[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Happy Anniversary! - K_Love - Sep 30, 2016 - 4:42pm
 
punk? hip-hop? metal? noise? garage? - rhahl - Sep 30, 2016 - 4:41pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - K_Love - Sep 30, 2016 - 4:35pm
 
2016 Elections - haresfur - Sep 30, 2016 - 3:32pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - haresfur - Sep 30, 2016 - 3:27pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - triskele - Sep 30, 2016 - 3:26pm
 
Ask the Libertarian - kurtster - Sep 30, 2016 - 3:05pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - Red_Dragon - Sep 30, 2016 - 2:56pm
 
ouchies - SeriousLee - Sep 30, 2016 - 2:22pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - mrselfdestruct - Sep 30, 2016 - 2:02pm
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - lily34 - Sep 30, 2016 - 1:37pm
 
RP3 Beta Player - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 30, 2016 - 1:36pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - miamizsun - Sep 30, 2016 - 12:53pm
 
~*Funny Cats*~ - DaveInVA - Sep 30, 2016 - 12:15pm
 
Name My Band - Antigone - Sep 30, 2016 - 12:08pm
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - kurtster - Sep 30, 2016 - 12:05pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - Proclivities - Sep 30, 2016 - 11:31am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - SeriousLee - Sep 30, 2016 - 11:22am
 
Oh, The Stupidity - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 30, 2016 - 11:17am
 
Jrzy Updates - Antigone - Sep 30, 2016 - 11:03am
 
RP App for Android - mjvander - Sep 30, 2016 - 9:43am
 
Poetry Forum - ScottN - Sep 30, 2016 - 8:12am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - buddy - Sep 30, 2016 - 6:58am
 
Things You Thought Today - Antigone - Sep 30, 2016 - 6:56am
 
You might be getting old if...... - Antigone - Sep 30, 2016 - 6:37am
 
The Image Post - SeriousLee - Sep 30, 2016 - 2:10am
 
Political debate in online discussion forums - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 29, 2016 - 9:40pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos; Please Limit to 510 ... - fractalv - Sep 29, 2016 - 9:32pm
 
What can you hear right now? - bokey - Sep 29, 2016 - 6:59pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - bokey - Sep 29, 2016 - 6:03pm
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - Coaxial - Sep 29, 2016 - 6:03pm
 
Classical Music - oldviolin - Sep 29, 2016 - 5:15pm
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - aflanigan - Sep 29, 2016 - 2:51pm
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - Antigone - Sep 29, 2016 - 2:37pm
 
Stupid Questions (and Answers) - Proclivities - Sep 29, 2016 - 1:21pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 29, 2016 - 1:12pm
 
Graphic designers, ho's! - Proclivities - Sep 29, 2016 - 12:44pm
 
Donald Trump and the exodus to Canada - westslope - Sep 29, 2016 - 12:39pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oppositelock - Sep 29, 2016 - 11:28am
 
• • •  What's For Dinner ? • • •  - DaveInVA - Sep 29, 2016 - 11:03am
 
Media Bias - steeler - Sep 29, 2016 - 10:51am
 
Protest Songs - R_P - Sep 29, 2016 - 9:25am
 
Trump - oldviolin - Sep 29, 2016 - 9:22am
 
Back to the 60's - R_P - Sep 29, 2016 - 9:15am
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - Sep 29, 2016 - 8:43am
 
Films you're excited about. - miamizsun - Sep 29, 2016 - 4:35am
 
New Music - Alexandra - Sep 28, 2016 - 11:41pm
 
Live Music - rhahl - Sep 28, 2016 - 10:26pm
 
Back to the 70's - rhahl - Sep 28, 2016 - 8:37pm
 
The war on Funk is over! - rhahl - Sep 28, 2016 - 6:55pm
 
Best Song Comments. - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 28, 2016 - 6:12pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Sep 28, 2016 - 5:26pm
 
(Musical) Coincidences - Alexandra - Sep 28, 2016 - 5:05pm
 
Facebook Tips - haresfur - Sep 28, 2016 - 3:41pm
 
ONE WORD - Red_Dragon - Sep 28, 2016 - 10:36am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 28, 2016 - 10:29am
 
Regarding dogs - sirdroseph - Sep 28, 2016 - 7:27am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Sep 28, 2016 - 6:12am
 
Make Lily34 Laugh - lily34 - Sep 28, 2016 - 6:05am
 
how do you feel right now? - PoundPuppy - Sep 27, 2016 - 7:00pm
 
The Obituary Page - GeneP59 - Sep 27, 2016 - 6:49pm
 
Back to the 00's - rhahl - Sep 27, 2016 - 5:25pm
 
Caretakers Of Our Parents - FourFortyEight - Sep 27, 2016 - 4:46pm
 
Regarding cats - DaveInVA - Sep 27, 2016 - 3:38pm
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - DaveInVA - Sep 27, 2016 - 1:27pm
 
Coffee - miamizsun - Sep 27, 2016 - 11:55am
 
Question for hard-core Firefox techies - BillG - Sep 27, 2016 - 11:52am
 
Books read recently - rhahl - Sep 27, 2016 - 10:27am
 
Science benefitting us old codgers - aflanigan - Sep 27, 2016 - 9:08am
 
Word of the Day - lily34 - Sep 27, 2016 - 6:45am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Sep 26, 2016 - 7:33pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Sep 26, 2016 - 5:07pm
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - oldviolin - Sep 26, 2016 - 4:50pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - oldviolin - Sep 26, 2016 - 4:21pm
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - DaveInVA - Sep 26, 2016 - 2:54pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Guns Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 421, 422, 423  Next
Post to this Topic
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC desert


Posted: Sep 16, 2016 - 8:43am

Missouri: The Shoot-Me State

This Editorial board opinion-editorial in the New York Times describes how Missouri is set to pass a law that removes background checks and allows those with criminal records such as those found guilty of domestic violence to carry concealed firearms.

What is this context of these decisions by state legislators?  Especially in light of an apparent recent uptick in homicides.  See:  Murder Rates Rose in a Quarter of the Nation’s 100 Largest Cities


haresfur
I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 10, 2016 - 5:47pm

 bokey wrote:

Give them suctions cups and let them off themselves.

 

bokey
Beep!
bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 10, 2016 - 5:44pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:

Wright is absolutely correct. There shouldn't have been any actual firearms - let alone ammunition - in the room. No excuse. Nope. None.

 
Give them suctions cups and let them off themselves.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 10, 2016 - 5:34pm

 haresfur wrote: 
Wright is absolutely correct. There shouldn't have been any actual firearms - let alone ammunition - in the room. No excuse. Nope. None.
haresfur
I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 10, 2016 - 4:25pm

 westslope wrote:
Florida cop fatally shoots 73-year-old former librarian during role play

Incredible.

Why did the police officer not check the rounds before commencing the exercise?  

 

POLICE GUNNING DOWN A 73 YEAR-OLD WOMAN DURING A WEAPONS CLASS WAS NO ACCIDENT — JIM WRIGHT EXPLAINS IT ALL


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC desert


Posted: Aug 10, 2016 - 2:22pm

Florida cop fatally shoots 73-year-old former librarian during role play

Incredible.

Why did the police officer not check the rounds before commencing the exercise?  
kauri

kauri Avatar

Location: taranaki .new zealand
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Rabbit


Posted: Aug 4, 2016 - 8:04pm

https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrats/videos/1020879604671760/ i rest my case
islander
Dog is my copilot
islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Scorpio
Chinese Yr: Cock


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 5:03pm

 kurtster wrote:

No, I anticipated this thought.  It is more than likely that most vets use a gun, to make sure.  A vet is always going to be able to get a gun no matter what any law says.  It skews the numbers for the general population.  

And you're suggesting what for our vets ?  How are you going to intervene at any level when more active duty off themselves than those killed in combat ?  This is a systemic problem, not a gun problem.

Suicide is not a gun problem, period.  Its an excuse to restrict guns, not a reason. 

 
More health and support services when they return for starters. Long term, stop sending them away as much to fight foreign people for questionable objectives so you don't have so many returning with issues.

A you're fond of saying, laws won't stop anyone, soldier or not.  The idea is to make them less common and readily accessible so that a rash action won't have such dire consequences. Suicide itself is not a gun problem, but the ready availability of guns makes the suicide problem substantially worse. As demonstrated in Australia, lower suicide rates are an outcome of fewer guns around. Whether you want to call it a direct or an indirect benefit doesn't really matter to me.

Your original statement (the one that confused me), demonstrated that the two issues are intertwined. I think you were trying to say we should de-link them because a reasonable percentage of the suicides were ex-military. But that really doesn't make much sense to me. If suicide is a problem it doesn't really matter who it is that's killing themselves. 
haresfur
I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 4:31pm

 kurtster wrote:

Thanks, the post war 70's were pretty nuts for me for a lot of reasons.  

And thanks for the pdf file in your other post.  Pretty interesting stuff in there and detailed.  As I poked around to answer what piled up over the day, I ended up at wiki and found this regarding suicide in Australia and in particular involving guns.

Some researchers have found a significant change in the rate of firearm suicides after the legislative changes. For example, Ozanne-Smith et al. (2004) in the journal Injury Prevention found a reduction in firearm suicides in Victoria, however this study did not consider non-firearm suicide rates. Others have argued that alternative methods of suicide have been substituted. De Leo, Dwyer, Firman & Neulinger, studied suicide methods in men from 1979 to 1998 and found a rise in hanging suicides that started slightly before the fall in gun suicides. As hanging suicides rose at about the same rate as gun suicides fell, it is possible that there was some substitution of suicide methods. It has been noted that drawing strong conclusions about possible impacts of gun laws on suicides is challenging, because a number of suicide prevention programs were implemented from the mid-1990s onwards, and non-firearm suicides also began falling.

It seems that your pdf link supports the trends between hanging and guns on page 13 of the report or page 23 of the file.  

I'm not trying to belittle suicide at any level or say that we should do nothing to prevent it as a society.  I'm just questioning the role that guns have in the subject of suicide as it pertains to the restriction of guns in the USA and our 2nd.

Still reading your pdf.  I went to wiki first and found the part that I quoted and then went to your link to see if it supported or refuted wiki.

Much obliged.

 
As I said before, I read it as the number of alternate methods don't make up for the decrease in gun deaths. But numbers get squishy and we don't have an alternate earth to use as a control group. I'm sure there are substitutions of methods and Australia has been pretty good at starting to address and de-stigmatise mental health issues. I look at it all as defense in depth. Small steps help.
kurtster
miss you little buddy
kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 4:11pm

 haresfur wrote:

Just to be clear, in spite of differences on this issue, I'm sorry for you loss, Kurt.

 
Thanks, the post war 70's were pretty nuts for me for a lot of reasons.  

And thanks for the pdf file in your other post.  Pretty interesting stuff in there and detailed.  As I poked around to answer what piled up over the day, I ended up at wiki and found this regarding suicide in Australia and in particular involving guns.

Some researchers have found a significant change in the rate of firearm suicides after the legislative changes. For example, Ozanne-Smith et al. (2004) in the journal Injury Prevention found a reduction in firearm suicides in Victoria, however this study did not consider non-firearm suicide rates. Others have argued that alternative methods of suicide have been substituted. De Leo, Dwyer, Firman & Neulinger, studied suicide methods in men from 1979 to 1998 and found a rise in hanging suicides that started slightly before the fall in gun suicides. As hanging suicides rose at about the same rate as gun suicides fell, it is possible that there was some substitution of suicide methods. It has been noted that drawing strong conclusions about possible impacts of gun laws on suicides is challenging, because a number of suicide prevention programs were implemented from the mid-1990s onwards, and non-firearm suicides also began falling.

It seems that your pdf link supports the trends between hanging and guns on page 13 of the report or page 23 of the file.  

I'm not trying to belittle suicide at any level or say that we should do nothing to prevent it as a society.  I'm just questioning the role that guns have in the subject of suicide as it pertains to the restriction of guns in the USA and our 2nd.

Still reading your pdf.  I went to wiki first and found the part that I quoted and then went to your link to see if it supported or refuted wiki.

Much obliged.


kurtster
miss you little buddy
kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 3:29pm

 islander wrote:

Just to be clear, are you saying that we shouldn't be so concerned about suicide deaths because a lot of them are former soldiers?  

 
No, I anticipated this thought.  It is more than likely that most vets use a gun, to make sure.  A vet is always going to be able to get a gun no matter what any law says.  It skews the numbers for the general population.  

And you're suggesting what for our vets ?  How are you going to intervene at any level when more active duty off themselves than those killed in combat ?  This is a systemic problem, not a gun problem.

Suicide is not a gun problem, period.  Its an excuse to restrict guns, not a reason. 
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 3:03pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
That's what I meant... the first round should have made him know something's not right. 

It goes beyond that—unless someone else loaded it and handed it to him (a real possibility from what I read, which might be sort of an excuse if he wasn't familiar) it's not like he mixed up a box of blanks and a box of live ammo. You have to individually load each ball into the cylinder and pack it in with a little lever. It's time-consuming and awkward. You would definitely notice you had loaded a ball.

Maybe he left the cylinder loaded the last time he shot it a year or two ago (not as dangerous as it sounds; just leave the percussion cap off and it won't go off) and forgot he'd done it.You can't just unload the thing either—you have to fire it or go thru some even-more-time-consuming extraction process to get that ball out of there. Being as generous as I can here.

But he should still have looked in the cylinders before fitting the caps. And then there's the recoil. A long train of mistakes. Somebody's gonna get his ass kicked in court. And if the organizers didn't have insurance (if they did they probably don't anymore) then dog help them.


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC desert


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 2:48pm

 haresfur wrote:

Just to be clear, in spite of differences on this issue, I'm sorry for you loss, Kurt.

 
I'll echo the sentiment.  Even if the victim was just a room mate or former room mate.

Reminds me of a grade 5 class mate who hung himself a few years later.  Robert.  He was weird.  Already pear-shaped in grade 5 and kinda nerdy — decades before being nerdy became uber cool.  Some of the kids picked on him though the bullying was minor compared to what it could have been.   

I never tormented Robert but then I did not stand up for him either.  My days of standing up for strangers and people I did not know well would come later.  Call it the curse of a 6' 5" male with a warrior complex.  


ScottFromWyoming
I eat pints
ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Pisces
Chinese Yr: Tiger


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 2:36pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
So you're shootin' cotton wads out o' your .44 handloader, but a real ball got in there "somehow." Once you get up off the ground, you gonna pull the trigger again?

It's not like you wouldn't notice. The difference in recoil between a cotton wad and a .44 ball is the difference between a firm handshake and a kitten batting at you.

 
That's what I meant... the first round should have made him know something's not right.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 2:15pm

 Lazy8 wrote:

I expect they'll be handed to him.

 
{#Lol}
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 2:09pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:
Why is he carrying those?
 
I expect they'll be handed to him.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 2:00pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
Cap & ball. No ammo.

Why is he carrying those?
 


Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 1:52pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:
The real question here is wtf would a "wild west exhibition" shooter even have bulleted ammunition in his kit? 

Cap & ball. No ammo.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 1:50pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

So you're shootin' cotton wads out o' your .44 handloader, but a real ball got in there "somehow." Once you get up off the ground, you gonna pull the trigger again?

 
The real question here is wtf would a "cowboy action" shooter even have bulleted ammunition in his kit?


Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 1:43pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
So you're shootin' cotton wads out o' your .44 handloader, but a real ball got in there "somehow." Once you get up off the ground, you gonna pull the trigger again?

It's not like you wouldn't notice. The difference in recoil between a cotton wad and a .44 ball is the difference between a firm handshake and a kitten batting at you.
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 421, 422, 423  Next