[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Counting with Pictures - ScottN - May 23, 2018 - 10:36pm
 
Freedom of speech? - R_P - May 23, 2018 - 8:56pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - BlueHeronDruid - May 23, 2018 - 8:43pm
 
Books read recently - haresfur - May 23, 2018 - 8:35pm
 
Things that piss me off - haresfur - May 23, 2018 - 8:31pm
 
Trump - R_P - May 23, 2018 - 7:48pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - zevon - May 23, 2018 - 7:28pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - oldviolin - May 23, 2018 - 7:13pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - May 23, 2018 - 6:51pm
 
The Truth Unfolds - Red_Dragon - May 23, 2018 - 6:15pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - May 23, 2018 - 12:16pm
 
Live Music - R_P - May 23, 2018 - 11:41am
 
Breaking News - R_P - May 23, 2018 - 10:49am
 
Celebrity Deaths - GeneP59 - May 23, 2018 - 9:16am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - May 23, 2018 - 9:10am
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - Proclivities - May 23, 2018 - 6:56am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - miamizsun - May 23, 2018 - 6:10am
 
Environmental, Brilliance or Stupidity - miamizsun - May 23, 2018 - 5:04am
 
World Music - R_P - May 23, 2018 - 12:34am
 
Latin Music - R_P - May 23, 2018 - 12:24am
 
The Obituary Page - ScottN - May 22, 2018 - 8:54pm
 
BACK TO THE 80's - R_P - May 22, 2018 - 7:16pm
 
Guns - kcar - May 22, 2018 - 7:12pm
 
TV shows you watch - kcar - May 22, 2018 - 6:12pm
 
How To Be Politically Correct, A Primer - R_P - May 22, 2018 - 4:09pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - Antigone - May 22, 2018 - 3:16pm
 
oh boy CAKE! - haresfur - May 22, 2018 - 2:49pm
 
New Music - JrzyTmata - May 22, 2018 - 12:52pm
 
what about those emo kids? - Proclivities - May 22, 2018 - 11:27am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - May 22, 2018 - 10:56am
 
When are you too old to drive? - meower - May 22, 2018 - 10:27am
 
Back to the 00's - rhahl - May 22, 2018 - 10:21am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - kurtster - May 22, 2018 - 7:14am
 
XPRIZE & Singularity University - miamizsun - May 22, 2018 - 4:12am
 
Milk squirting in Turkey??? - miamizsun - May 22, 2018 - 4:06am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Contaminator - May 22, 2018 - 12:45am
 
Your Current Crush - Alexandra - May 21, 2018 - 11:12pm
 
Immigration - haresfur - May 21, 2018 - 11:11pm
 
Ridiculous or Funny Spam - R_P - May 21, 2018 - 10:50pm
 
Those Silly FBI Guys! - ScottFromWyoming - May 21, 2018 - 10:21pm
 
"Everybody Must Get Stoned" actually not about drugs - Manbird - May 21, 2018 - 8:44pm
 
International Year of Rumi - 2007 - oldviolin - May 21, 2018 - 6:30pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - May 21, 2018 - 6:07pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - R_P - May 21, 2018 - 5:34pm
 
Coffee - Manbird - May 21, 2018 - 5:33pm
 
The Great Divide: Retro vs. Metro America - Manbird - May 21, 2018 - 5:28pm
 
Toodledo and/or OpenID - Manbird - May 21, 2018 - 5:18pm
 
Fun For Fingers - Manbird - May 21, 2018 - 5:12pm
 
• • • Lost and Found • • •  - Manbird - May 21, 2018 - 5:09pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - haresfur - May 21, 2018 - 4:03pm
 
PANTS ON FIRE! - miamizsun - May 21, 2018 - 3:53pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - haresfur - May 21, 2018 - 2:36pm
 
illegal immigrants - R_P - May 21, 2018 - 2:29pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - May 21, 2018 - 1:38pm
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - May 21, 2018 - 8:46am
 
What are you reading now? - rhahl - May 21, 2018 - 7:12am
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - May 21, 2018 - 6:32am
 
Classical Music - R_P - May 20, 2018 - 9:01pm
 
Buying a Car - SeriousLee - May 20, 2018 - 6:58pm
 
BillyGee's Greatest Segues - SeriousLee - May 20, 2018 - 4:07pm
 
Stuff I've Said Out Loud - Antigone - May 20, 2018 - 2:46pm
 
PUNS - BIRDS - oldviolin - May 20, 2018 - 2:13pm
 
Race in America - R_P - May 20, 2018 - 1:52pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Antigone - May 20, 2018 - 12:00pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - Antigone - May 20, 2018 - 11:03am
 
Is Wikipedia Objective? - maryte - May 20, 2018 - 8:20am
 
More reggae, less Marley please - sirdroseph - May 20, 2018 - 6:26am
 
Beer - sirdroseph - May 20, 2018 - 6:23am
 
songs that ROCK! - R_P - May 20, 2018 - 2:03am
 
Iran - richskarma - May 19, 2018 - 11:05pm
 
Make me a stereo system! (poof!!) - Beaker - May 19, 2018 - 8:51pm
 
Radio Paradise on the Amazon Echo - jarro - May 19, 2018 - 4:30pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - maryte - May 19, 2018 - 10:52am
 
What Are You Grateful For? - triskele - May 19, 2018 - 5:47am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - SeriousLee - May 19, 2018 - 4:26am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » The Chomsky / Zinn Reader Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Dec 1, 2017 - 12:37pm

 miamizsun wrote:
i don't suppose you know anyone who may have grabbed a copy...  {#Shifty} 
 
I might. Let me check...

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 1, 2017 - 4:12am

 R_P wrote:
I guess so.
 
i don't suppose you know anyone who may have grabbed a copy...  {#Shifty}
R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Nov 30, 2017 - 11:12am

 miamizsun wrote:
?

i see dollar signs

maybe it was time sensitive
 
I guess so.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2017 - 6:02am

 R_P wrote:
Free ebook:
Noam Chomsky - Requiem for the American Dream: The 10 Principles of Concentration of Wealth & Power

 
?

i see dollar signs

maybe it was time sensitive

R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Nov 28, 2017 - 12:39pm

Free ebook:
Noam Chomsky - Requiem for the American Dream: The 10 Principles of Concentration of Wealth & Power
R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Nov 18, 2017 - 11:37am

Edward S. Herman, media critic who co-wrote ‘Manufacturing Consent,’ dies at 92

Edward S. Herman, an economist who collaborated with scholar and political activist Noam Chomsky on blistering critiques of U.S. foreign policy and the mass media, most influentially with their book “Manufacturing Consent,” died Nov. 11 at a hospital near his home in Penn Valley, Pa. He was 92.

Dr. Herman had bladder cancer, said his wife, Christine Abbott. The disease was not diagnosed until after his death.

An emeritus professor of finance at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business, Dr. Herman was known as a soft-spoken, cat-loving pianist, fond of donning a T-shirt that read “Thank God for Mozart” during times of political tumult.

Yet his tenderness in person was belied by a ferocious rhetorical style in his prose, where he criticized “humanitarian wars” in Iraq and Vietnam, and lambasted mainstream media outlets. (...)


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jul 4, 2017 - 3:40pm

If somebody would kindly explain to me what Neo-liberalism is, I would be much obliged.
R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 4, 2017 - 11:50am


R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 2, 2017 - 6:49pm


R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 3, 2017 - 4:08pm

Arkansas' Howard Zinn Witch-Hunt Fizzles
Why the great historian would have loved what transpired over the past few weeks

R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 17, 2017 - 11:52am


R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: May 17, 2016 - 12:47am


R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: May 11, 2016 - 4:34pm

The Costs of Violence
Masters of Mankind (Part 2)
In brief, the Global War on Terror sledgehammer strategy has spread jihadi terror from a tiny corner of Afghanistan to much of the world, from Africa through the Levant and South Asia to Southeast Asia. It has also incited attacks in Europe and the United States. The invasion of Iraq made a substantial contribution to this process, much as intelligence agencies had predicted. Terrorism specialists Peter Bergen and Paul Cruickshank estimate that the Iraq War “generated a stunning sevenfold increase in the yearly rate of fatal jihadist attacks, amounting to literally hundreds of additional terrorist attacks and thousands of civilian lives lost; even when terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan is excluded, fatal attacks in the rest of the world have increased by more than one-third.” Other exercises have been similarly productive. (...)

R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: May 9, 2016 - 12:01am

American Power Under Challenge
Masters of Mankind (Part 1)
By Noam Chomsky

(This piece, the first of two parts, is excerpted from Noam Chomsky’s new book, Who Rules the World? (Metropolitan Books). Part 2 will be posted on Tuesday morning.)

When we ask “Who rules the world?” we commonly adopt the standard convention that the actors in world affairs are states, primarily the great powers, and we consider their decisions and the relations among them. That is not wrong. But we would do well to keep in mind that this level of abstraction can also be highly misleading.

States of course have complex internal structures, and the choices and decisions of the political leadership are heavily influenced by internal concentrations of power, while the general population is often marginalized. That is true even for the more democratic societies, and obviously for others. We cannot gain a realistic understanding of who rules the world while ignoring the “masters of mankind,” as Adam Smith called them: in his day, the merchants and manufacturers of England; in ours, multinational conglomerates, huge financial institutions, retail empires, and the like. Still following Smith, it is also wise to attend to the “vile maxim” to which the “masters of mankind” are dedicated: “All for ourselves and nothing for other people” — a doctrine known otherwise as bitter and incessant class war, often one-sided, much to the detriment of the people of the home country and the world.

In the contemporary global order, the institutions of the masters hold enormous power, not only in the international arena but also within their home states, on which they rely to protect their power and to provide economic support by a wide variety of means. When we consider the role of the masters of mankind, we turn to such state policy priorities of the moment as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, one of the investor-rights agreements mislabeled “free-trade agreements” in propaganda and commentary. They are negotiated in secret, apart from the hundreds of corporate lawyers and lobbyists writing the crucial details. The intention is to have them adopted in good Stalinist style with “fast track” procedures designed to block discussion and allow only the choice of yes or no (hence yes). The designers regularly do quite well, not surprisingly. People are incidental, with the consequences one might anticipate. (...)


bokey
I haven’t seen the Democrats this mad since we freed the slaves
bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 31, 2016 - 4:03pm

 R_P wrote: 
Doo doo.Poopy head.
R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 31, 2016 - 3:03pm

A Conversation on Privacy With Edward Snowden, Noam Chomsky, and Glenn Greenwald

R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 19, 2016 - 1:24pm

Chomsky and his critics

When the Swedish Academy awarded Bertrand Russell a Nobel Prize, the philosopher was uneasy. I have always supposed, he wrote, that one cannot be respectable without being wicked. He conducted his life out of step with the creed of authority. Twice imprisoned and twice removed from his academic post for his broadsides against war and religion, the aristocratic radical actively courted the displeasure of an elite that made his grandfather prime minister of England. And when, of late, it was disclosed that the CIA had spied on Noam Chomsky, it was not much of a revelation that he too is a prime target for the respectable.

An extensive literature has grown up over the years that pegs him as, variously, a Holocaust denier, a neo-Nazi fellow traveller, a Stalin admirer, a Hezbollah adviser, a Saddam Hussein defender, and a Pol Pot sympathiser. These indictments come not just from the remote wilds of the rightwing media. They come from liberal sectors of the press.

What accounts for the obsession? One has long suspected that his critics work in teams to revile him. But the full extent of their collusion has remained unclear. Documents that have come to light reveal that it is a tightly orchestrated network of foreign policy hawks in the press, academia, and politics, some connected with the Henry Jackson Society (HJS), a neoconservative think tank with links to political officials in the United States and Great Britain. The remarks that follow will trace the connections between the key figures of this circle, past and present. (...)


R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 16, 2016 - 9:34am



"Requiem for the American Dream": Wake Up Call!

Noam Chomsky's new film "Requiem for the American Dream" is a clear-eyed, easily accessible outline of how and why American idealism has been sabotaged. Although he doesn't detail the dream, Chomsky sketches its promise of mobility, an expectation of progress toward a better life through some sort of democratic polity.

These documentary interviews, filmed over four years, suggest that the destruction of the dream is not a natural, inexorable occurrence, but the result of choices made by people operating within certain belief systems and for self-enrichment. Could the dream have been realized through different circumstances, different people making different choices?

Regarded by many as America's most influential intellectual, Noam Chomsky is also a great story teller. Without overwhelming the viewer or the material, he marshals data, example and anecdote, cutting through 250 years of history to distill ten basic principles of wealth and power which have conspired against the American Dream. More than anything, the film is a well organized, thoughtful look at these forces and their consequences.

This is not an exhortative polemic. Although Chomsky is not dispassionate, he is more saddened than outraged, more intent on finding cause than inciting action. Unlike fellow system critics like ubiquitous former Labor Secretary cum political reformist Robert Reich, Chomsky neither suggests, nor pleads for saving capitalism through economic reshuffling or revitalized bourgeois democratic elections.

Chomsky finds the roots of the Requiem in how the United States was originally set up. The U.S. Constitution put power in the hands of the wealthy. The Constitution was written to prevent, not promote, democracy. Concentrations of wealth resulted in concentrations of political power. The course of our history has been defined by the struggles of this wealth and political power against upsurges in democratization, most notably in the 1930s labor movement and the 1960s peace, civil rights and women's movements.

Power and wealth fought back against these popular movements by trying to shape ideology and manufacture consent. Elections are engineered. Attempts to regulate the economy are undermined. Solidarity of the American dreamers is attacked. As Chomsky has shown through earlier work ("Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media" with Edward S. Herman, 1988) control was extended beyond the use of force into the domain of culture by marketing compliance and marginalizing dissent.

Chomsky himself provides an example of the extent to which dissent is marginalized when he chooses to avoid mentioning by name the great sources of ideas which help us understand how power and wealth function: socialists like Gramsci, Lukacs or even the scholar of the British Museum himself. Rather than end his dissertation in despair, Chomsky offers elements of hope, if not exactly a well lit path to redemption. Popular movements, efforts to dismantle illegitimate authority, freedom of speech and new forms of political action all offer hope. He cites philosopher John Dewey's admonition that institutions should be under participatory democratic control. What matters, relates Chomsky quoting his friend Historian Howard Zinn, is the countless deeds of unknown people who lay the basis for the events of human history. Ultimately, learning how the world works will greatly aid in changing it. For his great contributions to the latter, particularly the summary given in "Requiem for the American Dream," Noam Chomsky has helped lay the foundations for understanding and ultimately change.


R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 14, 2016 - 10:08am

Why I Choose Optimism Over Despair: An Interview With Noam Chomsky

One of philosophy's central and most perplexing questions is, "Who are we?" Indeed, virtually all essential questions about human civilization, power, authority and governance follow from the question of what kind of creatures we are.

But is there really something distinct about us as a species? Or, to put the question in a more traditional philosophical context, is there such a thing as human nature? Classical philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle thought so, and so did most philosophers that form part of the modern tradition, beginning with Thomas Hobbes and going all the way up to Nietzsche. Of course, scientists have also probed human nature, and continue to do so down to this day, with the question being of particular interest to linguists, evolutionary biologists, neuroscientists and psychologists.

Noam Chomsky, one of the world's most influential linguists (the same prolific scholar known around the world for his trenchant critiques of US foreign policy and critical analyses on a wide range of social and political issues), has also been preoccupied for much of his life with the perennial question of what kind of creatures we are. His pathbreaking contributions to the field of linguistics have considerably advanced our understanding of the human mind, which has in turn influenced a diverse area of studies, ranging from cognitive science and computer science to philosophy and psychology.

Chomsky's latest book, just released by Columbia University Press, is fittingly titled, What Kind of Creatures Are We? The book is a collection of lectures delivered by Chomsky at Columbia University in December 2013, delving into areas like cognitive science, linguistics, philosophy and political theory. I talked with Chomsky about the book, his scientific explorations of language and the mind, and his views on society and politics in this exclusive interview for Truthout. (...)


R_P
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 27, 2016 - 7:11pm

Noam Chomsky Interview: “Enormous Sense of Hopelessness and Anger” Reflected in Appeal of Trump and Sanders
(...) I assume that Hillary Clinton will win the Democratic nomination just because of the nature of our electoral system, which is basically now “bought” elections overwhelmingly, and the major funders will probably succeed at putting her across. What Bernie Sanders has achieved is pretty remarkable, but I doubt very much, in our existing system, he can make it beyond the primaries. So I think a fair guess is that Clinton will be nominated.

On the other side, it is probably going to be either Donald Trump or Ted Cruz. In my opinion, Cruz is scarier than Trump. Trump is a kind of wildcard, but Cruz is really dangerous, if he means anything he’s saying.

Melissa Parker: You have a personal friendship with Bernie Sanders?

Noam Chomsky: That’s kind of an exaggeration. When he was mayor of Burlington about 30 years ago, he did invite me up for a couple of days to give some talks at town hall, and I also spent time with him. We talked, and I kind of followed him around in his daily duties talking to firemen, people in old age homes, just discussing with people about their personal problems. I was struck by the fact that Sanders was able to engage very easily with people over quite a broad spectrum of attitudes, thoughts and class lines. I thought he was very effective.

Sanders calls himself a Socialist, but I think what that means is New Deal Democrat basically. A New Deal Democrat in today’s political spectrum is way off to the left. President Eisenhower, who said that anyone who doesn’t accept New Deal measures is out of the political system, would be regarded as a dangerous leftist today. Everything has moved so far to the right. I don’t agree with Sanders on everything, not surprisingly, but I think he’s a respectable New Deal Democrat whose proposals would help the country considerably. (...)


Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20  Next