RP Listener Forum - Radio Paradise

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 11:15pm

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 10:13pm

Alexandra wrote:

Well, all my albums and organization were lost with the absence of Pro. Will the new free thing accommodate all the same image volumes?

You're asking me like I know. I think so. I just have to see how much we have uploaded. I think about half a TB.

Pro

Unlimited Storage
Ad Free
Detailed Stats

Free

1 Terabyte
With Ads
No Stats

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 10:09pm

islander wrote:

Notscripts / noscripts will keep you from seeing most ads.

Yeah, but it's not the ads, usually, that bug me as much as how they blow up the layout. With an ad blocker there'll just be big holes, I guess.

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 10:07pm

ScottFromWyoming wrote:

They'll let anyone switch their pro account to a free account. You get ads with the free, and no stats, which are fun but are they worth it? I'm going to look at it without logging in for a while and see if the ads are egregious.

Well, all my albums and organization were lost with the absence of Pro. Will the new free thing accommodate all the same image volumes?

EDIT: Oops - just peeked in. Now I see what you're talking about. The sets are restored. Kinda looks like Facebook.

Yay!

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 9:51pm

ScottFromWyoming wrote:

They'll let anyone switch their pro account to a free account. You get ads with the free, and no stats, which are fun but are they worth it? I'm going to look at it without logging in for a while and see if the ads are egregious.

Notscripts / noscripts will keep you from seeing most ads.

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 9:50pm

Alexandra wrote:

They'll let anyone switch their pro account to a free account. You get ads with the free, and no stats, which are fun but are they worth it? I'm going to look at it without logging in for a while and see if the ads are egregious.

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 9:37pm

ScottFromWyoming wrote:

...which is a Terabyte! Rawr!

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 9:14pm

Alexandra wrote:

Sounds like a dinosaur name.

I need to renew my Flickr....I let my Pro account lapse, now I'm down to the bare minimum.

...which is a Terabyte! Rawr!

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 8:58pm

ScottFromWyoming wrote:

Flickr: Everyone gets a free terabyte. And they fancied up the layout too.

Sounds like a dinosaur name.

I need to renew my Flickr....I let my Pro account lapse, now I'm down to the bare minimum.

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 8:33pm

Leslie wrote:

The timing sucks, because I just renewed my "Pro" fee a couple months ago. It's a great move, though.

Us, too. But I wonder if we get something they don't. Aside from the fact that we have like 9000 images up already.

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 7:46pm

ScottFromWyoming wrote:

Flickr: Everyone gets a free terabyte. And they fancied up the layout too.

The timing sucks, because I just renewed my "Pro" fee a couple months ago. It's a great move, though.

Posted: May 20, 2013 - 7:21pm

Flickr: Everyone gets a free terabyte. And they fancied up the layout too.

Posted: May 19, 2013 - 9:31pm

swell_sailor wrote:

Nope. I'd forgotten about them. The card cannot be formatted. I need to contact Sandisk about a warranty replacement.

maybe Sandisk can do recovery for you. they owe you.

Posted: May 19, 2013 - 9:15pm

buzz wrote:

did you ever recover your pics from the cf card?

Nope. I'd forgotten about them. The card cannot be formatted. I need to contact Sandisk about a warranty replacement.

Posted: May 19, 2013 - 9:11pm

swell_sailor wrote:

Told ya.

did you ever recover your pics from the cf card?

Posted: May 19, 2013 - 8:40pm

swell_sailor wrote:

Told ya.

I got your back, ya old hobo.

Posted: May 19, 2013 - 8:37pm

Manbird wrote:

Measuring the temperature of light

Told ya.

Posted: May 19, 2013 - 8:33pm

swell_sailor wrote:

Thanks. I don't like that it sits on my speaker, but the light is cool.

Measuring the temperature of light

F. Herrmann; Institut für Theoretische Festkörperphysik, Universität, 76128 Karlsruhe

Abstract
Light emitted by a black body has a temperature, the same temperature as the body it is coming from. In this article we will present a method of showing students that sun light on the earth has a very high temperature and how this temperature can be measured by means of a normal thermometer, before they learn anything about statistics and the Planck distribution.

Zusammenfassung
Licht, das von einem schwarzen Strahler emittiert wird, hat eine bestimmte Temperatur: dieselbe Temperatur wie der Körper, von dem es herkommt. In dem Artikel wird ein Weg vorgestellt, wie man Schülern oder Studenten zeigen kann, daß Sonnenlicht auf der Erde eine sehr hohe Temperatur hat und wie diese Temperatur mit einem gewöhnlichen Thermometer gemessen werden kann, noch bevor den Lernenden etwas über Statistik und Planck-Verteilung bekannt ist.

Light emitted by a black body has a temperature, the same temperature as the body it is coming from. Thus, sunlight has a temperature of 6000 K; light coming from an incandescent lamp has about 2800 K; the infrared light emitted by a hot iron may have 500 K and the light emitted by the planet earth has roughly 300 K. After being emitted, the light can change its temperature, e. g. in the process of an isentropic expansion. An example is the cosmic background radiation which at the time of its decoupling from matter 10⁶ years after the big bang had a temperature of 10⁴ K and after about 10¹⁰ years of isentropic expansion has now only 2.7 K.
The temperature of a particular light can be deduced from its spectrum. In all the above-mentioned cases the light is Planck distributed, and since the temperature is a parameter of the Planck distribution, the temperature can be determined when the distribution is known.
However, explaining a temperature of a system by means of a distribution is rather complicated and can be discussed only at an advanced level. Moreover, deducing the temperature from a spectrum instead of measuring it directly by means of a thermometer may cause the student to believe that one is dealing with a somewhat generalized temperature concept and not with the same temperature which was introduced at the beginning of the thermodynamics course and measured with a normal mercury thermometer or a thermocouple.
In this article we will present a method of showing students that sun light has a very high temperature and how this temperature can (at least in principle) be measured by means of a thermometer, before they learn anything about statistics and the Planck distribution.
The light we receive from the sun is emitted by what we perceive as the sun's surface. Since this surface has a temperature of 6000 K, the light coming from there should be expected to have the same temperature, i. e. 6000 K. However, this conclusion doesn't appear to be very plausible: Shouldn't every body that is exposed to sunlight immediately burn? And why does a thermometer that is exposed to sunlight not indicate 6000 K? To answer these questions we have to take a closer look at the process of measuring a temperature. To measure the temperature of a system A by means of a thermometer B, A and B have to be set into thermal contact. Accordingly, it should indeed be sufficient to hold the thermometer into the sunlight in order to measure the light's temperature. If this is done, the temperature value displayed by the thermometer is higher than when the thermometer is placed into the shade. However, it is far below the expected 6000 K.
When trying to measure the temperature in this manner, we forgot, that the thermometer is in thermal contact not only with the sunlight but simultaneously with the air. Since the air is not in thermal equilibrium with the sunlight, air and light will have different temperatures. What then will the thermometer display?
This question is similar to the following: Which potential difference will a voltmeter display that is simultaneously connected with two batteries of different open circuit voltages, Fig. 1?

Fig. 1: The voltmeter displays a potential difference that is situated between the open circuit voltages of both batteries.

Here, it is clear that the voltmeter displays a potential difference that is situated between both open circuit voltages but whose exact value depends on the internal resistances of the batteries.
In the same way we can conclude that the thermometer is making a compromise between the temperatures of the various systems to which it is connected, and it is impossible to deduce either of the systems' temperatures it is in contact with.
However, in our case it is easy to remedy: All we have to do is to eliminate the air around the thermometer by placing it, for instance, into a transparent, evacuated container. The result is that the temperature displayed by the thermometer is higher than before but still remains far below 6000 K. What mistake have we been making this time? Let us ask once more the question about which system the thermometer is in thermal contact with. The answer is, of course, with the light of the sun. There remains, however, another competitor, that we have overseen up to now, i. e. the thermal radiation coming from all directions except from the small solid angle occupied by the sun. From 99.9995 % of all directions comes invisible infrared light of ambient temperature, i. e. approximately 300 K. Only from the remaining 0.0005 % of directions does hot sunlight come. Thus, the thermometer has to again make a compromise and this compromise comes out very much in favor of the ambient 300 K radiation.
Again we look for a solution. We have to make sure that sunlight doesn't only come from 0.0005 % of the directions. Rather it has to come from all directions, from the whole solid angle. To realize that is, at least in principle, not difficult. One has to place mirrors and/or prisms around the thermometer in such a way that sunlight falls on the thermometer's sensor from all directions. A continuous mirror that does the job is called a light concentrator (Welford and Winston 1989).
The exact form of a perfect concentrator will not be discussed here. However, using a parabolic mirror or a lens is a good attempt at achieving the same effect as a concentrator. Indeed, in this way one reaches easily a temperature of about 1000 K and, with some more effort, several thousands of Kelvins. A perfect mirror arrangement would indeed lead to 6000 K. (Of course, our normal thermometers can't sustain such a high temperature).
Thus, the sunlight's high temperature can be deduced from the familiar experience made when a burning glass or a parabolic mirror increases the temperature of a body to a high value. Lenses, parabolic mirrors and concentrators, can be used to set a body in thermal equilibrium with light coming from directions within a small solid angle.
Our discussion shows that it doesn't make much sense to say (as it is often done) that the temperature "in the sun" is, for example, 45 degrees centigrade. A thermometer exposed to sunlight displays neither the temperature of the sunlight, nor that of the air or that of the ambient infrared radiation. Rather, the indicated temperature value is no more than the result of a hardly interpretable compromise between the temperatures of these systems.
References
Welford W T andWinston R 1989 High Collection Nonimaging Optics, (Academic Press), p. 55

Posted: May 19, 2013 - 8:25pm

buzz wrote:

like it

Thanks. I don't like that it sits on my speaker, but the light is cool.

Posted: May 19, 2013 - 7:52pm

swell_sailor wrote:

This time of year the light always comes through the window in the afternoon and illuminates this guy.

Nice Alberto Silent Accordion Butterfly.

like it