[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Regarding dogs - sirdroseph - Sep 28, 2016 - 2:59am
 
Ask the Libertarian - rexi - Sep 28, 2016 - 1:31am
 
RP3 Beta Player - sjuttiosju - Sep 28, 2016 - 12:22am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Danny_G - Sep 27, 2016 - 11:04pm
 
2016 Elections - kcar - Sep 27, 2016 - 9:56pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos; Please Limit to 510 ... - fractalv - Sep 27, 2016 - 9:48pm
 
Trump - kcar - Sep 27, 2016 - 9:45pm
 
Make Lily34 Laugh - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 27, 2016 - 9:19pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - Red_Dragon - Sep 27, 2016 - 8:00pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oppositelock - Sep 27, 2016 - 7:51pm
 
how do you feel right now? - PoundPuppy - Sep 27, 2016 - 7:00pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - GeneP59 - Sep 27, 2016 - 7:00pm
 
The Obituary Page - GeneP59 - Sep 27, 2016 - 6:49pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - pontfarrer - Sep 27, 2016 - 6:33pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - GeneP59 - Sep 27, 2016 - 5:49pm
 
Back to the 00's - rhahl - Sep 27, 2016 - 5:25pm
 
Caretakers Of Our Parents - FourFortyEight - Sep 27, 2016 - 4:46pm
 
Regarding cats - DaveInVA - Sep 27, 2016 - 3:38pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Antigone - Sep 27, 2016 - 3:33pm
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - DaveInVA - Sep 27, 2016 - 1:27pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 27, 2016 - 12:46pm
 
Name My Band - Red_Dragon - Sep 27, 2016 - 12:34pm
 
Coffee - miamizsun - Sep 27, 2016 - 11:55am
 
Question for hard-core Firefox techies - BillG - Sep 27, 2016 - 11:52am
 
Books read recently - rhahl - Sep 27, 2016 - 10:27am
 
Donald Trump and the exodus to Canada - sirdroseph - Sep 27, 2016 - 9:37am
 
Science benefitting us old codgers - aflanigan - Sep 27, 2016 - 9:08am
 
Word of the Day - lily34 - Sep 27, 2016 - 6:45am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Sep 27, 2016 - 6:12am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - miamizsun - Sep 27, 2016 - 4:59am
 
Poetry Forum - Manbird - Sep 26, 2016 - 9:57pm
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Sep 26, 2016 - 7:33pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Sep 26, 2016 - 5:07pm
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - oldviolin - Sep 26, 2016 - 4:50pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - oldviolin - Sep 26, 2016 - 4:21pm
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - DaveInVA - Sep 26, 2016 - 2:54pm
 
Make Jrzy Laugh - JrzyTmata - Sep 26, 2016 - 1:56pm
 
How's the weather? - BlueHeronDruid - Sep 26, 2016 - 12:40pm
 
Jrzy Updates - JrzyTmata - Sep 26, 2016 - 12:27pm
 
Unindicted felon: candidate Hillary Clinton - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 26, 2016 - 10:26am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - lily34 - Sep 26, 2016 - 8:59am
 
What makes you smile? - Coaxial - Sep 26, 2016 - 7:16am
 
Beer - Proclivities - Sep 26, 2016 - 6:52am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - kurtster - Sep 25, 2016 - 7:01pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Sep 25, 2016 - 5:08pm
 
The war on Funk is over! - rhahl - Sep 25, 2016 - 5:05pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - triskele - Sep 25, 2016 - 4:46pm
 
Back to the 90's - rhahl - Sep 25, 2016 - 3:16pm
 
Back to the 10's - rhahl - Sep 25, 2016 - 2:58pm
 
FOUR WORDS - rmgman - Sep 25, 2016 - 2:23pm
 
THREE WORDS - rmgman - Sep 25, 2016 - 2:22pm
 
TWO WORDS - rmgman - Sep 25, 2016 - 2:21pm
 
ONE WORD - rmgman - Sep 25, 2016 - 2:20pm
 
Cloud Gazing (Photos You've Taken) - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 25, 2016 - 1:10pm
 
Back to the 60's - rhahl - Sep 25, 2016 - 11:14am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Sep 25, 2016 - 10:55am
 
punk? hip-hop? metal? noise? garage? - rhahl - Sep 25, 2016 - 10:29am
 
songs that ROCK! - rhahl - Sep 25, 2016 - 7:46am
 
Protest Songs - kurtster - Sep 25, 2016 - 3:28am
 
Show us your NEW _______________!!!! - JrzyTmata - Sep 24, 2016 - 5:00pm
 
Back to the 70's - rhahl - Sep 24, 2016 - 3:12pm
 
Curious; why is RP discontinuing the merchandise? - Steely_D - Sep 24, 2016 - 10:56am
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - miamizsun - Sep 24, 2016 - 10:46am
 
Questions. - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 23, 2016 - 8:32pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 23, 2016 - 8:27pm
 
No more commercials please - aflanigan - Sep 23, 2016 - 1:59pm
 
Celebrity News - DaveInVA - Sep 23, 2016 - 1:41pm
 
Best Song Comments. - Proclivities - Sep 23, 2016 - 11:30am
 
RPeeps I miss. - Antigone - Sep 23, 2016 - 10:47am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - LowPhreak - Sep 23, 2016 - 10:00am
 
Re-written stories or headlines - Red_Dragon - Sep 23, 2016 - 9:48am
 
End of the Journals ? - steeler - Sep 23, 2016 - 6:40am
 
Covers that are better than the original - olivertwist - Sep 22, 2016 - 4:21pm
 
Surfing! - miamizsun - Sep 22, 2016 - 3:36pm
 
Peace - miamizsun - Sep 22, 2016 - 3:28pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » The Chomsky / Zinn Reader Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: May 17, 2016 - 12:47am


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: May 11, 2016 - 4:34pm

The Costs of Violence
Masters of Mankind (Part 2)
In brief, the Global War on Terror sledgehammer strategy has spread jihadi terror from a tiny corner of Afghanistan to much of the world, from Africa through the Levant and South Asia to Southeast Asia. It has also incited attacks in Europe and the United States. The invasion of Iraq made a substantial contribution to this process, much as intelligence agencies had predicted. Terrorism specialists Peter Bergen and Paul Cruickshank estimate that the Iraq War “generated a stunning sevenfold increase in the yearly rate of fatal jihadist attacks, amounting to literally hundreds of additional terrorist attacks and thousands of civilian lives lost; even when terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan is excluded, fatal attacks in the rest of the world have increased by more than one-third.” Other exercises have been similarly productive. (...)

R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: May 9, 2016 - 12:01am

American Power Under Challenge
Masters of Mankind (Part 1)
By Noam Chomsky

(This piece, the first of two parts, is excerpted from Noam Chomsky’s new book, Who Rules the World? (Metropolitan Books). Part 2 will be posted on Tuesday morning.)

When we ask “Who rules the world?” we commonly adopt the standard convention that the actors in world affairs are states, primarily the great powers, and we consider their decisions and the relations among them. That is not wrong. But we would do well to keep in mind that this level of abstraction can also be highly misleading.

States of course have complex internal structures, and the choices and decisions of the political leadership are heavily influenced by internal concentrations of power, while the general population is often marginalized. That is true even for the more democratic societies, and obviously for others. We cannot gain a realistic understanding of who rules the world while ignoring the “masters of mankind,” as Adam Smith called them: in his day, the merchants and manufacturers of England; in ours, multinational conglomerates, huge financial institutions, retail empires, and the like. Still following Smith, it is also wise to attend to the “vile maxim” to which the “masters of mankind” are dedicated: “All for ourselves and nothing for other people” — a doctrine known otherwise as bitter and incessant class war, often one-sided, much to the detriment of the people of the home country and the world.

In the contemporary global order, the institutions of the masters hold enormous power, not only in the international arena but also within their home states, on which they rely to protect their power and to provide economic support by a wide variety of means. When we consider the role of the masters of mankind, we turn to such state policy priorities of the moment as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, one of the investor-rights agreements mislabeled “free-trade agreements” in propaganda and commentary. They are negotiated in secret, apart from the hundreds of corporate lawyers and lobbyists writing the crucial details. The intention is to have them adopted in good Stalinist style with “fast track” procedures designed to block discussion and allow only the choice of yes or no (hence yes). The designers regularly do quite well, not surprisingly. People are incidental, with the consequences one might anticipate. (...)


bokey
Beep!
bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 31, 2016 - 4:03pm

 R_P wrote: 
Doo doo.Poopy head.
R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 31, 2016 - 3:03pm

A Conversation on Privacy With Edward Snowden, Noam Chomsky, and Glenn Greenwald

R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 19, 2016 - 1:24pm

Chomsky and his critics

When the Swedish Academy awarded Bertrand Russell a Nobel Prize, the philosopher was uneasy. I have always supposed, he wrote, that one cannot be respectable without being wicked. He conducted his life out of step with the creed of authority. Twice imprisoned and twice removed from his academic post for his broadsides against war and religion, the aristocratic radical actively courted the displeasure of an elite that made his grandfather prime minister of England. And when, of late, it was disclosed that the CIA had spied on Noam Chomsky, it was not much of a revelation that he too is a prime target for the respectable.

An extensive literature has grown up over the years that pegs him as, variously, a Holocaust denier, a neo-Nazi fellow traveller, a Stalin admirer, a Hezbollah adviser, a Saddam Hussein defender, and a Pol Pot sympathiser. These indictments come not just from the remote wilds of the rightwing media. They come from liberal sectors of the press.

What accounts for the obsession? One has long suspected that his critics work in teams to revile him. But the full extent of their collusion has remained unclear. Documents that have come to light reveal that it is a tightly orchestrated network of foreign policy hawks in the press, academia, and politics, some connected with the Henry Jackson Society (HJS), a neoconservative think tank with links to political officials in the United States and Great Britain. The remarks that follow will trace the connections between the key figures of this circle, past and present. (...)


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 16, 2016 - 9:34am



"Requiem for the American Dream": Wake Up Call!

Noam Chomsky's new film "Requiem for the American Dream" is a clear-eyed, easily accessible outline of how and why American idealism has been sabotaged. Although he doesn't detail the dream, Chomsky sketches its promise of mobility, an expectation of progress toward a better life through some sort of democratic polity.

These documentary interviews, filmed over four years, suggest that the destruction of the dream is not a natural, inexorable occurrence, but the result of choices made by people operating within certain belief systems and for self-enrichment. Could the dream have been realized through different circumstances, different people making different choices?

Regarded by many as America's most influential intellectual, Noam Chomsky is also a great story teller. Without overwhelming the viewer or the material, he marshals data, example and anecdote, cutting through 250 years of history to distill ten basic principles of wealth and power which have conspired against the American Dream. More than anything, the film is a well organized, thoughtful look at these forces and their consequences.

This is not an exhortative polemic. Although Chomsky is not dispassionate, he is more saddened than outraged, more intent on finding cause than inciting action. Unlike fellow system critics like ubiquitous former Labor Secretary cum political reformist Robert Reich, Chomsky neither suggests, nor pleads for saving capitalism through economic reshuffling or revitalized bourgeois democratic elections.

Chomsky finds the roots of the Requiem in how the United States was originally set up. The U.S. Constitution put power in the hands of the wealthy. The Constitution was written to prevent, not promote, democracy. Concentrations of wealth resulted in concentrations of political power. The course of our history has been defined by the struggles of this wealth and political power against upsurges in democratization, most notably in the 1930s labor movement and the 1960s peace, civil rights and women's movements.

Power and wealth fought back against these popular movements by trying to shape ideology and manufacture consent. Elections are engineered. Attempts to regulate the economy are undermined. Solidarity of the American dreamers is attacked. As Chomsky has shown through earlier work ("Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media" with Edward S. Herman, 1988) control was extended beyond the use of force into the domain of culture by marketing compliance and marginalizing dissent.

Chomsky himself provides an example of the extent to which dissent is marginalized when he chooses to avoid mentioning by name the great sources of ideas which help us understand how power and wealth function: socialists like Gramsci, Lukacs or even the scholar of the British Museum himself. Rather than end his dissertation in despair, Chomsky offers elements of hope, if not exactly a well lit path to redemption. Popular movements, efforts to dismantle illegitimate authority, freedom of speech and new forms of political action all offer hope. He cites philosopher John Dewey's admonition that institutions should be under participatory democratic control. What matters, relates Chomsky quoting his friend Historian Howard Zinn, is the countless deeds of unknown people who lay the basis for the events of human history. Ultimately, learning how the world works will greatly aid in changing it. For his great contributions to the latter, particularly the summary given in "Requiem for the American Dream," Noam Chomsky has helped lay the foundations for understanding and ultimately change.


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 14, 2016 - 10:08am

Why I Choose Optimism Over Despair: An Interview With Noam Chomsky

One of philosophy's central and most perplexing questions is, "Who are we?" Indeed, virtually all essential questions about human civilization, power, authority and governance follow from the question of what kind of creatures we are.

But is there really something distinct about us as a species? Or, to put the question in a more traditional philosophical context, is there such a thing as human nature? Classical philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle thought so, and so did most philosophers that form part of the modern tradition, beginning with Thomas Hobbes and going all the way up to Nietzsche. Of course, scientists have also probed human nature, and continue to do so down to this day, with the question being of particular interest to linguists, evolutionary biologists, neuroscientists and psychologists.

Noam Chomsky, one of the world's most influential linguists (the same prolific scholar known around the world for his trenchant critiques of US foreign policy and critical analyses on a wide range of social and political issues), has also been preoccupied for much of his life with the perennial question of what kind of creatures we are. His pathbreaking contributions to the field of linguistics have considerably advanced our understanding of the human mind, which has in turn influenced a diverse area of studies, ranging from cognitive science and computer science to philosophy and psychology.

Chomsky's latest book, just released by Columbia University Press, is fittingly titled, What Kind of Creatures Are We? The book is a collection of lectures delivered by Chomsky at Columbia University in December 2013, delving into areas like cognitive science, linguistics, philosophy and political theory. I talked with Chomsky about the book, his scientific explorations of language and the mind, and his views on society and politics in this exclusive interview for Truthout. (...)


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 27, 2016 - 7:11pm

Noam Chomsky Interview: “Enormous Sense of Hopelessness and Anger” Reflected in Appeal of Trump and Sanders
(...) I assume that Hillary Clinton will win the Democratic nomination just because of the nature of our electoral system, which is basically now “bought” elections overwhelmingly, and the major funders will probably succeed at putting her across. What Bernie Sanders has achieved is pretty remarkable, but I doubt very much, in our existing system, he can make it beyond the primaries. So I think a fair guess is that Clinton will be nominated.

On the other side, it is probably going to be either Donald Trump or Ted Cruz. In my opinion, Cruz is scarier than Trump. Trump is a kind of wildcard, but Cruz is really dangerous, if he means anything he’s saying.

Melissa Parker: You have a personal friendship with Bernie Sanders?

Noam Chomsky: That’s kind of an exaggeration. When he was mayor of Burlington about 30 years ago, he did invite me up for a couple of days to give some talks at town hall, and I also spent time with him. We talked, and I kind of followed him around in his daily duties talking to firemen, people in old age homes, just discussing with people about their personal problems. I was struck by the fact that Sanders was able to engage very easily with people over quite a broad spectrum of attitudes, thoughts and class lines. I thought he was very effective.

Sanders calls himself a Socialist, but I think what that means is New Deal Democrat basically. A New Deal Democrat in today’s political spectrum is way off to the left. President Eisenhower, who said that anyone who doesn’t accept New Deal measures is out of the political system, would be regarded as a dangerous leftist today. Everything has moved so far to the right. I don’t agree with Sanders on everything, not surprisingly, but I think he’s a respectable New Deal Democrat whose proposals would help the country considerably. (...)


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 22, 2015 - 8:20am

Electing The President of an Empire

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 22, 2015 - 6:07am

 RichardPrins wrote:


 
got it running in the backgound

first visual observation



{#Wink}
R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 22, 2015 - 1:04am


sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Aug 15, 2015 - 7:25am


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 30, 2015 - 5:48pm


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 25, 2015 - 9:56am

Howard Zinn's one-man one-hour play "Marx in Soho"

Intro skipped
R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 22, 2015 - 10:03am


sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Jun 11, 2015 - 12:04pm

Obama is 'opportunist,' Hillary Clinton no different just 'more militant' - Noam Chomsky
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2015 - 3:43pm



after our dialog last night i wanted to post a link to c4ss - some praise and critique of chomsky on this site

Left-Libertarian - Classics, The Art of the Possible - Recovered
Chomsky’s Augustinian Anarchism

R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 3, 2015 - 5:16pm


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 1, 2015 - 11:50pm


Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19  Next