[ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Log in above to post your comment
Ghiaap
(Haarlo, The Netherlands)
Posted: Jun 06, 2013 - 02:56
 

 Rofi wrote:
If God would make this kind of music, I would listen to him 

 
God is a God of Thunder and Rock 'n' Roll....{#Fire}

Rofi
(Amsterdam)
Posted: May 15, 2013 - 11:45
 

If God would make this kind of music, I would listen to him 

Nadita
(Zürich, Switzerland)
Posted: Apr 04, 2013 - 03:36
 

Love it!
It makes me think if there would be a chance that RP would Play "young blood" by Russian Circles!
wow..!!!

Probably there would be a chance. Event though its quite -  louder! :-)

richlister
(Here, there, pretty much everywhere.)
Posted: Dec 14, 2012 - 04:44
 

 palad1 wrote:


Actually... 

*pushes nerd glasses back-on*

Douglas Addams mentions that the engineers that built it ran a test question by it but did not wait for the answer. The question was what is 6*9. Later-on it is revealed that this race had 13 fingers in total, making their numeric system base-13.

42 in base 13 = 54 base 10

Douglas Adams wowed never to make any more math jokes after that.

 
 
And to think, you'll never get that time back.

jazzface78
(you're gonna make me give myself a good talkin' to, NY)
Posted: Nov 29, 2012 - 15:19
 

heroin much? 



palad1
(London UK. A froggie in exile.)
Posted: Oct 25, 2012 - 09:19
 

 
Blastcat900 wrote:

The number 42 is, in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, "The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything", and is calculated by an enormous supercomputer over a period of 7.5 million years to be 42. Unfortunately no one knows what the question is. Thus, to calculate the Ultimate Question, a special computer the size of a small planet and using organic components was created and named "Earth".
 

Actually... 

*pushes nerd glasses back-on*

Douglas Addams mentions that the engineers that built it ran a test question by it but did not wait for the answer. The question was what is 6*9. Later-on it is revealed that this race had 13 fingers in total, making their numeric system base-13.

42 in base 13 = 54 base 10

Douglas Adams wowed never to make any more math jokes after that.

 

max_p
Posted: Sep 06, 2012 - 09:19
 

 ottovonb wrote:
Ah....nothing like a dreamy interlude in the middle of a crappy work day. Nice!
 
yeah but had a 'droner' on just prior

oldviolin
(Esse Quam Videri)
Posted: Aug 27, 2012 - 07:15
 

it's not so far, really...

Proclivities
(Carrboro, NC)
Posted: Aug 10, 2012 - 10:06
 

 justsomeone wrote:
If God is an astronaut, who built the spaceship?
 
Some guy named Kevin.

jim1964
(1379 miles to Wall Drug)
Posted: Aug 05, 2012 - 21:59
 

...this is cool, I'm watching the live NASA feed on the landing of the Mars rover and in the background this is playing. Maybe God is an astronaut.

shplody
Posted: Jul 05, 2012 - 11:22
 

Never thought RP would play God is an astronaut... terrific stuff.

ottovonb
Posted: Jul 05, 2012 - 11:21
 

Ah....nothing like a dreamy interlude in the middle of a crappy work day. Nice!

tulfan
(Still in SE MI)
Posted: Jul 05, 2012 - 11:21
 

 justsomeone wrote:
If God is an astronaut, who built the spaceship?
 


My God wouldn't need one but ironically does wear a helmet

justsomeone
(Between a rock and a hard place)
Posted: Jun 25, 2012 - 12:57
 

If God is an astronaut, who built the spaceship?

Byronape
("post-capitalist wreckageville")
Posted: Apr 05, 2012 - 19:05
 

 unclehud wrote:
What's to say there aren't living beings that require an ammonia atmosphere, use sulfur for metabolic energy, communicate through touch or telepathy, and would explode in gravitational fields less than 4G?  (Cell phone pun for those not paying close attention.)  It's quite plausible that they would absolutely assume a form completely "alien" to Earthlings.  Why, oh why, must it possess general human characterisitics?

While I agree 100% with your arguement, there are some reasons why "intelligent" life would generally be considered to have a humanoid form.  

Think about the traits that make humans (argueably) superior to other life on this planet.  

1) Brains as far from the ground as possible.
2) Front facing eyes with short optic nerves.
3) Multiple communication methods that frequently combine to add context (ie, "Sure honey, you can go out drinking all night..." while her toe is tapping and eyebrow up.)
4) Limbs with multiple points of articulation.
5) Digits with multiple points of articulation.
6) Thumbs.  They speak for themselves.
7) Walking upright, freeing upper limbs for object manipulation.

There are many others, but I think you get the drift.

Now, I think the assumption that intelligent life on "Earth-like" planets (liquid water, O2 and carbon-dioxide, hard non-liquid surfaces) would generally have humanish characteristics due to the thought that all life needs liquid water to form.  

That being said, there is no reason that I can think of that other forms wouldn't evolve on their own.  It would all depend on what was needed to thrive in their environment.

Blastcat900
Posted: Apr 05, 2012 - 18:50
 

 Byronape wrote:

It just so happens that 42 is the answer to Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything.  I don't think that's a coincidence...
 
The number 42 is, in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, "The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything", and is calculated by an enormous supercomputer over a period of 7.5 million years to be 42. Unfortunately no one knows what the question is. Thus, to calculate the Ultimate Question, a special computer the size of a small planet and using organic components was created and named "Earth".



fredriley
(Nottingham, UK)
Posted: Mar 22, 2012 - 04:19
 

 unclehud wrote:
To revisit an previous topic on this thread ...
 
Someone suggested earlier, and I paraphrase here, that there is a negligible chance of livable conditions on another planet in the Milky Way.  That comment went on to list a few items required to sustain life: "(liquid water, energy, and organic material) ".
 
That someone was wrong, going by the increasing number of extrasolar planets being discovered by astronomers, a few of which look to be 'goldilocks planets'. With over 400 billion stars in our galaxy, and millions of galaxies in the universe, there must be countless billions of planets. Even if the conditions for carbon-based life are unlikely, say 1 in 10 million for arguments' sake, then you've still got millions of planets in the universe that are suitable for life.  IMO the probability of there not being extraterrestrial life is vanishingly small.

Not that that's what this band's name is about. I think it's an ironic comment on the Von Daniken pseudo-religion of the 70s (as mentioned in an earlier comment of mine) which in essence saw extraterrestrials as gods guiding humanity to progress and watching over us over the millennia.

leathepea
(Hickory, NC)
Posted: Feb 29, 2012 - 12:45
 

 ozzie1313 wrote:
If God is an astronaut, then he is too many light years away for us to really know anything about him with any accuracy.  We can only be enthralled with the myth like earlier mankind used oral history to not lose track of and to perpetuate their identity. 
 
Awesome! 



ozzie1313
Posted: Feb 19, 2012 - 10:12
 

If God is an astronaut, then he is too many light years away for us to really know anything about him with any accuracy.  We can only be enthralled with the myth like earlier mankind used oral history to not lose track of and to perpetuate their identity. 

RedGuitar
(Iowa, USA)
Posted: Feb 15, 2012 - 11:42
 

 unclehud wrote:
To revisit an previous topic on this thread ...
 
Someone suggested earlier, and I paraphrase here, that there is a negligible chance of livable conditions on another planet in the Milky Way.  That comment went on to list a few items required to sustain life: "(liquid water, energy, and organic material) ".
 
Years ago under the stimulus of powerful chemicals, my friends and I used to critique "the Star Trek view of cosmology".  Why must we assume that other sentient beings use carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen for metabolism?  Why must they always be assumed to inhabit axially symmetrical bodies, with, let's be serious here, a head, thorax, two arms and two legs?  Star Trek and LOTS of other science fiction vehicles also portrayed aliens using vocalizations or other noises for communication — a characteristic at which we chuckled for hours.  (Damned chemicals.)
 
What's to say there aren't living beings that require an ammonia atmosphere, use sulfur for metabolic energy, communicate through touch or telepathy, and would explode in gravitational fields less than 4G?  (Cell phone pun for those not paying close attention.)  It's quite plausible that they would absolutely assume a form completely "alien" to Earthlings.  Why, oh why, must it possess general human characterisitics?
 
That's like, just my opinion, man.  No disrespect aimed at anyone.
 
I am most definitely with you on this.  "Life" could have many forms!


eruwenolorien
(SC)
Posted: Feb 02, 2012 - 09:52
 

 unclehud wrote:
To revisit an previous topic on this thread ...
 
Someone suggested earlier, and I paraphrase here, that there is a negligible chance of livable conditions on another planet in the Milky Way.  That comment went on to list a few items required to sustain life: "(liquid water, energy, and organic material) ".
 
Years ago under the stimulus of powerful chemicals, my friends and I used to critique "the Star Trek view of cosmology".  Why must we assume that other sentient beings use carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen for metabolism?  Why must they always be assumed to inhabit axially symmetrical bodies, with, let's be serious here, a head, thorax, two arms and two legs?  Star Trek and LOTS of other science fiction vehicles also portrayed aliens using vocalizations or other noises for communication — a characteristic at which we chuckled for hours.  (Damned chemicals.)
 
What's to say there aren't living beings that require an ammonia atmosphere, use sulfur for metabolic energy, communicate through touch or telepathy, and would explode in gravitational fields less than 4G?  (Cell phone pun for those not paying close attention.)  It's quite plausible that they would absolutely assume a form completely "alien" to Earthlings.  Why, oh why, must it possess general human characterisitics?
 
That's like, just my opinion, man.  No disrespect aimed at anyone.
 
I love this post, as I have always been stumped by the assumption that "living" means "needs the elements as humans to exist."

Also, I love this song. Solid 10!


unclehud
(300 feet above the planet)
Posted: Nov 16, 2011 - 06:02
 

To revisit an previous topic on this thread ...
 
Someone suggested earlier, and I paraphrase here, that there is a negligible chance of livable conditions on another planet in the Milky Way.  That comment went on to list a few items required to sustain life: "(liquid water, energy, and organic material) ".
 
Years ago under the stimulus of powerful chemicals, my friends and I used to critique "the Star Trek view of cosmology".  Why must we assume that other sentient beings use carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen for metabolism?  Why must they always be assumed to inhabit axially symmetrical bodies, with, let's be serious here, a head, thorax, two arms and two legs?  Star Trek and LOTS of other science fiction vehicles also portrayed aliens using vocalizations or other noises for communication — a characteristic at which we chuckled for hours.  (Damned chemicals.)
 
What's to say there aren't living beings that require an ammonia atmosphere, use sulfur for metabolic energy, communicate through touch or telepathy, and would explode in gravitational fields less than 4G?  (Cell phone pun for those not paying close attention.)  It's quite plausible that they would absolutely assume a form completely "alien" to Earthlings.  Why, oh why, must it possess general human characterisitics?
 
That's like, just my opinion, man.  No disrespect aimed at anyone.



Maupie
(Velp (gld), the Netherlands)
Posted: Oct 30, 2011 - 06:28
 

this is bad, this sucks

bmeador
(24fps)
Posted: Oct 25, 2011 - 17:54
 

What a wonderful transition to this from Utopia. Nice, Bill. Very nice!


Krispian
(Vancouver, BC)
Posted: Oct 25, 2011 - 17:54
 

Goldfrapp - Utopia > God is an Astronaut - A Deafening Distance = Nice segue!

On_The_Beach
(The Blue Planet)
Posted: Oct 13, 2011 - 18:20
 

 Byronape wrote:
It just so happens that 42 is the answer to Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything.  I don't think that's a coincidence...
 
I'm not a "Hitchhikers" pundit, but I'm glad you picked up the (intentional) reference.



Byronape
(Snorkeling in the River Styx)
Posted: Oct 11, 2011 - 17:22
 

 On_The_Beach wrote:

Well, I've done the counting. As it turns out there are 42 more grains of sand on Earth than there are stars in the universe. So take THAT, universe!! (The universe thinks it's so great.)

 
It just so happens that 42 is the answer to Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything.  I don't think that's a coincidence...



sporkster
(Adelaide, South Australia)
Posted: Aug 09, 2011 - 20:45
 

I don't mind this song, but I don't really understand why it's being played to death... There is so much other music out there!

Ntropy
(Cleveland, OH)
Posted: Jul 27, 2011 - 18:38
 

 fabduchi wrote:
I really like this song! The album is great too.

 
 
Yeah. I just adore these guys... They are incredible.


On_The_Beach
(Vancouver BC, Bud)
Posted: Jun 24, 2011 - 22:29
 

 Proclivities wrote:
Despite what Carl Sagan asserted, it's quite possible (or probable) that there are more grains of sand on the Earth's beaches than there are stars in the Universe - but I haven't counted lately.
 
Well, I've done the counting. As it turns out there are 42 more grains of sand on Earth than there are stars in the universe. So take THAT, universe!! (The universe thinks it's so great.)


drife
(Golden, CO)
Posted: Jun 15, 2011 - 12:30
 

This sounds like something right out of the Porcupine Tree music book.

bluecshells
(EARTH)
Posted: Jun 13, 2011 - 08:55
 

I like that one!


boober
(KC,Mo)
Posted: Jun 13, 2011 - 08:53
 

 coy wrote:

50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars
are you sure ??

 
I checked his math...he's right!


bluecshells
(EARTH)
Posted: Jun 13, 2011 - 08:53
 

All bright



coy
(san antonio)
Posted: Jun 11, 2011 - 20:49
 

1wolfy
(Mission Viejo California)
Posted: Apr 22, 2009 - 10:27 < Reply >

..if God were an invention, all living things  came to be by some wild ass cosmic mistake..seems ignorant to my minds eye..it requires a whole lot of faith in man made science to believe that, but to each his own. SweTex wrote:
I like this!...but I have to disagree. God is not an astrounat, God is the invention of the only animal who knows it's going to die. 
 

SweTex
(Swede living in Texas)
Posted: Mar 26, 2009 - 10:58 < Reply >

 healyf52 wrote:


You have it backwards, humanity is the invention of the only being that knows that it's not going to die.
 

I guess one of us has got it backwards....And I'm SURE you're convinced its me.



coy
(san antonio)
Posted: Jun 11, 2011 - 17:47
 

 themotion wrote:

There are 100,000,000,000 stars in the Milky Way Galaxy. 
There are 500,000,000,000 galaxies in the Universe.
That's 5.0 × 1022 stars in the known universe ... or:

50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars

To put that in perspective, that's more stars in the universe than grains of sand on all of earth's beaches.

To say that just one of those stars, by some "wild ass cosmic mistake," has a planet containing the ingredients for life (liquid water, energy and organic material) goes against logic and probability. In fact, it has been found that several of Jupiter's and Saturn's moons contain liquid water, organic material and tidal energy created by the gravitational forces of the planet's they orbit. 

Life may not be as precious or unique as we once imagined. 

 
50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars
are you sure ??


Galateea
(Lynchburg, VA)
Posted: May 24, 2011 - 06:52
 

Yes! ...and, god is an astronaut!

fabduchi
(Ramos Mejia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.)
Posted: May 14, 2011 - 22:02
 

I really like this song! The album is great too.

 

whitehawk
Posted: May 12, 2011 - 18:18
 

Trying to write a detailed technical report and this song is just the what I need to keep going.

Love the song.

fredriley
(Nottingham, UK)
Posted: May 11, 2011 - 02:50
 

A pleasant surprise to me is that this band are from Wicklow, Ireland, just up the road from where I grew up in Bray. Not that there's any trace of Irish in their music, mind. This is a fine and disturbing album which the Nottingham jury heartily recommends.

JH_Junior
(São Paulo Brazil)
Posted: Apr 22, 2011 - 17:39
 

I Like !   {#Music}

Proclivities
(Carrboro, NC)
Posted: Apr 19, 2011 - 12:19
 

 themotion wrote:

There are 100,000,000,000 stars in the Milky Way Galaxy. 
There are 500,000,000,000 galaxies in the Universe.
That's 5.0 × 1022 stars in the known universe ... or:

50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars

To put that in perspective, that's more stars in the universe than grains of sand on all of earth's beaches.

To say that just one of those stars, by some "wild ass cosmic mistake," has a planet containing the ingredients for life (liquid water, energy and organic material) goes against logic and probability. In fact, it has been found that several of Jupiter's and Saturn's moons contain liquid water, organic material and tidal energy created by the gravitational forces of the planet's they orbit. 

Life may not be as precious or unique as we once imagined. 

 
Despite what Carl Sagan asserted, it's quite possible (or probable) that there are more grains of sand on the Earth's beaches than there are stars in the Universe - but I haven't counted lately.
 


4merdj
(donde el viento se devuelve)
Posted: Apr 19, 2011 - 12:09
 

 4merdj wrote:
Nice smooth transition as a segue to Goldfrapp's Utopia ... {#Meditate}
 
Ditto ... today ... {#Whisper}

fast_eddie
Posted: Apr 13, 2011 - 08:16
 

This song gets better every time I hear it!!

Felix_The_Cat
(Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Posted: Apr 05, 2011 - 14:47
 

 Felix_The_Cat wrote:

God is a bit monotone...{#Ask}


 
I mean.. monotonous {#Mrgreen}


SusanHiddenPoet
(Texas)
Posted: Jan 19, 2011 - 21:04
 

 roulleau wrote:

Why listen to this when Explosions in the Sky does it so much better?


 
{#Curtain}  How about listening to one right after the other?  9 {#Arrowu} 10 ... as it began streaming my body went, "Ahhhhhh, I love this song." {#Cheers}

fingerpin
(oHIo)
Posted: Jan 05, 2011 - 09:25
 

 Felix_The_Cat wrote:

God is a bit monotone...{#Ask}


He can also appear a bit petty.  {#Wink}



wildrudi
(NW Germany, Oldenburg)
Posted: Jan 01, 2011 - 12:24
 

{#Dancingbanana}

roulleau
Posted: Dec 08, 2010 - 14:32
 

Why listen to this when Explosions in the Sky does it so much better?



Felix_The_Cat
(Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Posted: Nov 04, 2010 - 16:26
 

God is a bit monotone...{#Ask}