USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - May 3, 2024 - 7:32pm
SCOTUS
- kcar - May 3, 2024 - 6:25pm
Trump
- kcar - May 3, 2024 - 6:10pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 4:51pm
Wither Bill?
- Zep - May 3, 2024 - 4:12pm
The Dragons' Roost
- GeneP59 - May 3, 2024 - 3:53pm
Favorite Quotes
- black321 - May 3, 2024 - 3:38pm
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 3:05pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 3:04pm
Israel
- R_P - May 3, 2024 - 12:32pm
RightWingNutZ
- islander - May 3, 2024 - 11:55am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- MrDill - May 3, 2024 - 11:41am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - May 3, 2024 - 10:28am
Wordle - daily game
- Coaxial - May 3, 2024 - 9:50am
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 9:46am
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 9:36am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 9:24am
What can you hear right now?
- Beaker - May 3, 2024 - 9:22am
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - May 3, 2024 - 8:26am
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - May 3, 2024 - 8:19am
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- R_P - May 3, 2024 - 7:54am
Derplahoma!
- sunybuny - May 3, 2024 - 4:56am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - May 3, 2024 - 4:54am
Unquiet Minds - Mental Health Forum
- miamizsun - May 3, 2024 - 4:36am
What Makes You Laugh?
- miamizsun - May 3, 2024 - 4:31am
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 3, 2024 - 3:38am
Main Mix Playlist
- R567 - May 3, 2024 - 12:06am
Who Killed The Electric Car??? -- The Movie
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 2, 2024 - 9:51pm
If not RP, what are you listening to right now?
- oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 5:56pm
Joe Biden
- R_P - May 2, 2024 - 5:07pm
Other Medical Stuff
- miamizsun - May 2, 2024 - 4:37pm
What Makes You Sad?
- thisbody - May 2, 2024 - 3:35pm
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - May 2, 2024 - 3:07pm
Breaking News
- thisbody - May 2, 2024 - 2:57pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 9:27am
Questions.
- oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 9:13am
The Obituary Page
- Proclivities - May 2, 2024 - 7:42am
And the good news is....
- Bill_J - May 1, 2024 - 6:30pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- ladron - May 1, 2024 - 6:22pm
Things you would be grating food for
- Manbird - May 1, 2024 - 3:58pm
Economix
- black321 - May 1, 2024 - 12:19pm
I Heart Huckabee - NOT!
- Manbird - Apr 30, 2024 - 7:49pm
Democratic Party
- R_P - Apr 30, 2024 - 4:01pm
Oh, The Stupidity
- haresfur - Apr 30, 2024 - 3:30pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:46pm
Canada
- black321 - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:37pm
What Did You See Today?
- Isabeau - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:15pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - Apr 30, 2024 - 7:02am
Food
- Bill_J - Apr 29, 2024 - 7:46pm
New Music
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 29, 2024 - 11:36am
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 29, 2024 - 8:34am
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc)
- rgio - Apr 29, 2024 - 7:37am
Photos you haven't taken of yourself
- Antigone - Apr 29, 2024 - 5:03am
Britain
- R_P - Apr 28, 2024 - 10:47am
Birthday wishes
- GeneP59 - Apr 28, 2024 - 9:56am
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 27, 2024 - 9:53pm
Classical Music
- miamizsun - Apr 27, 2024 - 1:23pm
LeftWingNutZ
- Lazy8 - Apr 27, 2024 - 12:46pm
Things You Thought Today
- Red_Dragon - Apr 27, 2024 - 12:17pm
The Moon
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:08pm
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance
- fractalv - Apr 26, 2024 - 8:59pm
Musky Mythology
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 7:23pm
Mini Meetups - Post Here!
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 4:02pm
Australia has Disappeared
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 2:41pm
Radio Paradise sounding better recently
- firefly6 - Apr 26, 2024 - 10:39am
Neil Young
- Steely_D - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:20am
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:01am
Environmental, Brilliance or Stupidity
- miamizsun - Apr 26, 2024 - 5:07am
Ask an Atheist
- R_P - Apr 25, 2024 - 11:02am
Afghanistan
- R_P - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:26am
Science in the News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:00am
The Abortion Wars
- Isabeau - Apr 25, 2024 - 9:27am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- ColdMiser - Apr 25, 2024 - 7:15am
What's that smell?
- Manbird - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:27pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:55am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
The Conservative War on Christmas
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next |
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 2:42pm |
|
aflanigan wrote:My familiarity with these checkoff programs was previously close to nonexistent, but most of the news reports I've seen tend to support their effectiveness in boosting the sales/popularity of the various farm products (from blueberries to dairy). Besides, as I tried to point out, my main goal is to point out the silliness of grandstanding campaigns decrying the "War on Christmas" mounted by folks like O'Reilly, John Gibson, and others that fasten onto news reports and snippets to promote the notion of a "liberal plot" against a culturally popular holiday. I'm emulating their breathless denunciations for comic effect. I guess with you, I've failed, eh?
History gets written by the victors and Media Relations managers with reporters on speed dial. I'm a very small player in a tiny corner of the ag market, and checkoff programs do nothing for me. I still get to pay for them, tho. So do you, for that matter—that checkoff fee doesn't come out of thin air. It raises production costs, which ultimately come out of the customer's pocket. So you're paying to find more customers to compete with you at the store and bid the price you pay up further. I get the joke, just thought is was kinda thin. And the checkoff thing hits a nerve.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 2:23pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote: aflanigan wrote:Fine, you think checkoff programs are incompatible with your free-market principles. So are subsidies and many other things the government does. That's not why conservatives are protesting this, is it?
Couldn't care less why conservatives are protesting it, I'm concerned that you think it's worth defending. My familiarity with these checkoff programs was previously close to nonexistent, but most of the news reports I've seen tend to support their effectiveness in boosting the sales/popularity of the various farm products (from blueberries to dairy). Besides, as I tried to point out, my main goal is to point out the silliness of grandstanding campaigns decrying the "War on Christmas" mounted by folks like O'Reilly, John Gibson, and others that fasten onto news reports and snippets to promote the notion of a "liberal plot" against a culturally popular holiday. I'm emulating their breathless denunciations for comic effect. I guess with you, I've failed, eh?
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 12:49pm |
|
aflanigan wrote:Fine, you think checkoff programs are incompatible with your free-market principles. So are subsidies and many other things the government does. That's not why conservatives are protesting this, is it?
Couldn't care less why conservatives are protesting it, I'm concerned that you think it's worth defending.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 12:04pm |
|
kurtster wrote: The ACLU was founded by card carrying communists.
That is reason evough to curse them and be suspicious of everything they do.
The USA was founded by slave owners. That is reason enough to curse the USA and be suspicious of everything it does (right?)
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 11:57am |
|
Lazy8 wrote:
Fine, you think checkoff programs are incompatible with your free-market principles. So are subsidies and many other things the government does. That's not why conservatives are protesting this, is it?
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 10:12am |
|
aflanigan wrote:I don't think characterizing the fee as "self imposed" is misleading at all. The idea did not originate with Obama or the USDA but with the trade association representing Xmas tree growers (NCTA). There was a months long comment period for input from growers, and most seemed to favor it. And how does a "checkoff" fee imposed only on sales of natural trees force artificial tree makers to pay for it? Your comment doesn't make sense.
You may feel that such checkoff programs, which have been popular with other produce, are not effective, and that's OK. Maybe you could lobby for allowing small growers to opt out. But the bloviators such as Sen. Jim DeMint who are howling and cursing Obama aren't arguing the merits of its effectiveness. They are using (to borrow your words) "cheap rhetorical tricks" to slam Obama, and potentially harming Christmas Tree farmers just to score cheap political points.
Imagine an industry you're part of had some players active in a trade association (that you may not be a member of, may not agree with, may not even like) and decided they wanted to impose a fee on everybody in the industry to promote a product. If you aren't a member, would you even know about it? Would your first notification be a visit from a USDA enforcement officer three years later handing you a summons for the back taxes you didn't know you were supposed to be paying, plus a fine for non-compliance? Being given an opportunity to object isn't the same thing as being allowed to opt out, or even vote on it. Or on the people that make the rules—this is an administratively-imposed tax, established by bureaucrats. Smaller players, again, will probably never hear about the hearings until they're over. If the magnanimous concession is made to let people opt out why involve the federal government in the first place? Make the industry fund its own promotion. The check-off fee may cover the cost of the promotion, but does it cover the cost of collecting the fees, enforcement actions against those who don't cough it up, and administrative overhead? I seriously doubt it. Competitors are funding the USDA thru their taxes. Is the USDA going to create a check-off program to promote artificial christmas trees, or are they paying taxes to support an agency that's trying to put them at a competitive disadvantage? The federal government is favoring one industry over others, tilting the playing field. This is not what governments are for. I don't care what Jim DeMint thinks about it. His partisan theatrics don't justify anybody else's.
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 9:24am |
|
aflanigan wrote:...to the extent that the title of this topic and the wording of my original post contained some hyperbole, chalk it up to my lame attempt at satire. band name
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 9:17am |
|
Lazy8 wrote:Your article is quite misleading. This isn't an industry "imposing a fee on itself", which they don't need the USDA taxing tree farmers to do. Industry groups fund this kind of promotional effort themselves all the time. This is an example of crony capitalism.
Every grower, member of the trade group or not, pays this tax and deals with the overhead of accounting for it. The tax is supposed to cover the costs of the program, but I seriously doubt that every penny of administration and overhead at USDA would be. Taxpayers (including manufacturers of competing products) are chipping in to boost sales for one industry.
This program is a triumph of industry lobbying over the common good. Why aren't you outraged by its very existence? And why are you using the kind of cheap rhetorical tricks that you object to elsewhere?
I don't think characterizing the fee as "self imposed" is misleading at all. The idea did not originate with Obama or the USDA but with the trade association representing Xmas tree growers (NCTA). There was a months long comment period for input from growers, and most seemed to favor it. And how does a "checkoff" fee imposed only on sales of natural trees force artificial tree makers to pay for it? Your comment doesn't make sense. You may feel that such checkoff programs, which have been popular with other produce, are not effective, and that's OK. Maybe you could lobby for allowing small growers to opt out. But the bloviators such as Sen. Jim DeMint who are howling and cursing Obama aren't arguing the merits of its effectiveness. They are using (to borrow your words) "cheap rhetorical tricks" to slam Obama, and potentially harming Christmas Tree farmers just to score cheap political points. As to your last question, to the extent that the title of this topic and the wording of my original post contained some hyperbole, chalk it up to my lame attempt at satire.
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 8:49am |
|
aflanigan wrote:Your article is quite misleading. This isn't an industry "imposing a fee on itself", which they don't need the USDA taxing tree farmers to do. Industry groups fund this kind of promotional effort themselves all the time. This is an example of crony capitalism. Every grower, member of the trade group or not, pays this tax and deals with the overhead of accounting for it. The tax is supposed to cover the costs of the program, but I seriously doubt that every penny of administration and overhead at USDA would be. Taxpayers (including manufacturers of competing products) are chipping in to boost sales for one industry. This program is a triumph of industry lobbying over the common good. Why aren't you outraged by its very existence? And why are you using the kind of cheap rhetorical tricks that you object to elsewhere?
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 8:38am |
|
aflanigan wrote:
Yes, but my question was for Bill, not you.
I'm sorry...Didn't you see my hand up?
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 8:38am |
|
ah, today's screaming match... buh bye, now.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 8:36am |
|
hippiechick wrote: Yes! Every citizen is entitled to legal representation. (Every person, citizen or not?)
Yes, but my question was for Bill, not you.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 8:36am |
|
kurtster wrote: Santa Claus on the government payroll violates the seperation between church and state doesn't it ?
So if conservatives suddenly believe in the separation clause, why do they accuse others who object to creches on government property for the same reason of making "war on Christmas"? Why aren't they leading the war? This is all too deliciously hypocritical!
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 8:34am |
|
aflanigan wrote:
Should Ted Bundy be entitled to legal representation? Should Fred Phelps?
Yes! Every citizen is entitled to legal representation. (Every person, citizen or not?)
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 8:31am |
|
Monkeysdad wrote:
Should NAMBLA have ANY rights? The ACLU has gone to bat for them.
Should Ted Bundy be entitled to legal representation? Should Fred Phelps?
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 8:30am |
|
Monkeysdad wrote:
Well I know the original post for topic had nothing to do with "conservatives" so I had to ask the question.
Actually, it did. Read the story. Pressure from the Heritage Foundation and other conservative pundits has derailed an industry-initiated promotional campaign aimed at boosting lagging natural Christmas tree sales.
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 6:17am |
|
bokey wrote: I figure they just learned to keep their agenda quiet.
Perhaps, but it's an odd contradiction. They're an organization which upholds and defends rights granted by the American Constitution - well, in theory.
|
|
bokey
Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 6:08am |
|
Proclivities wrote: Maybe it's enough for you, but that's a statement from the late 1920's, written by a man who left the ACLU over 60 years ago and died 30 years ago.
I figure they just learned to keep their agenda quiet.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 6:06am |
|
Proclivities wrote: kurtster wrote: The ACLU was founded by card carrying communists.
That is reason evough to curse them and be suspicious of everything they do.
I like nostalgia as much as the next guy, but it's 2011, not 1950; "Tail-gunner Joe" is long dead, as is Kruschev. The ACLU barred communist members in 1940. I was going to say somethng similar, but that is funny!
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 10, 2011 - 5:58am |
|
bokey wrote: I think the statement "Communism is the goal" is more than enough.
Maybe it's enough for you, but that's a statement from the late 1920's, written by a man who left the ACLU over 60 years ago and died 30 years ago.
|
|
|