[ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Eddie Vedder — You've Got To Hide Your Love Away
Log in above to post your comment
calypsus_1
Posted: Aug 02, 2009 - 22:30
 


Eddie, Mike and GE Smith performing a stunning rendition of the Dylan Classic "Masters Of War" Live:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8GHBk_HSXg



niciforpj2
Posted: Jun 28, 2007 - 10:42
 
beelzebubba wrote:
The only thing this version adds to the original is a lead vocal that sounds like he has poop in his mouth when he sings.
One of the first things one learns when taking singing lessons is to pretend your mouth is full of bees... or like your biting an apple you're quite perceptive... at least now we know you're listening. However... we also know you have no knowledge of music.
niciforpj2
Posted: Jun 28, 2007 - 10:35
 
drover wrote:
Eddie Vedder has a singular gift for ruining everything he sings (with the possible exception of Evenflow). And so he does with this.
Your retarded!!
niciforpj2
Posted: Jun 28, 2007 - 10:32
 
kilroyjoe3 wrote:





I don't call it a warble. It sounds more like he's trying to sing with a bag of marbles in his mouth. Yellowleadbetter is the ultimate example. Can anyone honestly make out the lyrics to that song?


There are no lyrics to Yellow Ledbetter, the song is sang from the heart... as are all of his songs, the band makes the songs recognizeable and Eddie makes the songs infanate.... 20 years from now... noone will know the lyrics to Yellow Ledbetter but it will be a song that everyone will know and will sing along with.
Pyro
(Lose E. Anna)
Posted: Aug 22, 2006 - 14:16
 

xsrossiter
(So Cal)
Posted: Jun 10, 2006 - 09:26
 
Vedder tries to sing a song. Maybe if he begged, Stephen Stills would teach him how to write.
kilroyjoe3
(New York City)
Posted: May 26, 2006 - 19:18
 
orpheus wrote:


gotta absofuckinglutely LUV that trademark warble!



I don't call it a warble. It sounds more like he's trying to sing with a bag of marbles in his mouth. Yellowleadbetter is the ultimate example. Can anyone honestly make out the lyrics to that song?
Mari
(Broome, WA)
Posted: Apr 27, 2006 - 16:10
 
mrrmt wrote:


me too!
... Me Three! ... ...
smallstakes
Posted: Apr 27, 2006 - 16:08
 
bobrk wrote:
Typically if you're going to cover something, you need to do something different with it. This sounds too much like the original to be a good cover.

Exactly!
Zep
(Beating the bushes)
Posted: Mar 14, 2006 - 20:37
 
Wadro13 wrote:
Sorry, Duders, MJ is making money off of this. And I say awesome. The guy has had a Funked up life, and to make it worse , the world won't leave him alone!!!!


I suspect Mr Jackson's fungible assets may soon be back on the block.
bobrk
(Beautiful Downtown San Jose)
Posted: Mar 14, 2006 - 16:19
 
Typically if you're going to cover something, you need to do something different with it. This sounds too much like the original to be a good cover.

At least it's followed by a Beatles song I've not heard before, "One After 909".
crockydile
(The swamps of Houston)
Posted: Feb 13, 2006 - 06:31
 
Wadro13 wrote:


Fun Fact: Entertainment Law!

As the owner of publishing rights to a song, one holds the copyright. A copyright is something obtained once a piece of art is secured in a tangible form (i.e. song lyrics scribbled on a diner napkin). In order to challenge any breech of copyright, the the holder must first register the work with the US government.
Any time the copywritten material is further published (as sheet music) or covered by another artist (Eddie Vedder) a fee must be paid to the copyright owner. In the latter instance a standard fee is set by the Harry Fox agency (8.5 cents per copy of the work sold) to be collected and distributed to the copyright owner. Anyone can perform a cover of any song, but the copyright owner will receive a portion of profits from it's sale, as noted above.
Sorry, Duders, MJ is making money off of this. And I say awesome. The guy has had a Funked up life, and to make it worse , the world won't leave him alone!!!!
(just quit dogging around!)


As I understand it, McCartney is still making something off it too.
crockydile
(The swamps of Houston)
Posted: Feb 13, 2006 - 06:29
 
I've only recently come to appreciate some of Pearl Jam's stuff...this song makes me reconsider. I know it's Vedder by himself, so I won't judge the band by this.

This song makes me want to strangle myself.
mojoman
(Rocky Mountains, Colorado)
Posted: Jan 29, 2006 - 13:32
 
Um, Eddie? Your pretension is showing.
orpheus
(east coast)
Posted: Dec 16, 2005 - 23:24
 
cbonai wrote:
Some remakes are good. Some are not. This one leaves me wanting...wanting to throttle that warble out of Vedders voice!


gotta absofuckinglutely LUV that trademark warble!
Wadro13
(Ann Arbor, MI)
Posted: Dec 02, 2005 - 09:14
 
Faithful_Fool wrote:
I can stand listening to Beatle covers all day long if it means keeping any amount of $$$ out of Michael Jackson's pocket!


Fun Fact: Entertainment Law!

As the owner of publishing rights to a song, one holds the copyright. A copyright is something obtained once a piece of art is secured in a tangible form (i.e. song lyrics scribbled on a diner napkin). In order to challenge any breech of copyright, the the holder must first register the work with the US government.
Any time the copywritten material is further published (as sheet music) or covered by another artist (Eddie Vedder) a fee must be paid to the copyright owner. In the latter instance a standard fee is set by the Harry Fox agency (8.5 cents per copy of the work sold) to be collected and distributed to the copyright owner. Anyone can perform a cover of any song, but the copyright owner will receive a portion of profits from it's sale, as noted above.
Sorry, Duders, MJ is making money off of this. And I say awesome. The guy has had a Funked up life, and to make it worse , the world won't leave him alone!!!!
(just quit dogging around!)
Kerly
(Estonia)
Posted: Nov 03, 2005 - 02:12
 
Funny thing, my boss has the same last name and she's Estonian :)

I like that track and I like that soundtrack, too.
So many good tracks on it. I like the covers, good ones.
rolf
(Frankfurt, Germany)
Posted: Nov 03, 2005 - 02:11
 
ZarSU wrote:


I personally think nothing beats the Beatles, it doesn't matter who does the cover, they will almost always get a low rating from me for tainting a classic, no matter what!

malmquna
(Temporarily Texas)
Posted: Oct 19, 2005 - 11:42
 
I wouldn't say this cover is better than the original, nor is it one of Vedder's better covers, but it's quite good. Then again, I think Eddie does a pretty good job at covers in general. Maybe it's just generational...Ten was one of the first CD's I ever owned.
mrrmt
(Baltimore, MD)
Posted: Oct 19, 2005 - 11:42
 
flandersdog wrote:


well said.

I love Eddie. call me a Vedder-phile.


me too!
Faithful_Fool
(Streets of San Francisco)
Posted: Oct 19, 2005 - 11:40
 
I can stand listening to Beatle covers all day long if it means keeping any amount of $$$ out of Michael Jackson's pocket!
UltraNurd
(Boston, MA)
Posted: Oct 19, 2005 - 11:38
 
Bleargh. I'll stick to the original.
drover
(Chicago, IL)
Posted: Sep 05, 2005 - 04:57
 
Eddie Vedder has a singular gift for ruining everything he sings (with the possible exception of Evenflow). And so he does with this.
rolf
(Frankfurt, Germany)
Posted: Sep 05, 2005 - 04:54
 
One more cover I don´t need. Please play the originals.
oufason
(Dallas, TX)
Posted: Aug 21, 2005 - 08:37
 
n4ku wrote:
I've had this soundtrack for ages, and never got into it much.

I really had trouble wrapping my mind around Beatles covers.

But the more I hear some of these songs, the better I like it.


I agree that this ST is uneven at best, but I really like this cut. I will be accused of blasphemy, but I am liking this better than the original.
SCprof
(South Carolina)
Posted: Aug 06, 2005 - 11:26
 
Another Eddie fanatic here. His version is certainly different, but does it justice.
n4ku
(Cloud 9)
Posted: Jun 23, 2005 - 05:15
 
I've had this soundtrack for ages, and never got into it much.

I really had trouble wrapping my mind around Beatles covers.

But the more I hear some of these songs, the better I like it.
cbonai
(Vermont)
Posted: Jun 23, 2005 - 05:14
 
Some remakes are good. Some are not. This one leaves me wanting...wanting to throttle that warble out of Vedders voice!
ZarSU
(RI aka The Arm Pit of New England)
Posted: Jun 08, 2005 - 12:20
 
junkee_bizness wrote:
This is a great tribute and a cover to Lennon. People who dislike this version, they just hate Eddie. Prejudice - Eddism.


I personally think nothing beats the Beatles, it doesn't matter who does the cover, they will almost always get a low rating from me for tainting a classic, no matter what!
flandersdog
(the sunny Pac NW)
Posted: Jun 08, 2005 - 12:19
 
junkee_bizness wrote:
This is a great tribute and a cover to Lennon. People who dislike this version, they just hate Eddie. Prejudice - Eddism.


well said.

I love Eddie. call me a Vedder-phile.
g1lgam3sh
(Manchester)
Posted: Jun 08, 2005 - 12:18
 
Despite his faults, which he was learning about and continuing to openly express I miss John.

This song is one of reasons why.

(pimp)
tony99
Posted: May 10, 2005 - 04:57
 
Great song from a reasonable sountrack to an awful movie.

I like Ben Folds - 'Golden Slumbers' and Aimee/Michael - 'Two of Us' on the same album
junkee_bizness
Posted: Apr 25, 2005 - 16:53
 
This is a great tribute and a cover to Lennon. People who dislike this version, they just hate Eddie. Prejudice - Eddism.
number6
Posted: Apr 25, 2005 - 13:57
 
Beanie wrote:
Call me a no-taste unbeliever, but I really like his voice with this song.


OK. You're a no-taste unbe--
Actually, I too think Vedder does well with this song. Still prefer the original, but I do like this cover as well.
flandersdog
(the sunny Pac NW)
Posted: Apr 25, 2005 - 13:52
 
physicsgenius wrote:
Overplayed original mumbled by idiot.


for a (self-proclaimed) genius, that's an idiotic comment. man's an acclaimed musician and a multimillionaire. how exactly is he an idiot?

say what you want about kittens, bunnies or flowers...but do not speak ill of Eddie!
Beanie
(Now....edited for content)
Posted: Apr 25, 2005 - 13:52
 
Call me a no-taste unbeliever, but I really like his voice with this song.
beelzebubba
(Where the hell is Walldrug, South Dakota?)
Posted: Apr 25, 2005 - 13:51
 
The only thing this version adds to the original is a lead vocal that sounds like he has poop in his mouth when he sings.

Shesdifferent
(Desert metropolis via Arizona)
Posted: Apr 10, 2005 - 22:29
 
eyelykearrpee wrote:
Yooouu've got to hiiiiide your glooove OJ.
I can always count on a fellow RP listener to give me a ROLFLG comment
radiojunkie
(a sleepy bordertown (NY/CT))
Posted: Apr 10, 2005 - 22:24
 
Why is everybody so down on this? I think it's a damn good tribute to the original. Maybe it's just because I hear so much of Lennon in it. It definitely doesn't ruin the song for me!
Art_Carnage
(DeepintheheartofTexas)
Posted: Mar 12, 2005 - 12:12
 
Don't try covering the Fab Four unless you can bring something new to it.
physicsgenius
Posted: Jan 27, 2005 - 06:09
 
Overplayed original mumbled by idiot.
coding_to_music
(Marlborough Massachusetts)
Posted: Jan 12, 2005 - 12:25
 
eyelykearrpee wrote:
Yooouu've got to hiiiiide your glooove OJ.
LOL
eyelykearrpee
Posted: Nov 29, 2004 - 05:24
 
Yooouu've got to hiiiiide your glooove OJ.
orpheus
(east coast)
Posted: Oct 15, 2004 - 23:50
 
LavenderVanilla wrote:
I hate Eddie Vedder and his warbling, he is ruining this song, please make it stop. John would be rolling in his grave had he not been creamated.


creamated as in International Delight or Coffee Mate? :D :D
BooKitty
(My own private Idaho.)
Posted: Oct 15, 2004 - 23:04
 
What is the point of this? Me thinks Eddie thinks way too much of himself.
keemun
Posted: Oct 01, 2004 - 09:31
 
when this came out I took a while to listen to it back-to-back with the original. it's very similar, but much heavier and darker than the original, both with Vedder's voice and a bassier guitar sound. I think he adds his own phrasing and emphasis, and while I like the subtle lightness of the original better, I think this is a worthwhile cover.
LavenderVanilla
Posted: Oct 01, 2004 - 09:30
 
I hate Eddie Vedder and his warbling, he is ruining this song, please make it stop. John would be rolling in his grave had he not been creamated.
gntlemanartist
(Telos)
Posted: Sep 16, 2004 - 14:48
 
Enough with the bad Beatles covers. It ain't right, I tell you! <-(
BooKitty
(My own private Idaho.)
Posted: Jun 23, 2004 - 15:39
 
I don't know if I love or hate this...... No wait, I hate this. EV does nothing new with a classic but put his name on it.
TaGirl_Keri
(Auckland Kiwi)
Posted: May 15, 2004 - 01:30
 
The Silkie made the best version in my opinion. about 1965 (guess)