[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Main Mix Playlist - R567 - May 3, 2024 - 12:06am
 
Trump - Steely_D - May 2, 2024 - 10:57pm
 
RightWingNutZ - kurtster - May 2, 2024 - 10:37pm
 
Who Killed The Electric Car??? -- The Movie - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 2, 2024 - 9:51pm
 
Wordle - daily game - NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 2, 2024 - 8:34pm
 
Name My Band - Manbird - May 2, 2024 - 7:37pm
 
If not RP, what are you listening to right now? - oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 5:56pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 5:46pm
 
Joe Biden - R_P - May 2, 2024 - 5:07pm
 
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful - thisbody - May 2, 2024 - 4:58pm
 
Other Medical Stuff - miamizsun - May 2, 2024 - 4:37pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - thisbody - May 2, 2024 - 3:35pm
 
songs that ROCK! - thisbody - May 2, 2024 - 3:07pm
 
Breaking News - thisbody - May 2, 2024 - 2:57pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - pilgrim - May 2, 2024 - 1:35pm
 
Israel - R_P - May 2, 2024 - 1:04pm
 
Russia - NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 2, 2024 - 12:40pm
 
NYTimes Connections - Bill_J - May 2, 2024 - 12:35pm
 
NY Times Strands - Bill_J - May 2, 2024 - 12:19pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 9:27am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 9:17am
 
Questions. - oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 9:13am
 
What can you hear right now? - ScottFromWyoming - May 2, 2024 - 8:39am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - pilgrim - May 2, 2024 - 8:27am
 
The Obituary Page - Proclivities - May 2, 2024 - 7:42am
 
Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 2, 2024 - 4:00am
 
And the good news is.... - Bill_J - May 1, 2024 - 6:30pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - ladron - May 1, 2024 - 6:22pm
 
Unquiet Minds - Mental Health Forum - haresfur - May 1, 2024 - 5:49pm
 
Things you would be grating food for - Manbird - May 1, 2024 - 3:58pm
 
Economix - black321 - May 1, 2024 - 12:19pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - haresfur - Apr 30, 2024 - 8:46pm
 
I Heart Huckabee - NOT! - Manbird - Apr 30, 2024 - 7:49pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Apr 30, 2024 - 6:34pm
 
Democratic Party - R_P - Apr 30, 2024 - 4:01pm
 
Oh, The Stupidity - haresfur - Apr 30, 2024 - 3:30pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:46pm
 
Canada - black321 - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:37pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Isabeau - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:15pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Apr 30, 2024 - 7:02am
 
Food - Bill_J - Apr 29, 2024 - 7:46pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - Apr 29, 2024 - 1:11pm
 
New Music - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 29, 2024 - 11:36am
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 29, 2024 - 8:34am
 
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc) - rgio - Apr 29, 2024 - 7:37am
 
Photos you haven't taken of yourself - Antigone - Apr 29, 2024 - 5:03am
 
Britain - R_P - Apr 28, 2024 - 10:47am
 
Birthday wishes - GeneP59 - Apr 28, 2024 - 9:56am
 
SCOTUS - Steely_D - Apr 28, 2024 - 1:44am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 27, 2024 - 9:53pm
 
Classical Music - miamizsun - Apr 27, 2024 - 1:23pm
 
LeftWingNutZ - Lazy8 - Apr 27, 2024 - 12:46pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Red_Dragon - Apr 27, 2024 - 12:17pm
 
The Moon - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:08pm
 
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance - fractalv - Apr 26, 2024 - 8:59pm
 
Musky Mythology - Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 7:23pm
 
Mini Meetups - Post Here! - Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 4:02pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 2:41pm
 
Radio Paradise sounding better recently - firefly6 - Apr 26, 2024 - 10:39am
 
Neil Young - Steely_D - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:20am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:01am
 
Environmental, Brilliance or Stupidity - miamizsun - Apr 26, 2024 - 5:07am
 
Poetry Forum - Manbird - Apr 25, 2024 - 12:30pm
 
Ask an Atheist - R_P - Apr 25, 2024 - 11:02am
 
Afghanistan - R_P - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:26am
 
Science in the News - Red_Dragon - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:00am
 
What the hell OV? - miamizsun - Apr 25, 2024 - 9:46am
 
The Abortion Wars - Isabeau - Apr 25, 2024 - 9:27am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - ColdMiser - Apr 25, 2024 - 7:15am
 
What's that smell? - Manbird - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:27pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:55am
 
TV shows you watch - Beaker - Apr 24, 2024 - 7:32am
 
China - R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 5:35pm
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - sunybuny - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:53am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Red_Dragon - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:42pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Sex Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 164, 165, 166  Next
Post to this Topic
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:45am

 oldslabsides wrote:

Depends on your local laws, I think.

 


What if he doesn't use adult diapers? Not sexually, anyway.
Zep

Zep Avatar

Location: Funkytown


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:44am

 hippiechick wrote:
People this is sex
.....
You may feel like you're getting fucked, but there is definitely a difference
 
My corp firewall is blocking those, and for that, perhaps I should feel grateful.
 
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:42am

 winter wrote:

Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?

 
Depends on your local laws, I think.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:41am

 winter wrote:

Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?

 

As your attorney I advise you, yes. 
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:33am

 sirdroseph wrote:


Quite.

 


Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:30am

 winter wrote:

Yes.

 

Quite.
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:27am

 oldslabsides wrote:


indeed.

 


Yes.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:26am

 winter wrote:

Tax policy is weird.

 

indeed.
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:22am

 Lazy8 wrote:
 oldslabsides wrote:
Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.

It goes the other way too: a two-earner household can pay higher rates married than single because they get bumped to a higher bracket (the "marriage penalty"). With one earner making substantially more than the other it works the other way.
 


Tax policy is weird.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:41am

People this is sex



This is not



You may feel like you're getting fucked, but there is definitely a difference
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:37am

 oldslabsides wrote:
Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.

It goes the other way too: a two-earner household can pay higher rates married than single because they get bumped to a higher bracket (the "marriage penalty"). With one earner making substantially more than the other it works the other way.

hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:34am

 oldslabsides wrote:

Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
 
If you want to talk taxes, go find another thread. Marriage has nothing to do with sex (all too often, unfortunately). But I think someone here doesn't know that.

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:30am

 sirdroseph wrote:


According to the GOP, that time is now.{#Rolleyes}

 
Well, some people...

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:29am

 oldslabsides wrote:

Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
 

According to the GOP, that time is now.{#Rolleyes}
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:26am

 rosedraws wrote:

Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years.  They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper.  But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple.  Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.

Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage?  What's in it for them?
 
Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.

Alexandra

Alexandra Avatar

Location: PNW
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:15am

 rosedraws wrote:

Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years.  They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper.  But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple.  Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.

Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage?  What's in it for them?


 

Maybe the conservatives (who are religious) feel better about people not living in "sin?"   {#Ask} Good question.
rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:13am

 Alexandra wrote:


I often think to myself that some people should just live together and quit making it legal. All they do is make attorneys rich. I also think (and I know this sounds horrible) that if people do have marriages, there can be renewal period every 5 years to stay or go without any legals becoming involved. That is just the nature of marriage these days...many people settle/choose too quickly....or a partner changes drastically on them...or worse things....and then find that they really don't want to have to pay for the mistake with the rest of their lives. If the "for life" stigma/burden is removed, maybe it would be easier for people to decide to find happiness.

/2 cents

 
Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years.  They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper.  But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple.  Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.

Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage?  What's in it for them?

Alexandra

Alexandra Avatar

Location: PNW
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:13am

 buzz wrote:

maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.

 

I agree, but shit does happen sometimes, even if they do. I dodged two bullets in the past. If I'd married them, I'd probably be divorced now. It really does pay (literally) to be picky. {#Lol}


oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:12am

 buzz wrote:

maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.

 

Thanks. I'll remember that next time around.


buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:11am

 Alexandra wrote:


I often think to myself that some people should just live together and quit making it legal. All they do is make attorneys rich. I also think (and I know this sounds horrible) that if people do have marriages, there can be renewal period every 5 years to stay or go without any legals becoming involved. That is just the nature of marriage these days...many people settle/choose too quickly....or a partner changes drastically on them...or worse things....and then find that they really don't want to have to pay for the mistake with the rest of their lives. If the "for life" stigma/burden is removed, maybe it would be easier for people to decide to find happiness.

/2 cents

 
maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 164, 165, 166  Next