[ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Log in above to post your comment
jblockinger
Posted: Jun 17, 2013 - 19:24
 

Great classic song
Lazarus
(Bethany)
Posted: Jun 17, 2013 - 19:24
 


a magnificent song from a truly great album...  love it...
 

michaelc
(Walnut Creek, CA)
Posted: Jun 17, 2013 - 19:22
 

this is the current list 
Air — Talisman
Younger Brother — Train
Pink Floyd — Time
Beethoven — Symphony No.5
While my guitar gently weeps

this is why I listen to RP

Sweet_Virginia
Posted: May 28, 2013 - 05:06
 

Great point- is it possible to post old playlists through time. High historical interest and a great source of musical inspiration... B&R recommendations would probably result in a lot of music purchases online...

treatment_bound
(Duluth to Madison)
Posted: May 21, 2013 - 13:47
 

I thought I'd post this on a song which gets played a lot, and this one seems to fit the bill--


Does anybody know what were the very first songs played here at RP?  I'd love to go back and read some embryonic comments of 13+ years ago.  I only found this station after reading this TIME magazine article from April 2004:
 
>>Bill and Rebecca Goldsmith are making a living from an idea that would probably get you laughed out of business school: running an Internet radio station commercial free. From their home in Paradise, Calif., in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada, they operate Radioparadise.coma format-busting station that spins a tasteful mix of music ranging from the Beatles to Norah Jones to the Strokes. Fewer than 5,000 listeners tune in during peak times, but fans like it so much, they sent the couple $120,000 in contributions last year, covering the cost of bandwidth, song royalties and other expenses and leaving enough to support a "comfortable lifestyle," says Bill Goldsmith, who quit a 30-year career in FM radio to run and DJ his homegrown version.

If you can't bear another spin of Britney Spears, you're one of the reasons that stations like Radioparadise are beginning to prosper and investors are again flocking to another alternative to the AM/FM dial: satellite radio. After years of unmet promise, online stations, along with satellite offerings like Sirius and XM Satellite Radio, are building audiences even as regular radio struggles through a decade-long slump (time spent listening is down 14% since 1994, according to the ratings firm Arbitron). Critics say industry consolidation has turned AM/FM stations into McRadio: nationally uniform, repetitive and clogged more than ever with ads and promos. But scores of high-quality alternatives are now competing for your ears (and dollars).

Just a few years ago, online radio heads were mainly tech geeks willing to put up with patchy, low-quality sound. These days about 19 million people listen to online radio at least once a week, up from 7 million in 2000, according to Arbitron. Online listenership is growing at an average 43% a year as more people get broadband connections at home and tune in for content that's unavailable or in short supply on commercial stations, from blues to folk to Al Franken's new liberal Air America network, which is broadcast in just a few markets on the AM/FM dial but was streamed 2 million times in its first week, according to its exclusive webcaster, RealNetworks. "People are fed up with terrestrial radio," says Dave Goldberg, who oversees Yahoo's music site and radio network, Launchcast, which draws 1 million listeners a week.

For now, it's the satellite guys, together claiming around 2 million subscribers, who are drawing Wall Street's attention. Though their stock prices had plummeted over concerns that they might run out of cash, their shares have soared in the past year. XM is up 379%; Sirius, 491%. Analyst April Horace of Janco Partners in Denver predicts that within five years 16 million Americans will be listening to satellite radio. She says the market would explode if a popular shock jock like Howard Stern were to defect with his 15 million listeners, a prospect that looked more likely last week after six traditional stations dropped his show following an FCC proposal to fine their corporate parent, Clear Channel Communications, $495,000 for airing his "indecent" content.

Satellite broadcasters use a pay-radio model, beaming dozens of channels coast to coast commercial free, with original programming such as comedy and kids' shows. Financially backed in part by automakers, the satellite firms charge between $10 and $13 a month, mainly targeting car-radio users. Increasingly, though, listeners are buying portable tuners for their homes. To neutralize a key AM/FM advantage, both satellite broadcasters have started to provide traffic and weather updates in select markets.

So far, digital radio's growth isn't hurting big radio empires such as Clear Channel. With 1,213 stations and roughly a 30% ratings share in markets such as Phoenix, Ariz., and Milwaukee, Wis., Clear Channel had a record 2003: revenues of $8.9 billion and a net income of $1.1 billion. But listeners are clearly spending less time with terrestrial radio. One cause may simply be more media competition, from DVDs to video games to an expanding universe of digital TV. But critics of the radio industry say consolidation is partly to blame too. They claim Clear Channel and other big groups have ruined the airwaves by homogenizing song lists, politicizing the dial with conservative talk and sucking out local flavor with voice-tracking technology, which enables DJs to sound like local talent even if they're a thousand miles away. Clear Channel contends that its cost-cutting measures have saved hundreds of stations from bankruptcy and that it's the programming's popularity, reflected in ratings, that ultimately drives the business.

Nonetheless, teenagers and young adults are increasingly going online to find new music (not just file-sharing networks), particularly alternative content that rarely gets airplay on the commercial FM dial. About 13% of Americans ages 12 to 24 now listen to online radio on a weekly basis, up from 6% of that age group in 2001, according to Edison Media Research/Arbitron. With 185 stations, AOL's radio network, which, like TIME, is part of Time Warner, draws a weekly listenership of 1.5 million (by that measure, Arbitron notes, it's the nation's largest online network). Advertising remains tiny, but that may change. Ronning Lipset, an upstart Internet-radio ad firm in New York City, recently started packaging AOL, Live365.com MSN and Yahoo into a kind of national network, which has a combined audience of at least 250,000 listeners in a quarter hour, the minimum needed to appeal to national-media planners. The firm says the networks will start running audio spots from national advertisers in May.

For now the AM/FM industry doesn't seem too concerned. Arbitron estimates that 228 million Americans ages 12 and up still listen to broadcast radio weekly, and radio remains the top broadcast medium after TV for advertisers who want to reach a mass market. Radio ad sales in Arbitron markets are forecast to rise 5.5% this year, to $14 billion, according to BIA Financial Network, a media consultancy in Chantilly, Va. Yet as more consumers tune to stations like Radioparadise, those numbers could slip. Goldsmith's thoughtful playlists are organized by musical theme, moving from, say, a bluesy Tracy Chapman tune to a Latin-blues Carlos Santana track to a rock-blues number by the Hellecasters. He heeds listener feedback and says the only thing he really cares about is "playing good music," regardless of whether it's a hot single being pitched by a promoter or a classic. That's why his fans are pulling out their wallets to support him.



Papa_Smurf
(Spokane WA)
Posted: May 16, 2013 - 23:27
 

oh my ... your killing me,how do you guys come up with this wave? I dont care im riddin it thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

k-man
(SCruz, CA)
Posted: May 08, 2013 - 16:31
 

Ho man, what a fantastic, timeless piece. Beefy be the bass. And Paul always looked so childlike, how can that face make that thump?

Of course, George's part is nothing less than the very top of musicianship here. He has a way of reaching in and grabbing my heart, and giving it a good squeeze....

kdarwish
(Turku, Finland)
Posted: May 04, 2013 - 00:02
 

Extremely engaging quality from the very beginning chords. Timely too, in brilliant sunlight just "noticed the floor still needs sweeping". Has to wait 'til guitar finishes weeping, Thank you Radio Paradise. :)



Lazarus
(Bethany)
Posted: Apr 26, 2013 - 20:44
 



marvelous...  love this song...  love this whole album...
 

nicolewe
Posted: Apr 15, 2013 - 16:04
 

Beethoven and then the Beatles. Two 10's, one after the other. I love RP.

Lazarus
(Bethany)
Posted: Apr 02, 2013 - 20:34
 


Everybody in my church loves this song...  and this entire album...
 

MA
Posted: Mar 26, 2013 - 09:06
 

White Album – the best rock/pop album ever.



ckcotton
(Adding snarky comments since 2007)
Posted: Mar 18, 2013 - 10:34
 

 Hannio wrote:


Your grammar.
 
Seriously?
 

Hannio
(Austin, TX)
Posted: Mar 18, 2013 - 10:28
 

 ckcotton wrote:

Really?

Your CRAZY! 
 

Your grammar.

ckcotton
(Adding snarky comments since 2007)
Posted: Mar 18, 2013 - 10:21
 

 MojoJojo wrote:
While my ears gently bleed.
 
Really?

Your CRAZY! 

BobLoblaw
(Bytown)
Posted: Mar 15, 2013 - 05:27
 

Three 9+ songs in a row....Bill is not messing around this morning!

Michallik
(Zgorzelec, Pl.)
Posted: Mar 07, 2013 - 00:52
 

{#Bananajam}

Lazarus
(Bethany)
Posted: Feb 22, 2013 - 22:16
 

 lemmoth wrote:


Me thinks a certain former member, may be a member again..................C'mon Lazarus
 

I be me...  hope you are having a marvelous time right this moment...

love this song...
 

lemmoth
(NYC)
Posted: Jan 22, 2013 - 14:54
 

 Lazarus wrote:

Well said...  miss you...

 
 

Me thinks a certain former member, may be a member again..................C'mon Lazarus

Zoinks
(near Boston)
Posted: Jan 22, 2013 - 14:47
 

 I wish this was like reddit so I could upvote your comment.  

ambrebalte wrote:
The first Beatles I listened too.
I was 13. Just moved to a place I didn't like, a village, where people were looking at us "from the suburbs", as perfect strangers. I just lost all my friends, never felt that alone before, outcast. And there was this music teacher who seemed so softly sad, who decided that instead of the usual "flatitudes" we would be better off discovering sounds we could relate to, giving us a good reason to study English simultaneously.
I don't remember if it was just after noon or later, if it was in the winter or in the summer. But I clearly see and feel the sudden suspension of breathes. Never were we so calm, even long after the music finished. Moments of grace last. 
I don't remember any other moments in my teen age when we were so moved that we didn't even think about hiding it. It was beyond music, a whole state of mind, like to touch a legend, to be a part of the myth. In this small French village in the deep countryside, beginning of the 70s'.
 
I wish this was like reddit so I could upvote your comment.

ambrebalte
(Wolxheim (France) - Dreaming about resuming my life in Beijing province)
Posted: Jan 14, 2013 - 17:53
 

The first Beatles I listened too.
I was 13. Just moved to a place I didn't like, a village, where people were looking at us "from the suburbs", as perfect strangers. I just lost all my friends, never felt that alone before, outcast. And there was this music teacher who seemed so softly sad, who decided that instead of the usual "flatitudes" we would be better off discovering sounds we could relate to, giving us a good reason to study English simultaneously.
I don't remember if it was just after noon or later, if it was in the winter or in the summer. But I clearly see and feel the sudden suspension of breathes. Never were we so calm, even long after the music finished. Moments of grace last. 
I don't remember any other moments in my teen age when we were so moved that we didn't even think about hiding it. It was beyond music, a whole state of mind, like to touch a legend, to be a part of the myth. In this small French village in the deep countryside, beginning of the 70s'.

On_The_Beach
(The Blue Planet)
Posted: Jan 14, 2013 - 17:41
 

 Bat wrote:
I finally rented it from Netflix (no HBO) and I would say the opposite.  There were a few interesting bits, but really nothing we've not heard before and 4 hours is WAY too long to watch people tell us things we already knew.  I'm not saying don't bother, but in my opinion it could have used some serious editing.
 
Personally I wouldn't edit anything, and I definitely wasn't bored, despite the running time. Perhaps they could keep the existing film as a "Director's Cut" and release a shorter version as an option.

MojoJojo
(Indianapolis, IN USA)
Posted: Jan 14, 2013 - 17:38
 

While my ears gently bleed.

DanFHiggins
(Mid Maryland)
Posted: Jan 11, 2013 - 12:26
 

Wow
still
timeless 

Lazarus
(Bethany)
Posted: Jan 03, 2013 - 09:00
 

 Cynaera wrote:

I love - and will always love - Harrison's music. But I read Clapton's biography, and he has a big, empty place in him that refuses to acknowledge his mistakes, other peoples' successes, and any hint of happiness. He's like a traveler, walking through life, observing events, sometimes even being part of those events, but not giving praise or blame, or anything. Neutral.

IMO, Harrison is the more "human" of the two. Clapton is genius on guitar, but Harrison was genius on life and love. Neither of which impacts the music, I guess, but I'd rather hear a bad song by Harrison than a good song by Clapton, based on what I know now.
 

 
Well said...  miss you...

 

martinc
(Ottawa Canada)
Posted: Jan 01, 2013 - 07:58
 

great song, great album. In 1968 when it was released I think it stayed on my turntable for months.

Bat
(Austin)
Posted: Dec 14, 2012 - 09:14
 

 On_The_Beach wrote:
Just saw the 3.5 hour Scorsese documentary on George last night.
Really excellent and a must-see for even the most casual Harrison/Beatles fan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xnx87LIDO9k
 
I finally rented it from Netflix (no HBO) and I would say the opposite.  There were a few interesting bits, but really nothing we've not heard before and 4 hours is WAY too long to watch people tell us things we already knew.  I'm not saying don't bother, but in my opinion it could have used some serious editing.

alexg1
Posted: Dec 11, 2012 - 03:22
 

 rockpommel16 wrote:

 stevendejong wrote:
Younger Brother - Train (a new great song)
Pink Floyd - Time
Beethoven - Symphony No.5 - 1. Allegro
The Beatles - While My Guitar Gently Weeps

This must be the Radio Paradise All Stars set. What will be next... AWESOME. 
 
....same as today......incredible....is RP really a radio station?.....think,it´s A LOT more......
 
And today... 63 days cycle?

coy
(san antonio)
Posted: Nov 20, 2012 - 21:23
 

one of the best songs of all time anywhere

zigzag
Posted: Nov 09, 2012 - 18:54
 

Love Macca's bass fluff just prior to the fade out.

I mean, that mistake reveals the level of boredom and disinterest that George's songs generally induced in the Fab Two.

And one wonders what Lennon's contribution to the recording was. I could look it up in my Beatles Sessions book but I suspect the answer will be "bonking Yoko".

 

midreaming
Posted: Nov 01, 2012 - 16:11
 

 jhorton wrote:
Hard to pick a, " Most overplayed Beatles song," but this one would certainly be high on my list....
  bumpity bump-ditty bump .. indeed. Thanks horty



Papasmeg
(Lille France)
Posted: Oct 20, 2012 - 13:00
 

Still my favourite Beatles track after nearly 45 years..........
 

helgigermany
(Germany)
Posted: Oct 20, 2012 - 12:55
 

Very super nice!

valeriogonzalez
(Quito, Ecuador)
Posted: Oct 20, 2012 - 12:54
 

20!

linzie
Posted: Oct 12, 2012 - 15:12
 

Beatles were great......GH's greatest contribution!!

He's a team player, letting the rest in on this gem!!!

rockpommel16
(rockpommel´s land...near the netherlands)
Posted: Oct 09, 2012 - 10:05
 

 stevendejong wrote:
Younger Brother - Train (a new great song)
Pink Floyd - Time
Beethoven - Symphony No.5 - 1. Allegro
The Beatles - While My Guitar Gently Weeps

This must be the Radio Paradise All Stars set. What will be next... AWESOME. 
 
....same as today......incredible....is RP really a radio station?.....think,it´s A LOT more......

(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Oct 09, 2012 - 10:04
 


WE BE DANCING...  LOVE IT...


 

(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Sep 26, 2012 - 12:36
 



bingo by jingo...  love this song...

 

theralph
(Virginia)
Posted: Aug 18, 2012 - 12:34
 

We can not have this!This song is the best clue ever to...... something. What it is we may never know but I wouldn't want it any other way.

http://myfuneral.com/images/wirkandasnichthaben.jpg 

ziakut
(Right Here)
Posted: Aug 10, 2012 - 14:26
 

To All Who have responded: 

Thank you for your thought provoking feedback. I agree with most everything that was said. Thank you for sharing your opinions and thoughts. They were well received and fun to read. I suppose I was a bit harsh in my first comment...however I do feel a discombobulation on this album as WonderLizard said very eloquently. 

johnjconn
(chicago land)
Posted: Aug 10, 2012 - 14:22
 

 amoreena wrote:
More proof that the Beatles are dying in the wrong order........
 
Beatle death list , in order
Stu
Brian
John
Linda
George

(note: did Paul died in 68? ya know, the whole Paul is dead thing)

shellbella
(so california)
Posted: Aug 10, 2012 - 14:20
 

 amoreena wrote:
More proof that the Beatles are dying in the wrong order........
 
That's harsh... I know what you mean... but its still harsh....

On_The_Beach
(The Blue Planet)
Posted: Aug 07, 2012 - 18:27
 

Just saw the 3.5 hour Scorsese documentary on George last night.
Really excellent and a must-see for even the most casual Harrison/Beatles fan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xnx87LIDO9k

WonderLizard
(2,755.46 mi. due east of Paradise)
Posted: Aug 07, 2012 - 10:24
 

 ziakut wrote:
Ok, I'm gonna catch flack for this one...This album is a huge disappointment from beginning to end. Why on earth would this album be released shortly after Hey Jude was released as a single and have it no where to be found? The version of Revolution on this album was a slurred, slow, prodding performance. There was so much filler here too? Ob-la-di? C'mon! Songs like 'Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me and My Monkey'...?! I suppose an album with such filler...songs like this one and possibly 'Julia' sound like masterpieces. Granted...I find George's contributions to be some of the best on this album...it is by far a 'good' Beatles album. A real middle finger from the fab four...knowing they can sell albums no matter what the material is. A botching from beginning to end IMO.

Ok bring on the lashings...I can take it.
 
Parlophone never released Beatles' singles on albums. They were always separate releases. It was the U.S. market that expected singles on albums—hence Capitol's chopping up the British releases to fit the American conception of an album. Not coincidentally the practice enabled Capitol to squeeze out a couple of "extra" albums, those wily devils. Heh-heh.

Actually, I think you're spot on about the overall change in quality from Sgt. Pepper's and Revolver. However, what it displayed was four separate Beatles instead of The Beatles, if you get the distinction. I think a lot of their success as songwriters and recording musicians was attributable to how they interacted. John roughed up Paul's pabulum, and Paul smoothed out John's bombast. They both worked George's stuff over. Regardless of the dynamic, it worked stunningly well. The Beatles was the first glimpse we got into the band's inner tensions—that each member of the band was bursting to be considered as an individual. So, Paul's stuff was a little sweeter than usual ("Ob-la-di Ob-la-da"), and John's a little raunchier ("Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me and My Monkey")—good gets, BTW. And maybe, like Tommy a couple of years later, half could have been jettisoned, and the rest assembled into a decent rock'n'roll album. We have instead what they gave us.

IMHO, I don't think what they gave us was an upthrust middle finger. Now, they may have been giving it to each other, but I can't believe—nor have I found quoted evidence—that would support the notion that they were so scornful of their audience, that they thought they could foist anything, no matter how badly conceived or shoddily performed, on their drooling minions. All in all, The Beatles methinks has withstood the test of time, unevenness and all. So, no flak—just food for thought.


amoreena
(west whatnot)
Posted: Aug 07, 2012 - 09:04
 

More proof that the Beatles are dying in the wrong order........

stevendejong
Posted: Aug 07, 2012 - 08:59
 

Younger Brother - Train (a new great song)
Pink Floyd - Time
Beethoven - Symphony No.5 - 1. Allegro
The Beatles - While My Guitar Gently Weeps

This must be the Radio Paradise All Stars set. What will be next... AWESOME. 

Kokoloco53
(Southeastern Arizona)
Posted: Aug 07, 2012 - 08:58
 

Hey ope!

iam_overlord
(Brighton, MA)
Posted: Jul 25, 2012 - 14:42
 

 ziakut wrote:
Ok, I'm gonna catch flack for this one...This album is a huge disappointment from beginning to end. Why on earth would this album be released shortly after Hey Jude was released as a single and have it no where to be found? The version of Revolution on this album was a slurred, slow, prodding performance. There was so much filler here too? Ob-la-di? C'mon! Songs like 'Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me and My Monkey'...?! I suppose an album with such filler...songs like this one and possibly 'Julia' sound like masterpieces. Granted...I find George's contributions to be some of the best on this album...it is by far a 'good' Beatles album. A real middle finger from the fab four...knowing they can sell albums no matter what the material is. A botching from beginning to end IMO.

Ok bring on the lashings...I can take it.

 
 
Much as I love the Beatles, it's hard to disagree with you.

IMO, maybe this didn't need to be a double-album. Sounds like it could have used a little less LSD (no pun intended).

jagdriver
(Just a nod and a wink south of Paradise)
Posted: Jul 25, 2012 - 14:41
 

 ziakut wrote:
Ok, I'm gonna catch flack for this one...This album is a huge disappointment from beginning to end. Why on earth would this album be released shortly after Hey Jude was released as a single and have it no where to be found? The version of Revolution on this album was a slurred, slow, prodding performance. There was so much filler here too? Ob-la-di? C'mon! Songs like 'Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me and My Monkey'...?! I suppose an album with such filler...songs like this one and possibly 'Julia' sound like masterpieces. Granted...I find George's contributions to be some of the best on this album...it is by far a 'good' Beatles album. A real middle finger from the fab four...knowing they can sell albums no matter what the material is. A botching from beginning to end IMO.

Ok bring on the lashings...I can take it.
 
Second only to Let It Be, it's admittedly my least favorite Beatles album (as released in the States). George Martin rightfully advised them to leave half of it on the cutting room floor, so to speak, but the Fabs (read: Paul) wouldn't have it. You also have to consider that they were floundering as a group—they had just recently lost Brian Epstein, immediately after which John was quoted as, "Great... what are we going to do now?" Never mind that Paul had already taken charge as the group's leader (at least in the studio) long before.

They had also just returned from that ill-advised trip to the Maharishi's compound in India, where most of them eventually saw through their new-found spiritual leader and correctly identified him as a fraud. After both events I know I'd be despondent and wouldn't be open to suggestions from George Martin or anyone at EMI. Given that they were also at loggerheads with one another at this point, I think recording this LP was nothing more than self-absorbed therapy. That it yielded any tunes worthy of inclusion in the Beatles canon is phenomenal and illustrates just how creative and musical they could be.

Oh, and did I fail to mention that Yoko had just recently come on the scene? I do not blame her for their breakup, as it had been brewing already. That said, the Lennons' insistence that she be ever-present in the studio during the recording of this double-LP could only serve to further alienate each individual member. (I lump Ringo and George together, however, as I both of them had issues with the "double-headed monster" at this point.)

lemmoth
(NYC)
Posted: Jul 25, 2012 - 14:38
 

 ziakut wrote:
Ok, I'm gonna catch flack for this one...This album is a huge disappointment from beginning to end. Why on earth would this album be released shortly after Hey Jude was released as a single and have it no where to be found? The version of Revolution on this album was a slurred, slow, prodding performance. There was so much filler here too? Ob-la-di? C'mon! Songs like 'Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me and My Monkey'...?! I suppose an album with such filler...songs like this one and possibly 'Julia' sound like masterpieces. Granted...I find George's contributions to be some of the best on this album...it is by far a 'good' Beatles album. A real middle finger from the fab four...knowing they can sell albums no matter what the material is. A botching from beginning to end IMO.

Ok bring on the lashings...I can take it.

 
 
OK - You could have also asked in 1967, how could the Sgt. Pepper album possible be released without including either track on the just released single Strawberry Fields Forever b/w Penny Lane.

The answer is the pop/rock music industry was still transitioning from a heavy reliance on singles to albums - a trransition which of course has been reversed in recent years.

As for your overall take on the White Album — been hearing that there is a lot of filler ever since I picked up my first copy of Rolling Stone in the 70's but to say this far from a "good" Beatles album, or a "real middle finger" from the boys or a "botching from beginning to end are absolutely ludicrous statements.

By my reckoning there are 72:32 of terrific music and 21:03 of filler.  I'll let y'all guess what I consider filler.