[ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Log in above to post your comment
hayduke2
(Southampton, NY)
Posted: Apr 02, 2013 - 18:03
 

Birthday of Mr. Soul
Oh this man's sound was so super excellant 

aspicer
(Chicago, IL)
Posted: Mar 02, 2013 - 06:54
 

I suppose the upside of just hearing that horrible Bjork mess is this sounds even more unbelievable?!
 

joelbb
Posted: Oct 27, 2012 - 21:32
 

Those were simpler, straight-forward days.  No missing the message here.

ziakut
(Right Here)
Posted: Oct 27, 2012 - 21:29
 

Smooth Marvin. I could listen to MG all night long.

WonderLizard
(2,755.46 mi. due east of Paradise)
Posted: Sep 26, 2012 - 10:05
 

 300BaudAcoustic wrote:
In a truly sad admission...as much as I love Marvin, I like the cheezy Jack Black version of this song from High Fidelity even better... :p
 
Which is the perfect antidote to those who can't get Dr. Evil and Frau out of their minds. Jack Black's rendition had to be the biggest surprise of High Fidelity.

leafmold
Posted: Sep 26, 2012 - 09:58
 

 sheeelaaa wrote:
Sorry but this does not make up for Bjork.  She's still ringing in my head — get out, damnit!
 
Agreed. It might take the whole album....

sheeelaaa
(where great wine begins)
Posted: Jul 25, 2012 - 11:49
 

Sorry but this does not make up for Bjork.  She's still ringing in my head — get out, damnit!

dwlangham
(Nowhere to be found)
Posted: Jul 25, 2012 - 11:49
 

This would seriously improve a lonely guy's chances of success, I would think (hope).

asilbuch
Posted: Jul 25, 2012 - 11:48
 

{#Kiss}

ThePoose
(Ottawa, capital of Canada)
Posted: Jul 25, 2012 - 11:47
 

Up your keester for Easter!

 
Ahnyer_Keester wrote:
And in order to make it up to us for that Bjork insanity... Here's some Marvin Gaye. All's forgiven.
 



kingart
(Brooklyn NY)
Posted: Jul 25, 2012 - 11:47
 

Ahhhhhhhhhhh. 

chelsiaann
(Helena, Montucky)
Posted: Jul 25, 2012 - 11:46
 

 Ahnyer_Keester wrote:
And in order to make it up to us for that Bjork insanity... Here's some Marvin Gaye. All's forgiven.
 
Did that not just happen again!? Programmed rotation or just a good segue for grumpy listeners?



Stingray
Posted: Jul 25, 2012 - 11:46
 

Very Gaye...

danoodles
(Saint Louis, Mo.)
Posted: May 23, 2012 - 05:18
 

This tune always puts the misses in a touchy, feelly kind of mood :) 

eddiethebus
Posted: May 23, 2012 - 05:17
 

 Proclivities wrote:

Those movies (like most made after about 1985) are almost entirely forgettable to me - this song is not.
 

always makes me think about HiFidelity :)

richlister
Posted: May 23, 2012 - 05:16
 

Simply, awesome...

Dahlia_Gumbo
(San Francisco)
Posted: Apr 21, 2012 - 11:52
 

Yeeeaaaah.
{#Tongue}

jsumnergar
(Chicago)
Posted: Apr 21, 2012 - 11:51
 

Yeah Baby

Ahnyer_Keester
(Chicago Il)
Posted: Mar 20, 2012 - 19:05
 

And in order to make it up to us for that Bjork insanity... Here's some Marvin Gaye. All's forgiven.

Proclivities
(Carrboro, NC)
Posted: Jan 17, 2012 - 07:21
 

 ziggytrix wrote:
Austin Powers ruined my ability to take this song seriously.
 
Those movies (like most made after about 1985) are almost entirely forgettable to me - this song is not.



djengs
Posted: Dec 16, 2011 - 14:18
 

 ziggytrix wrote:
Austin Powers ruined my ability to take this song seriously.
 

You might try watching High Fidelity sometime. When Jack Black tears into this near the end you get the idea they know the power of the song and uhmm, its aim.

wenatchee
(Duvall, WA)
Posted: Dec 16, 2011 - 14:17
 

When you hear a tune so many times it is easy to critique it.  The coo-ing could be a little less obvious   ;-)   Still a great tune however

Cuse
(Upstate)
Posted: Dec 16, 2011 - 14:15
 

 listen_n_sf wrote:
The soundtrack for unintended pregnancy.
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Good juan


mcYammer
(Beervana)
Posted: Dec 16, 2011 - 14:13
 

Here is my proper p.m. song.
Thank you, Bill

neuticle
(fog fog fog)
Posted: Dec 16, 2011 - 14:13
 

How many babies were made to this song?

AliGator
(The Bluegrass)
Posted: Nov 14, 2011 - 21:13
 

 ziggytrix wrote:
Austin Powers ruined my ability to take this song seriously.
 
 

It didn't ruin it for me, but I think of that scene every time I hear this.  

RParadise
(Hastings-on-Hudson, NY)
Posted: Sep 12, 2011 - 19:14
 

Maybe the greatest slow-dancing-in-the-dark song ever.


ri_shelton
(A few clicks up the river)
Posted: Sep 12, 2011 - 19:13
 

Rating it a 9, because I just smile and sway, but promise me you'll never play it in the morning!

ziggytrix
(Dallas, TX)
Posted: Aug 12, 2011 - 10:23
 

 cc_rider wrote:

Nobody can ruin this song for me. Marvin had it goin' ON.

 
Don't get me wrong - this song has still got the funk in spades! 

It just now also makes me grin and sometimes snicker a bit.


shutter
(You can't get here from there)
Posted: Jun 10, 2011 - 09:48
 

 ziggytrix wrote:
Austin Powers ruined my ability to take this song seriously.
  ...and how might that be, Frau Farbissina?



Lrobby99
(Wisconsin, USA)
Posted: Jun 10, 2011 - 09:42
 

Nothing short of a solid 9. Just a shame how Marvin left us.



Ahnyer_Keester
(Chicago Il)
Posted: Jun 10, 2011 - 09:42
 

 dave216j wrote:

Indeed...that was unexpected and awesome...
 
Yes, as in cleanse the pallet.


dave216j
(DC)
Posted: May 09, 2011 - 19:03
 

 linden wrote:
Great segue from Bjork's "Oh So Quiet." I salute you, Bill! {#Notworthy}
 
Indeed...that was unexpected and awesome...

DD rabbi_phil
(beach)
Posted: Mar 07, 2011 - 16:21
 

Ain't nothin like the real thing baby.

listen_n_sf
Posted: Mar 07, 2011 - 16:18
 

The soundtrack for unintended pregnancy.

linden
(Santa Cruz, CA)
Posted: Mar 07, 2011 - 16:16
 

Great segue from Bjork's "Oh So Quiet." I salute you, Bill! {#Notworthy}

cc_rider
(Austin Texas. Y'all.)
Posted: Mar 07, 2011 - 16:15
 

 ziggytrix wrote:
Austin Powers ruined my ability to take this song seriously.
 
Nobody can ruin this song for me. Marvin had it goin' ON.


anabel
Posted: Feb 04, 2011 - 08:30
 

judging by the playlist, I think Bill is feelin frisky!! {#Jump}



jools
(Brighton UK)
Posted: Jan 04, 2011 - 01:02
 

First working day of my year - nice track to get things moving...

ziggytrix
(Dallas, TX)
Posted: Dec 03, 2010 - 10:37
 

Austin Powers ruined my ability to take this song seriously.

bseib
(40 24' N 86 53' W)
Posted: Dec 03, 2010 - 10:34
 

crap..... I already rated it a 10...  ;-)


MannAudioltd
(Worcester England)
Posted: Oct 01, 2010 - 03:03
 

im back there

calypsus_1
Posted: Aug 20, 2010 - 16:34
 

 

Marvin Gaye - Let's Get It On, Live in Montreux (1980)

"The fabulous Marvin Gaye singing a great version of his classic "Let's Get It On" in Montreux Jazz Festival. "

Marvin Gaye - Lets Get It On. Live (1976)  

"In 1976 Marvin Gayes marriage was about to collapse. He was also just about to be imprisoned because of non-paid child-support to his wife Anna. Reputedly Motown bailed Marvin out and he was suggested to leave US for a some time. Promoter Jeffrey Kruger arranged a European tour to start up in September 1976 and it also included a long waited visit to England for the first time in ten years.

This concert in question was held in 10th October before sell-out audience in Edenhall concert hall Amsterdam. The track listing is pretty much identical compared to the Album "Marvin Gaye - Live At The London Palladium!" which was recorded on the same tour seven days earlier. Only songs missing are "Trouble Man" and "God is Love". All the other tracks are exactly (although in different order) the same as on this DVD, even including the content of medleys. These Medleys are actually one of the biggest problems in this concert. In a way the whole concert is one gigantic medley, while atleast what I was expecting, were the full versions of the songs. If compared to the performances in the "Live in Montreux" DVD this concert feels pretty boring. Marvin himself explained the reason for these medleys in Sharon Davis´ biography book like this; "I got a list of songs from my promoter. He told me all the tracks that were popular in England and I just put them into medley form for few minutes because I hadn´t done them in years. In fact, when I sing them in the States people go for popcorn and hot dogs. The only way you can perform an old record in the States is if you are very animated about it because American´s don´t want memories. They´re not nostalgic people. So I can´t understand why British audiences want to hear the old stuff because for me the songs are very painful, especially those with Tammi Terrell..."

The show starts up with two songs from the "I Want you" album; "All The Way Round" and "Since I Had You". The effect of constant eating of junk food and irregular sleeping habits can bee seen on Marvins body as his appearance looks a bit sleepy and swollen. The song "Come Get To This" leads the concert onwards as an intro to an extended version of "Let´s Get It On" in which Marvin really "gets it on" in seducing the female viewers in the audience. After "Let´s Get It On" begins the chain of medleys which won´t end until the finale which is the "Distant Lover". First medley includes some biggest 60´s hits like "Pride and Joy", "I Heard It Through The Grapewine" ect.

The second medley consisted of songs from the "What´s Going On?" album starting with "Inner City Blues" and then leading through "What´s Going On?" to "Save The Children". For the final medley of classic duet songs, Marvin was joined on stage by a lady called Florence Lyles. With Florence Marvin sings through songs like "You´re All I Need" and "Ain´t No Mountain High Enough", but unfortunately Flo´s voice sounds really flat compared to original duet partners like Tammi Terrels or Kim Westons. She really doesn´t make any justice for these songs although It´s only my own oppinion. The Finale "Distant lover" is probably the best act in this concert though I think a better performance can be heard on the "Live At The London Palladium" album. "

 




ziakut
(Chicago, IL)
Posted: May 26, 2010 - 10:18
 

Marvin Gaye is always a breath of fresh air.

skyguy
(CO)
Posted: Feb 20, 2010 - 12:09
 

Yeah! Almost makes up for the incessant Radio Head whine. almost.

jools
(Brighton UK)
Posted: Jan 20, 2010 - 02:10
 

 peter_james_bond wrote:
handyrae wrote:
Going from Radiohead's Nude to this is a wonderful illustration of the phrase going from the sublime to the ridiculous, or in this case from the ridiculous to the sublime.
 

 
The_Shrike wrote:
No, you had it correct the first time.
 
You guys are comparing apples and oranges. Both artists are great in their own way. {#Meditate}
 
No - Radiohead are crap

jools
(Brighton UK)
Posted: Jan 20, 2010 - 02:09
 

Now - this is MUCH better than Radiodick,I mean Radiohead.....

peter_james_bond
(The Burg)
Posted: Dec 19, 2009 - 16:45
 

handyrae wrote:
Going from Radiohead's Nude to this is a wonderful illustration of the phrase going from the sublime to the ridiculous, or in this case from the ridiculous to the sublime.
 

 
The_Shrike wrote:
No, you had it correct the first time.
 
You guys are comparing apples and oranges. Both artists are great in their own way. {#Meditate}

peter_james_bond
(The Burg)
Posted: Dec 19, 2009 - 16:13
 

 romeotuma wrote:
This song is soooo gooood for the ears...
 
yessssss.....


(former member)
(hotel in Las Vegas)
Posted: Dec 19, 2009 - 16:12
 



This song is soooo gooood for the ears...