[ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Log in above to post your comment
Lazarus
(Bethany)
Posted: Mar 19, 2013 - 11:00
 


beautiful cover...  special to hear it live...  love it love it love it...
 

pvcnote
(SP/SP)
Posted: Mar 19, 2013 - 10:50
 

Again and again and again....??????????????
Twice a day?????
I prefer  "Once a Year"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

owchita
(On the banks)
Posted: Mar 15, 2013 - 16:15
 

I like it !

idiot_wind
Posted: Mar 03, 2013 - 12:37
 

C'mon...play the VU version. Or play "Heroin" or "Waiting for my man"

Lazarus
(Bethany)
Posted: Dec 30, 2012 - 20:44
 



Everybody in my church loves this live cover...

 

oldsaxon
(Wales via Vancouver, BC.)
Posted: Nov 29, 2012 - 11:45
 

 mcullers wrote:
Great song, but the studio version outshines this live version. The Stevie-Nicks-Shakevoice and rushed chorus lyrics in this version leave a bit to be desired. Give me the studio version any day.
 
Maybe, yeah...still had I been there I would have probably been quite pleased.

mcullers
(Country-Dominated TX)
Posted: Jun 25, 2012 - 07:33
 

Great song, but the studio version outshines this live version. The Stevie-Nicks-Shakevoice and rushed chorus lyrics in this version leave a bit to be desired. Give me the studio version any day.

ScottN
(Condo in Gaza full time now. Thank TFSM I saw the divot where the landmine was placed.)
Posted: Jun 09, 2012 - 11:48
 

 pugg689 wrote:
nice, but hard to out do Lou Reed, Rock N Roll Animal live version
 
Apples and Oranges in my view.  They are, mostly, playing different songs.  Even the lyrics aren't totally shared.  Lou Reed's version truly smokes while the CJ's let you enjoy their understated, but excellent, version.

(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Jun 09, 2012 - 11:42
 



I'm a lover of this marvelous cover...

 

Gregorama
(Austin, TX)
Posted: May 24, 2012 - 11:28
 

I didn't like te studio version and don't like this any better.

I've always found her style to
seem kind of mopey. It sounds like she's perpetually bummed out. To me anyway.

Proclivities
(Carrboro, NC)
Posted: May 24, 2012 - 11:25
 

 pugg689 wrote:
nice, but hard to out do Lou Reed, Rock N Roll Animal live version
 
True, but I prefer this version to the CJ's studio version, for some reason.

Kokoloco53
(Southeastern Arizona)
Posted: May 08, 2012 - 16:56
 

Rolllllllllllll.......another one, just like the other one. You've been holding onto it, so give me a hit!

soundlife
(ROME ITALY)
Posted: Apr 06, 2012 - 23:14
 

I do love this version!!

salzburg4321
(Salzburg, Austria)
Posted: Mar 06, 2012 - 06:56
 

I wish she would not whisper so loudly!

(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Feb 21, 2012 - 17:46
 

 Poacher wrote:
In England after 1750, rural poverty continued to be widespread. The 'enclosure' movement of the 18th Century deprived people of land, because of this many became labourers. Wages were low and their diet was worse, and many turned to poaching to survive.

Not everything is as it seems.
 


Interesting that you use the term "England" instead of "Great Britain"...  my Scottish relatives think you are a moronic jerk who is the result of intense inbreeding...

we are a long ways from 1750, poacher, so make all the excuses and rationalizations for yourself that you wish...

the studio version of this cover is from a truly magnificent album...  everybody in my hotel room loves it...



Poacher
(Brighton, UK)
Posted: Feb 21, 2012 - 15:15
 

In England after 1750, rural poverty continued to be widespread. The 'enclosure' movement of the 18th Century deprived people of land, because of this many became labourers. Wages were low and their diet was worse, and many turned to poaching to survive.

Not everything is as it seems.

 romeotuma wrote:


A "poacher" is by definition "one who hunts or fishes illegally on the property of another"... and that is not some derogatory name someone else calls you— that is your name for yourself... you call yourself a common thief...

these song forums are for song comments, and I am an honest commentator...

this cover is a fave for everybody in my hotel room...


(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Feb 19, 2012 - 10:00
 

 Poacher wrote:
Welcome to the special Romeotuma spam/comments page. Normal service will be resumed on the next track he does not rate a 10. Thank you.
 

A "poacher" is by definition "one who hunts or fishes illegally on the property of another"... and that is not some derogatory name someone else calls you— that is your name for yourself... you call yourself a common thief...

these song forums are for song comments, and I am an honest commentator...

this cover is a fave for everybody in my hotel room...


 


Poacher
(Brighton, UK)
Posted: Feb 19, 2012 - 06:56
 

Welcome to the special Romeotuma spam/comments page. Normal service will be resumed on the next track he does not rate a 10. Thank you.

(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Feb 03, 2012 - 14:34
 



This cover is soooo good my nipples get hard when I hear it...



 

(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Jan 02, 2012 - 19:40
 



Sweet piano work on the live version of this very cool cover...  and the guitar lead rocks...  love it...

 


(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Dec 17, 2011 - 20:00
 



absolutely magnificent...  love it...
 

BBOGDA
Posted: Oct 31, 2011 - 10:54
 

Not so much.



(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Oct 31, 2011 - 10:46
 



Everybody in my hotel room loves this cover...
 

hencini
Posted: Sep 29, 2011 - 17:27
 

Cool!!  From a live song that sounds like Lou Reed to a live song that was written by Lou Reed!!  

Love this song in both VU and CJ trim... : )

nalle
(Malmo, Sweden)
Posted: Aug 29, 2011 - 07:56
 

Soooo god for my ears :) Love her voice and this is a great cover.

Mita
(Santa Fe, NM)
Posted: Aug 13, 2011 - 15:15
 

One of the few covers of any song that is decent.

pugg689
Posted: Aug 13, 2011 - 15:14
 

nice, but hard to out do Lou Reed, Rock N Roll Animal live version

andrewlevert
Posted: Jul 13, 2011 - 06:37
 

Agreed.

 mirland wrote:

I prefer the Trinity Sessions recording of this track. But Margo Timmins voice is always great :)
 



andrewlevert
Posted: Jul 13, 2011 - 06:37
 

The Trinity Sessions version of Sweet Jane is 10x better. The acoustics in that Toronto church are amazing and work perfectly for Sweet Jane.

(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Apr 25, 2011 - 07:34
 



Yeah, this is awesome...  brings back some memories...  very soothing...  love it...

 

(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Apr 09, 2011 - 09:24
 



Love the piano on this version...


 

perikleshokie
(Raleigh,NC)
Posted: Feb 21, 2011 - 07:18
 

Sweet Margo.{#Heartkiss}

wenatchee
(Duvall, WA)
Posted: Feb 21, 2011 - 07:16
 

I like her voice, but it comes off a few notches lower than what I would expect.  Just once it would be nice to see her amp it up a bit.



boober
(KC,Mo)
Posted: Jan 05, 2011 - 06:33
 

 Misterfixit wrote:
Note to Sound Board Guy:  Up the singer a couple of notches; level the bass and lead axe.  Otherwise.... good job of capturing ambiance.  I could see the singer breathing into the mic ..

Oh yes, note to self:  buy or steal this album.
  Note to self:
Hire Mr Fixit as a sound man next time he's in KC....he likes bumping up the lead vocals.


whtahtefcuk
(Flagstaff, AZ, USA)
Posted: Jan 05, 2011 - 06:28
 

Real Nice

haresfur
Posted: Dec 20, 2010 - 16:04
 

 alanthecowboy wrote:

It was live in the sense that it was recorded live off the floor, not multitracked, but there wasn't an audience there, so I hesitate to call it a 'live' album.

 
No wonder the crowd was so quiet - I thought they were just in a dream-state. {#Think}

bluedot
(Long Beach, CA)
Posted: Nov 18, 2010 - 22:16
 

Vox a bit low, but the sweetness still comes through!

bluedot
(Long Beach, CA)
Posted: Nov 18, 2010 - 22:06
 

 westslope wrote:

Agreed.  This one is not bad.  If I was Lou Reed, I would be flattered.  

 
lol


mirland
(Denmark)
Posted: Oct 18, 2010 - 06:04
 

I prefer the Trinity Sessions recording of this track. But Margo Timmins voice is always great :)

westslope
(BC coast)
Posted: Oct 02, 2010 - 07:49
 

 Stefen wrote:
Let's just say the studio version is sublime.
 
Agreed.  This one is not bad.  If I was Lou Reed, I would be flattered.  


Huey
(Netherlands)
Posted: Aug 31, 2010 - 07:52
 

 Stefen wrote:
Let's just say the studio version is sublime.
 
Yes...


Otomi
(La orilla de la civilización)
Posted: Aug 15, 2010 - 11:07
 

 Misterfixit wrote:
Note to Sound Board Guy:  Up the singer a couple of notches; level the bass and lead axe.  Otherwise.... good job of capturing ambiance.  I could see the singer breathing into the mic ..

Oh yes, note to self:  buy or steal this album.
 
Note to self: hide CDs whenever funny guys from Nashville come to visit (just in case).

skyguy
(CO)
Posted: Jul 14, 2010 - 13:25
 

What vocal range this girl has!{#Neutral}

leaf
(Vancouver, BC)
Posted: Jul 14, 2010 - 13:25
 

 Stefen wrote:
Let's just say the studio version is sublime.
 
Agreed.


siandbeth
(Santa Cruz California)
Posted: Jun 28, 2010 - 10:22
 

 siandbeth wrote:
Could just be my cheap speakers but I wish they made her voice more pronounced.
 
Oh, I see mrfixit said the same thing earlier.


siandbeth
(Santa Cruz California)
Posted: Jun 28, 2010 - 10:21
 

Could just be my cheap speakers but I wish they made her voice more pronounced.

Stefen
(West Hollywood, CA)
Posted: May 27, 2010 - 14:34
 

Let's just say the studio version is sublime.

(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Apr 25, 2010 - 21:38
 



This is a nice version...  love it...





tiptoncat
Posted: Mar 25, 2010 - 06:56
 

 stephw wrote:

MUTE {#Headache}


 

Interesting comment, since that's what they do to opposition voices in Canada?

stephw
(Ottawa, ON)
Posted: Mar 25, 2010 - 06:52
 

MUTE {#Headache}