RP Listener Forum - Radio Paradise - eclectic commercial free Internet radio
[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Image That Goes With a Song Lyric - Alexandra - Mar 1, 2015 - 6:27pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos; Please Limit to 510 ... - swell_sailor - Mar 1, 2015 - 6:19pm
 
The Image Post - nook - Mar 1, 2015 - 6:03pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - JrzyTmata - Mar 1, 2015 - 5:52pm
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - Antigone - Mar 1, 2015 - 5:29pm
 
Private messages in a public forum - Coaxial - Mar 1, 2015 - 4:53pm
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - Coaxial - Mar 1, 2015 - 4:47pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - lily34 - Mar 1, 2015 - 4:19pm
 
Name My Band - haresfur - Mar 1, 2015 - 2:11pm
 
Let's Rip - CD's - haresfur - Mar 1, 2015 - 1:59pm
 
• • •  What's For Dinner ? • • •  - olivertwist - Mar 1, 2015 - 1:46pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Mar 1, 2015 - 11:09am
 
Epic Facebook Statuses - Coaxial - Mar 1, 2015 - 9:15am
 
How's the weather? - bokey - Mar 1, 2015 - 9:08am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Mar 1, 2015 - 8:18am
 
Things that piss me off - Red_Dragon - Mar 1, 2015 - 6:32am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Mar 1, 2015 - 6:04am
 
Facebook Tips - bokey - Mar 1, 2015 - 12:54am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - Feb 28, 2015 - 11:06pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oldviolin - Feb 28, 2015 - 10:59pm
 
Veterans - haresfur - Feb 28, 2015 - 10:47pm
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - oldviolin - Feb 28, 2015 - 10:38pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Feb 28, 2015 - 10:10pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Feb 28, 2015 - 9:57pm
 
Maps • Google • GeoGuessr - thedoctork - Feb 28, 2015 - 7:35pm
 
British Parliamentary Elections 2015 - haresfur - Feb 28, 2015 - 6:54pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - westslope - Feb 28, 2015 - 4:53pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - bokey - Feb 28, 2015 - 4:32pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Red_Dragon - Feb 28, 2015 - 3:51pm
 
Coffee - Steely_D - Feb 28, 2015 - 3:39pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 28, 2015 - 2:34pm
 
Tech & Science - Red_Dragon - Feb 28, 2015 - 12:45pm
 
Regarding dogs - RichardPrins - Feb 28, 2015 - 12:36pm
 
OUR CATS!! - JrzyTmata - Feb 28, 2015 - 11:58am
 
Top 885 Albums on WXPN - Sean-E-Sean - Feb 28, 2015 - 11:55am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Prodigal_SOB - Feb 28, 2015 - 11:17am
 
Roku 2 vs. Roku 3 - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 28, 2015 - 11:14am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - bokey - Feb 28, 2015 - 10:36am
 
Triskele and The Grateful Dead - MsJudi - Feb 28, 2015 - 9:53am
 
Parenthood!!! - MsJudi - Feb 28, 2015 - 9:51am
 
soul / R & B ? - marko86 - Feb 28, 2015 - 8:33am
 
Earworm - Sean-E-Sean - Feb 28, 2015 - 7:57am
 
Help!!!!!!!! - Coaxial - Feb 28, 2015 - 7:39am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - triskele - Feb 28, 2015 - 6:57am
 
Way Cool Video - sirdroseph - Feb 28, 2015 - 5:55am
 
Let's make some Music - lunar1963 - Feb 28, 2015 - 5:11am
 
The Global War on Terror - sirdroseph - Feb 28, 2015 - 5:00am
 
Celebrity Deaths - sirdroseph - Feb 28, 2015 - 2:44am
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - kurtster - Feb 27, 2015 - 8:14pm
 
You might be getting old if...... - Red_Dragon - Feb 27, 2015 - 6:28pm
 
Private Messages (PMs) you've decided to share - helenofjoy - Feb 27, 2015 - 3:48pm
 
Fake Clouds or Geo Engineering ???? - kurtster - Feb 27, 2015 - 1:49pm
 
Favorite Movie Quote Conversation - aflanigan - Feb 27, 2015 - 1:48pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - KurtfromLaQuinta - Feb 27, 2015 - 12:43pm
 
Republican Party - RichardPrins - Feb 27, 2015 - 12:41pm
 
Favorite Quotes - EdEastridge - Feb 27, 2015 - 10:09am
 
Celebrity News - DaveInVA - Feb 27, 2015 - 8:52am
 
Now What! Fight for a Fair Internet - black321 - Feb 27, 2015 - 8:23am
 
THE Question of Our Time - Steve - Feb 27, 2015 - 8:08am
 
Pictures you have taken of your feet. *snort* - Antigone - Feb 27, 2015 - 7:35am
 
Birthday wishes - helenofjoy - Feb 27, 2015 - 7:33am
 
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones - Coaxial - Feb 27, 2015 - 7:32am
 
Name Our Snowman - Antigone - Feb 27, 2015 - 7:24am
 
Australia - haresfur - Feb 27, 2015 - 3:49am
 
Will you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - Coaxial - Feb 26, 2015 - 8:58pm
 
RP App for Android - BillG - Feb 26, 2015 - 6:48pm
 
What makes you smile? - Beaker - Feb 26, 2015 - 3:31pm
 
Classical Music - RichardPrins - Feb 26, 2015 - 3:18pm
 
Unusual News - Beaker - Feb 26, 2015 - 2:52pm
 
Banksy! - haresfur - Feb 26, 2015 - 2:25pm
 
Regarding Birds - aflanigan - Feb 26, 2015 - 2:06pm
 
Why are Canadians so interested in US politics, anyway? - Beaker - Feb 26, 2015 - 2:06pm
 
Best Song Comments. - Alexandra - Feb 26, 2015 - 2:00pm
 
Lyrics - sneff - Feb 26, 2015 - 1:56pm
 
Favourite cover version? - sneff - Feb 26, 2015 - 1:42pm
 
(a public service of RP)
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Guns Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 390, 391, 392  Next
Post to this Topic
DaveInVA
Single, unwanted, unloved eccentric, crusty ol' fart with cats
DaveInVA Avatar

Location: In a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Leo
Chinese Yr: Buffalo


Posted: Feb 26, 2015 - 1:10pm

ATF pushes bullet ban, threatens top-selling AR-15 rifle


haresfur
I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle Australia
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 8, 2015 - 2:21pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
So anyway, just ranting. That dealer is a terrorist, IMO. A vile human being capable of nearly anything in defense of his "beliefs."
 
:speechless 
Coaxial
SHINE ON
Coaxial Avatar

Location: 543 miles west of Paradis,1491 miles east of Paradise
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Capricorn
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Jan 8, 2015 - 1:44pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

His email tagline is "Every time I start my Harley, Jesus kills a hippie." Aren't Harleys and hippies sort of, you know,  ? 

 
Wow...Sorry about what this asshole did to your friend...Karma has a way of dealing with people like this.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 8, 2015 - 1:26pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
On Dec. 11, a local guy went missing. He was on a suicide watch with the local behavioral health center, and his brother, who I grew up with and worked briefly in this office with, had gone to his home and taken all of the guns out. The guy made no secret of his wishes, and the family was scrambling to get him more secure, but that was apparently a few days coming. I don't know how background checks work, but his decline was fairly precipitous and maybe it takes time to show up in the database. I don't know. Anyway, he'd gotten his last two guns at a particular dealer, so his girlfriend went in there to tell them the situation and cried/pleaded with them not to sell him a gun. They in fact got a visit from the man a day later, ordered in a .38 derringer and delivered it. They found the guy last week. His girlfriend went to the shop to apologize for making a scene and the shop owner lost his shit and started screaming at her from across the store that she was a crazy bitch who drove the guy to take his own life.

We say we have to have a system where people who want guns should be able to get them, but those who shouldn't have them can't get them. But here's a case where the shop owner clearly had more than enough information —but not a law— to guide him in his decision to sell, but he ignored that information and took the money. But he'll be first in line to protest a law telling him how to run his business. He'll be the first to blame the system—anyone but himself—for allowing this to happen. But he's wrong.

This is also the same dealer who heard a local DJ/news anchor doing a morning radio show, saying something mild, along the lines of more rigorous background checks and maybe "assault weapons" should be more carefully tracked. I didn't hear the actual broadcast. Well this infuriated the gun dealer, so he began prying into the DJ's past and found that he'd been convicted of a felony (stolen guns/selling stolen guns as it happens) 10 or 12 years earlier, in Alaska. The radio guy had come to Wyoming soon after that and over time got his job as a reporter, became the ski school director where I patrol, got married, had kids. It's safe to say that the DJ probably should have owned up to his wife about his past, but it was his past and his life. But no, the gun dealer didn't share this info, he just sat on it. Then one day, he heard the radio guy talk about the election and how everyone should go vote, he had his "I Voted" sticker and so should you etc. Well in Alaska, if convicted of a felony, you cannot legally vote until you are out of jail. Once you're on parole, you can vote. In Wyoming, if convicted of a felony, you cannot vote again, ever. Mr gun dealer pounced. Provided the local sheriff with details of the Alaska crimes, and quoted the DJ's words that he had voted in our county. The sheriff confirmed that the guy had actually registered to vote, asked the radio guy if he'd voted, got a "yes" and was duty-bound to arrest him on felony voter fraud charges. Lost his job(s), wife & family. A local attorney from a famous Wyoming family got him through without any additional jail time, got him a job he's excelling at, but the family and kids have moved on.

So anyway, just ranting. That dealer is a terrorist, IMO. A vile human being capable of nearly anything in defense of his "beliefs."

 

 
sorry about your friend

florida has the "baker act"

ScottFromWyoming
Psycho. Poodle
ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Pisces
Chinese Yr: Tiger


Posted: Jan 8, 2015 - 11:02am

 sirdroseph wrote:


Sounds like that dealer shouldn't own weapons either much less sell them.....psycho alert!{#Eek}

 
His email tagline is "Every time I start my Harley, Jesus kills a hippie." Aren't Harleys and hippies sort of, you know,  ? 
sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Jan 8, 2015 - 10:54am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


So anyway, just ranting. That dealer is a terrorist, IMO. A vile human being capable of nearly anything in defense of his "beliefs."

 

 

Sounds like that dealer shouldn't own weapons either much less sell them.....psycho alert!{#Eek}
meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female
Zodiac: Gemini


Posted: Jan 8, 2015 - 10:50am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
On Dec. 11, a local guy went missing. He was on a suicide watch with the local behavioral health center, and his brother, who I grew up with and worked briefly in this office with, had gone to his home and taken all of the guns out. The guy made no secret of his wishes, and the family was scrambling to get him more secure, but that was apparently a few days coming. I don't know how background checks work, but his decline was fairly precipitous and maybe it takes time to show up in the database. I don't know. Anyway, he'd gotten his last two guns at a particular dealer, so his girlfriend went in there to tell them the situation and cried/pleaded with them not to sell him a gun. They in fact got a visit from the man a day later, ordered in a .38 derringer and delivered it. They found the guy last week. His girlfriend went to the shop to apologize for making a scene and the shop owner lost his shit and started screaming at her from across the store that she was a crazy bitch who drove the guy to take his own life.

We say we have to have a system where people who want guns should be able to get them, but those who shouldn't have them can't get them. But here's a case where the shop owner clearly had more than enough information —but not a law— to guide him in his decision to sell, but he ignored that information and took the money. But he'll be first in line to protest a law telling him how to run his business. He'll be the first to blame the system—anyone but himself—for allowing this to happen. But he's wrong.

This is also the same dealer who heard a local DJ/news anchor doing a morning radio show, saying something mild, along the lines of more rigorous background checks and maybe "assault weapons" should be more carefully tracked. I didn't hear the actual broadcast. Well this infuriated the gun dealer, so he began prying into the DJ's past and found that he'd been convicted of a felony (stolen guns/selling stolen guns as it happens) 10 or 12 years earlier, in Alaska. The radio guy had come to Wyoming soon after that and over time got his job as a reporter, became the ski school director where I patrol, got married, had kids. It's safe to say that the DJ probably should have owned up to his wife about his past, but it was his past and his life. But no, the gun dealer didn't share this info, he just sat on it. Then one day, he heard the radio guy talk about the election and how everyone should go vote, he had his "I Voted" sticker and so should you etc. Well in Alaska, if convicted of a felony, you cannot legally vote until you are out of jail. Once you're on parole, you can vote. In Wyoming, if convicted of a felony, you cannot vote again, ever. Mr gun dealer pounced. Provided the local sheriff with details of the Alaska crimes, and quoted the DJ's words that he had voted in our county. The sheriff confirmed that the guy had actually registered to vote, asked the radio guy if he'd voted, got a "yes" and was duty-bound to arrest him on felony voter fraud charges. Lost his job(s), wife & family. A local attorney from a famous Wyoming family got him through without any additional jail time, got him a job he's excelling at, but the family and kids have moved on.

So anyway, just ranting. That dealer is a terrorist, IMO. A vile human being capable of nearly anything in defense of his "beliefs."

 

 

  not a rant as far as I'm concerned.


ScottFromWyoming
Psycho. Poodle
ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Pisces
Chinese Yr: Tiger


Posted: Jan 8, 2015 - 10:47am

On Dec. 11, a local guy went missing. He was on a suicide watch with the local behavioral health center, and his brother, who I grew up with and worked briefly in this office with, had gone to his home and taken all of the guns out. The guy made no secret of his wishes, and the family was scrambling to get him more secure, but that was apparently a few days coming. I don't know how background checks work, but his decline was fairly precipitous and maybe it takes time to show up in the database. I don't know. Anyway, he'd gotten his last two guns at a particular dealer, so his girlfriend went in there to tell them the situation and cried/pleaded with them not to sell him a gun. They in fact got a visit from the man a day later, ordered in a .38 derringer and delivered it. They found the guy last week. His girlfriend went to the shop to apologize for making a scene and the shop owner lost his shit and started screaming at her from across the store that she was a crazy bitch who drove the guy to take his own life.

We say we have to have a system where people who want guns should be able to get them, but those who shouldn't have them can't get them. But here's a case where the shop owner clearly had more than enough information —but not a law— to guide him in his decision to sell, but he ignored that information and took the money. But he'll be first in line to protest a law telling him how to run his business. He'll be the first to blame the system—anyone but himself—for allowing this to happen. But he's wrong.

This is also the same dealer who heard a local DJ/news anchor doing a morning radio show, saying something mild, along the lines of more rigorous background checks and maybe "assault weapons" should be more carefully tracked. I didn't hear the actual broadcast. Well this infuriated the gun dealer, so he began prying into the DJ's past and found that he'd been convicted of a felony (stolen guns/selling stolen guns as it happens) 10 or 12 years earlier, in Alaska. The radio guy had come to Wyoming soon after that and over time got his job as a reporter, became the ski school director where I patrol, got married, had kids. It's safe to say that the DJ probably should have owned up to his wife about his past, but it was his past and his life. But no, the gun dealer didn't share this info, he just sat on it. Then one day, he heard the radio guy talk about the election and how everyone should go vote, he had his "I Voted" sticker and so should you etc. Well in Alaska, if convicted of a felony, you cannot legally vote until you are out of jail. Once you're on parole, you can vote. In Wyoming, if convicted of a felony, you cannot vote again, ever. Mr gun dealer pounced. Provided the local sheriff with details of the Alaska crimes, and quoted the DJ's words that he had voted in our county. The sheriff confirmed that the guy had actually registered to vote, asked the radio guy if he'd voted, got a "yes" and was duty-bound to arrest him on felony voter fraud charges. Lost his job(s), wife & family. A local attorney from a famous Wyoming family got him through without any additional jail time, got him a job he's excelling at, but the family and kids have moved on.

So anyway, just ranting. That dealer is a terrorist, IMO. A vile human being capable of nearly anything in defense of his "beliefs."

 
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 5, 2015 - 8:20am

aflanigan wrote:
My mistake. I was under the impression that the second amendment was part of the constitution.

Just nothing to do with the post you responded to.
aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Jan 5, 2015 - 8:04am

 Lazy8 wrote:
aflanigan wrote:
Actually, one of the factors courts tend to weigh on constitutional issues such as gay marriage is whether someone is suffering actual harm.

The courts aren't involved, I wasn't bringing up any constitutional issues, and being sent to prison ought to count as actual harm. But thanks for sharing.

 
My mistake. I was under the impression that the second amendment was part of the constitution.

 
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 5, 2015 - 7:46am

aflanigan wrote:
Actually, one of the factors courts tend to weigh on constitutional issues such as gay marriage is whether someone is suffering actual harm.

The courts aren't involved, I wasn't bringing up any constitutional issues, and being sent to prison ought to count as actual harm. But thanks for sharing.
aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Jan 5, 2015 - 7:43am

 Lazy8 wrote:

The point isn't who's more oppressed
 

Actually, one of the factors courts tend to weigh on constitutional issues such as gay marriage is whether someone is suffering actual harm.
kurtster
ignore the kitteh behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: counting flowers on the wall ...
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Jan 5, 2015 - 5:17am

it was written:

This law may or may not be constitutional - there is a process we have to follow to establish that. But it was enacted by a legal procedure that we as a society have agreed to as a method for governing all of our peoples regardless of position on the liberal/conservative spectrum.  It's not a good precedent to have groups - especially armed groups, decide they can just ignore certain laws because they don't like them. It's worse when the enforcement arm of our government openly supports that action because they also have issues with the law.

 
 
Yes, the initiative or referendum process.  Perhaps the biggest example of how the people have so decisively spoken would be about gay marriage.  I'm not debating the merits of it, just using it as an example.  In state after state, bans or restrictions were passed by initiatives and in some cases, state legislation.  They have all been stuck down or will be, regardless of the will of the majority.
    it was also written:

I'm just not so into the precedent of "I don't like this law that was just passed, so I'm going to openly ignore it". There are dozens of laws that trouble or inconvenience me. Some even have constitutional arguments against them. Do I get to just start ignoring them? Or do I need to get at least 20 friends to help me with a rally? 

We have sheriffs, many sheriffs, openly saying just that on gun laws and immigration laws to name just two cases, not just ordinary citizens.  The 20 teens will be remembered as the decade of bad laws, imho.  So many bad laws are being passed that they cannot be overturned just because of the shear number of them.  Who has the money and the standing to do that ?  Basically no one.  And with a lack of standing, regardless of money, a bad law will sit, maybe for decades and be forgotten, until someone walks it out to oppress an individual or groups.  This is how it is done and being done to us all.  Same as it ever was, only more so than ever before.

The deep pockets or the deepest pockets win, depending on the side taken in a challenge, no matter what.  It is the death of a thousand cuts.

Furthermore, the rule of law has been rendered to simple campaign lip service / rhetoric, no different from the biggest one of all time ... I'm tough on crime, vote for me !   Proof of that lies at our borders.  The rule of law as I understand it, depends on a sovereign state or nation.  Sovereignty begins at the borders.  To not defend our borders is to defiantly act against our sovereignty and the rule of law.  Did I just define a version of tyranny ?

There is a civic duty to defy bad laws.  But who can take that risk anymore ?  I applaud the stand of the gathering of people in Washington cited in the article that started this latest dialogue.  How about we arrest the protesters in NYC and other places marching around chanting ... What do we want ?  Dead cops !  When do we want it ?  Now !  How is that not inciting riot and any different from shouting fire in a theatre ?

Society is coming unglued and rather quickly.  And it even seems to be by design considering who the leaders are and the laws they are ignoring in fomenting this civil unrest.

Later ... 


Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 4, 2015 - 7:58pm

islander wrote:
Sorry, I am a bit sensitive on this too - largely because I know a lot of rational people who lose there shit when this topic comes up and I very frequently get accused of being BOTH a gun grabbing liberal pussy, and a Gun loving nutcase who doesn't care when babies are shot. 

I'm actually more on your side than the others. But your amazing inertia of "No" isn't going to hold forever. When it breaks I think you are going to see some of the gun grabbing that you fear so much. A little compromise from both sides could solve this for 99+% of people across the spectrum, but neither side will have it.  Hey, whatever. I live in my lily white well protected enclave.  I'll probably benefit from the loopholes that will inevitably be put in place as well. There's really no talking to most on this topic. 

And gun owners really aren't as oppressed as black people in the south in the 40's.

The point isn't who's more oppressed, it's that civil disobedience is just as valid a tool of protest today as it was when Henry David Thoreau coined the term in 1849.

As for compromise, here's a suggestion: how about trying something other than yet another law? If you want someone's cooperation threatening to put him in prison isn't necessarily the best way to get it.


islander
Dog is my copilot
islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Scorpio
Chinese Yr: Cock


Posted: Jan 4, 2015 - 6:42pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
islander wrote:
What?  Seriously, I like and respect you a lot. But I can't talk to you about this subject. Whenever we do you get vindictive and insulting. I guess I can see where it comes from, but you've said things that are seriously hurtful and unnecessary and it's not worth it to me to even try when that's the outcome. I look forward to continuing our friendly conversations and friendship on any other topic.

I do get heartily sick of the sanctimony and dishonesty that always accompanies this debate, and that gets expressed as snark. If my last was enough to set you off you might consider a slightly thicker skin. I expect to see a lot worse directed my way. Also: you aren't the only one reading this. Feel free to ignore me, but I'm going to respond to the point you raised.

The point of my last post (which it's not clear got thru) is that civil disobedience is a legitimate way to make a political point. When a majority (for whatever reason) imposes its will on a minority via law it's fair game for the minority to respond by saying "Over my dead body." It forces the electorate to come to terms with what they have legislated—what it actually means, rather than the puppies-and-rainbows bill of goods they were sold.

 
Sorry, I am a bit sensitive on this too - largely because I know a lot of rational people who lose there shit when this topic comes up and I very frequently get accused of being BOTH a gun grabbing liberal pussy, and a Gun loving nutcase who doesn't care when babies are shot. 

I'm actually more on your side than the others. But your amazing inertia of "No" isn't going to hold forever. When it breaks I think you are going to see some of the gun grabbing that you fear so much. A little compromise from both sides could solve this for 99+% of people across the spectrum, but neither side will have it.  Hey, whatever. I live in my lily white well protected enclave.  I'll probably benefit from the loopholes that will inevitably be put in place as well. There's really no talking to most on this topic. 

And gun owners really aren't as oppressed as black people in the south in the 40's. 
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 4, 2015 - 6:07pm

islander wrote:
What?  Seriously, I like and respect you a lot. But I can't talk to you about this subject. Whenever we do you get vindictive and insulting. I guess I can see where it comes from, but you've said things that are seriously hurtful and unnecessary and it's not worth it to me to even try when that's the outcome. I look forward to continuing our friendly conversations and friendship on any other topic.

I do get heartily sick of the sanctimony and dishonesty that always accompanies this debate, and that gets expressed as snark. If my last was enough to set you off you might consider a slightly thicker skin. I expect to see a lot worse directed my way. Also: you aren't the only one reading this. Feel free to ignore me, but I'm going to respond to the point you raised.

The point of my last post (which it's not clear got thru) is that civil disobedience is a legitimate way to make a political point. When a majority (for whatever reason) imposes its will on a minority via law it's fair game for the minority to respond by saying "Over my dead body." It forces the electorate to come to terms with what they have legislated—what it actually means, rather than the puppies-and-rainbows bill of goods they were sold.
islander
Dog is my copilot
islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Scorpio
Chinese Yr: Cock


Posted: Jan 4, 2015 - 11:34am

 Lazy8 wrote:
 islander wrote:
I'm just not so into the precedent of "I don't like this law that was just passed, so I'm going to openly ignore it". There are dozens of laws that trouble or inconvenience me. Some even have constitutional arguments against them. Do I get to just start ignoring them? Or do I need to get at least 20 friends to help me with a rally?

bite me

Nope, can't see any good coming from that at all, ever. Nope.

And before you get all puffed up and righteous and "how dare you"—you don't get to pick my heroes.

 
What?  Seriously, I like and respect you a lot. But I can't talk to you about this subject. Whenever we do you get vindictive and insulting. I guess I can see where it comes from, but you've said things that are seriously hurtful and unnecessary and it's not worth it to me to even try when that's the outcome. I look forward to continuing our friendly conversations and friendship on any other topic. 


Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 4, 2015 - 11:20am

 islander wrote:
I'm just not so into the precedent of "I don't like this law that was just passed, so I'm going to openly ignore it". There are dozens of laws that trouble or inconvenience me. Some even have constitutional arguments against them. Do I get to just start ignoring them? Or do I need to get at least 20 friends to help me with a rally?

bite me

Nope, can't see any good coming from that at all, ever. Nope.

And before you get all puffed up and righteous and "how dare you"—you don't get to pick my heroes.
sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Jan 2, 2015 - 2:47am

 islander wrote:

I'm just not so into the precedent of "I don't like this law that was just passed, so I'm going to openly ignore it". There are dozens of laws that trouble or inconvenience me. Some even have constitutional arguments against them. Do I get to just start ignoring them? Or do I need to get at least 20 friends to help me with a rally? 

 
Yea I get that.
Red_Dragon
y ddraig goch ddyry gychwyn
Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Jesusland


Posted: Jan 1, 2015 - 3:53pm

 bokey wrote:

If you give out free ammo and beer you'll have a better turnout.

 
That's the ticket!
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 390, 391, 392  Next