have nothing to fear regarding the SAT should read his link and then read the treaty.  It may wake a few people up to what you and the UN are advocating for us Americans in order to take away our guns.

Your article cites some pretty amazing facts when left unexamined.

To absorb the scale of the mayhem, it's worth trying to guess the death toll of all the wars in American history since the War of Independence began in 1775, and follow that by estimating the number killed by firearms in the US since the day that Robert F. Kennedy was shot in 1968 by a .22 Iver-Johnson handgun, wielded by Sirhan Sirhan. The figures from Congressional Research Service, plus recent statistics from icasualties.org, tell us that from the first casualties in the battle of Lexington to recent operations in Afghanistan, the toll is 1,171,177. By contrast, the number killed by firearms, including suicides, since 1968, according to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention and the FBI, is 1,384,171.


Note the bolded, including suicides.  I went deeper into the article to discover what the admitted ratio of suicide to homicide is. Its well over a 2:1 ratio.  So back that number minus the suicides down to 480k, or about 11k per year.  More people die from cars than firearm homicides on a 2:1 ratio.  While everylife is precious, 11k out of 300 million is extremely small.

You're being extremely dishonest in citing an article that includes a highly inflating number of suicide deaths to make the case for an outbreak of violence that resembles a civil war for crissakes.  If you want to have an honest discussion, use meaningful and honest numbers.

Are you trying to turn a sentiment with deliberate dishonesty or did you fail to read your own source all the way through ?

Just like the Navy Yard shootings, the first reports were an assault weapon, since we have learned it was a shotgun.  A shot gun that our VP Biden said everyone should have and please shoot through your front door first without looking to see who was on the other side.


RichardPrins
Anti-Procrustean
RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 22, 2013 - 6:29pm

American gun use is out of control. Shouldn't the world intervene?
The death toll from firearms in the US suggests that the country is gripped by civil war
{#Mrgreen}
kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Sep 19, 2013 - 1:43pm

 aflanigan wrote: 
and ?
meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female
Zodiac: Gemini


Posted: Sep 19, 2013 - 10:03am

 aflanigan wrote: 

thank you.
aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Sep 19, 2013 - 9:29am

This Other Town
hippiechick
Did you ever grow anything in the garden of your mind?
hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female
Zodiac: Cancer
Chinese Yr: Buffalo


Posted: Apr 11, 2013 - 6:31am

New Research Confirms Gun Rampages Are Rising—and Armed Civilians Don't Stop Them


Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 57, 58, 59  Next