RP Listener Forum - Radio Paradise - eclectic commercial free Internet radio
[ ]      [ ]   [ ]

how do you feel right now? - Coaxial - Mar 26, 2015 - 10:24pm
 
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes (and Taxes) - Coaxial - Mar 26, 2015 - 10:16pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - Coaxial - Mar 26, 2015 - 8:59pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Coaxial - Mar 26, 2015 - 8:52pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - Manbird - Mar 26, 2015 - 7:59pm
 
Oh, The Stupidity - DaveInVA - Mar 26, 2015 - 5:17pm
 
Business as Usual - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 5:01pm
 
Iran - kurtster - Mar 26, 2015 - 4:47pm
 
Questions. - buzz - Mar 26, 2015 - 4:23pm
 
Vote for the next President now! - kurtster - Mar 26, 2015 - 4:20pm
 
Animation - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 4:10pm
 
Germany - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 3:18pm
 
Media Bias - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 3:02pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Mar 26, 2015 - 2:44pm
 
How's the weather? - DaveInVA - Mar 26, 2015 - 1:14pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - DaveInVA - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:51pm
 
Films you're excited about. - Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:30pm
 
By jimminy! Cricket! - haresfur - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:27pm
 
RadioParadise HD: API/webservice for integration in XBMC? - Neo_Moucha - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:21pm
 
Epic Facebook Statuses - Prodigal_SOB - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:05pm
 
Oklahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Prodigal_SOB - Mar 26, 2015 - 11:25am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Mar 26, 2015 - 11:22am
 
Oh GOD, they're GAY! - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 11:18am
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - islander - Mar 26, 2015 - 11:13am
 
Movie Recommendation - lily34 - Mar 26, 2015 - 10:46am
 
George Bush's War: How many dead now? - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 10:44am
 
Cool Stuff I Really Want - JrzyTmata - Mar 26, 2015 - 10:33am
 
TV shows you watch - Proclivities - Mar 26, 2015 - 9:32am
 
RP App for Android - SaskWind87 - Mar 26, 2015 - 9:19am
 
Baseball, anyone? - Prodigal_SOB - Mar 26, 2015 - 8:31am
 
Climate Change - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 26, 2015 - 7:57am
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Mar 26, 2015 - 7:54am
 
What Are You Grateful For? - Prodigal_SOB - Mar 26, 2015 - 7:39am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - Mar 26, 2015 - 6:46am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - islander - Mar 26, 2015 - 6:30am
 
Israel - kurtster - Mar 26, 2015 - 5:49am
 
Radiohead - RichardPrins - Mar 26, 2015 - 12:02am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 25, 2015 - 11:44pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 11:16pm
 
What Did You See Today? - haresfur - Mar 25, 2015 - 9:40pm
 
Graphic designers, ho! - haresfur - Mar 25, 2015 - 9:39pm
 
Yemen - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 8:01pm
 
What makes you smile? - kurtster - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:58pm
 
Unusual News - DaveInVA - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:14pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:10pm
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - Antigone - Mar 25, 2015 - 3:33pm
 
Will you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - DaveInVA - Mar 25, 2015 - 3:31pm
 
Economix - kurtster - Mar 25, 2015 - 3:24pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - lily34 - Mar 25, 2015 - 11:33am
 
::TCM:: Turner Classic Movies - Steve - Mar 25, 2015 - 11:04am
 
Those lovable acronym guys & gals - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 10:49am
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 10:44am
 
How big are the shirts? - Proclivities - Mar 25, 2015 - 10:34am
 
what makes you frown - Alexandra - Mar 25, 2015 - 10:25am
 
Silly, just plain silly. - aflanigan - Mar 25, 2015 - 9:54am
 
Beer - Proclivities - Mar 25, 2015 - 8:20am
 
Venezuela - RichardPrins - Mar 25, 2015 - 8:10am
 
Breaking News - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:58am
 
Graphic designers, ho's! - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:55am
 
A nice light topic - Proclivities - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:29am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - lily34 - Mar 25, 2015 - 7:07am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Mar 25, 2015 - 6:25am
 
Swag ::::::>>> RP style - Proclivities - Mar 25, 2015 - 6:11am
 
Make Lily34 Laugh - meower - Mar 25, 2015 - 6:11am
 
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones - Coaxial - Mar 25, 2015 - 5:31am
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - bokey - Mar 25, 2015 - 4:37am
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - 2cats - Mar 25, 2015 - 3:59am
 
Free Mp3s - RichardPrins - Mar 24, 2015 - 11:10pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - Steely_D - Mar 24, 2015 - 10:55pm
 
Canada - RichardPrins - Mar 24, 2015 - 9:01pm
 
That was beautiful... - Alexandra - Mar 24, 2015 - 8:32pm
 
Things I Saw Today... - Coaxial - Mar 24, 2015 - 7:38pm
 
Please Don't Post Here - ScottN - Mar 24, 2015 - 7:11pm
 
Birds' nest - Antigone - Mar 24, 2015 - 6:12pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - haresfur - Mar 24, 2015 - 5:37pm
 
(a public service of RP)
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Philosophy (Meaty Metaphysical Munchables!) Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
Post to this Topic
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Feb 23, 2015 - 7:14pm

What did Nietzsche mean when he said 'if you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back at you'?
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Jan 28, 2015 - 5:56pm


Prodigal_SOB
Work is the curse of the drinking class
Prodigal_SOB Avatar

Location: Back Home Again in Indiana
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Snake


Posted: Nov 3, 2014 - 8:44am





RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Oct 27, 2014 - 3:08pm

The Cold Logic of Drunk People - The Atlantic
At a bar in France, researchers made people answer questions about philosophy. The more intoxicated the subject, the more utilitarian he or she was likely to be.
Prodigal_SOB
Work is the curse of the drinking class
Prodigal_SOB Avatar

Location: Back Home Again in Indiana
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Snake


Posted: Oct 23, 2014 - 5:23pm

  
  Have I ever told the one about the poor misguided philosophy student who was always putting Descartes before Horace?
 
Prodigal_SOB
Work is the curse of the drinking class
Prodigal_SOB Avatar

Location: Back Home Again in Indiana
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Snake


Posted: Oct 17, 2014 - 10:58am

 RichardPrins wrote:
{#Mrgreen}

Nobody really needs instruction for that, as it sort of comes naturally. I bet even amoebae know how to do it (in its most basic form).
 
  There are people in this town getting doctorates in folklore.  That's always seemed a bit odd to me too.

 
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Oct 17, 2014 - 10:44am

 Prodigal_SOB wrote:
You know this is something I really don't think I need that much instruction in.
 
{#Mrgreen}

Nobody really needs instruction for that, as it sort of comes naturally. I bet even amoebae know how to do it (in its most basic form).


Prodigal_SOB
Work is the curse of the drinking class
Prodigal_SOB Avatar

Location: Back Home Again in Indiana
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Snake


Posted: Oct 17, 2014 - 9:48am

 RichardPrins wrote: 
You know this is something I really don't think I need that much instruction in.
 
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Oct 17, 2014 - 8:41am

Heil Hedonism! {#Drunk}
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Oct 8, 2014 - 7:31pm

Chimpanzee 'personhood' effort begins new court battle | Science/AAAS | News

Chimpanzees are back in court. Today, judges in New York state heard the first in a series of appeals attempting to grant “legal personhood” to the animals. The case is part of a larger effort by an animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) to free a variety of creatures—from research chimps to aquarium dolphins—from captivity.

Late last year, NhRP filed lawsuits in three New York lower courts on behalf of four captive chimpanzees in the state. Two—Tommy and Kiko—live in cages on private property, according to the group. The other two—Hercules and Leo—are lab chimps at Stony Brook University. The litigation was spearheaded by Steven Wise, a prominent animal rights lawyer and NhRP’s founder, who spent years consulting with scientists, policy experts, and other lawyers to hone a strategy. His group settled on filing a writ of habeas corpus, which allows a person being held captive to have a say in court. Any judge that granted the writ would be tacitly acknowledging that a chimpanzee is a legal person and thus must be freed from its current confines.

That didn’t happen: All three lower courts dismissed the lawsuits. So NhRP appealed, and Wise argued the first of those appeals this afternoon. Making his case for Tommy in front of a five-judge panel and a packed courthouse, he contended that chimpanzees are so cognitively and genetically similar to humans that they deserve a fundamental right to bodily liberty. He wants Tommy—and eventually the other chimpanzees—moved to a sanctuary in Florida. Wise didn’t have any pushback: Tommy’s owners didn’t appear in court, and they didn’t file legal briefs challenging the case.

“It went as well as we could have hoped,” says NhRP’s executive director, Natalie Prosin, who was also at the hearing. “The judges were really engaged. They had obviously read our briefs and materials, and they asked really intelligent questions.”

Prosin is also heartened by a move the court made in July. In response to NhRP’s concerns that Tommy’s owners would try to move him out of state to avoid further litigation, the judges unanimously granted a preliminary injunction to prevent any move. “That was a major victory for us,” Prosin says. “It means the court thinks our appeal has a decent chance of success.”

That’s a fair assessment, says Richard Cupp, a law professor at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California, and a noted opponent of personhood for animals. But he still doesn’t think NhRP is going to win. “The weight of precedent and reasoning goes so strongly against these cases,” says Cupp, who would rather see a focus on animal welfare than animal rights. “Animal personhood is an artificial and unrealistic concept,” he says. “Language won’t help these creatures—human responsibility will.” (...)


RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Aug 18, 2014 - 6:22pm


haresfur
I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle Australia
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 1, 2014 - 6:30pm

 RichardPrins wrote:


 
{#Lol}
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Jul 1, 2014 - 6:18pm


Red_Dragon
y ddraig goch ddyry gychwyn
Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Jesusland


Posted: Jan 29, 2014 - 5:24pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
Our quantum reality problem – Adrian Kent – Aeon
When the deepest theory we have seems to undermine science itself, some kind of collapse looks inevitable

(...) It was clear from the start that quantum theory challenged all our previous preconceptions about the nature of matter and how it behaves, and indeed about what science can possibly – even in principle – say about these questions. Over the years, this very slipperiness has made it irresistible to hucksters of various descriptions. I regularly receive ads offering to teach me how to make quantum jumps into alternate universes, tap into my infinite quantum self-energy, and make other exciting-sounding excursions from the plane of reason and meaning. It’s worth stressing, then, that the theory itself is both mathematically precise and extremely well confirmed by experiment.

Quantum mechanics has correctly predicted the outcomes of a vast range of investigations, from the scattering of X-rays by crystals to the discovery of the Higgs boson at the Large Hadron Collider. It successfully explains a vast range of natural phenomena, including the structure of atoms and molecules, nuclear fission and fusion, the way light interacts with matter, how stars evolve and shine, and how the elements forming the world around us were originally created.

Yet it puzzled many of its founders, including Einstein and Erwin Schrödinger, and it continues to puzzle physicists today. Einstein in particular never quite accepted it. ‘It seems hard to sneak a look at God’s cards,’ he wrote to a colleague, ‘but that he plays dice and uses “telepathic” methods (as the present quantum theory requires of him) is something that I cannot believe for a single moment.’ In a 1935 paper co-written with Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, Einstein asked: ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’ He concluded that it could not. Given apparently sensible demands on what a description of physical reality must entail, it seemed that something must be missing. We needed a deeper theory to understand physical reality fully.

Einstein never found the deeper theory he sought. Indeed, later theoretical work by the Irish physicist John Bell and subsequent experiments suggested that the apparently reasonable demands of that 1935 paper could never be satisfied. Had Einstein lived to see this work, he would surely have agreed that his own search for a deeper theory of reality needed to follow a different path from the one he sketched in 1935.

Even so, I believe that Einstein would have remained convinced that a deeper theory was needed. None of the ways we have so far found of looking at quantum theory are entirely believable. In fact, it’s worse than that. To be ruthlessly honest, none of them even quite makes sense. But that might be about to change. (...)



 
we are but bumps on the ass of a cosmic jackass
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Jan 29, 2014 - 5:12pm

Our quantum reality problem – Adrian Kent – Aeon
When the deepest theory we have seems to undermine science itself, some kind of collapse looks inevitable

(...) It was clear from the start that quantum theory challenged all our previous preconceptions about the nature of matter and how it behaves, and indeed about what science can possibly – even in principle – say about these questions. Over the years, this very slipperiness has made it irresistible to hucksters of various descriptions. I regularly receive ads offering to teach me how to make quantum jumps into alternate universes, tap into my infinite quantum self-energy, and make other exciting-sounding excursions from the plane of reason and meaning. It’s worth stressing, then, that the theory itself is both mathematically precise and extremely well confirmed by experiment.

Quantum mechanics has correctly predicted the outcomes of a vast range of investigations, from the scattering of X-rays by crystals to the discovery of the Higgs boson at the Large Hadron Collider. It successfully explains a vast range of natural phenomena, including the structure of atoms and molecules, nuclear fission and fusion, the way light interacts with matter, how stars evolve and shine, and how the elements forming the world around us were originally created.

Yet it puzzled many of its founders, including Einstein and Erwin Schrödinger, and it continues to puzzle physicists today. Einstein in particular never quite accepted it. ‘It seems hard to sneak a look at God’s cards,’ he wrote to a colleague, ‘but that he plays dice and uses “telepathic” methods (as the present quantum theory requires of him) is something that I cannot believe for a single moment.’ In a 1935 paper co-written with Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, Einstein asked: ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’ He concluded that it could not. Given apparently sensible demands on what a description of physical reality must entail, it seemed that something must be missing. We needed a deeper theory to understand physical reality fully.

Einstein never found the deeper theory he sought. Indeed, later theoretical work by the Irish physicist John Bell and subsequent experiments suggested that the apparently reasonable demands of that 1935 paper could never be satisfied. Had Einstein lived to see this work, he would surely have agreed that his own search for a deeper theory of reality needed to follow a different path from the one he sketched in 1935.

Even so, I believe that Einstein would have remained convinced that a deeper theory was needed. None of the ways we have so far found of looking at quantum theory are entirely believable. In fact, it’s worse than that. To be ruthlessly honest, none of them even quite makes sense. But that might be about to change. (...)


RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Jan 22, 2014 - 10:26am

Optical illusions educate the mind – Iwan Rhys Morus – Aeon

NoEnzLefttoSplit
Being Norwegian is over-rated.
NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male
Zodiac: Taurus
Chinese Yr: Tiger


Posted: Jan 17, 2014 - 12:38pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
Discovery of quantum vibrations in 'microtubules' inside brain neurons supports controversial theory of consciousness
A review and update of a controversial 20-year-old theory of consciousness published in Physics of Life Reviews claims that consciousness derives from deeper level, finer scale activities inside brain neurons. The recent discovery of quantum vibrations in "microtubules" inside brain neurons corroborates this theory, according to review authors Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose. They suggest that EEG rhythms (brain waves) also derive from deeper level microtubule vibrations, and that from a practical standpoint, treating brain microtubule vibrations could benefit a host of mental, neurological, and cognitive conditions. (...)


 
Bandyopadhyay and his team will couple microtubule vibrations from active neurons to play Indian musical instruments. "Consciousness depends on anharmonic vibrations of microtubules inside neurons, similar to certain kinds of Indian music, but unlike Western music which is harmonic," Hameroff explains.
sounds better than a drum machine.
RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Jan 16, 2014 - 9:15pm

Discovery of quantum vibrations in 'microtubules' inside brain neurons supports controversial theory of consciousness
A review and update of a controversial 20-year-old theory of consciousness published in Physics of Life Reviews claims that consciousness derives from deeper level, finer scale activities inside brain neurons. The recent discovery of quantum vibrations in "microtubules" inside brain neurons corroborates this theory, according to review authors Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose. They suggest that EEG rhythms (brain waves) also derive from deeper level microtubule vibrations, and that from a practical standpoint, treating brain microtubule vibrations could benefit a host of mental, neurological, and cognitive conditions. (...)

RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Nov 24, 2013 - 11:55am

The Limits of Understanding - World Science Festival
This statement is false. Think about it, and it makes your head hurt. If it’s true, it’s false. If it’s false, it’s true. In 1931, Austrian logician Kurt Gödel shocked the worlds of mathematics and philosophy by establishing that such statements are far more than a quirky turn of language: he showed that there are mathematical truths which simply can’t be proven. In the decades since, thinkers have taken the brilliant Gödel’s result in a variety of directions—linking it to limits of human comprehension and the quest to recreate human thinking on a computer. In this full program from the 2010 Festival, leading thinkers untangle Gödel’s discovery and examine the wider implications of his revolutionary finding.

RichardPrins

RichardPrins Avatar



Posted: Nov 22, 2013 - 11:23am

In defense of philosophy - Opinion - Al Jazeera English
Authors question the dominant suspicion of philosophical inquiry and critical thinking in democratic societies.

On World Philosophy Day, UN official urges critical thinking on inclusion, sustainability
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18  Next