RP Listener Forum - Radio Paradise - eclectic commercial free Internet radio
[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - sirdroseph - Oct 30, 2014 - 9:37am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - lily34 - Oct 30, 2014 - 9:31am
 
Stuff I've Said Out Loud - averybadcat - Oct 30, 2014 - 9:17am
 
The Moon - Prodigal_SOB - Oct 30, 2014 - 9:15am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Alexandra - Oct 30, 2014 - 8:53am
 
Regarding cats - Steve - Oct 30, 2014 - 8:53am
 
Epic Facebook Statuses - Proclivities - Oct 30, 2014 - 8:23am
 
Things You Thought Today - Alexandra - Oct 30, 2014 - 8:08am
 
Stuff I Heard Other People Say Out Loud - Prodigal_SOB - Oct 30, 2014 - 8:04am
 
Today in History - ScottN - Oct 30, 2014 - 7:44am
 
Music Videos - Red_Dragon - Oct 30, 2014 - 7:35am
 
Baseball, anyone? - kurtster - Oct 30, 2014 - 7:34am
 
Films you're excited about. - RichardPrins - Oct 30, 2014 - 7:19am
 
Maps • Google • GeoGuessr - Proclivities - Oct 30, 2014 - 6:45am
 
Oh GOD, they're GAY! - RichardPrins - Oct 30, 2014 - 5:53am
 
Tech & Science - RichardPrins - Oct 30, 2014 - 5:44am
 
NEED A COMPUTER GEEK! - miamizsun - Oct 30, 2014 - 5:27am
 
Movies to avoid? - miamizsun - Oct 30, 2014 - 5:12am
 
Amazing art - RichardPrins - Oct 30, 2014 - 4:15am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Oct 30, 2014 - 4:02am
 
Ebola - Proclivities - Oct 30, 2014 - 3:40am
 
Palestine - RichardPrins - Oct 30, 2014 - 3:26am
 
Spambags on RP - fractalv - Oct 30, 2014 - 12:18am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - Lazy8 - Oct 29, 2014 - 11:49pm
 
Unusual News - DaveInVA - Oct 29, 2014 - 7:52pm
 
Photos you haven't taken of yourself - Coaxial - Oct 29, 2014 - 6:29pm
 
Good morning - riponlink - Oct 29, 2014 - 6:17pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 29, 2014 - 6:09pm
 
Dying for Halloween Music to start! - JrzyTmata - Oct 29, 2014 - 5:17pm
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - haresfur - Oct 29, 2014 - 4:50pm
 
Abiogenesis! - RichardPrins - Oct 29, 2014 - 3:58pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - haresfur - Oct 29, 2014 - 3:55pm
 
Guns - aflanigan - Oct 29, 2014 - 3:53pm
 
Sailboat / Powerboat Live-aboards - haresfur - Oct 29, 2014 - 3:49pm
 
Great guitar faces - Moak - Oct 29, 2014 - 3:20pm
 
Interesting Tidbits - fidget - Oct 29, 2014 - 3:18pm
 
Sweet horrible irony. - haresfur - Oct 29, 2014 - 3:17pm
 
Quotations - Antigone - Oct 29, 2014 - 3:03pm
 
Name My Band - Antigone - Oct 29, 2014 - 2:45pm
 
Favorite Books from Your Youth - Alexandra - Oct 29, 2014 - 2:02pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - Coaxial - Oct 29, 2014 - 1:44pm
 
Zombies! - RichardPrins - Oct 29, 2014 - 1:19pm
 
new music suggesstions~ - black321 - Oct 29, 2014 - 1:07pm
 
The Chomsky / Zinn Reader - RichardPrins - Oct 29, 2014 - 12:16pm
 
LeftWingNutZ - RichardPrins - Oct 29, 2014 - 11:58am
 
What IS he doing? - Proclivities - Oct 29, 2014 - 11:35am
 
The Global War on Terror - RichardPrins - Oct 29, 2014 - 11:04am
 
Creepy - Proclivities - Oct 29, 2014 - 10:32am
 
Things that piss me off - DaveInVA - Oct 29, 2014 - 9:31am
 
RPeep News You Should Know - Alexandra - Oct 29, 2014 - 7:46am
 
Robots - Proclivities - Oct 29, 2014 - 7:42am
 
What did you have for dinner? - glmace - Oct 29, 2014 - 6:52am
 
Today, I learned... - lily34 - Oct 29, 2014 - 6:23am
 
Phine Phound Photographs - Proclivities - Oct 29, 2014 - 6:12am
 
Those lovable acronym guys & gals - miamizsun - Oct 29, 2014 - 4:08am
 
Occupy Together... - RichardPrins - Oct 29, 2014 - 12:52am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos; Please Limit to 510 ... - fractalv - Oct 28, 2014 - 9:34pm
 
Business as Usual - RichardPrins - Oct 28, 2014 - 7:44pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - DaveInVA - Oct 28, 2014 - 5:27pm
 
BillyGee's Greatest Segues - swell_sailor - Oct 28, 2014 - 4:52pm
 
• • •  What's For Dinner ? • • •  - DaveInVA - Oct 28, 2014 - 4:48pm
 
NASA & other news from space - haresfur - Oct 28, 2014 - 4:40pm
 
This Film is not yet Rated - miamizsun - Oct 28, 2014 - 3:32pm
 
XPRIZE - miamizsun - Oct 28, 2014 - 2:26pm
 
I can't figure out RP after all these years... - haresfur - Oct 28, 2014 - 2:06pm
 
Graphic designers, ho's! - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 28, 2014 - 1:55pm
 
how do you feel right now? - lily34 - Oct 28, 2014 - 1:37pm
 
Waterfalls - miamizsun - Oct 28, 2014 - 12:49pm
 
On second thought... - Proclivities - Oct 28, 2014 - 11:43am
 
~*Funny Cats*~ - Proclivities - Oct 28, 2014 - 11:30am
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - Proclivities - Oct 28, 2014 - 11:05am
 
Want to put a live chat room on radio site, any ideas how... - Coaxial - Oct 28, 2014 - 9:30am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Oct 28, 2014 - 8:35am
 
What is Humanity's best invention? - Steve - Oct 28, 2014 - 8:28am
 
Jack Bruce R.I.P and thank you - oldviolin - Oct 28, 2014 - 8:18am
 
(a public service of RP)
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » OBAMACARE Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 57, 58, 59  Next
Post to this Topic
Steely_D
I'm a fool to do your dirty work
Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay, where the Cuban gentlemen sleep all day


Posted: Oct 27, 2014 - 8:42pm

 DaveInVA wrote:

And its such a coincidence that those same companies are in cahoots with Medicare telling us they wont tell us what the new Medicare fees will be taken from our SSD and Social Security checks until after the elections also. I guess they don't want to piss off all those seniors before they vote.

 
Don't forget how they also funded Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey in return for him creating all those fake results.
You won't read about it on Snopes, since it's a liberal lies mouthpiece. Wake up, sheeple!

 
DaveInVA
Single, unwanted, unloved eccentric, crusty ol' fart with cats
DaveInVA Avatar

Location: In a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Leo
Chinese Yr: Buffalo


Posted: Oct 27, 2014 - 8:22pm

 Steely_D wrote:

Yeah, but you have to be impressed that the leader of the free world, in the face of his other challenges and personal aspirations - he still took time to personally strike a deal with those private companies so that they wouldn't mail those books in time so that his plans could continue. At least he's trying.
 

 
And its such a coincidence that those same companies are in cahoots with Medicare telling us they wont tell us what the new Medicare fees will be taken from our SSD and Social Security checks until after the elections also. I guess they don't want to piss off all those seniors before they vote.


kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Oct 27, 2014 - 8:00pm

Earlier this month, I found out our our premiums for our Advantage plans are going up 40%, our formulary was changing to include less drugs and higher deductibles and co pays and that our network doctors were changing.  We received our new formulary and rate hikes for drugs in 2015, but we have not received the books for our network doctors yet.

We called last week to find out where the books for our network doctors and hospitals are and we were told that they would not be mailed until November 5th, the day after the election.  WTF ?  But of course, critical information such as that is always withheld until after elections.  That is Obama's way, afterall.  An informed voter is a bad voter ...

" If you like you doctor, you can keep your doctor. "

So not only do we have to wait until after the election to find out, we have to decide by December 7th which plan to go with.  That is roughly 4 weeks at most depending on if and when the booklets arrive.  That is supposed to be enough time to find out about alternate plans, should ours change too much ?

Thanks Obama ! 
Steely_D
I'm a fool to do your dirty work
Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay, where the Cuban gentlemen sleep all day


Posted: Oct 27, 2014 - 6:55pm

Is the Affordable Care Act Working?


sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Oct 23, 2014 - 3:59am

 MrsHobieJoe wrote:

I thought we knew this already, at least I'm sure it's been mentioned here before. I still prefer our system but to each his own.

 

I do too, that is exactly my point.
MrsHobieJoe
Make tea, not war.
MrsHobieJoe Avatar

Location: somewhere in Europe
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 22, 2014 - 11:09pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

Another part of article I posted on another thread, but this succinctly articulates what I have been saying about ACA.  This highlights the extreme hypocrisy of both the so called conservatives who oppose the ACA and the so called liberals who support it:

Health Reform

Contrary to rants that Obama’s 2010 health reform, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), is the most socialistic legislation in American history, the reality is that it is virtually textbook Republican health policy, with a pedigree from the Heritage Foundation and Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, among others.

It’s important to remember that historically the left-Democratic approach to healthcare reform was always based on a fully government-run system such as Medicare or Medicaid. During debate on health reform in 2009, this approach was called “single payer,” with the government being the single payer. One benefit of this approach is cost control: the government could use its monopsony buying power to force down prices just as Walmart does with its suppliers.

Conservatives wanted to avoid too much government control and were adamantly opposed to single-payer. But they recognized that certain problems required more than a pure free-market solution. One problem in particular is covering people with pre-existing conditions, one of the most popular provisions in ACA. The difficulty is that people may wait until they get sick before buying insurance and then expect full coverage for their conditions. Obviously, this free-rider problem would bankrupt the health-insurance system unless there was a fix.

The conservative solution was the individual mandate—forcing people to buy private health insurance, with subsidies for the poor. This approach was first put forward by Heritage Foundation economist Stuart Butler in a 1989 paper, “A Framework for Reform,” published in a Heritage Foundation book, A National Health System for America. In it, Butler said the number one element of a conservative health system was this: “Every resident of the U.S. must, by law, be enrolled in an adequate health care plan to cover major health costs.” He went on to say:

Under this arrangement, all households would be required to protect themselves from major medical costs by purchasing health insurance or enrolling in a prepaid health plan. The degree of financial protection can be debated, but the principle of mandatory family protection is central to a universal health care system in America.

In 1991, prominent conservative health economist Mark V. Pauley also endorsed the individual mandate as central to healthcare reform. In an article in the journal Health Affairs, Pauley said:

All citizens should be required to obtain a basic level of health insurance. Not having health insurance imposes a risk of delaying medical care; it also may impose costs on others, because we as a society provide care to the uninsured. … Permitting individuals to remain uninsured results in inefficient use of medical care, inequity in the incidence of costs of uncompensated care, and tax-related distortions.

In 2004, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) endorsed an individual mandate in a speech to the National Press Club. “I believe higher-income Americans today do have a societal and personal responsibility to cover in some way themselves and their children,” he said. Even libertarian Ron Bailey, writing in Reason, conceded the necessity of a mandate in a November 2004 article titled, “Mandatory Health Insurance Now!” Said Bailey: “Why shouldn’t we require people who now get health care at the expense of the rest of us pay for their coverage themselves? … Mandatory health insurance would not be unlike the laws that require drivers to purchase auto insurance or pay into state-run risk pools.”

Among those enamored with the emerging conservative health reform based on an individual mandate was Mitt Romney, who was elected governor of Massachusetts in 2002. In 2004, he put forward a state health reform plan to which he later added an individual mandate. As Romney explained in June 2005, “No more ‘free riding,’ if you will, where an individual says: ‘I’m not going to pay, even though I can afford it. I’m not going to get insurance, even though I can afford it. I’m instead going to just show up and make the taxpayers pay for me’.”

The following month, Romney emphasized his point: “We can’t have as a nation 40 million people—or, in my state, half a million—saying, ‘I don’t have insurance, and if I get sick, I want someone else to pay’.”

In 2006, Governor Romney signed the Massachusetts health reform into law, including the individual mandate. Defending his legislation in a Wall Street Journal article, he said:

I proposed that everyone must either purchase a product of their choice or demonstrate that they can pay for their own health care. It’s a personal responsibility principle.

Some of my libertarian friends balk at what looks like an individual mandate. But remember, someone has to pay for the health care that must, by law, be provided: Either the individual pays or the taxpayers pay. A free ride on government is not libertarian.

As late as 2008, Robert Moffitt of the Heritage Foundation was still defending the individual mandate as reasonable, non-ideological and nonpartisan in an article for the Harvard Health Policy Review.

So what changed just a year later, when Obama put forward a health-reform plan that was almost a carbon copy of those previously endorsed by the Heritage Foundation, Mitt Romney, and other Republicans? The only thing is that it was now supported by a Democratic president that Republicans vowed to fight on every single issue, according to Robert Draper’s book Do Not Ask What Good We Do.

Senior Obama adviser David Axelrod later admitted that Romney’s Massachusetts plan was the “template” for Obama’s plan. “That work inspired our own health plan,” he said in 2011. But no one in the White House said so back in 2009. I once asked a senior Obama aide why. His answer was that once Republicans refused to negotiate on health reform and Obama had to win only with Democratic votes, it would have been counterproductive, politically, to point out the Obama plan’s Republican roots.

The left wing of the House Democratic caucus was dubious enough about Obama’s plan as it was, preferring a single-payer plan. Thus it was necessary for Obama to portray his plan as more liberal than it really was to get the Democratic votes needed for passage, which of course played right into the Republicans’ hands. But the reality is that ACA remains a very modest reform based on Republican and conservative ideas.



 
I thought we knew this already, at least I'm sure it's been mentioned here before. I still prefer our system but to each his own.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 22, 2014 - 2:37pm

just got a notice from my ins co

my plan is going away as of dec 31

new premiums?

i'm getting jacked

or i can take my chances on the state's new exchange

where's my bailout?


sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Oct 22, 2014 - 11:07am

Another part of article I posted on another thread, but this succinctly articulates what I have been saying about ACA.  This highlights the extreme hypocrisy of both the so called conservatives who oppose the ACA and the so called liberals who support it:

Health Reform

Contrary to rants that Obama’s 2010 health reform, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), is the most socialistic legislation in American history, the reality is that it is virtually textbook Republican health policy, with a pedigree from the Heritage Foundation and Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, among others.

It’s important to remember that historically the left-Democratic approach to healthcare reform was always based on a fully government-run system such as Medicare or Medicaid. During debate on health reform in 2009, this approach was called “single payer,” with the government being the single payer. One benefit of this approach is cost control: the government could use its monopsony buying power to force down prices just as Walmart does with its suppliers.

Conservatives wanted to avoid too much government control and were adamantly opposed to single-payer. But they recognized that certain problems required more than a pure free-market solution. One problem in particular is covering people with pre-existing conditions, one of the most popular provisions in ACA. The difficulty is that people may wait until they get sick before buying insurance and then expect full coverage for their conditions. Obviously, this free-rider problem would bankrupt the health-insurance system unless there was a fix.

The conservative solution was the individual mandate—forcing people to buy private health insurance, with subsidies for the poor. This approach was first put forward by Heritage Foundation economist Stuart Butler in a 1989 paper, “A Framework for Reform,” published in a Heritage Foundation book, A National Health System for America. In it, Butler said the number one element of a conservative health system was this: “Every resident of the U.S. must, by law, be enrolled in an adequate health care plan to cover major health costs.” He went on to say:

Under this arrangement, all households would be required to protect themselves from major medical costs by purchasing health insurance or enrolling in a prepaid health plan. The degree of financial protection can be debated, but the principle of mandatory family protection is central to a universal health care system in America.

In 1991, prominent conservative health economist Mark V. Pauley also endorsed the individual mandate as central to healthcare reform. In an article in the journal Health Affairs, Pauley said:

All citizens should be required to obtain a basic level of health insurance. Not having health insurance imposes a risk of delaying medical care; it also may impose costs on others, because we as a society provide care to the uninsured. … Permitting individuals to remain uninsured results in inefficient use of medical care, inequity in the incidence of costs of uncompensated care, and tax-related distortions.

In 2004, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) endorsed an individual mandate in a speech to the National Press Club. “I believe higher-income Americans today do have a societal and personal responsibility to cover in some way themselves and their children,” he said. Even libertarian Ron Bailey, writing in Reason, conceded the necessity of a mandate in a November 2004 article titled, “Mandatory Health Insurance Now!” Said Bailey: “Why shouldn’t we require people who now get health care at the expense of the rest of us pay for their coverage themselves? … Mandatory health insurance would not be unlike the laws that require drivers to purchase auto insurance or pay into state-run risk pools.”

Among those enamored with the emerging conservative health reform based on an individual mandate was Mitt Romney, who was elected governor of Massachusetts in 2002. In 2004, he put forward a state health reform plan to which he later added an individual mandate. As Romney explained in June 2005, “No more ‘free riding,’ if you will, where an individual says: ‘I’m not going to pay, even though I can afford it. I’m not going to get insurance, even though I can afford it. I’m instead going to just show up and make the taxpayers pay for me’.”

The following month, Romney emphasized his point: “We can’t have as a nation 40 million people—or, in my state, half a million—saying, ‘I don’t have insurance, and if I get sick, I want someone else to pay’.”

In 2006, Governor Romney signed the Massachusetts health reform into law, including the individual mandate. Defending his legislation in a Wall Street Journal article, he said:

I proposed that everyone must either purchase a product of their choice or demonstrate that they can pay for their own health care. It’s a personal responsibility principle.

Some of my libertarian friends balk at what looks like an individual mandate. But remember, someone has to pay for the health care that must, by law, be provided: Either the individual pays or the taxpayers pay. A free ride on government is not libertarian.

As late as 2008, Robert Moffitt of the Heritage Foundation was still defending the individual mandate as reasonable, non-ideological and nonpartisan in an article for the Harvard Health Policy Review.

So what changed just a year later, when Obama put forward a health-reform plan that was almost a carbon copy of those previously endorsed by the Heritage Foundation, Mitt Romney, and other Republicans? The only thing is that it was now supported by a Democratic president that Republicans vowed to fight on every single issue, according to Robert Draper’s book Do Not Ask What Good We Do.

Senior Obama adviser David Axelrod later admitted that Romney’s Massachusetts plan was the “template” for Obama’s plan. “That work inspired our own health plan,” he said in 2011. But no one in the White House said so back in 2009. I once asked a senior Obama aide why. His answer was that once Republicans refused to negotiate on health reform and Obama had to win only with Democratic votes, it would have been counterproductive, politically, to point out the Obama plan’s Republican roots.

The left wing of the House Democratic caucus was dubious enough about Obama’s plan as it was, preferring a single-payer plan. Thus it was necessary for Obama to portray his plan as more liberal than it really was to get the Democratic votes needed for passage, which of course played right into the Republicans’ hands. But the reality is that ACA remains a very modest reform based on Republican and conservative ideas.




kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Jul 30, 2014 - 5:09am

 BlueHeronDruid wrote:

Pick one and get the care you need NOW. Your foot isn't going to wait too long, right? You can always change next enrollment period.

 
FWIW, we have Anthem as a provider for several years now and are happy.  They do have people that will call you and follow up as well as you can ask them questions for concerns.

Its about who has the biggest network and doctors closest to you.  Anthem is a big national, which can be a good thing these days. And yes, you can always change the next enrollment period if it doesn't work as well as you hope.

 
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 30, 2014 - 5:02am

 BlueHeronDruid wrote:

Pick one and get the care you need NOW. Your foot isn't going to wait too long, right? You can always change next enrollment period.

 
i agree

take some action there dude

chin sac up please
Manbird
Offal Makes Me Strong! Strong! Strong! Weak! Strong! Strong! Strong! Strong! Strong! Strong!
Manbird Avatar

Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Virgo


Posted: Jul 29, 2014 - 10:11pm

 BlueHeronDruid wrote:

Pick one and get the care you need NOW. Your foot isn't going to wait too long, right? You can always change next enrollment period.

 
I'll call the county medical tomorrow and talk to someone. they have some people there just for that.
I know I saw a ratings guide and the one I wanted to pick has a big hand-made
sign on their building that says NO OBAMACARES ACCEPTED HERE!!! 
Is this red neck country or what? Once again, the autistic gets to scrape the
bottom of the barrel. 
BlueHeronDruid
no longer accepting hot potatoes
BlueHeronDruid Avatar



Posted: Jul 29, 2014 - 10:03pm

 Manbird wrote:
I have some kind of obamacare/medical and they gave me 3 choices of plans. One eas kaiser so I picked that one.
Then they call and said I couldn't pick kaiser unless I was already a member for at least a year. Now I have two to pick
from:California Health and Wellness or Anthem. How do I know which to pick> Jeez, what a runaround. I'm thinking about
keeping the guy I was seeing in Santa Rosa but he's so far. I have a feeling whatever I pick, it's going to be shit
quality care. 

 
Pick one and get the care you need NOW. Your foot isn't going to wait too long, right? You can always change next enrollment period.
Manbird
Offal Makes Me Strong! Strong! Strong! Weak! Strong! Strong! Strong! Strong! Strong! Strong!
Manbird Avatar

Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Virgo


Posted: Jul 29, 2014 - 9:52pm

I have some kind of obamacare/medical and they gave me 3 choices of plans. One eas kaiser so I picked that one.
Then they call and said I couldn't pick kaiser unless I was already a member for at least a year. Now I have two to pick
from:California Health and Wellness or Anthem. How do I know which to pick> Jeez, what a runaround. I'm thinking about
keeping the guy I was seeing in Santa Rosa but he's so far. I have a feeling whatever I pick, it's going to be shit
quality care. 


LizK

LizK Avatar

Location: Houston, Texas
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Buffalo


Posted: Jul 29, 2014 - 8:54pm

 kurtster wrote:

The VA did a lot to help keep my Dad going his last 10 or so years and he had Medicare with a damn good supplement.  But that wasn't enough.  The help he got from the VA especially with Rx medicines the folks couldn't have otherwise afforded made all the difference.

There is no panacea to our health care mess.  When it comes to quality health care, more choices and options are better.  Obamacare is the opposite fewer choices designed to meet all needs.  That is impossible, period end of story.  One size never fits all.  Will never come close and in medicine, close is no cigar.

Having said that, the VA is broken beyond repair.  It needs to be replaced, or at the very least all Vets should have the VA pay their bills in private facilities when the VA cannot provide them in a timely fashion or is simply not close enough for our veterans to easily reach.  This can be done right now, with the stroke of a President;s pen.  WTF is he waiting for ? 
Oh and welcome to the loony bin ...

  "Vets should have the VA pay their bills in private facilities when the VA cannot provide them in a timely fashion."  That Bill is becoming law as we speak. - 07-29-14


RichardPrins
Anti-Procrustean
RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Jul 27, 2014 - 10:07am

Keep spending/whining... {#Mrgreen}

Why Anti-Obamacare Ads Actually Increased Obamacare Enrollment
Opponents of the Affordable Care Act outspent Obamacare's proponents 15-to-one, but they might have been funding their rivals' cause.

kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Jul 24, 2014 - 6:03pm

 expertTexpert wrote:

The Koch Brothers Want To Scare The Obamacare Out Of You

What the heck? Have we no shame?

"Brawndo. It's got electrolytes."

 
Brawndo, its what George Soros has for breakfast !

Since yer new around here, every time you bring up the Koch bros there is an obligation to respond with a Soros reference.

Carry on ... 


ScottN
"Thought for today" has been postponed until tomorrow.
ScottN Avatar

Location: An inch above the K/T boundary. But smth near fracking still has appeal.
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aries
Chinese Yr: Buffalo


Posted: Jul 24, 2014 - 2:11pm

 expertTexpert wrote:
Not surprising, sadly, that you were insured. The little graph I posted notes that it's usually the case (78%).
The ACA has faults, but the goal of eliminating these crap policies was an important, necessary, part of its implementation.

*shakes fist a ScottN's kidney, and the folks that crafted a crap insurance policy* 

Yes. I knew that.  The policy did pay a bit.  The policy's primary value was in getting me decent care w/minimum hassle.  The hospital saw I was insured and admitted me, though this was not an "ER" situation and they had no obligation to do so.  I had many chats with the acct'g folk at the hospital following treatment.   They said they are frequently blind-sided too by lousy insurance policies.  It was their *whispered* advice to file br when they became aware of my overall financial situation.
ScottN
"Thought for today" has been postponed until tomorrow.
ScottN Avatar

Location: An inch above the K/T boundary. But smth near fracking still has appeal.
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aries
Chinese Yr: Buffalo


Posted: Jul 24, 2014 - 1:34pm

 expertTexpert wrote:

Sorry to hear. And, sadly, you have plenty of company.

.... 
btw, I had insurance. Obviously it was very deficient.  A policy that would not be valid under ACA now.  My kidney timed it all wrong.

ScottN
"Thought for today" has been postponed until tomorrow.
ScottN Avatar

Location: An inch above the K/T boundary. But smth near fracking still has appeal.
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aries
Chinese Yr: Buffalo


Posted: Jul 24, 2014 - 1:26pm

 expertTexpert wrote:

That's an excellent point. The politics surrounding the "one term President" made it imperative that he not get any credit for any positive work. (Step one: he's not even from America!)
Identifying the obvious need for universal health care, for reform of the outrageous cost/care delivery problem that Americans face, and trying to make progress - it was doomed from the moment he espoused it.

Not because providing health care to all Americans is wrong. It's right for many many reasons.
But it was obstructed because of who he is. (Socialist! Liar! Egomaniac!)

The millions of uninsured Americans, or those that are poorly insured by scam companies, or those paying exorbitant sums that bankrupt them, or the people struggling through the VA system - all of those people are frustrated or ill or going to die young to make sure we have a one term President. Otherwise, our "leaders" could've compromised on something much more useful.

But, like they say in golf: play the ball from where it lies.
From where we are now, how can we protect our citizenry from illness and bankruptcy? Neither of those things seem good for our nation.
 
I declared a medical cost induced bankruptcy two weeks ago, so I know.  Hindsight certainly shows alternatives that would have been better, but were not thought feasible at the time.  Additionally, the ACA is tremendously complex (note recent court rulings).  We simply have to get  to UHC and that will take a new POTUS and Congress to do. 

"As if", say the lobbies.


ScottN
"Thought for today" has been postponed until tomorrow.
ScottN Avatar

Location: An inch above the K/T boundary. But smth near fracking still has appeal.
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aries
Chinese Yr: Buffalo


Posted: Jul 24, 2014 - 12:43pm

 sirdroseph wrote:
I agree, it is just too bad we have a President that not only did not push for that, but implemented a plan that continues to line the pockets of the for profit insurance companies and at the same time decreasing freedom even more by putting the burden on the middle and lower middle class forcing those that cannot afford insurance to enter into the poor coverage heath insurance debacle like the rest of us and maybe get reinbursed for it down the beaurocratic line as these families struggle to buy groceries because of their new "gift" premium. All implemented by our good trustworthy friends at the IRS.{#Rolleyes}  Why? All for his legacy so he can say he pushed through "affordable health care for everyone".  What a joke.
 
UHC was his first choice.  It was declared not doable by congressional leaders. The ACA was seen as the next best thing.  It has faults—everybody can see that, but imo, is better than what is in effect prior to its enactment.

Hilary Clinton tried for UHC back in '93/94 and got nowhere.  The HC and Big Pharma lobbies are too strong to allow government to shake their money trees.
I don't think Obama made a very good strategic move by accepting, as he did during his re-election, the moniker Obamacare.  Too many people detest him and it gets in the way of clear thinking and progress.  The ACA is/was intended to be a step to UHC.
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 57, 58, 59  Next