[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Music Lesson - Proclivities - Jan 21, 2017 - 7:21am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Jan 21, 2017 - 6:45am
 
Things You Thought Today - Antigone - Jan 21, 2017 - 6:16am
 
Trump - rhahl - Jan 21, 2017 - 6:11am
 
Health Care - rhahl - Jan 21, 2017 - 6:00am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - kurtster - Jan 21, 2017 - 5:34am
 
Signz o' The Apocalype in The Nooz - SeriousLee - Jan 21, 2017 - 4:29am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - R_P - Jan 21, 2017 - 3:10am
 
The War on Women - R_P - Jan 21, 2017 - 2:14am
 
We are the world - My dream - oldviolin - Jan 20, 2017 - 11:42pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Jan 20, 2017 - 11:29pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Jan 20, 2017 - 11:01pm
 
Fake News*    ?    ! - R_P - Jan 20, 2017 - 9:20pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Antigone - Jan 20, 2017 - 5:28pm
 
Obama's Second Term - Skydog - Jan 20, 2017 - 5:08pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - SeriousLee - Jan 20, 2017 - 4:52pm
 
Live Music - rhahl - Jan 20, 2017 - 4:46pm
 
Back to the 70's - rhahl - Jan 20, 2017 - 4:12pm
 
Those lovable acronym guys & gals - miamizsun - Jan 20, 2017 - 2:30pm
 
Next life I'm going to be a black girl backup singer - rhahl - Jan 20, 2017 - 2:16pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ZM_Herb - Jan 20, 2017 - 2:06pm
 
One of the weirdest things I've seen on the web - SeriousLee - Jan 20, 2017 - 1:25pm
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - Skydog - Jan 20, 2017 - 1:15pm
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Jan 20, 2017 - 1:06pm
 
Republican Party - haresfur - Jan 20, 2017 - 12:43pm
 
WTF??!! - haresfur - Jan 20, 2017 - 12:38pm
 
Help!!!!!!!! - Proclivities - Jan 20, 2017 - 11:48am
 
Abiogenesis! - R_P - Jan 20, 2017 - 11:08am
 
The Obituary Page - Antigone - Jan 20, 2017 - 10:51am
 
2017 - rhahl - Jan 20, 2017 - 10:43am
 
music that makes you dance with big wavy gestures - rhahl - Jan 20, 2017 - 10:03am
 
What's your favorite quote? - Proclivities - Jan 20, 2017 - 9:34am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Red_Dragon - Jan 20, 2017 - 9:22am
 
What Did You Do Today? - Red_Dragon - Jan 20, 2017 - 8:55am
 
Poetry Forum - Red_Dragon - Jan 20, 2017 - 8:51am
 
Before and After - Proclivities - Jan 20, 2017 - 8:25am
 
What Did You See Today? - lily34 - Jan 20, 2017 - 8:24am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jan 20, 2017 - 8:15am
 
This is amazing! - Antigone - Jan 20, 2017 - 8:09am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - ptooey - Jan 20, 2017 - 7:51am
 
Helpful emergency signs - Proclivities - Jan 20, 2017 - 7:25am
 
Peace - Skydog - Jan 20, 2017 - 6:05am
 
Just joined RP - prkbenchmutation - Jan 20, 2017 - 5:57am
 
Tech & Science - Red_Dragon - Jan 20, 2017 - 5:07am
 
Precious Metals, Money & Investing - Skydog - Jan 20, 2017 - 3:55am
 
Chelsea Manning - sirdroseph - Jan 20, 2017 - 2:17am
 
MIXES - R_P - Jan 20, 2017 - 12:59am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos; Please Limit to 510 ... - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 19, 2017 - 8:43pm
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - FourFortyEight - Jan 19, 2017 - 6:52pm
 
What makes you smile? - Antigone - Jan 19, 2017 - 6:34pm
 
Back to the 40's - Skydog - Jan 19, 2017 - 5:49pm
 
Play the Blues - rhahl - Jan 19, 2017 - 4:56pm
 
Nuclear power - saviour or scourge? - haresfur - Jan 19, 2017 - 3:54pm
 
And the good news is.... - Proclivities - Jan 19, 2017 - 1:26pm
 
Gov - miamizsun - Jan 19, 2017 - 1:25pm
 
Amazing art - Proclivities - Jan 19, 2017 - 1:17pm
 
Partisanship -- See Any Resemblance? - rhahl - Jan 19, 2017 - 12:24pm
 
Don't Make Me Laugh - Skydog - Jan 19, 2017 - 10:20am
 
Military Matters - R_P - Jan 19, 2017 - 10:19am
 
File under the ultra cool tab - Proclivities - Jan 19, 2017 - 9:52am
 
Baseball, anyone? - Prodigal_SOB - Jan 19, 2017 - 9:24am
 
Thomas Kinkade -- Painter Scandal - Skydog - Jan 19, 2017 - 9:10am
 
Unquiet Minds - Mental Health Forum - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jan 19, 2017 - 7:58am
 
PUSH THE SHUFFLE FOR GOD SAKES - aflanigan - Jan 19, 2017 - 7:30am
 
Tomato Gardens - rhahl - Jan 19, 2017 - 7:24am
 
Regarding dogs - rhahl - Jan 19, 2017 - 7:10am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Jan 18, 2017 - 9:12pm
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 18, 2017 - 8:52pm
 
Maarjamaa - oldviolin - Jan 18, 2017 - 4:57pm
 
What is Humanity's best invention? - rhahl - Jan 18, 2017 - 1:21pm
 
how do you feel right now? - miamizsun - Jan 18, 2017 - 1:01pm
 
BACK TO THE 80's - hindsightseer - Jan 18, 2017 - 12:45pm
 
Dreams - Tales from your sleep - Antigone - Jan 18, 2017 - 12:27pm
 
Media Matters - Steely_D - Jan 18, 2017 - 12:10pm
 
What Time Is It ? - Antigone - Jan 18, 2017 - 11:47am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Guns Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 421, 422, 423  Next
Post to this Topic
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC desert


Posted: Sep 16, 2016 - 8:43am

Missouri: The Shoot-Me State

This Editorial board opinion-editorial in the New York Times describes how Missouri is set to pass a law that removes background checks and allows those with criminal records such as those found guilty of domestic violence to carry concealed firearms.

What is this context of these decisions by state legislators?  Especially in light of an apparent recent uptick in homicides.  See:  Murder Rates Rose in a Quarter of the Nation’s 100 Largest Cities


haresfur
I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 10, 2016 - 5:47pm

 bokey wrote:

Give them suctions cups and let them off themselves.

 

bokey
I haven’t seen the Democrats this mad since we freed the slaves
bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 10, 2016 - 5:44pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:

Wright is absolutely correct. There shouldn't have been any actual firearms - let alone ammunition - in the room. No excuse. Nope. None.

 
Give them suctions cups and let them off themselves.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 10, 2016 - 5:34pm

 haresfur wrote: 
Wright is absolutely correct. There shouldn't have been any actual firearms - let alone ammunition - in the room. No excuse. Nope. None.
haresfur
I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 10, 2016 - 4:25pm

 westslope wrote:
Florida cop fatally shoots 73-year-old former librarian during role play

Incredible.

Why did the police officer not check the rounds before commencing the exercise?  

 

POLICE GUNNING DOWN A 73 YEAR-OLD WOMAN DURING A WEAPONS CLASS WAS NO ACCIDENT — JIM WRIGHT EXPLAINS IT ALL


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC desert


Posted: Aug 10, 2016 - 2:22pm

Florida cop fatally shoots 73-year-old former librarian during role play

Incredible.

Why did the police officer not check the rounds before commencing the exercise?  
kauri

kauri Avatar

Location: taranaki .new zealand
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Rabbit


Posted: Aug 4, 2016 - 8:04pm

https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrats/videos/1020879604671760/ i rest my case
islander
Dog is my copilot
islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Scorpio
Chinese Yr: Cock


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 5:03pm

 kurtster wrote:

No, I anticipated this thought.  It is more than likely that most vets use a gun, to make sure.  A vet is always going to be able to get a gun no matter what any law says.  It skews the numbers for the general population.  

And you're suggesting what for our vets ?  How are you going to intervene at any level when more active duty off themselves than those killed in combat ?  This is a systemic problem, not a gun problem.

Suicide is not a gun problem, period.  Its an excuse to restrict guns, not a reason. 

 
More health and support services when they return for starters. Long term, stop sending them away as much to fight foreign people for questionable objectives so you don't have so many returning with issues.

A you're fond of saying, laws won't stop anyone, soldier or not.  The idea is to make them less common and readily accessible so that a rash action won't have such dire consequences. Suicide itself is not a gun problem, but the ready availability of guns makes the suicide problem substantially worse. As demonstrated in Australia, lower suicide rates are an outcome of fewer guns around. Whether you want to call it a direct or an indirect benefit doesn't really matter to me.

Your original statement (the one that confused me), demonstrated that the two issues are intertwined. I think you were trying to say we should de-link them because a reasonable percentage of the suicides were ex-military. But that really doesn't make much sense to me. If suicide is a problem it doesn't really matter who it is that's killing themselves. 
haresfur
I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 4:31pm

 kurtster wrote:

Thanks, the post war 70's were pretty nuts for me for a lot of reasons.  

And thanks for the pdf file in your other post.  Pretty interesting stuff in there and detailed.  As I poked around to answer what piled up over the day, I ended up at wiki and found this regarding suicide in Australia and in particular involving guns.

Some researchers have found a significant change in the rate of firearm suicides after the legislative changes. For example, Ozanne-Smith et al. (2004) in the journal Injury Prevention found a reduction in firearm suicides in Victoria, however this study did not consider non-firearm suicide rates. Others have argued that alternative methods of suicide have been substituted. De Leo, Dwyer, Firman & Neulinger, studied suicide methods in men from 1979 to 1998 and found a rise in hanging suicides that started slightly before the fall in gun suicides. As hanging suicides rose at about the same rate as gun suicides fell, it is possible that there was some substitution of suicide methods. It has been noted that drawing strong conclusions about possible impacts of gun laws on suicides is challenging, because a number of suicide prevention programs were implemented from the mid-1990s onwards, and non-firearm suicides also began falling.

It seems that your pdf link supports the trends between hanging and guns on page 13 of the report or page 23 of the file.  

I'm not trying to belittle suicide at any level or say that we should do nothing to prevent it as a society.  I'm just questioning the role that guns have in the subject of suicide as it pertains to the restriction of guns in the USA and our 2nd.

Still reading your pdf.  I went to wiki first and found the part that I quoted and then went to your link to see if it supported or refuted wiki.

Much obliged.

 
As I said before, I read it as the number of alternate methods don't make up for the decrease in gun deaths. But numbers get squishy and we don't have an alternate earth to use as a control group. I'm sure there are substitutions of methods and Australia has been pretty good at starting to address and de-stigmatise mental health issues. I look at it all as defense in depth. Small steps help.
kurtster
behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 4:11pm

 haresfur wrote:

Just to be clear, in spite of differences on this issue, I'm sorry for you loss, Kurt.

 
Thanks, the post war 70's were pretty nuts for me for a lot of reasons.  

And thanks for the pdf file in your other post.  Pretty interesting stuff in there and detailed.  As I poked around to answer what piled up over the day, I ended up at wiki and found this regarding suicide in Australia and in particular involving guns.

Some researchers have found a significant change in the rate of firearm suicides after the legislative changes. For example, Ozanne-Smith et al. (2004) in the journal Injury Prevention found a reduction in firearm suicides in Victoria, however this study did not consider non-firearm suicide rates. Others have argued that alternative methods of suicide have been substituted. De Leo, Dwyer, Firman & Neulinger, studied suicide methods in men from 1979 to 1998 and found a rise in hanging suicides that started slightly before the fall in gun suicides. As hanging suicides rose at about the same rate as gun suicides fell, it is possible that there was some substitution of suicide methods. It has been noted that drawing strong conclusions about possible impacts of gun laws on suicides is challenging, because a number of suicide prevention programs were implemented from the mid-1990s onwards, and non-firearm suicides also began falling.

It seems that your pdf link supports the trends between hanging and guns on page 13 of the report or page 23 of the file.  

I'm not trying to belittle suicide at any level or say that we should do nothing to prevent it as a society.  I'm just questioning the role that guns have in the subject of suicide as it pertains to the restriction of guns in the USA and our 2nd.

Still reading your pdf.  I went to wiki first and found the part that I quoted and then went to your link to see if it supported or refuted wiki.

Much obliged.


kurtster
behind the kurtain
kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 3:29pm

 islander wrote:

Just to be clear, are you saying that we shouldn't be so concerned about suicide deaths because a lot of them are former soldiers?  

 
No, I anticipated this thought.  It is more than likely that most vets use a gun, to make sure.  A vet is always going to be able to get a gun no matter what any law says.  It skews the numbers for the general population.  

And you're suggesting what for our vets ?  How are you going to intervene at any level when more active duty off themselves than those killed in combat ?  This is a systemic problem, not a gun problem.

Suicide is not a gun problem, period.  Its an excuse to restrict guns, not a reason. 
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 3:03pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
That's what I meant... the first round should have made him know something's not right. 

It goes beyond that—unless someone else loaded it and handed it to him (a real possibility from what I read, which might be sort of an excuse if he wasn't familiar) it's not like he mixed up a box of blanks and a box of live ammo. You have to individually load each ball into the cylinder and pack it in with a little lever. It's time-consuming and awkward. You would definitely notice you had loaded a ball.

Maybe he left the cylinder loaded the last time he shot it a year or two ago (not as dangerous as it sounds; just leave the percussion cap off and it won't go off) and forgot he'd done it.You can't just unload the thing either—you have to fire it or go thru some even-more-time-consuming extraction process to get that ball out of there. Being as generous as I can here.

But he should still have looked in the cylinders before fitting the caps. And then there's the recoil. A long train of mistakes. Somebody's gonna get his ass kicked in court. And if the organizers didn't have insurance (if they did they probably don't anymore) then dog help them.


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC desert


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 2:48pm

 haresfur wrote:

Just to be clear, in spite of differences on this issue, I'm sorry for you loss, Kurt.

 
I'll echo the sentiment.  Even if the victim was just a room mate or former room mate.

Reminds me of a grade 5 class mate who hung himself a few years later.  Robert.  He was weird.  Already pear-shaped in grade 5 and kinda nerdy — decades before being nerdy became uber cool.  Some of the kids picked on him though the bullying was minor compared to what it could have been.   

I never tormented Robert but then I did not stand up for him either.  My days of standing up for strangers and people I did not know well would come later.  Call it the curse of a 6' 5" male with a warrior complex.  


ScottFromWyoming
I eat pints
ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Pisces
Chinese Yr: Tiger


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 2:36pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
So you're shootin' cotton wads out o' your .44 handloader, but a real ball got in there "somehow." Once you get up off the ground, you gonna pull the trigger again?

It's not like you wouldn't notice. The difference in recoil between a cotton wad and a .44 ball is the difference between a firm handshake and a kitten batting at you.

 
That's what I meant... the first round should have made him know something's not right.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 2:15pm

 Lazy8 wrote:

I expect they'll be handed to him.

 
{#Lol}
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 2:09pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:
Why is he carrying those?
 
I expect they'll be handed to him.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 2:00pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
Cap & ball. No ammo.

Why is he carrying those?
 


Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 1:52pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:
The real question here is wtf would a "wild west exhibition" shooter even have bulleted ammunition in his kit? 

Cap & ball. No ammo.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 1:50pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

So you're shootin' cotton wads out o' your .44 handloader, but a real ball got in there "somehow." Once you get up off the ground, you gonna pull the trigger again?

 
The real question here is wtf would a "cowboy action" shooter even have bulleted ammunition in his kit?


Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2016 - 1:43pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
So you're shootin' cotton wads out o' your .44 handloader, but a real ball got in there "somehow." Once you get up off the ground, you gonna pull the trigger again?

It's not like you wouldn't notice. The difference in recoil between a cotton wad and a .44 ball is the difference between a firm handshake and a kitten batting at you.
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 421, 422, 423  Next