RP Listener Forum - Radio Paradise - eclectic commercial free Internet radio
[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Jeopardy! ~ worth watching again soon? - BlueHeronDruid - Mar 27, 2015 - 3:06pm
 
Name My Band - Antigone - Mar 27, 2015 - 3:01pm
 
Cool Stuff I Really Want - Alexandra - Mar 27, 2015 - 2:45pm
 
Vote for the next President now! - RichardPrins - Mar 27, 2015 - 2:35pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - BlueHeronDruid - Mar 27, 2015 - 2:12pm
 
Does the Avian Bird FLU concern you? - Coaxial - Mar 27, 2015 - 2:11pm
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - Coaxial - Mar 27, 2015 - 2:03pm
 
What makes you smile? - skyguy - Mar 27, 2015 - 1:51pm
 
• • • Clownstock • • •  - Proclivities - Mar 27, 2015 - 12:55pm
 
Medical Questions - kurtster - Mar 27, 2015 - 12:55pm
 
What Are You Grateful For? - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 27, 2015 - 11:07am
 
Things You Thought Today - Proclivities - Mar 27, 2015 - 11:06am
 
What Did You Do Today? - islander - Mar 27, 2015 - 10:59am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - randyblew - Mar 27, 2015 - 10:48am
 
Local Scandals, politics and news - Prodigal_SOB - Mar 27, 2015 - 10:17am
 
Breaking News - Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2015 - 10:00am
 
Counting with Pictures - mrtuba9 - Mar 27, 2015 - 8:26am
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 27, 2015 - 8:25am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Proclivities - Mar 27, 2015 - 7:02am
 
how do you feel right now? - Coaxial - Mar 27, 2015 - 4:53am
 
Unusual News - Proclivities - Mar 27, 2015 - 3:36am
 
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes (and Taxes) - Coaxial - Mar 26, 2015 - 10:16pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - Manbird - Mar 26, 2015 - 7:59pm
 
Oh, The Stupidity - DaveInVA - Mar 26, 2015 - 5:17pm
 
Business as Usual - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 5:01pm
 
Iran - kurtster - Mar 26, 2015 - 4:47pm
 
Questions. - buzz - Mar 26, 2015 - 4:23pm
 
Animation - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 4:10pm
 
Germany - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 3:18pm
 
Media Bias - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 3:02pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Mar 26, 2015 - 2:44pm
 
How's the weather? - DaveInVA - Mar 26, 2015 - 1:14pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - DaveInVA - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:51pm
 
Films you're excited about. - Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:30pm
 
By jimminy! Cricket! - haresfur - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:27pm
 
RadioParadise HD: API/webservice for integration in XBMC? - Neo_Moucha - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:21pm
 
Epic Facebook Statuses - Prodigal_SOB - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:05pm
 
Oklahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Prodigal_SOB - Mar 26, 2015 - 11:25am
 
Oh GOD, they're GAY! - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 11:18am
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - islander - Mar 26, 2015 - 11:13am
 
Movie Recommendation - lily34 - Mar 26, 2015 - 10:46am
 
George Bush's War: How many dead now? - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 10:44am
 
TV shows you watch - Proclivities - Mar 26, 2015 - 9:32am
 
RP App for Android - SaskWind87 - Mar 26, 2015 - 9:19am
 
Baseball, anyone? - Prodigal_SOB - Mar 26, 2015 - 8:31am
 
Climate Change - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 26, 2015 - 7:57am
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Mar 26, 2015 - 7:54am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - Mar 26, 2015 - 6:46am
 
Israel - kurtster - Mar 26, 2015 - 5:49am
 
Radiohead - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:02am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 25, 2015 - 11:44pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 11:16pm
 
What Did You See Today? - haresfur - Mar 25, 2015 - 9:40pm
 
Graphic designers, ho! - haresfur - Mar 25, 2015 - 9:39pm
 
Yemen - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 8:01pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:10pm
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - Antigone - Mar 25, 2015 - 3:33pm
 
Will you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - DaveInVA - Mar 25, 2015 - 3:31pm
 
Economix - kurtster - Mar 25, 2015 - 3:24pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - lily34 - Mar 25, 2015 - 11:33am
 
::TCM:: Turner Classic Movies - Steve - Mar 25, 2015 - 11:04am
 
Those lovable acronym guys & gals - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 10:49am
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 10:44am
 
How big are the shirts? - Proclivities - Mar 25, 2015 - 10:34am
 
what makes you frown - Alexandra - Mar 25, 2015 - 10:25am
 
Silly, just plain silly. - aflanigan - Mar 25, 2015 - 9:54am
 
Beer - Proclivities - Mar 25, 2015 - 8:20am
 
Venezuela - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 8:10am
 
Graphic designers, ho's! - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:55am
 
A nice light topic - Proclivities - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:29am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - lily34 - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:07am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Mar 25, 2015 - 6:25am
 
Swag ::::::>>> RP style - Proclivities - Mar 25, 2015 - 6:11am
 
Make Lily34 Laugh - meower - Mar 25, 2015 - 6:11am
 
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones - Coaxial - Mar 25, 2015 - 5:31am
 
(a public service of RP)
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » The Chomsky / Zinn Reader Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
Post to this Topic
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Mar 3, 2015 - 11:08am

Noam Chomsky on Life & Love: Still Going at 86, Renowned Dissident is Newly Married | Democracy Now!
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Feb 20, 2015 - 11:12pm


RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Jan 27, 2015 - 2:35pm


RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Dec 16, 2014 - 10:10pm


via
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Oct 29, 2014 - 12:16pm

What Makes Mainstream Media Mainstream (Chomsky, 1997)
(...) There is another sector of the media, the elite media, sometimes called the agenda-setting media because they are the ones with the big resources, they set the framework in which everyone else operates. The New York Times and CBS, that kind of thing. Their audience is mostly privileged people. The people who read the New York Times—people who are wealthy or part of what is sometimes called the political class—they are actually involved in the political system in an ongoing fashion. They are basically managers of one sort or another. They can be political managers, business managers (like corporate executives or that sort of thing), doctoral managers (like university professors), or other journalists who are involved in organizing the way people think and look at things.

The elite media set a framework within which others operate. If you are watching the Associated Press, who grind out a constant flow of news, in the mid-afternoon it breaks and there is something that comes along every day that says "Notice to Editors: Tomorrow’s New York Times is going to have the following stories on the front page." The point of that is, if you’re an editor of a newspaper in Dayton, Ohio and you don’t have the resources to figure out what the news is, or you don’t want to think about it anyway, this tells you what the news is. These are the stories for the quarter page that you are going to devote to something other than local affairs or diverting your audience. These are the stories that you put there because that’s what the New York Times tells us is what you’re supposed to care about tomorrow. If you are an editor in Dayton, Ohio, you would sort of have to do that, because you don’t have much else in the way of resources. If you get off line, if you’re producing stories that the big press doesn’t like, you’ll hear about it pretty soon. In fact, what just happened at San Jose Mercury News is a dramatic example of this. So there are a lot of ways in which power plays can drive you right back into line if you move out. If you try to break the mold, you’re not going to last long. That framework works pretty well, and it is understandable that it is just a reflection of obvious power structures.

The real mass media are basically trying to divert people. Let them do something else, but don’t bother us (us being the people who run the show). Let them get interested in professional sports, for example. Let everybody be crazed about professional sports or sex scandals or the personalities and their problems or something like that. Anything, as long as it isn’t serious. Of course, the serious stuff is for the big guys. "We" take care of that. (...)

RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Oct 16, 2014 - 9:49am



Noam Chomsky at UN (Oct 14th, 2014) "Solutions To The Israel-Palestine Conflict"
Chomsky starts at 7:36
Q&A starts at 38:14
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Oct 13, 2014 - 12:35pm

A People's History of the United States, Chapter 1: Columbus, The Indians, and Human Progress

RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 29, 2014 - 10:06am

Noam Chomsky—Infuriating and Necessary - The Daily Beast #books
You don’t have to buy Chomsky’s ideas wholesale to recognize that his often outrageous critiques of American democracy and capitalism usually hit their targets.

It is a testament to Noam Chomsky’s brilliance and bravery that despite his soft spoken manner and quiet personality, he manages to inspire fiery passion in millions of activists around the world, curiosity and conviction from students on nearly every college campus, and hatred from angry nationalists wearing red, white, and blue blindfolds. (...)


RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 11, 2014 - 12:01pm


Howard Zinn on Obama: "If you want to end terrorism, you have to stop being terrorists"
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 11, 2014 - 9:53am

Cease-Fires in Which Violations Never Cease: What's Next for Israel, Hamas and Gaza?

(...) The first of this series was the Agreement on Movement and Access Between Israel and the Palestinian Authority in November 2005.  It called for "a crossing between Gaza and Egypt at Rafah for the export of goods and the transit of people, continuous operation of crossings between Israel and Gaza for the import/export of goods, and the transit of people, reduction of obstacles to movement within the West Bank, bus and truck convoys between the West Bank and Gaza, the building of a seaport in Gaza, (and the) re-opening of the airport in Gaza" that Israeli bombing had demolished.

That agreement was reached shortly after Israel withdrew its settlers and military forces from Gaza.  The motive for the disengagement was explained by Dov Weissglass, a confidant of then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who was in charge of negotiating and implementing it. "The significance of the disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace process," Weissglass informed the Israeli press. "And when you freeze that process, you prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, and you prevent a discussion on the refugees, the borders, and Jerusalem. Effectively, this whole package called the Palestinian state, with all that it entails, has been removed indefinitely from our agenda. And all this with authority and permission. All with a (U.S.) presidential blessing and the ratification of both houses of Congress." True enough.

"The disengagement is actually formaldehyde," Weissglass added. "It supplies the amount of formaldehyde that is necessary so there will not be a political process with the Palestinians."  Israeli hawks also recognized that instead of investing substantial resources in maintaining a few thousand settlers in illegal communities in devastated Gaza, it made more sense to transfer them to illegal subsidized communities in areas of the West Bank that Israel intended to keep.

The disengagement was depicted as a noble effort to pursue peace, but the reality was quite different.  Israel never relinquished control of Gaza and is, accordingly, recognized as the occupying power by the United Nations, the U.S., and other states (Israel apart, of course).  In their comprehensive history of Israeli settlement in the occupied territories, Israeli scholars Idith Zertal and Akiva Eldar describe what actually happened when that country disengaged: the ruined territory was not released "for even a single day from Israel's military grip or from the price of the occupation that the inhabitants pay every day." After the disengagement, "Israel left behind scorched earth, devastated services, and people with neither a present nor a future.  The settlements were destroyed in an ungenerous move by an unenlightened occupier, which in fact continues to control the territory and kill and harass its inhabitants by means of its formidable military might." (...)


RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 5, 2014 - 10:39am

The End of History? - Noam Chomsky
The short, strange era of human civilization would appear to be drawing to a close.
An Indian army camp on the 'world's highest battlefield,' the Siachen Glacier. Long the site of brutal battles between India and Pakistan, the glacier is now melting as the result of climate change. (Annirudha Mookerjee/Getty Images)
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Sep 4, 2014 - 4:44pm


RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Aug 20, 2014 - 7:11pm


The Limitations and Problems with "Just War" Theory
Military Academy in West Point, New York on 4/20/2006
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Aug 13, 2014 - 5:20pm


RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Aug 5, 2014 - 9:06pm

How Many Minutes to Midnight?
(Why National Security Has Nothing to Do With Security)
Hiroshima Day 2014
By Noam Chomsky
If some extraterrestrial species were compiling a history of Homo sapiens, they might well break their calendar into two eras: BNW (before nuclear weapons) and NWE (the nuclear weapons era).  The latter era, of course, opened on August 6, 1945, the first day of the countdown to what may be the inglorious end of this strange species, which attained the intelligence to discover the effective means to destroy itself, but — so the evidence suggests — not the moral and intellectual capacity to control its worst instincts.

Day one of the NWE was marked by the “success” of Little Boy, a simple atomic bomb.  On day four, Nagasaki experienced the technological triumph of Fat Man, a more sophisticated design.  Five days later came what the official Air Force history calls the “grand finale,” a 1,000-plane raid — no mean logistical achievement — attacking Japan’s cities and killing many thousands of people, with leaflets falling among the bombs reading “Japan has surrendered.” Truman announced that surrender before the last B-29 returned to its base.

Those were the auspicious opening days of the NWE.  As we now enter its 70th year, we should be contemplating with wonder that we have survived.  We can only guess how many years remain.

Some reflections on these grim prospects were offered by General Lee Butler, former head of the U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM), which controls nuclear weapons and strategy.  Twenty years ago, he wrote that we had so far survived the NWE “by some combination of skill, luck, and divine intervention, and I suspect the latter in greatest proportion.”

Reflecting on his long career in developing nuclear weapons strategies and organizing the forces to implement them efficiently, he described himself ruefully as having been “among the most avid of these keepers of the faith in nuclear weapons.” But, he continued, he had come to realize that it was now his “burden to declare with all of the conviction I can muster that in my judgment they served us extremely ill.” And he asked, “By what authority do succeeding generations of leaders in the nuclear-weapons states usurp the power to dictate the odds of continued life on our planet? Most urgently, why does such breathtaking audacity persist at a moment when we should stand trembling in the face of our folly and united in our commitment to abolish its most deadly manifestations?”

He termed the U.S. strategic plan of 1960 that called for an automated all-out strike on the Communist world “the single most absurd and irresponsible document I have ever reviewed in my life.” Its Soviet counterpart was probably even more insane.  But it is important to bear in mind that there are competitors, not least among them the easy acceptance of extraordinary threats to survival. (...)

RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Aug 4, 2014 - 7:06pm

 mutepoint wrote:
As predicted.

Q.E.D. 
 
Evidently you're still missing the proverbial beam. {#Mrgreen}
Beaker

Beaker Avatar



Posted: Aug 4, 2014 - 6:55pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
mutepoint wrote:
I expect that you will continue to frantically dance on command at the sight of my various retorts to your propaganda.  Because you can't tolerate an opposing view without a condescending or unprovoked ad hom response.  Same like always.
  
Still projecting, cupcake? {#Mrgreen}

 
As predicted.

Q.E.D.  
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Aug 4, 2014 - 6:50pm

 mutepoint wrote:
I expect that you will continue to frantically dance on command at the sight of my various retorts to your propaganda.  Because you can't tolerate an opposing view without a condescending or unprovoked ad hom response.  Same like always.
 
Still projecting, cupcake? {#Mrgreen}
Beaker

Beaker Avatar



Posted: Aug 4, 2014 - 5:56pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

Surely you didn't expect me to defend Obama in the same way that you defended the Bush adventures? {#Mrgreen}

 
I expect that you will continue to frantically dance on command at the sight of my various retorts to your propaganda.  Because you can't tolerate an opposing view without a condescending or unprovoked ad hom response.  Same like always.
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Aug 4, 2014 - 5:48pm

 mutepoint wrote:
 
Surely you didn't expect me to defend Obama in the same way that you defended the Bush adventures? {#Mrgreen}
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18  Next