[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Listener-supported — Commercial-free
Album:
Avg rating:
0

Your rating:
Total ratings: 0










Released: 0
Length: 0:00
Plays (last 30 days): 0
Comments (47)add comment
ScottFromWyoming wrote:
That was Baz Luhrmann.
That was columnist Mary Schmich being read by Baz Luhrmann. Mary said she had never been called on to give a commencement speech but if she had, that was what she'd have said.
Ando wrote:
"Always wear sunscreen", or something like that. Urban Legend had it that it came from a Vonnegut graduation speech, but no...
That was Baz Luhrmann.
ecorunner wrote:
Anyone, including you, who is against the philosophy of this song is not a thinker for the good of the entire world
Would you call yourself open-minded?
From the song, words verbatim from speech, sentences reordered: "Disarmament with mutual honor and confidence is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose differences not with arms but with intellect and decent purpose. Another war could utterly destroy this civilization, which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years. We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex." Dwight D. Eisenhower (1961) - last televised address to the nation. Ah yes, Dwight Eisenhower, that pansy liberal who mandated the development of the space program, helped start the end of legalized discrimination in the U.S. by up-holding the Constitution, oh, and the commander of D-Day, the end of the Korean War, the solidification of NATO and countless other intelligent and wise policies and initiatives. He wasn't perfect, but to suggest his own words about how the world should try to be are weak or "pie-in-the-sky" is niave and uniformed at best, and, at worst, a sign of the ultimate "brain washing" of the U.S. population by the military industrial complex. Learn something about the U.S.: https://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/farewell.htm https://obits.com/ike.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_eisenhower#Wartime_commander As a final note, Eisenhower (who was never personally involved in combat and who refused the Medal of Honor on the grounds that it required service in the face of enemy fire ), was prepared to take full responsiblity for a failed Normandy invasion: "It was never a certainty that Overlord would succeed. The tenuousness surrounding the entire decision including the timing and the location of the Normandy invasion might be summarized by a short speech that Eisenhower himself wrote, in advance, in case he might need it. In it, he took full responsibility for catastrophic failure, should that be the final result. Thankfully, on D-Day, the BBC broadcast a brief speech by Eisenhower about the successful landings. The never-used second speech was found much later, in a shirt pocket, by an aide. It read: "Our landings have failed and I have withdrawn the troops. My decision to attack at this time and place was based on the best information available. The troops, the air and the Navy did all that bravery could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt it is mine alone." "
"Always wear sunscreen", or something like that. Urban Legend had it that it came from a Vonnegut graduation speech, but no...
I like this, nice and easy. This almost reminds me of that one song that everyone and their cousins played for graduation, where that guy is just talking for a long time. Anyone remember what song I'm talking about?
mojoman wrote:
Puh-leeze! The observations are unoriginal. And the solution? Pie-in-the-sky pap. This is the type of moral philosophy one finds in the better brands of fortune cookies. Try telling this to a Saddam Hussien or a Josef Stalin. (Yes, how did Stalin put it? "How many divisions has the Pope?") The solution isn't warm, fuzzy "let's all get along" nonsense. The world isn't a warm, fuzzy place. The solution is hard-headed realism. Jesus, most of all, was a hard-headed realist who did not let that get in the way of treating all people justly. (And remember, "justice" means some people getting what they deserve.) Peace does not mean the absence of war. It means being willing to defend yourself and others against injustice and unprovoked violence. Had Pete Seeger had his way, all of Western Europe would be Communist, Saddam Hussein would still be murdering millions--on and on.
Anyone, including you, who is against the philosophy of this song is not a thinker for the good of the entire world, but is basically believes in a self-important, get rich, screw everyone else in the process approach. We can not keep living our luxurious lives, accumulating piles of material crap, while animals and plants are becoming rarer and rarer everyday, and we as capitalists cannot expect everyone else in the world to follow along with our pursuit of wealth and power in the world. We must find a more common ground of sustainability within our selves and globally, what makes us truely happy, and what is good for humankind. Its not the United States versus the rest of the world, as many of our fellow conservative minded people believe. As soon as we accept that we are part of a larger entity, the more we can accept our place in the world. Your philosophy does not speak to me, and I surely hope, not to most of the world. If so, God have mercy on us.
mojoman wrote:
Puh-leeze! The observations are unoriginal. And the solution? Pie-in-the-sky pap. This is the type of moral philosophy one finds in the better brands of fortune cookies. Try telling this to a Saddam Hussien or a Josef Stalin. (Yes, how did Stalin put it? "How many divisions has the Pope?") The solution isn't warm, fuzzy "let's all get along" nonsense. The world isn't a warm, fuzzy place. The solution is hard-headed realism. Jesus, most of all, was a hard-headed realist who did not let that get in the way of treating all people justly. (And remember, "justice" means some people getting what they deserve.) Peace does not mean the absence of war. It means being willing to defend yourself and others against injustice and unprovoked violence. Had Pete Seeger had his way, all of Western Europe would be Communist, Saddam Hussein would still be murdering millions--on and on.
That said, it wasn't Saddam Hussein who attacked us. We've overrun two nations so far, with a third and fourth in our gunsights. You, a realist, believe what you see on TV. You, a realist, do not understand reality. The reality is that our administration had to have a pretext to go after and secure 13.5 billion barrels of oil reserves, and 9/11 provided it. We are ruled by giant corporations, that constantly distort our democratic system to meet their needs. I don't like to be preached to by uninformed people. Wake up.
It's interesting to hear Seeger doing Eisenhower's farewell speech as part of a musical piece, but since he was around for that broadcast I'm willing to bet some parts of that speech still resonate very strongly for him. As for calling the observations unoriginal, I think Eisenhower could be said to know some trenchant things about war, politics, and human nature given his experiences.
mojoman wrote:
Puh-leeze! The observations are unoriginal. And the solution? Pie-in-the-sky pap. This is the type of moral philosophy one finds in the better brands of fortune cookies.
I agree and I would add that statements like "we have more medicine but less wellness" have a distorted (at best) view of history. I sure as hell wouldn't want to undergo the medicine of even 100 years ago when the life expectancy was, what, 48?
Had Pete Seeger had his way, all of Western Europe would be Communist, Saddam Hussein would still be murdering millions--on and on.
However, this also distorts history. We invaded Iraq not to save the "millions" Hussein was murdering ("I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building." GW Bush, 2000), we invaded to find the WMDs that were an imminent threat. Where did those turn out to be, by the way?
Hannio wrote:
Kids just do what everybody else is doing, including brick throwing.
not just kids, adults too. all the monkeys do just what the other monkey is doing.
The other noise Pete Seeger makes often drowns out the fact that he's actually a pretty damned good musician. Sure was nice to hear that banjo again!
Puh-leeze! The observations are unoriginal. And the solution? Pie-in-the-sky pap. This is the type of moral philosophy one finds in the better brands of fortune cookies. Try telling this to a Saddam Hussien or a Josef Stalin. (Yes, how did Stalin put it? "How many divisions has the Pope?") The solution isn't warm, fuzzy "let's all get along" nonsense. The world isn't a warm, fuzzy place. The solution is hard-headed realism. Jesus, most of all, was a hard-headed realist who did not let that get in the way of treating all people justly. (And remember, "justice" means some people getting what they deserve.) Peace does not mean the absence of war. It means being willing to defend yourself and others against injustice and unprovoked violence. Had Pete Seeger had his way, all of Western Europe would be Communist, Saddam Hussein would still be murdering millions--on and on.
Truly moving. This song has an intelligent message. Although time sensitive, a slightly altered message could be applied to almost every generation. Songs like this should be leading the populace - but instead, we follow Britney Spears.
original!
Wow. Deeply moving. Yep . . . there it is again . . . oh, wait . . . it was just my bowels (although the sound was just a musical as this song).
fatport wrote:
Actually one thing that worked in the '60s and appears to be working again is student political involvement. I guess we can thank Bush for this (he's got to be good for something). We've suffered from decades of co-opted, apathetic young people. Kids need to get pissed off and throw the occasional brick, or the greedheads will continue to take us down.
Kids just do what everybody else is doing, including brick throwing.
Freebish wrote:
at the Newport Folk Festival in '66 when Dylan went electric, Seeger went running to his car, hands over ears screaming "make it stop".
theres a lot of myths about this concert (actaully '65) that the audienced booed dylan offstage for using an electric guitar. however this tells it somewhat differently https://buffaloreport.com/020826dylan.html
I think this was the first piece that made me sit up and take notice of RP... Profound...
This song is rivetting. It came on while I was at work and I was immediately transfixed. My phone rang and I didn't answer it, all I could do was sit and listen. That's good music.
dpjag wrote:
Listening to this was just frustrating. Kind of like watching the first Austin Powers movie - where everything that worked in the '60s was broken today - but with the comedy missing.
Actually one thing that worked in the '60s and appears to be working again is student political involvement. I guess we can thank Bush for this (he's got to be good for something). We've suffered from decades of co-opted, apathetic young people. Kids need to get pissed off and throw the occasional brick, or the greedheads will continue to take us down.
Um, just to set the record straight about the "Paradox of our Time" speech... https://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/paradox.asp It was NOT penned by a Columbine HS student. Nor is it anonymous. Credit belongs with Dr. Bob Moorehead under the title "The Paradox of our Age" (which is reprinted in full at the above link). Still amazing stuff. Nice to hear Pete again, too. And love the banjo!
resonator wrote:
Very interesting. I especially liked: "We have bigger houses and smaller families, more conveniences and less time. We have more degrees but less depth, more knowledge but less judgement, more experts but more problems, more medicine but less wellness."
Extremely profound, moving. It's truth makes me too sad.
A funny story I heard about Pete Seeger was that at the Newport Folk Festival in '66 when Dylan went electric, Seeger went running to his car, hands over ears screaming "make it stop".
Deeeeeeep thoughts. Reaaaaaallly makes ya think. Hmmmmmmmmm.
Um. . .okay. . . This is freakin' AWESOME! It kinda reminds me of a mass e-mail I got some time ago. Cool commentary though. Nice to see a modern song featuring Pete Seeger. Wow.
Very interesting. I especially liked: "We have bigger houses and smaller families, more conveniences and less time. We have more degrees but less depth, more knowledge but less judgement, more experts but more problems, more medicine but less wellness."
GolfRomeo wrote:
I googled this speech. Link is here: https://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html
Ah, tx!
This song has special impact after Farenheit 9/11, especially the references to guarding against the "acquisition of unwarranted influence...by the militaryindustrial complex." The lines that follow this comment in Ike's farewell speech (thanks for the link to it) are chillingly prophetic of the Patriot Act: "The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes." Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to learn them bigtime.
GolfRomeo wrote:
I googled this speech. Link is here: https://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html
Thanks for this. That's one piece of the speech puzzle...the others are equally interesting: (from https://www.themammals.net/reviews.html)
Pete Seeger's voice can be heard on the closing track, "Industrial Park," the melody of which was penned by his grandson. Pete recites quotations that are credited, according to the liner, variously to William James <1899>, President Dwight D. Eisenhower <1961> and a Columbine High School student <1999>. The words of the latter contributor, are quite frightening as well as thoughtful "The paradox of our time in history, Is that we have taller buildings but shorter tempers, We have wider freeways but narrower viewpoints, We spend more but we have less, We buy more but we enjoy it less, We have bigger houses and smaller families, More conveniences and less time, We have more degrees but less depth, More knowledge but less judgement, More experts but more problems, More medicine but less wellness."
Really good and really timely song. (And kudos to my former Hudson Valley home for producing such talent!)
I googled this speech. Link is here: https://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html
I like it. Still significant and important. Thanks for telling us a little about it before you play it. It makes it much more interesting.
Listening to this was just frustrating. Kind of like watching the first Austin Powers movie - where everything that worked in the '60s was broken today - but with the comedy missing.
Should be played over and over and over again.
arighter2 wrote:
Whoa. Powerful shyte after all these years. Tastefully backed.
Wow. Who could imagine DDE putting his intitals to this speach. Beautiful.
Whoa. Powerful shyte after all these years. Tastefully backed.
BillG wrote:
Nope. Dwight D. Eisenhower. Well, actually his speechwriter Malcolm Moos. That was his farewell address and introduced the phrase "military-industrial complex".
Figures! Uhg!
More music, less narrative please. :grumpy.gif:
I saw the Mammals in concert last year. Awesome group! Perfect for Radio Paradise.
bluedot wrote:
i gave it a 10 for significance of message.
Ditto! Raven
This morning's playlist has been totally enjoyable! Thanks so much Bill!
i gave it a 10 for significance of message.
MsJudi wrote:
Was that a Winston Churchill speech?
Nope. Dwight D. Eisenhower. Well, actually his speechwriter Malcolm Moos. That was his farewell address and introduced the phrase "military-industrial complex". Ike comes off looking pretty good when compared to the current crop of Republican "leaders" - definitely on the short list of basically-decent 20th Century US presidents.
Was that a Winston Churchill speech?
I was fortunate enough to see Pete perform once with Arlo Guthrie - what a treat. such great talent, and amazing song-writing.
thanks bill, you rock!