[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

What makes you smile? - haresfur - Apr 29, 2016 - 6:04pm
 
Trump - rotekz - Apr 29, 2016 - 5:58pm
 
Favorite Words - porphyrius - Apr 29, 2016 - 5:21pm
 
The End of Europe - porphyrius - Apr 29, 2016 - 4:54pm
 
Phillip K. DIck - R_P - Apr 29, 2016 - 4:12pm
 
Your Current Crush - haresfur - Apr 29, 2016 - 4:11pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - haresfur - Apr 29, 2016 - 3:50pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - BillG - Apr 29, 2016 - 3:49pm
 
how do you feel right now? - Alexandra - Apr 29, 2016 - 3:19pm
 
Things You Thought Today - safcpaul - Apr 29, 2016 - 2:48pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - Red_Dragon - Apr 29, 2016 - 2:30pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - olivertwist - Apr 29, 2016 - 2:27pm
 
The Prince topic - olivertwist - Apr 29, 2016 - 2:24pm
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - DaveInVA - Apr 29, 2016 - 2:12pm
 
RightWingNutZ - rotekz - Apr 29, 2016 - 1:47pm
 
Mars Exploration Rover Mission Status - Skydog - Apr 29, 2016 - 1:18pm
 
Make me a stereo system! (poof!!) - Lazy8 - Apr 29, 2016 - 12:18pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - aflanigan - Apr 29, 2016 - 11:40am
 
Amazing art - Red_Dragon - Apr 29, 2016 - 11:34am
 
2016 Elections - Beaker - Apr 29, 2016 - 11:12am
 
Classical Music - Alexandra - Apr 29, 2016 - 11:07am
 
The Image Post - Proclivities - Apr 29, 2016 - 11:05am
 
Oklahoma Questions and Points of Interest - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 29, 2016 - 10:33am
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - Red_Dragon - Apr 29, 2016 - 10:27am
 
Things that piss me off - DaveInVA - Apr 29, 2016 - 9:52am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Apr 29, 2016 - 9:46am
 
Animal Resistance - sirdroseph - Apr 29, 2016 - 9:42am
 
Regarding cats - Alexandra - Apr 29, 2016 - 9:16am
 
New RP OS X app on Apple App Store - earthtrip - Apr 29, 2016 - 9:09am
 
The Obituary Page - Lazy8 - Apr 29, 2016 - 8:14am
 
What Makes You Sad? - ptooey - Apr 29, 2016 - 8:07am
 
Word of the Day - ScottN - Apr 29, 2016 - 7:42am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - miamizsun - Apr 29, 2016 - 7:17am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Apr 29, 2016 - 6:17am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - Proclivities - Apr 29, 2016 - 6:10am
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - Red_Dragon - Apr 29, 2016 - 4:52am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - sirdroseph - Apr 29, 2016 - 4:50am
 
Birthday wishes - miamizsun - Apr 29, 2016 - 4:18am
 
Beer - rotekz - Apr 29, 2016 - 1:40am
 
Public Messages in a Private Forum - BlueHeronDruid - Apr 29, 2016 - 1:12am
 
Message To Lucky - oldviolin - Apr 28, 2016 - 8:41pm
 
• • • What Makes You Happy? • • •  - muzik - Apr 28, 2016 - 7:57pm
 
Make Lily34 Laugh - Coaxial - Apr 28, 2016 - 7:50pm
 
Name My Band - Antigone - Apr 28, 2016 - 5:44pm
 
Alternative Web Browsers - DaveInVA - Apr 28, 2016 - 4:21pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - DaveInVA - Apr 28, 2016 - 2:48pm
 
Fox Spews - Steely_D - Apr 28, 2016 - 2:10pm
 
Obama's Second Term - rotekz - Apr 28, 2016 - 1:02pm
 
RPeep News You Should Know - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 28, 2016 - 12:37pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Apr 28, 2016 - 12:30pm
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - Proclivities - Apr 28, 2016 - 12:04pm
 
Those lovable acronym guys & gals - R_P - Apr 28, 2016 - 11:33am
 
Best Song Comments. - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 28, 2016 - 11:19am
 
What Do You Want From RP? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 28, 2016 - 10:33am
 
Unindicted felon: candidate Hillary Clinton - rotekz - Apr 28, 2016 - 10:15am
 
Tech & Science - aflanigan - Apr 28, 2016 - 9:12am
 
Unusual News - DaveInVA - Apr 28, 2016 - 7:57am
 
Coffee - olivertwist - Apr 28, 2016 - 7:37am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Apr 28, 2016 - 6:08am
 
Anti-War - miamizsun - Apr 28, 2016 - 5:39am
 
And the good news is.... - Kaw - Apr 28, 2016 - 5:28am
 
NETFLIX - R_P - Apr 27, 2016 - 9:27pm
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - porphyrius - Apr 27, 2016 - 6:15pm
 
What the hell OV? - porphyrius - Apr 27, 2016 - 6:07pm
 
Meeting in da men's room - porphyrius - Apr 27, 2016 - 5:58pm
 
Aliens: The Answer To Everything! - porphyrius - Apr 27, 2016 - 5:55pm
 
Water Wars - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 27, 2016 - 5:19pm
 
Economix - aflanigan - Apr 27, 2016 - 2:11pm
 
Zombies! - Proclivities - Apr 27, 2016 - 1:11pm
 
That's good advice - Proclivities - Apr 27, 2016 - 11:21am
 
What are you listening to now? - oldviolin - Apr 27, 2016 - 9:48am
 
Cell Phone Hell - miamizsun - Apr 27, 2016 - 9:46am
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - R_P - Apr 27, 2016 - 9:13am
 
Déjà Vu - R_P - Apr 27, 2016 - 8:54am
 
Drones - R_P - Apr 27, 2016 - 8:36am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » The Chomsky / Zinn Reader Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19  Next
Post to this Topic
bokey
Liberals are the people the hippies warned us about
bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 31, 2016 - 4:03pm

 R_P wrote: 
Doo doo.Poopy head.
R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 31, 2016 - 3:03pm

A Conversation on Privacy With Edward Snowden, Noam Chomsky, and Glenn Greenwald

R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 19, 2016 - 1:24pm

Chomsky and his critics

When the Swedish Academy awarded Bertrand Russell a Nobel Prize, the philosopher was uneasy. I have always supposed, he wrote, that one cannot be respectable without being wicked. He conducted his life out of step with the creed of authority. Twice imprisoned and twice removed from his academic post for his broadsides against war and religion, the aristocratic radical actively courted the displeasure of an elite that made his grandfather prime minister of England. And when, of late, it was disclosed that the CIA had spied on Noam Chomsky, it was not much of a revelation that he too is a prime target for the respectable.

An extensive literature has grown up over the years that pegs him as, variously, a Holocaust denier, a neo-Nazi fellow traveller, a Stalin admirer, a Hezbollah adviser, a Saddam Hussein defender, and a Pol Pot sympathiser. These indictments come not just from the remote wilds of the rightwing media. They come from liberal sectors of the press.

What accounts for the obsession? One has long suspected that his critics work in teams to revile him. But the full extent of their collusion has remained unclear. Documents that have come to light reveal that it is a tightly orchestrated network of foreign policy hawks in the press, academia, and politics, some connected with the Henry Jackson Society (HJS), a neoconservative think tank with links to political officials in the United States and Great Britain. The remarks that follow will trace the connections between the key figures of this circle, past and present. (...)


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 16, 2016 - 9:34am



"Requiem for the American Dream": Wake Up Call!

Noam Chomsky's new film "Requiem for the American Dream" is a clear-eyed, easily accessible outline of how and why American idealism has been sabotaged. Although he doesn't detail the dream, Chomsky sketches its promise of mobility, an expectation of progress toward a better life through some sort of democratic polity.

These documentary interviews, filmed over four years, suggest that the destruction of the dream is not a natural, inexorable occurrence, but the result of choices made by people operating within certain belief systems and for self-enrichment. Could the dream have been realized through different circumstances, different people making different choices?

Regarded by many as America's most influential intellectual, Noam Chomsky is also a great story teller. Without overwhelming the viewer or the material, he marshals data, example and anecdote, cutting through 250 years of history to distill ten basic principles of wealth and power which have conspired against the American Dream. More than anything, the film is a well organized, thoughtful look at these forces and their consequences.

This is not an exhortative polemic. Although Chomsky is not dispassionate, he is more saddened than outraged, more intent on finding cause than inciting action. Unlike fellow system critics like ubiquitous former Labor Secretary cum political reformist Robert Reich, Chomsky neither suggests, nor pleads for saving capitalism through economic reshuffling or revitalized bourgeois democratic elections.

Chomsky finds the roots of the Requiem in how the United States was originally set up. The U.S. Constitution put power in the hands of the wealthy. The Constitution was written to prevent, not promote, democracy. Concentrations of wealth resulted in concentrations of political power. The course of our history has been defined by the struggles of this wealth and political power against upsurges in democratization, most notably in the 1930s labor movement and the 1960s peace, civil rights and women's movements.

Power and wealth fought back against these popular movements by trying to shape ideology and manufacture consent. Elections are engineered. Attempts to regulate the economy are undermined. Solidarity of the American dreamers is attacked. As Chomsky has shown through earlier work ("Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media" with Edward S. Herman, 1988) control was extended beyond the use of force into the domain of culture by marketing compliance and marginalizing dissent.

Chomsky himself provides an example of the extent to which dissent is marginalized when he chooses to avoid mentioning by name the great sources of ideas which help us understand how power and wealth function: socialists like Gramsci, Lukacs or even the scholar of the British Museum himself. Rather than end his dissertation in despair, Chomsky offers elements of hope, if not exactly a well lit path to redemption. Popular movements, efforts to dismantle illegitimate authority, freedom of speech and new forms of political action all offer hope. He cites philosopher John Dewey's admonition that institutions should be under participatory democratic control. What matters, relates Chomsky quoting his friend Historian Howard Zinn, is the countless deeds of unknown people who lay the basis for the events of human history. Ultimately, learning how the world works will greatly aid in changing it. For his great contributions to the latter, particularly the summary given in "Requiem for the American Dream," Noam Chomsky has helped lay the foundations for understanding and ultimately change.


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 14, 2016 - 10:08am

Why I Choose Optimism Over Despair: An Interview With Noam Chomsky

One of philosophy's central and most perplexing questions is, "Who are we?" Indeed, virtually all essential questions about human civilization, power, authority and governance follow from the question of what kind of creatures we are.

But is there really something distinct about us as a species? Or, to put the question in a more traditional philosophical context, is there such a thing as human nature? Classical philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle thought so, and so did most philosophers that form part of the modern tradition, beginning with Thomas Hobbes and going all the way up to Nietzsche. Of course, scientists have also probed human nature, and continue to do so down to this day, with the question being of particular interest to linguists, evolutionary biologists, neuroscientists and psychologists.

Noam Chomsky, one of the world's most influential linguists (the same prolific scholar known around the world for his trenchant critiques of US foreign policy and critical analyses on a wide range of social and political issues), has also been preoccupied for much of his life with the perennial question of what kind of creatures we are. His pathbreaking contributions to the field of linguistics have considerably advanced our understanding of the human mind, which has in turn influenced a diverse area of studies, ranging from cognitive science and computer science to philosophy and psychology.

Chomsky's latest book, just released by Columbia University Press, is fittingly titled, What Kind of Creatures Are We? The book is a collection of lectures delivered by Chomsky at Columbia University in December 2013, delving into areas like cognitive science, linguistics, philosophy and political theory. I talked with Chomsky about the book, his scientific explorations of language and the mind, and his views on society and politics in this exclusive interview for Truthout. (...)


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 27, 2016 - 7:11pm

Noam Chomsky Interview: “Enormous Sense of Hopelessness and Anger” Reflected in Appeal of Trump and Sanders
(...) I assume that Hillary Clinton will win the Democratic nomination just because of the nature of our electoral system, which is basically now “bought” elections overwhelmingly, and the major funders will probably succeed at putting her across. What Bernie Sanders has achieved is pretty remarkable, but I doubt very much, in our existing system, he can make it beyond the primaries. So I think a fair guess is that Clinton will be nominated.

On the other side, it is probably going to be either Donald Trump or Ted Cruz. In my opinion, Cruz is scarier than Trump. Trump is a kind of wildcard, but Cruz is really dangerous, if he means anything he’s saying.

Melissa Parker: You have a personal friendship with Bernie Sanders?

Noam Chomsky: That’s kind of an exaggeration. When he was mayor of Burlington about 30 years ago, he did invite me up for a couple of days to give some talks at town hall, and I also spent time with him. We talked, and I kind of followed him around in his daily duties talking to firemen, people in old age homes, just discussing with people about their personal problems. I was struck by the fact that Sanders was able to engage very easily with people over quite a broad spectrum of attitudes, thoughts and class lines. I thought he was very effective.

Sanders calls himself a Socialist, but I think what that means is New Deal Democrat basically. A New Deal Democrat in today’s political spectrum is way off to the left. President Eisenhower, who said that anyone who doesn’t accept New Deal measures is out of the political system, would be regarded as a dangerous leftist today. Everything has moved so far to the right. I don’t agree with Sanders on everything, not surprisingly, but I think he’s a respectable New Deal Democrat whose proposals would help the country considerably. (...)


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 22, 2015 - 8:20am

Electing The President of an Empire

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 22, 2015 - 6:07am

 RichardPrins wrote:


 
got it running in the backgound

first visual observation



{#Wink}
R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 22, 2015 - 1:04am


sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Aug 15, 2015 - 7:25am


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 30, 2015 - 5:48pm


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 25, 2015 - 9:56am

Howard Zinn's one-man one-hour play "Marx in Soho"

Intro skipped
R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 22, 2015 - 10:03am


sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Jun 11, 2015 - 12:04pm

Obama is 'opportunist,' Hillary Clinton no different just 'more militant' - Noam Chomsky
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2015 - 3:43pm



after our dialog last night i wanted to post a link to c4ss - some praise and critique of chomsky on this site

Left-Libertarian - Classics, The Art of the Possible - Recovered
Chomsky’s Augustinian Anarchism

R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 3, 2015 - 5:16pm


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 1, 2015 - 11:50pm


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 3, 2015 - 11:08am

Noam Chomsky on Life & Love: Still Going at 86, Renowned Dissident is Newly Married | Democracy Now!
R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 20, 2015 - 11:12pm


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 27, 2015 - 2:35pm


Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19  Next