RP Listener Forum - Radio Paradise - eclectic commercial free Internet radio
[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

OUR CATS!! - DaveInVA - Jan 25, 2015 - 12:11pm
 
Economix - RichardPrins - Jan 25, 2015 - 11:38am
 
What Did You Do Today? - triskele - Jan 25, 2015 - 11:36am
 
How's the weather? - islander - Jan 25, 2015 - 11:34am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Red_Dragon - Jan 25, 2015 - 11:15am
 
Baseball, anyone? - Prodigal_SOB - Jan 25, 2015 - 11:06am
 
Overheard - ScottN - Jan 25, 2015 - 9:41am
 
The Dragons' Roost - triskele - Jan 25, 2015 - 9:31am
 
Obama's Second Term - Steely_D - Jan 25, 2015 - 9:11am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - Steely_D - Jan 25, 2015 - 8:46am
 
That's good advice - JrzyTmata - Jan 25, 2015 - 8:15am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Jan 25, 2015 - 8:15am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Yonder - Jan 25, 2015 - 7:58am
 
Favourite Movie Scene - Red_Dragon - Jan 25, 2015 - 7:39am
 
Name My Band - Antigone - Jan 25, 2015 - 5:31am
 
For Jrzy! - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 25, 2015 - 5:11am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos; Please Limit to 510 ... - Alchemist - Jan 25, 2015 - 12:56am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Jan 24, 2015 - 11:34pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - laozilover - Jan 24, 2015 - 9:36pm
 
Celebrity Deaths - DaveInVA - Jan 24, 2015 - 7:30pm
 
What's the first concert you ever went to? - Alexandra - Jan 24, 2015 - 7:21pm
 
Separated At Birth...? - Red_Dragon - Jan 24, 2015 - 7:18pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - RichardPrins - Jan 24, 2015 - 6:58pm
 
how do you feel right now? - Beaker - Jan 24, 2015 - 6:39pm
 
Tomato Gardens - oldviolin - Jan 24, 2015 - 2:10pm
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Jan 24, 2015 - 2:06pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jan 24, 2015 - 1:56pm
 
Birds' nest - haresfur - Jan 24, 2015 - 1:45pm
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - RichardPrins - Jan 24, 2015 - 1:32pm
 
Today in History - DaveInVA - Jan 24, 2015 - 10:34am
 
Things You Thought Today - Prodigal_SOB - Jan 24, 2015 - 8:39am
 
Triskele and The Grateful Dead - Alexandra - Jan 24, 2015 - 8:29am
 
What did you have for dinner? - DaveInVA - Jan 24, 2015 - 8:21am
 
RP App for Android - stonecrab - Jan 24, 2015 - 7:16am
 
Amazon Prime Members - Free Streaming of Selected Movies ... - islander - Jan 24, 2015 - 6:47am
 
What's in a name? - Proclivities - Jan 24, 2015 - 6:04am
 
Canada Eh??? - marko86 - Jan 24, 2015 - 5:04am
 
Coffee - miamizsun - Jan 24, 2015 - 4:54am
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - Jan 23, 2015 - 9:04pm
 
Books read recently - ScottN - Jan 23, 2015 - 8:42pm
 
Maps • Google • GeoGuessr - thedoctork - Jan 23, 2015 - 7:55pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - geoff_morphini - Jan 23, 2015 - 6:45pm
 
• • •  What's For Dinner ? • • •  - DaveInVA - Jan 23, 2015 - 4:35pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - islander - Jan 23, 2015 - 3:40pm
 
Beer - bokey - Jan 23, 2015 - 3:31pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - Beaker - Jan 23, 2015 - 2:16pm
 
Your Office - Coaxial - Jan 23, 2015 - 1:56pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - Beaker - Jan 23, 2015 - 1:14pm
 
Way Cool Video - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 23, 2015 - 1:05pm
 
Saudi Arabia - RichardPrins - Jan 23, 2015 - 12:11pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - Alexandra - Jan 23, 2015 - 11:32am
 
Help!!!!!!!! - edieraye - Jan 23, 2015 - 10:55am
 
Creepy - Proclivities - Jan 23, 2015 - 10:50am
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - bokey - Jan 23, 2015 - 9:49am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Jan 23, 2015 - 9:40am
 
Graphic designers, ho's! - Proclivities - Jan 23, 2015 - 9:05am
 
The List of Reasons Why Schlabby Hates People - oldviolin - Jan 23, 2015 - 8:59am
 
Movie Recommendation - oldviolin - Jan 23, 2015 - 8:32am
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - Proclivities - Jan 23, 2015 - 8:09am
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - Coaxial - Jan 23, 2015 - 7:43am
 
Is Cash Socially Unacceptable? - aflanigan - Jan 23, 2015 - 7:16am
 
Make triskele smile - Coaxial - Jan 23, 2015 - 6:47am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - RichardPrins - Jan 23, 2015 - 3:00am
 
PSD when streaming via iTunes? - beagle_ac - Jan 23, 2015 - 2:05am
 
Health Care - Coaxial - Jan 22, 2015 - 8:26pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Jan 22, 2015 - 7:18pm
 
Will you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - Yonder - Jan 22, 2015 - 5:24pm
 
John Lennon listens to RP?..... - Yonder - Jan 22, 2015 - 4:44pm
 
Climate Change - RichardPrins - Jan 22, 2015 - 3:22pm
 
Grammar Police Rap Sheet - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 22, 2015 - 1:21pm
 
The War On Drugs = Fail - Red_Dragon - Jan 22, 2015 - 12:07pm
 
fortune cookies, says: - Proclivities - Jan 22, 2015 - 11:01am
 
Yummy Snack - Proclivities - Jan 22, 2015 - 7:26am
 
Photos you haven't taken of yourself - miamizsun - Jan 22, 2015 - 6:49am
 
Cookware? - Proclivities - Jan 22, 2015 - 6:29am
 
(a public service of RP)
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Ask the Libertarian Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 134, 135, 136  Next
Post to this Topic
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 20, 2015 - 11:28am

ScottFromWyoming wrote:
I started (yesterday) to make a post about similar events within the GOP, the tea party calling others RINOs etc.

I do think it's time for the Tea Party to break off like they mean it.

I totally get why they don't, why Rand Paul and Justin Amash are still Republicans: the game is rigged against any parties but the incumbents.
Red_Dragon
y ddraig goch ddyry gychwyn
Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Redneck Nation


Posted: Jan 20, 2015 - 11:01am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

I started (yesterday) to make a post about similar events within the GOP, the tea party calling others RINOs etc.

I do think it's time for the Tea Party to break off like they mean it.

 
I'm glad I don't have a label I feel so strongly about.
ScottFromWyoming
I eat pints.
ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Pisces
Chinese Yr: Tiger


Posted: Jan 20, 2015 - 10:48am

 Lazy8 wrote:
She's complaining about people within the movement trying to be purity police, not stereotyping.
 
I started (yesterday) to make a post about similar events within the GOP, the tea party calling others RINOs etc.

I do think it's time for the Tea Party to break off like they mean it.
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 20, 2015 - 10:21am

aflanigan wrote:
The vagueness and subjectivity inherent in definitions (or the arbitrariness of taxonomies)  is not an issue that is unique to so-called "marginalized groups". It applies to every collection of individuals who like to think that they share certain beliefs or characteristics of mind with others.

With respect to the linked article, what she is complaining about is coarse, broad brush stereotyping. Welcome to politics in the US, Libertarian girl!

Besides, you guys aren't truly marginalized in the minds of people who matter (i.e. the editors of Wikipedia)

 
Today, Wikipedia. Tomorrow...the world! Use your best Jeremy Clarkson voice for that last bit.

She's complaining about people within the movement trying to be purity police, not stereotyping.

Marginalized groups have a tougher time with it than mainstream political groups. Republicans have Fox News as a mouthpiece, Democrats have...everything on TV but Fox News as a mouthpiece. Greens get certain corners of NPR, nutcase right-wingers get shortwave radio, libertarians get a couple of really good magazines nobody reads and some internet traffic.

When Matt Taibbi would rant against libertarians in Rolling Stone even if only one in ten of the magazine's readers slogged thru his articles his audience was more than all the libertarian publications combined.
aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Jan 20, 2015 - 8:02am

 Lazy8 wrote:
This is referring to an ongoing internal dispute over who, exactly, is a libertarian. I think it's relevant because (as a marginalized group) we've mostly been described by people who oppose (and often despise) us. 

 
The vagueness and subjectivity inherent in definitions (or the arbitrariness of taxonomies)  is not an issue that is unique to so-called "marginalized groups". It applies to every collection of individuals who like to think that they share certain beliefs or characteristics of mind with others.

With respect to the linked article, what she is complaining about is coarse, broad brush stereotyping. Welcome to politics in the US, Libertarian girl!

Besides, you guys aren't truly marginalized in the minds of people who matter (i.e. the editors of Wikipedia)

 


Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 19, 2015 - 9:28am

This is referring to an ongoing internal dispute over who, exactly, is a libertarian. I think it's relevant because (as a marginalized group) we've mostly been described by people who oppose (and often despise) us. Any movement that doesn't have an authority to set the boundaries on who belongs and who doesn't faces the same issue—define yourself, or your enemies will do it for you. Define yourself too narrowly and you stay marginal.

I also recommend the blog (Libertarian Girl) as a lively, fresh perspective on the movement.

Dear Libertarian Critics, I’m Totally Changing My Name to Republican Girl

Just kidding. I’m not actually changing my name to “Republican Girl.” Lately I’ve been taking a lot of heat from libertarians who think I should change my name to “Republican Girl” or “Rand Paul Girl.” I’ve also been told to change my name to “Anarchist Girl” and “Socialist Girl.” It’s pretty typical for a libertarian to get called an anarchist and a teabagger all in the same day. So I calculated how much I care about what people call me and quickly realized I don’t care at all.

So why am I writing this if I don’t care? Well, it’s simple. Libertarianism is a rich political philosophy that covers a wide range of differing opinions and principles, all centered on the primacy of human liberty in political life. Although I don’t care what people call me personally, I do care about people consistently perpetuating false ideas about who or what is or isn’t libertarian.

Libertarianism isn’t a cult but you might think so if you hear the way some people talk about it. Libertarians don’t have one set way of thinking or trying to achieve a freer society. But it also doesn’t mean “I can do whatever I want,” “only anarchists are truly libertarian,” “libertarians aren’t anarchists,” or “all you need to know is the Non-Aggression Principle.”

When you see someone saying those things it means he or she has managed to take an inspiring and complex philosophy and butcher it into a simplistic and mindless slogan to fit their personal preferences or lack of understanding.  To argue that every libertarian belongs to the Libertarian Party or that every libertarian is an anarchist would be entirely ahistorical and hence false. There is literally no truth to those statements at all and they need to die in a fire.

The cheapest trick of amateur thinkers is to purport to excommunicate others based on one’s own definition of a term. It’s easy, requires no serious thought, grants the feeling of power and authority, and makes for easy argument. It’s also shoddy and pointless. If libertarianism were nothing but an app that you could download into your brain, we could all give up the struggle of thinking. But serious people recognize that ideas work in a different way.


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2015 - 2:35pm

 aflanigan wrote:
This fellow decided to renounce the social contract that comes with living in the US. Now, apparently, he's upset at the consequences of his actions.

Bitcoin Jesus not allowed to reenter US

 
he was scheduled to speak at the miami bitcoin conference

so it's not like he's moving back or trying to move back

but the letter from the embassy denying him looks like a wtf

apparently he's been to london and toronto recently for conferences with no issues

edit: maybe his shirt pissed someone off




aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Jan 14, 2015 - 12:44pm

This fellow decided to renounce the social contract that comes with living in the US. Now, apparently, he's upset at the consequences of his actions.

Bitcoin Jesus not allowed to reenter US
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 8, 2015 - 3:17pm

a take from BHL...

Jacob Levy on the Charlie Hebdo Attack

 

 


BlueHeronDruid

BlueHeronDruid Avatar



Posted: Nov 30, 2014 - 2:35am

 Lazy8 wrote:
I have my problems with this (its equation of Objectivism with libertarianism and some loaded academic language for starters) but it's the first time I've seen social science research acknowledge that libertarianism is distinct from the left-right paradigm and that has a moral basis.

The Largest Study Ever of Libertarian Psychology

Posted by in Moral Foundations in Action, Politics, Videos

We’ve been deluged in recent years with research on the psychology (and brain structure) of liberals and conservatives. But very little is known about libertarians — an extremely important group in American politics that is not at home in either political party.

At YourMorals.org we have now addressed the gap. Unlike most surveys, which force everyone to place themselves on a Left-Right scale, we have always allowed our visitors to choose “libertarian” as an option.  Given our unique web platform, where people register and then take multiple surveys, we have amassed what we believe is the largest and most detailed dataset in the world on the personality traits of libertarians (as well as of liberals and conservatives).

In a project led by Ravi Iyer, we analyzed data from nearly twelve thousand self-described libertarians, and compared their responses to those of 21,000 conservatives and 97,000 liberals. The paper was just published last week in PLoS ONE. The findings largely confirm what libertarians have long said about themselves, but they also shed light on why some people and not others end up finding libertarian ideas appealing. Here are three of the major findings:



 
Nice, read. Plus, you had me at "its."
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 29, 2014 - 7:28pm

I have my problems with this (its equation of Objectivism with libertarianism and some loaded academic language for starters) but it's the first time I've seen social science research acknowledge that libertarianism is distinct from the left-right paradigm and that has a moral basis.

The Largest Study Ever of Libertarian Psychology

Posted by in Moral Foundations in Action, Politics, Videos

We’ve been deluged in recent years with research on the psychology (and brain structure) of liberals and conservatives. But very little is known about libertarians — an extremely important group in American politics that is not at home in either political party.

At YourMorals.org we have now addressed the gap. Unlike most surveys, which force everyone to place themselves on a Left-Right scale, we have always allowed our visitors to choose “libertarian” as an option.  Given our unique web platform, where people register and then take multiple surveys, we have amassed what we believe is the largest and most detailed dataset in the world on the personality traits of libertarians (as well as of liberals and conservatives).

In a project led by Ravi Iyer, we analyzed data from nearly twelve thousand self-described libertarians, and compared their responses to those of 21,000 conservatives and 97,000 liberals. The paper was just published last week in PLoS ONE. The findings largely confirm what libertarians have long said about themselves, but they also shed light on why some people and not others end up finding libertarian ideas appealing. Here are three of the major findings:


sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Sep 5, 2014 - 5:09am

Libertarians are on the ballot for every race in the upcoming mid terms.  Looking forward to casting my vote, it may help the Democrats, but really what difference does it make? No more voting for the lesser of 2 evils!{#Dancingbanana_2}
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 25, 2014 - 6:22am

 miamizsun wrote:

bridges? transitions?

 

see nader and this {#Arrowd}

 

Rand Paul talks with Reason about the future of the GOP, the need to reach the 80-million-strong Millennial Generation, why having a strong national defense doesn't mean constant military interventions, and what Washington, D.C. can learn from the entrepreneurial culture of Silicon Valley.




sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Jul 16, 2014 - 4:51am



I know the map is whack (freekin Ruskies{#Mrgreen}). 


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 16, 2014 - 9:08am

nader's take on some stuff...


The longtime consumer activist, recidivist presidential candidate, and several-time host of Saturday Night Live talks with Nick Gillespie about what he sees as a new libertarian-progressive attack on crony capitalism, whether GM cars were ever any damn good, and why the Democrats still wrongly insist that he cost Al Gore the 2000 presidential election. Oh yeah, and that article of his Reason published in the early 1970s.

It's a wide-ranging, spirited, fun, and at times contentious conversation.




miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 15, 2014 - 7:26am

 RichardPrins wrote: 
obviously i (and maybe you as well) would identify more with chad on these articles

it's easy to observe socoipolitical conditioning desensitizing and/or hyper-sensitizing issues and chad in a sense (and rightly so) is pointing that out

his delivery could be better, but he philosophically nails the war issue very well

i do understand will's position (probably widely held)

imho where most people in general depart philosophically/social sciences when the scientific method is trumped by political conditioning

will may feel that he (or others) are held hostage by the writings of another person who previously brought issues to light or championed a cause (i think this is a huge problem with all political stripes/labels)

my take in this case is that the necessary evolution of social science is held hostage by political dogma backed up by force

a core issue and huge failure of the social sciences is the lack of precise definitions

political rulers love to manipulate language

peace

p.s. i know there are trolls everywhere but the comments, especially on chad's piece are really sad (it's heartbreaking)

RichardPrins
Anti-Procrustean
RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Jun 14, 2014 - 1:51pm

Why I left libertarianism: An ethical critique of a limited ideology - Salon.com
Libertarianism as direct experience: My defense of a misunderstood philosophy - Salon.com
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 29, 2014 - 5:44am

here's a very "left" libertarian site that embraces a lot of what the recent conversation reflects (noenz i'm talking to you {#Biggrin} and i think i've referred you here before)

Libertarianism and the Poor

 

video capture here

zwolinski makes some good points here

hopefully food for thought

bridges? transitions?




miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 29, 2014 - 5:37am

 Red_Dragon wrote:
Do animals have rights?

 
are these tasty animals?

{#Wink}
kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Apr 4, 2014 - 1:58am

 rexi wrote:


Lazy thinks his flavour of libertarianism has more merit than that of, say Chomsky, because there are more flashy web sites with information about it. He then bemoans that nobody is sponsoring such a web site for him to voice his opinion. Presumably because he hopes that he could then reach more people and preach to them (ye, I knwo he wasn't being serious). But in any case, even though he denies it, he himself makes a straight connection between money, public exposure and subjective perception of merit.

Not sure what you mean with your last sentence. A common point of reference suggests natural rights and equal intelligence is something for rational agents. I don't believe either are representative of the real world, but many libertarians do. In fact, that's precisely what I'm criticizing Lazy for believing.

Further down you wrote: Rights are personal perceptions. And followed it with a, to my mind, sensible description. Do you consider yourself a libertarian? Because what you wrote there does not square with natural rights libertarianism at all.

 
I would like to consider myself a libertarian, but it is a very elusive position or ideal.  My thoughts are still evolving, especially at my advanced age.  I agree that there are many flavours.  I am not a governmental anarchist by any means.  I believe in laws and order.  Socially, perhaps.I lean that way.  What one does with their own body and between consenting informed adults that causes no harm to others outside of that agreement should not be subject to governmental review or oversight.  If you want to play Russian Roulette, fine, just make sure that your affairs are in order and that you have made arrangements to have someone clean up the mess after the game.  The government should not have to pay for that expense and your medical expenses should you survive due to faulty aim.  Its a you made your bed, now lie in it situation as far as I am concerned.  Cruel ?  No, just honest.  I also support people like Dr Kevorkian.

On the law and order.  That is where things get fuzzy and concrete at the same time.  I accept the US Constitution as written and amended.  Equal Protection, Due Process, the assumption of innocence until proven otherwise and the Right of Self Defense of life and personal property and the right to have honestly acquired personal property are things I consider inalienable.  Our Bill of Rights also is inalienable in my world.

With all the flavours of libertarianism, I do recognize that it is a micro application and balancing or interfacing it in the macro is where feathers get ruffled and acceptance breaks down.  It can be reconciled through our First Amendment however, if libertarianism is treated as a religion and has protected Free Speech.  The rights of the individual should trump the rights of a group.  I do not believe in eminent domain.  My property is mine.  If you want my property for your use or a public use, make me an offer for it that I cannot refuse and if I do not accept it, accept that, too.

Why cannot I use Peyote if I like ?  Why do I have to be a member of a certain ethnicity in order to partake ?  My individual want should not be interfered with because I do not belong to a sanctioned group.  I must also recognize and respect the needs of others in order to get what I want or need.  If I live in a community, I should turn down the stereo around 11 pm so my neighbors can sleep.  If I live miles from anyone, then there is no restriction or no restriction is justifiable.  I need to recognize that I must live within my means.  If i want to do what I want 24 / 7, then I must live far enough away from others so that I do not trespass on the needs of others, which in the example offered would be sleep. But if I cannot afford to live in a remote area, then I must accept the limits inherent to my location.  Would not that also be likened to Common Sense ?

I can keep going in the Macro and discuss the role and limits of government in my view, but I'll stop here for now for feedback, if any, before proceeding.  If the expressions above do not represent libertarian thoughts, what are they then ?
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 134, 135, 136  Next