[ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Log in above to post your comment
ckcotton
(Adding snarky comments since 2007)
Posted: Apr 27, 2018 7:18
 

 aelfheld wrote:

I don't know.  I think it's very good at being annoying.

 
Ok, I’ll agree
bruceandjenna
Posted: Jan 03, 2018 18:53
 

Funky!  Betrays some gypsy blood,  which I may share. 
aelfheld
Posted: Jun 05, 2017 10:59
 

 ckcotton wrote:
Horribly annoying
 
I don't know.  I think it's very good at being annoying.
N4niner206
Posted: May 05, 2017 23:01
 

Like the song, but can't help but picture Adam Sandler singing this. I wonder if his little singing skits were at all influenced by them.
Grammarcop
(A place with fresh water and great beer)
Posted: Dec 14, 2016 8:21
 

 velvetglove wrote:
 But perhaps Bill will consider playing Female of the Species?
 
There's a joke in there but I'm just not gonna go there...
ckcotton
(Adding snarky comments since 2007)
Posted: Dec 14, 2016 8:04
 

Horribly annoying
twoplain2sea
(After the gold rush by my friend Amphion.)
Posted: Aug 11, 2016 21:51
 

       Snow and Katmandu, she looks the other way
Who's sponsoring denials in fire arenas she wants to know.
Chipps
(Yorkshire, UK)
Posted: Jun 30, 2016 0:28
 

Great to hear Space on RP. Can it really be 18 years or so since this came out?
yuel
(Taka-Tuka-Land)
Posted: Jun 09, 2016 8:32
 

sounded like a Mescaleros tune without Joe Strummer when it started- like it!
{#Bananapiano}
markybx
(Oud Amsterdam)
Posted: Jun 09, 2016 8:27
 

{#Bananajam}
joempie
(Switzerland)
Posted: May 29, 2016 0:44
 

 velvetglove wrote:
I must say, I'm amazed to hear this on RP (although at this point, I probably shouldn't be)!

Not their greatest. But perhaps Bill will consider playing Female of the Species? In honor of upcoming Halloween?
 
Female of the Species is indeed more beautiful, whereas this song is fun, but also a bit silly of course.

OHMish
(Copenhagen)
Posted: Mar 05, 2016 12:01
 

{#Fever}
thediceareloaded
(Berlin)
Posted: Feb 24, 2016 9:56
 

My god, a straight 9, what a fun song!
Decoy
(Milliway's, the Restaurant at the End of the Universe)
Posted: Feb 23, 2016 8:45
 

I must be getting old, this is awful.
grazie
(uk)
Posted: Feb 23, 2016 8:12
 

Only 5.5 for this seems little harsh.

It may have the artistic integrity of Pink Floyd, but it's load of fun.
oppositelock
(On the road)
Posted: Jan 02, 2016 9:39
 

Cool.  :)
 
midreaming
Posted: Oct 20, 2015 18:51
 

it's super mod, futuristic cocktail scene mann, banned in '56 for its incomprehensible lyrics and suggestive rhythms, bootlegged and colorized here for your voyeuristic listening pleasure.  ..so tie your shoes - and keep your hands above the table young man.  let's call this a 9 for being disco, trashy and breaking the rules.  eff the haters, seriously
tiggers
Posted: Oct 07, 2015 4:54
 

 Hannio wrote:

We do have our own, at least here in Texas we do, pendejo.  But I never realized superfluous u's had any masculine qualities.  What are you compensating for?



 
Really??? In modern parlance emasculated generally means to make something weaker/worse rather than the older definition of removing a man's masculinity, but I should have known better than to expect you to know or understand the nuances of the English language!!
Hannio
(Austin, TX)
Posted: Sep 30, 2015 10:15
 

 tiggers wrote:

It's our language so maybe you should get your own ... especially seeing as you have emasculated (look it up) ours for no good reason!

 

We do have our own, at least here in Texas we do, pendejo.  But I never realized superfluous u's had any masculine qualities.  What are you compensating for?


springof63
(Christchurch, England)
Posted: Aug 19, 2015 1:23
 

 penumbra wrote:
Lyrically brilliant... not sure about the music, though. And I think words look better with 'u's in them.
Interestingly, if you're concerned with superfluity in the English language, read the following by your very own Samuel Clemens:
.
"...For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all.
.
Generally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeiniing voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x"— bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez —tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivili.
.
Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev alojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld."
 
This made me larf.