[ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Log in above to post your comment
unclehud
(Hallelujah! Back in the ATL suburbs!)
Posted: May 10, 2018 11:58
 

 rhw wrote:
What a fun cover. I like this one. 
 
Me, too!
Papyjeff
(Brittany in France)
Posted: Feb 14, 2018 5:41
 

 VV wrote:
I'm giving it a "Marginal 2" rating. And even that is being kind. Great song that didn't deserve this treatment.

 
Is it because he is a French guy ? Racist !!!
Proclivities
(Paris of the Piedmont)
Posted: Aug 07, 2017 12:49
 

 Shmelo wrote:

Way to take a song and strip all the life out of it! 

Pure, unadulterated garbage.

 
Wouldn't taking something and somehow corrupting or debasing it make it "adulterated"?
dc_zee
Posted: May 19, 2017 16:30
 

 VV wrote:
I'm giving it a "Marginal 2" rating. And even that is being kind. Great song that didn't deserve this treatment.

 
Many "great" songs get covered. You could view it as a sign of respect (or envy...or laziness). IMO, the song is solid enough to survive the "treatment" you mention and still pull me in.  


VV
Posted: Apr 06, 2017 8:09
 

I'm giving it a "Marginal 2" rating. And even that is being kind. Great song that didn't deserve this treatment.
VH1
(near Alpha Centauri, then the next left!)
Posted: Jan 26, 2017 8:56
 

 Shmelo wrote:

Way to take a song and strip all the life out of it!

 

Pure, unadulterated garbage.



 
This is a complete "alternative fact"! {#Lol}
markybx
(Oud Amsterdam)
Posted: Jan 17, 2017 3:48
 

 Shmelo wrote:

Way to take a song and strip all the life out of it!

 

Pure, unadulterated garbage.



 

Shmelo
Posted: Jan 04, 2017 5:30
 

Way to take a song and strip all the life out of it!

 

Pure, unadulterated garbage.


flyboy50
(WESTMINSTER)
Posted: Dec 17, 2016 9:30
 

 DaidyBoy wrote:
Most excellent.  Can never be too groovy.

 
Right ?
ElCamoteLoco
(Latin America)
Posted: Sep 15, 2016 11:59
 

 MassivRuss wrote:
Meh. Fun, I suppose, but is there really much of anything here to distinguish this from the WS original? No? Sounds like a few overdub tracks laid down on top of the original. Big deal.

{#Ask}

 
Play the two versions back to back. They're chalk and cheese. I prefer this one.
rhw
(Chicago, IL)
Posted: Sep 15, 2016 11:59
 

What a fun cover. I like this one. 
thewiseking
(New York, New York)
Posted: Sep 15, 2016 11:59
 

loungey
markybx
(Oud Amsterdam)
Posted: Sep 02, 2016 5:26
 

 baylees wrote:
Good cover. Nice adaption.

 
Yes
baylees
Posted: May 11, 2016 11:24
 

Good cover. Nice adaption.
IndyDoug
(Indianapolis)
Posted: May 11, 2016 11:09
 

not a fan of his vocals. kind of annoying...
copymonkey
(in the northeast, but not near anywhere cool)
Posted: Apr 27, 2016 20:42
 

 MassivRuss wrote:

Wrong, the original was only guitar and drums, but whatevs
Meh. Fun, I suppose, but is there really much of anything here to distinguish this from the WS original? No? Sounds like a few overdub tracks laid down on top of the original. Big deal.

{#Ask}

 


Grammarcop
(A place with fresh water and great beer)
Posted: Apr 09, 2016 9:22
 

We be dancin' in the kitchen like late middle-aged dads!
bagman
Posted: Apr 09, 2016 9:18
 

{#War}{#Cheesygrin}
willmcnaught
(Eugene Oregon)
Posted: Mar 08, 2016 15:10
 

{#Bounce}
jmkate
(nearly under a stack of books)
Posted: Jun 18, 2015 8:25
 

And the chair dancing commences-now!